Exodus 15:22-23
They could not drink of the waters
Three days without water, then water that cannot be used. The place is named for the taste, and the name sticks to the event.
Verse by verse
- 15:22
The three days are measured from the departure from the sea. The passage does not state how many days passed between Marah and Elim.
- 15:23
Marah is connected explicitly with the bitter condition of its water. No specific mineral, toxin, or plant remedy is identified.
- 15:23
Could not drink describes an actual obstacle to using the water, not merely a complaint about its flavor.











The first problem after too much water is no water. The sea has ceased to be a barrier, but the wilderness has not ceased to be a wilderness. Three days of travel lead to a place where the needed thing is finally present and still cannot be used. The text moves from found no water to could not drink. Presence is not provision yet.
That distinction gives Marah its particular severity. These are not people refusing an unfashionable beverage. The Book of Exodus says that they could not drink the waters because they were bitter. It supplies no chemical analysis and no measured quantity, but it does make the inability plain. The name preserves the condition: Marah belongs to the Hebrew language of bitterness. The map carries the taste.
Moses remains the one bringing Israel onward. Nothing in these verses says that he has lost the route or stepped outside divine guidance. The chapter that has just celebrated deliverance leaves room for thirst without pretending that thirst cancels the deliverance. Its two bodies of water pose opposite problems. At the sea, Israel needed water to move aside. At Marah, Israel needs it to become drinkable.