The big picture
Paul answers Corinth's marriage questions without making either marriage or singleness the universal badge of serious faith. He begins with reciprocal obligations between husband and wife, including the striking claim that neither spouse possesses unilateral authority over his or her own body. Singleness can be a gift, marriage can be a legitimate choice, and separation is treated differently depending on the situation. Mixed households are not polluted by an unbelieving spouse, and an unwilling partner cannot be held in place by force. Paul then widens the discussion into calling, status, and the "present distress." Circumcision, slavery, marriage, and singleness are all conditions that must not be mistaken for the final measure of belonging to Christ. His preference for undivided attention is real, but so are his qualifications. Marriage is not sin, counsel is not a trap, and differing gifts prevent a single life arrangement from becoming the spiritual mold for everyone.
In this chapter
- Neither Spouse Stands Above the Other 1 Corinthians 7:1-7
The opening line about not touching a woman cannot be read in isolation from what follows.
- Preference Is Not the Same as a Prohibition 1 Corinthians 7:8-11
Paul can prefer singleness and still say, without embarrassment, "let them marry." The unmarried and widows may remain as he is if that condition can be sustained, but marriage is not described as a spiritual defeat.
- An Unbelieving Spouse Does Not Contaminate the Household 1 Corinthians 7:12-16
A believer married to an unbeliever is not spiritually contaminated by the household.
- Called in a Condition, Not Owned by It 1 Corinthians 7:17-24
Paul's repeated instruction to remain in the condition of one's calling is not a declaration that every social arrangement is ideal.
- Advice Shaped by Pressure and Divided Attention 1 Corinthians 7:25-35
The "present distress" gives Paul's preference for remaining as one is a specific atmosphere without giving readers enough information to reconstruct the crisis confidently.
- Room for a Decision Without the Accusation of Sin 1 Corinthians 7:36-40
The last cases preserve room for real decisions without turning either choice into an accusation of sin.

Scripture beside the summary
1 Corinthians · King James Version · 401 Corinthians 7:1-7
Neither Spouse Stands Above the Other
The opening line about not touching a woman cannot be read in isolation from what follows. Whether Paul is repeating a Corinthian position or introducing a claim he will qualify, his actual instruction becomes stubbornly reciprocal. Each husband has his own wife and each wife her own husband. Due benevolence runs both ways. Even authority over the body is stated twice, first of the wife and then of the husband, denying either spouse the privilege of treating the other as a one-way obligation. Temporary abstinence is possible, but only by consent, for a time, and with a stated purpose before the couple comes together again. A practice that looks especially spiritual cannot simply ignore the people practicing it. Paul then distinguishes concession from command and names his own unmarried state as a gift. That word gift prevents personal preference from hardening into a ranking system in which every faithful person must resemble Paul.

Deep dive
The opening claim about not touching a woman may reproduce a position from the Corinthians' letter, or it may introduce Paul's own qualified discussion of abstinence. Ancient punctuation does not settle the matter. What follows, however, is anything but a simple endorsement of sexual withdrawal. Paul speaks of each husband and each wife, then repeats the obligation in both directions. Even authority over the body is reciprocal. The husband receives no exemption from the sentence he might have been pleased to hear applied to his wife.
Temporary abstinence requires consent, a defined purpose, and an end. Its danger is not that prayer is unworthy, but that a supposedly spiritual practice can disregard the actual capacities of the people involved. Paul's language of concession and command prevents the arrangement from becoming a universal rule. He values his own unmarried condition while identifying it as a gift, not a qualification that every Christian must acquire. Different gifts complicate any easy ranking of households by holiness.
Words to trace: husband, wife, body, likewise, power, woman
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:1
“Now concerning” is peri de, the formula that marks each topic raised in the Corinthians’ own letter; it recurs at 7:25, 8:1, 12:1, 16:1 and 16:12. “Touch” is a polite idiom for sexual relations, as when God tells Abimelech, “suffered I thee not to touch her” (Genesis 20:6).
- 1 Corinthians 7:2
“Have” is another idiom for sexual union, the verb used in 5:1 of the man who “should have his father’s wife”. The Greek says “because of the fornications”, plural, the actual cases in Corinth rather than an abstract danger. Each clause gives the man and the woman the same wording.
- 1 Corinthians 7:3
The oldest manuscripts read simply “the debt”, what is owed; “benevolence” comes from later copies that softened the word. “Render” is apodidomi, to pay what is due, the verb of Romans 13:7, “Render therefore to all their dues.”
- 1 Corinthians 7:4
“Hath not power” is exousiazo, the verb of 6:12, “I will not be brought under the power of any.” Paul refused to be mastered by appetite; here he places each spouse willingly under the other’s authority. The word “likewise” turns a familiar claim of husbands into a claim of wives as well.
- 1 Corinthians 7:5
“Defraud” is apostereo, the verb of 6:8. “Give yourselves” is scholazo, to have leisure for, the root of “school”. Early copies speak of prayer alone; “fasting” was added later. “Incontinency” is akrasia, lack of self-mastery, the philosophers’ word for knowing what is right and failing to do it.
- 1 Corinthians 7:6
“Permission” is syngnome, a concession or allowance, found only here in the New Testament. What “this” refers to is disputed: the brief abstinence of verse 5, or the whole instruction to marry in verse 2. Either way, Paul marks the difference between allowing and requiring.
- 1 Corinthians 7:7
“Gift” is charisma, the word for the Spirit’s gifts in chapter 12, so marriage and singleness are both called gifts. Whether Paul had never married or was a widower is unknown. If his “I gave my voice” in Acts 26:10 means a vote in a council, marriage would have been expected of him, an inference only.
1 Corinthians 7:1-7
King James Version1Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
2Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
3Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
4The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
5Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
6But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
7For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
1 Corinthians 7:8-11
Preference Is Not the Same as a Prohibition
Paul can prefer singleness and still say, without embarrassment, "let them marry." The unmarried and widows may remain as he is if that condition can be sustained, but marriage is not described as a spiritual defeat. The line about burning belongs to the pressure of sexual desire in the immediate discussion and gives the permission practical force. When Paul turns to those already married, the ground changes. He distinguishes the Lord's command from his own preference and resists the idea that Christian commitment supplies a casual reason to dissolve an existing marriage. Even here, the wording acknowledges that separation can happen and names remaining unmarried or reconciliation within the case he is discussing. The passage does not reconstruct every dangerous household or answer every later pastoral question. It draws a clear line between choosing whether to marry and deciding what to do with a marriage already in place, refusing to treat those as the same problem.

Deep dive
The movement from the unmarried and widows to the married changes the question. For the first group, Paul expresses a preference and recognizes a legitimate alternative. Marriage is not a failure to reach the approved spiritual level. The comparison with burning most naturally concerns the force of sexual desire in this discussion; Paul does not need to introduce an otherwise unstated threat of punishment to make his point.
For married people, Paul distinguishes the Lord's command from his own preference. The prohibition of separation and divorce corresponds to Jesus' teaching about marriage. Yet the sentence also recognizes that separation can occur and names remaining unmarried or reconciliation as the alternatives within the case he is addressing. The text does not narrate a particular couple's circumstances, nor does it provide a complete account of every danger a household might contain. Its immediate purpose is to resist treating Christian commitment as permission to dissolve an existing marriage.
Words to trace: husband, depart, marry, unmarried, wife, abide
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:8
“Unmarried” is masculine and set beside “widows”, so some think Paul means widowers in particular; Greek had little use for a separate word. “Abide” is meno, to stay as one is, the verb that returns as the chapter’s refrain in verses 20 and 24.
- 1 Corinthians 7:9
“Contain” is enkrateuomai, to exercise self-control, the athlete’s word of 9:25: “every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things.” “Burn” is present tense, a continual burning. Not everyone is built for the discipline of the games.
- 1 Corinthians 7:10
One of the few places Paul cites a command of Jesus explicitly; Mark 10:9–12 and Matthew 19:6 give the saying. “Depart” is chorizo, to separate, a common term for divorce in the Greek papyri. The wife is addressed first.
- 1 Corinthians 7:11
Mark 10:12, alone among the gospels, has Jesus speak of a woman who “shall put away her husband”, a case that fitted the Roman world better than Jewish law. “Put away” is aphiemi, to send off or dismiss, the ordinary verb of a divorcing husband.
1 Corinthians 7:8-11
King James Version8I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
9But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
10And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:
11But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
1 Corinthians 7:12-16
An Unbelieving Spouse Does Not Contaminate the Household
A believer married to an unbeliever is not spiritually contaminated by the household. Paul reverses the direction of the fear. If the unbelieving spouse is willing to remain, the believer should not initiate the separation, and the language of sanctification means the marriage and children are not rendered unclean by association. Paul does not say that every family member has personally believed. He says the household need not be dismantled simply because faith is unevenly distributed within it. The situation changes when the unbelieving spouse refuses the marriage. "Let him depart" recognizes a limit that coercion cannot overcome, and Paul immediately speaks of not being under bondage and of God's call to peace. The question of remarriage has been disputed because the verse does not explicitly settle it. The final questions preserve the same restraint: one spouse cannot guarantee the other's salvation by controlling the household, however deeply that outcome may be desired.

Deep dive
The phrase "I, not the Lord" marks the absence of a directly cited saying of Jesus for this situation, not a confession that the following counsel is spiritually worthless. Paul answers a question created by conversion within an existing household. An unbelieving spouse who is willing to remain should not be dismissed. The language of sanctification reverses the imagined direction of contamination: the believer's marriage is not rendered unclean by association. The description of the children as holy belongs to that same household argument; it does not explicitly say that every member has personally believed.
The departure of an unwilling spouse changes the situation. Paul says the brother or sister is not under bondage in such cases and immediately names peace. Interpreters disagree over whether that release also authorizes remarriage, since the verse does not say so explicitly. The final questions about saving a spouse can be heard as hopeful possibility or as a warning against assuming an outcome. Either way, the believer cannot manufacture the other person's faith by controlling the marriage.
Words to trace: wife, husband, unbelieving, believeth, brother, depart
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:12
When Ezra found Jewish men married to foreign wives, the community resolved to “put away all the wives” (Ezra 10:3). Paul rules the opposite for a believer married to an unbeliever: if she consents to stay, he must not send her away. “Be pleased” is syneudokeo, to agree together.
- 1 Corinthians 7:13
Roman law let a wife end a marriage as readily as a husband, and Paul addresses her directly with the same verb he used for the husband. The unbelieving husband might well be the head of a household with its own gods, which made such a marriage harder for her than for him.
- 1 Corinthians 7:14
“Is sanctified” is perfect tense, has been made holy. Haggai 2:11–13 asked the priests whether holiness passes by touch; they answered no, though uncleanness does. Paul describes a household where holiness travels through the believing spouse, and he offers the children as the proof.
- 1 Corinthians 7:15
“Not under bondage” is douloo, to be enslaved. The Mishnah (Gittin 9:3) gives the essential words of a Jewish bill of divorce as “you are free to marry any man”, a formula some bring to this verse, though Paul does not use it. In the earliest copies the last clause says “you”, not “us”.
- 1 Corinthians 7:16
Each spouse is addressed by name in turn, “O wife... O man”, like two voices in a dialogue. 1 Peter 3:1 hopes that believing wives may win husbands “without the word”, by their conduct. “Save” is sozo, the ordinary word for salvation, and the question is left without an answer.
1 Corinthians 7:12-16
King James Version12But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
13And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.
14For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.
15But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.
16For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?
1 Corinthians 7:17-24
Called in a Condition, Not Owned by It
Paul's repeated instruction to remain in the condition of one's calling is not a declaration that every social arrangement is ideal. Circumcision proves the point. Neither acquiring its mark nor trying to erase it can turn conversion into something more authentic. The decisive matter is not a remodeled public identity but belonging to God and the obedience that follows. Slavery makes the principle harder and more unsettling. The phrase about using freedom if it becomes available has been read in more than one way, but Paul's next contrast is unambiguous enough to destabilize ordinary ownership. The enslaved believer is the Lord's freeman; the socially free believer is Christ's servant. "Ye are bought with a price" places the final claim in Christ rather than in the market's categories. Paul is not praising human slavery. He is refusing to let either slavery or freedom become the ultimate account of who a person is before the Lord.


Deep dive
Circumcision supplies the clearest example. Neither acquiring the mark nor trying to remove its appearance establishes Christian worth. Paul shifts attention from the condition in which someone was called to the obedience that belongs within that calling. The repeated instruction to remain is therefore not a claim that every social arrangement is good. It denies that conversion becomes valid only after a person's public identity has been reconstructed.
The slavery example is more difficult. The instruction "use it rather" has an unstated object: it has been read as taking available freedom, or as making use of the existing condition despite the possibility of release. The KJV readily allows the first reading, but the interpretive difficulty should not disappear. Paul's next contrast is clearer. The enslaved believer is the Lord's freedman, and the free believer is Christ's servant. Those descriptions unsettle the idea that earthly status expresses ultimate ownership. Being bought with a price belongs to Christ's claim, not to an endorsement of a human purchaser's power.
Words to trace: servant, abide, circumcised, free, Lord, nothing
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:17
“Distributed” is merizo, the verb of 1:13, “Is Christ divided?”: God has dealt each person a portion. “Ordain” is diatasso, to give orders, used of arranging troops. The appeal to “all churches” recurs in 4:17, 11:16 and 14:33, so Corinth is not a special case.
- 1 Corinthians 7:18
“Become uncircumcised” is epispaomai, a medical term for a surgical procedure that disguised circumcision. 1 Maccabees 1:15 says Hellenizing Jews in Jerusalem “made themselves uncircumcised” to join the gymnasium, where men exercised naked.
- 1 Corinthians 7:19
The sentence is a paradox, since circumcision was itself one of God’s commandments (Genesis 17:10). Galatians says the same twice with different endings: what counts is “faith which worketh by love” (5:6) or “a new creature” (6:15). Here it is keeping God’s commandments.
- 1 Corinthians 7:20
“Calling” is klesis, the situation in which a person was called, not a trade. Luther’s translation of verses like this helped give the German Beruf, calling, its later sense of a worldly occupation. The verse states the chapter’s rule a second time.
- 1 Corinthians 7:21
“Servant” is doulos, a slave; the King James softens it throughout. “Care not for it” means do not let it weigh on you. Roman slaves could sometimes buy their freedom from their own savings, and many of Corinth’s first settlers were former slaves, so the question was close to home.
- 1 Corinthians 7:22
“Freeman” is apeleutheros, a freedman, the legal term for a former slave who still owed duties and loyalty to his former owner as patron. The believing slave has Christ for that patron, and the free believer is Christ’s slave. Each status is turned inside out.
- 1 Corinthians 7:23
The words of 6:20 return, “Ye are bought with a price”, now with a new consequence. Around AD 96, 1 Clement 55 says some believers sold themselves into slavery to ransom others, so becoming a slave of men was not only a figure of speech.
- 1 Corinthians 7:24
The rule appears for the third time (verses 17, 20 and 24), framing the section like a refrain. This time it adds “with God”, para theo, beside God, in his presence: whatever one’s station, it is held in company with God.
1 Corinthians 7:17-24
King James Version17But as God hath distributed to every man, as the Lord hath called every one, so let him walk. And so ordain I in all churches.
18Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
19Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.
20Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called.
21Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.
22For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord’s freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ’s servant.
23Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.
24Brethren, let every man, wherein he is called, therein abide with God.
1 Corinthians 7:25-35
Advice Shaped by Pressure and Divided Attention
The "present distress" gives Paul's preference for remaining as one is a specific atmosphere without giving readers enough information to reconstruct the crisis confidently. He counsels stability under pressure, but then guards that counsel with an important sentence: if someone marries, "thou hast not sinned." The warning about trouble in the flesh concerns the real burdens attached to marriage in difficult circumstances, not a moral defect in marriage itself. Paul then compresses wives, grief, joy, buying, possession, and use of the world under a single horizon: "the fashion of this world passeth away." He is not canceling the obligations he has just required. He is preventing any present condition from becoming ultimate. His comments about divided attention are likewise practical. A spouse rightly cares about pleasing the other spouse. Singleness can permit less divided service, but Paul explicitly says he is not casting a snare. Counsel for devotion cannot become coercion without defeating its own purpose.
Deep dive
The "present distress" is important precisely because Paul does not identify it in detail. A local emergency, wider hardship, and the pressures of the approaching end have all informed readings of the passage. The chapter supports urgency, but not a confident reconstruction of a particular famine or persecution. Paul advises stability under pressure and then protects the person who chooses marriage from being branded a sinner. Trouble in the flesh means difficulties attending the condition, not that marriage itself is morally defective.
The compressed statements about wives, mourning, rejoicing, buying, and using the world place ordinary conditions beneath a larger horizon. Paul is not canceling the duties he has just required of married people. He is arguing that none of these conditions possesses permanence. The form of the world is passing, so present arrangements cannot bear the weight of being ultimate.
His account of divided attention is practical rather than contemptuous. A spouse has real concerns about pleasing the other spouse; Paul has already insisted those obligations matter. Singleness can allow a less divided concentration on the Lord's affairs. The final safeguard is unusually revealing: he does not intend to cast a snare. Advice meant to support devotion would contradict its own purpose if it became an instrument for trapping people in a condition they had not freely received.
Words to trace: Lord, wife, careth, world, please, both
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:25
“Virgins” is parthenoi, which can include unmarried men; Revelation 14:4 uses it of men. “Judgment” is gnome, an opinion or counsel, as in 2 Corinthians 8:10, “herein I give my advice”. “To be faithful” means trustworthy: Paul offers himself as a reliable adviser, not a lawgiver.
- 1 Corinthians 7:26
“I suppose” is nomizo, I think, a cautious verb. “Distress” is anagke, necessity or constraint, the word Jesus uses of the “great distress in the land” in Luke 21:23. “So to be” means to stay as one is.
- 1 Corinthians 7:27
“Bound” and “loosed” are the language of legal ties, as in Romans 7:2, where a wife “is bound by the law to her husband” while he lives. “Loosed” could include the widowed and the divorced. The two short questions mirror each other.
- 1 Corinthians 7:28
“Trouble” is thlipsis, pressure or affliction. “I spare you” is pheidomai, the verb of Romans 8:32, “He that spared not his own Son”. Paul speaks to the woman directly as well: if a virgin marries, she has not sinned.
- 1 Corinthians 7:29
“Is short” is synestalmenos, drawn together, contracted. The verb was used for furling a sail, and Acts 5:6 uses it of the young men who “wound up” Ananias’s body. Time has been gathered in. “It remaineth” is to loipon, from now on.
- 1 Corinthians 7:30
The pattern “as though not” runs through five clauses. Epictetus gave similar counsel (Enchiridion 11): never say of anything, “I have lost it”, but “I have given it back.” “Possessed” is katecho, to hold fast, the grip that buying tends to become.
- 1 Corinthians 7:31
“Abusing” is katachraomai, to use to the full, to use up, not to misuse. “Fashion” is schema, outward form, and some hear the image of a stage set being changed between scenes, a reading the word allows. The world’s present arrangement is on its way out.
- 1 Corinthians 7:32
“Without carefulness” is amerimnos, free from anxiety. “Careth” is merimnao, the verb of Matthew 6:25, “Take no thought for your life”, and Mark 4:19 names “the cares of this world” as thorns. The same verb runs through verses 32 to 34, used both well and badly.
- 1 Corinthians 7:33
The oldest manuscripts end this sentence with three more words, “and he is divided”, memeristai, the verb of 1:13, “Is Christ divided?” The King James instead attaches the idea of difference to the next verse. The married man pulled two ways is simply described, not blamed.
- 1 Corinthians 7:34
Two categories stand side by side: the unmarried woman, agamos, which in verse 11 included a separated wife, and the virgin who has never married. “Holy both in body and in spirit” may echo a Corinthian ideal, since Paul has just said the married wife’s concerns are legitimate.
- 1 Corinthians 7:35
“Snare” is brochos, a noose or halter thrown over an animal, found only here. “Without distraction” is aperispastos, from the verb used of Martha, “cumbered about much serving” in Luke 10:40, while Mary sat at the Lord’s feet. Paul’s picture of undistracted service is Mary’s.
1 Corinthians 7:25-35
King James Version25Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful.
26I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be.
27Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife.
28But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you.
29But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;
30And they that weep, as though they wept not; and they that rejoice, as though they rejoiced not; and they that buy, as though they possessed not;
31And they that use this world, as not abusing it: for the fashion of this world passeth away.
32But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord:
33But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife.
34There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.
35And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction.
1 Corinthians 7:36-40
Room for a Decision Without the Accusation of Sin
The last cases preserve room for real decisions without turning either choice into an accusation of sin. The exact relationship behind "his virgin" is disputed. The KJV can be read as a father or guardian deciding about a daughter's marriage, while another longstanding reading sees a man and his betrothed. Paul does not provide enough detail to erase that difficulty. What he does make plain is that marriage is permitted and a settled decision not to marry can also be good when made without necessity or compulsion. The widow's position is clearer. Her husband's death ends the bond, and she is free to marry "only in the Lord." Paul still states his judgment that remaining unmarried may be happier in the circumstances he has described. The chapter closes without embarrassment about that preference and without converting it into an absolute command. Having the Spirit is compatible with careful distinctions, legitimate alternatives, and counsel that refuses to pretend every faithful life must take one form.
Deep dive
The relationship behind "his virgin" is disputed. One reading understands a father or guardian deciding about a daughter's marriage, which fits the KJV's language of giving in marriage. Another understands a man and his betrothed. These are materially different situations, and the English wording should not conceal that difficulty. What is explicit is Paul's refusal to label marriage sinful, alongside his praise of a settled decision made without necessity or compulsion.
The widow's case is less obscure. Her husband's death ends the marital bond, and she is at liberty to marry, with the qualification "only in the Lord." Paul again states his judgment that remaining unmarried is happier in the circumstances under discussion. His closing reference to having the Spirit answers any suggestion that nuanced counsel is less spiritual than a sweeping rule. Throughout the chapter, conviction and qualification stand together. Paul can give a preference without pretending that every legitimate life must take the same shape.
Words to trace: doeth, giveth, heart, husband, marriage, think
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 7:36
“Pass the flower of her age” is hyperakmos, past the peak. If it describes the woman, she is getting older; if the man, the word can mean over-strong in passion. The Greek allows either, and the choice follows from how the whole case is read.
- 1 Corinthians 7:37
Four conditions are stacked: standing firm in his heart, under no necessity, having authority over his own will, and having decided. “Power” is exousia again, as in verse 4. “Keep” is tereo, to guard or preserve.
- 1 Corinthians 7:38
“Giveth in marriage” is gamizo, which normally means to give a daughter in marriage, as in Mark 12:25, “nor are given in marriage”. Some argue that in later Greek it could simply mean to marry. The final comparison, well and better, ranks without condemning.
- 1 Corinthians 7:39
The oldest manuscripts lack “by the law”, but Romans 7:2–3 states the same principle. “Be dead” is koimaomai, to fall asleep, the letter’s usual word for believers who have died (15:6, 18, 20). “Only in the Lord” limits the choice to a fellow believer.
- 1 Corinthians 7:40
“Happier” is makarioteros, more blessed. “I think also that I have the Spirit” may be pointed, since some in Corinth considered themselves the spiritual ones; 14:37 addresses anyone who “think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual”. Paul’s claim is modest in form and firm in substance.
1 Corinthians 7:36-40
King James Version36But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.
37Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.
38So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.
39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
40But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Identify the audience, problem, argument, command, and pastoral purpose.
- Follow connecting words so that one sentence remains inside the author’s reasoning.
- Distinguish a universal theological claim from an instruction shaped by a particular situation.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 1 Corinthians 7?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of 1 Corinthians 7 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Married, unmarried, widowed, and engaged believers listening to practical counsel for faithful life in their present circumstances?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
No exact media match is cataloged for this passage yet. New material can be connected when it becomes available.


