The big picture
The Book of 1 Corinthians moves from arguments about status to a failure the whole church has allowed to sit in plain sight. A man is living with his father's wife, and Paul is almost as disturbed by the congregation's pride as by the offense itself. He calls for a severe communal judgment whose stated end is still salvation, then uses Passover leaven to show why tolerated evil never stays neatly confined to one person. The cleansing language does not make the church a court over everyone outside its fellowship. Paul explicitly corrects that misunderstanding. His concern is the person called a brother whose conduct contradicts the fellowship being claimed. Outsiders remain under God's judgment, while the church is responsible for the boundary it has failed to maintain within. The chapter is severe, but its severity is not indiscriminate. It is aimed inward, at a community boasting where it should have mourned.
In this chapter
- Pride Where Mourning Belongs 1 Corinthians 5:1-5
The shocking relationship is only half of Paul's indictment.
- The Little Leaven Is Not a Little Matter 1 Corinthians 5:6-8
A little leaven is dangerous because it does not remain little once it enters the lump.
- Inside and Outside Are Not the Same Jurisdiction 1 Corinthians 5:9-13
Paul's correction of an earlier instruction prevents church discipline from turning into social disappearance.

Scripture beside the summary
1 Corinthians · King James Version · 131 Corinthians 5:1-5
Pride Where Mourning Belongs
The shocking relationship is only half of Paul's indictment. The other half is a church that knows enough to have a reputation for tolerating it and still remains "puffed up." He gives no invitation to fill in missing family details. "His father's wife" identifies the prohibited relationship, but the woman's history, the father's situation, and the path into the arrangement remain unstated. Paul's attention falls on the man and on the congregation that has not mourned. His proposed action is equally communal: the church gathered in the name and power of Jesus Christ, with Paul's apostolic judgment involved. "Deliver such an one unto Satan" is intentionally severe language for removal from the fellowship, and "destruction of the flesh" has drawn more than one interpretation. Paul does not explain the mechanism. He does state the intended destination: "that the spirit may be saved." The sentence is too severe for sentimental discipline and too saving in purpose for revenge.

Deep dive
The description "his father's wife" identifies the prohibited relationship without settling every detail of the household. It is commonly understood as a stepmother, but the letter does not name the woman, explain the father's situation, or reconstruct how the relationship began. Paul focuses on the man and on the church's response. The scandal is not concealed from the community; it is commonly reported. Their continued inflation of themselves therefore stands beside an offense that should have produced grief.
Paul distinguishes physical absence from his participation in the judgment. The assembly, his apostolic involvement, and the power of the Lord Jesus belong together in the proposed action. "Deliver such an one unto Satan" is severe language for a removal from the church's fellowship. The "destruction of the flesh" has been understood as bodily affliction, even death, or as the breaking of sinful fleshly life. Paul does not describe the mechanism. He does state the intended end: the person's salvation in the day of the Lord. That stated aim prevents the passage from being read as an exercise in revenge, while its severity prevents the aim from making exclusion merely symbolic.
Words to trace: Jesus, Lord, spirit, Christ, deed, fornication
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 5:1
Leviticus 18:8 forbids it: “The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover.” Roman law also barred marriage with a stepmother (Gaius, Institutes 1.63), so Paul’s remark about the Gentiles is accurate. “Have” is a present infinitive, an ongoing relationship rather than a single act. The oldest manuscripts lack “named”.
- 1 Corinthians 5:2
“Mourned” is pentheo, the grief of a funeral, the verb Jesus uses in Matthew 9:15 of mourning when the bridegroom is taken away. When Ezra learned of forbidden marriages among the returned exiles, he “mourned because of the transgression” (Ezra 10:6). Corinth’s reaction was the reverse.
- 1 Corinthians 5:3
Paul uses the same formula, absent in body and present in spirit, in Colossians 2:5. “Have judged already” is a perfect tense, kekrika: the verdict is reached and stands. Paul writes from Ephesus, across the Aegean, yet counts himself at the meeting.
- 1 Corinthians 5:4
The Greek lets “in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ” attach to Paul’s judging in verse 3, to the church’s gathering, or to the handing over in verse 5. Whichever it modifies, the verse assembles three presences: the church, Paul’s spirit, and the Lord’s power.
- 1 Corinthians 5:5
In the Greek of Job 2:6, God “delivers” Job into the adversary’s hand with the limit “but save his life”; the same verb stands here. 1 Timothy 1:20 uses the phrase of Hymenaeus and Alexander, handed over “that they may learn not to blaspheme”. In both places the handing over has a purpose beyond itself.
1 Corinthians 5:1-5
King James Version1It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.
2And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.
3For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,
4In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ,
5To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
1 Corinthians 5:6-8
The Little Leaven Is Not a Little Matter
A little leaven is dangerous because it does not remain little once it enters the lump. Paul uses the image to make Corinth's tolerated offense a communal matter without claiming that every member has committed the same act. Their boasting is already evidence that the problem has spread beyond one man's conduct. Then the metaphor takes a striking turn. They are told to purge old leaven "as ye are unleavened." Identity and obligation stand side by side. Christ, their Passover, has been sacrificed, so the church is addressed as a people whose deliverance is already real and whose common life must now match it. Paul does not create a new festival calendar out of the image. He names the moral contrast himself: malice and wickedness against sincerity and truth. The contradiction is the point. A congregation may possess an identity it did not create and still behave in ways that openly deny the character of that identity.


Deep dive
The smallness of the leaven is exactly what makes the image effective. A limited amount changes the whole lump. Paul does not need to claim that every Corinthian has committed the same act; he identifies a communal effect in the church's acceptance of it. The problem is already larger than the individual offense because the congregation is boasting instead of mourning.
The language then moves between an identity already given and a cleansing still required: the Corinthians are unleavened, yet the old leaven must be removed. The apparent tension is deliberate. Christ's sacrifice establishes the reality by which their communal life is to be ordered. Exodus 12 provides the Passover setting, but Paul specifies what the leaven represents here: malice and wickedness, set against sincerity and truth. He does not provide a calendar of new festival regulations. The feast image interprets the life of a people whose deliverance has occurred and whose toleration of evil contradicts the character of that deliverance.
Words to trace: leaven, lump, unleavened, bread, Christ, feast
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 5:6
“Glorying” is kauchema, the thing one boasts about. The leaven saying was proverbial; Paul repeats it word for word in Galatians 5:9. Leaven was not packaged yeast but a lump of old fermented dough kept back from the last batch, so each new batch carried the old one into it.
- 1 Corinthians 5:7
Before Passover every Jewish household cleared its rooms of leaven (Exodus 12:15, 19), and the Mishnah describes searching for it by lamplight on the night before (Pesachim 1:1). “Passover” is pascha, here the lamb itself; “is sacrificed” is thyo, the verb of Mark 14:12, “when they killed the passover”.
- 1 Corinthians 5:8
“Keep the feast” is present tense, “let us go on keeping festival”, as though the whole of life were the week of unleavened bread. “Sincerity” is eilikrineia, purity, traditionally explained as what can be judged in sunlight and found clean. Deuteronomy 16:3 calls the unleavened loaves “the bread of affliction”.
1 Corinthians 5:6-8
King James Version6Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
7Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
8Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
1 Corinthians 5:9-13
Inside and Outside Are Not the Same Jurisdiction
Paul's correction of an earlier instruction prevents church discipline from turning into social disappearance. He had written not to company with fornicators, but he now makes clear that he did not mean every sexually immoral, greedy, extortionate, or idolatrous person in the surrounding world. That reading would require leaving the world altogether, and Paul's blunt practicality exposes its absurdity. The boundary is different: a person "called a brother" whose life persists in the conduct he names while continuing to claim the fellowship. The list reaches far beyond sexual wrongdoing to greed, idolatry, abusive speech, drunkenness, and exploitation. Even refusing table fellowship makes the boundary concrete. Yet Paul sharply limits the church's jurisdiction. "Them that are without God judgeth." The command to put away the wicked person is directed inward. Corinth's failure is not that it has allowed sinners to exist nearby, but that it has refused to take responsibility for what its own claimed fellowship means.

Deep dive
The reference to an earlier epistle shows that the surviving letter called First Corinthians was not Paul's first written contact with this congregation. The earlier instruction has either been misunderstood or requires clarification. He had not meant an end to all association with sexually immoral people, the greedy, extortioners, or idolaters outside the church. Such a rule would require leaving the world altogether. The dry practicality exposes the impossibility of that reading.
The distinction is the person "called a brother" whose conduct contradicts the fellowship being claimed. Paul's list expands beyond sexual offenses to greed, idolatry, abusive speech, drunkenness, and exploitation. The refusal even to eat expresses a tangible boundary, not a merely private opinion. Yet judgment of outsiders is explicitly left to God. The final removal formula recalls the language of Deuteronomy's covenant judgments, now applied to the church's own membership. The paragraph does not make the church a court over the entire surrounding society; it defines the responsibility it has failed to exercise within its own gathering.
Words to trace: company, covetous, fornicators, judge, world, altogether
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Corinthians 5:9
“Company with” is synanamignymi, to mix oneself up together with, to mingle; it appears only here, in verse 11, and in 2 Thessalonians 3:14. “Fornicators” is pornoi. The word the Corinthians had apparently taken as a total social ban was about mingling, close association.
- 1 Corinthians 5:10
“Covetous” is pleonektes, the grasping person who always wants more. “Extortioners” is harpax, a snatcher, the word Jesus uses of false prophets who are “ravening wolves” (Matthew 7:15). In a port city of trade and temples, avoiding all such people meant leaving the world.
- 1 Corinthians 5:11
The list of verse 10 grows by two: the “railer”, loidoros, the abusive talker, and the drunkard. In 4:12 the apostles were the ones being reviled, loidoroumenoi, and blessing in return. Meals were where the church met, and 11:20–21 shows the Lord’s Supper was eaten at a full meal.
- 1 Corinthians 5:12
“Them that are without” is hoi exo, the outsiders, a Jewish phrase for those outside the community; Jesus uses it in Mark 4:11, and Paul in Colossians 4:5 and 1 Thessalonians 4:12. The question expects a yes: the church does judge its own.
- 1 Corinthians 5:13
Early Greek manuscripts had no accent marks, and “judgeth” can be accented as present or as future: God judges, or God will judge. The last sentence is Deuteronomy’s refrain, “so shalt thou put the evil away from among you”, repeated nearly ten times there and used of sexual offences in Deuteronomy 22:21–24.
1 Corinthians 5:9-13
King James Version9I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
10Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
11But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
12For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
13But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Identify the audience, problem, argument, command, and pastoral purpose.
- Follow connecting words so that one sentence remains inside the author’s reasoning.
- Distinguish a universal theological claim from an instruction shaped by a particular situation.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 1 Corinthians 5?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of 1 Corinthians 5 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: 1 Corinthians 5 develops its own movement around leaven, Christ, Jesus, Lord, spirit?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
No exact media match is cataloged for this passage yet. New material can be connected when it becomes available.


