1 Samuel 31:1-6
They slew Jonathan
Three sons are named and killed in one verse. The narrative gives them no scene, which is how the chapter registers the scale.
Verse by verse
- 31:2
The three sons killed here are named. This is not a statement that Saul had no surviving sons; Ishbosheth appears in 2 Samuel 2:8.
- 31:4
Saul's stated concern is enemy abuse. The armourbearer's refusal is attributed to fear, not to an explanation supplied by later commentary.
- 31:6
All his men describes those associated with Saul in this defeat. Verse 7 itself mentions surviving Israelites who flee their towns.












Jonathan's name comes first among the sons. The man who had defended David, the son whose loyalty had not followed his father's hostility, dies in the same defeat. Gilboa does not sort its casualties into the deserving and the undeserving. The names fall together.
Saul's last recorded instruction concerns what his enemies might do to him. The fear of abuse is stated; everything else about his private thoughts must remain unstated. His armourbearer cannot carry out the order, and the two deaths are reported in short, terrible sequence. The Book of First Samuel does not decorate them.
That same day together closes the paragraph. The compression matters: king, sons, attendant, and fighting men are gathered into one sentence, while the next verse will describe abandoned towns. This is a battlefield defeat with consequences beyond the battlefield. David is not standing over Saul, claiming a victory. According to 2 Samuel 1:1, he is at Ziklag. The throne loses its occupant without the fugitive striking him.