New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Delay Is Not Slackness

2 Peter 3

The big picture

The Second Epistle of Peter's final chapter takes the scoffers' objection seriously enough to quote it: if the promised coming is real, why does the world look unchanged? The answer begins with the flood. The same word that created the world has already interrupted it, so the scoffers' problem lies in the premise of uninterrupted continuity rather than in the logic drawn from it. The chapter then reframes the waiting. A day and a thousand years do not measure the Lord as human arithmetic assumes, and what appears to be slackness is called longsuffering with a purpose. Suddenness still remains, pictured by the thief, but dissolution is set beside the promise of new heavens and a new earth where righteousness dwells. The ending circles back to interpretation and knowledge: Paul's letters can be hard, unstable readers can twist them, those letters stand beside "the other scriptures", and knowledge remains something in which to grow.

In this chapter

2 Peter 3: The Delay Is Not Slackness
Chapter scene2 Peter 3

Scripture beside the summary

2 Peter · King James Version · 18

2 Peter 3:1-7

The Argument, and the Flood It Leaves Out

The Second Epistle of Peter opens its final chapter where the first chapter spent so much time: remembrance. The readers are to remember the holy prophets and the commandment of the apostles, two bodies of words already spoken before the present dispute. Then the scoffers are allowed to state their own case: "Where is the promise of his coming?" Their evidence is visible continuity, since everything appears to continue as it has from creation. The reply does not sneer at the logic. It attacks the premise. The world they describe as uninterrupted has already been overflowed with water and perished. The same "word of God" stands on both sides of the contrast, first in creation and then in the flood, and that same word now keeps the present heavens and earth "in store." The image is not of neglect but of reservation. The scoffers look at a world that seems unchanged; the chapter answers that they have left its largest interruption out of the calculation.

2 Peter 3:1-7: The Argument, and the Flood It Leaves Out
Chapter scene2 Peter 3

Deep dive

The letter states again that its purpose is remembrance, and names its authorities in pairs: the holy prophets, and the commandment of the apostles. Both are words already spoken. Nothing new is being offered.

The objection is quoted rather than paraphrased, which is unusual and gives it its force: "Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation." It is an argument from observation, and a good one on its own terms. Nothing visible has changed.

The answer turns on a verb that is easy to pass over. "This they willingly are ignorant of" renders a phrase meaning that this escapes them by their own choosing. What escapes them is the flood. The world they say has continued unchanged since creation is a world that was once overflowed and perished, and the agency named is the same in both cases: the word of God. The heavens and earth that are now are "kept in store" by that same word, the participle suggesting a treasury rather than neglect. The scoffers' premise, not their logic, is what the chapter denies.

Words to trace: water, earth, heavens, word, apostles, asleep

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 3:1

    This is the only New Testament letter that numbers itself, and the earlier one is most naturally 1 Peter. “Pure” is eilikrines, unmixed or sincere, a word traditionally explained as “tested by sunlight”, as cloth was held up to the light to find flaws. Paul prays that the Philippians may be “sincere” with the same word (Philippians 1:10).

  2. 2 Peter 3:2

    “The holy prophets” is the phrase Peter used in the temple: God spoke “by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began” (Acts 3:21). The oldest manuscripts read “the commandment of your apostles”, not “of us the apostles”, naming the apostles who first brought the gospel to these readers.

  3. 2 Peter 3:3

    The oldest manuscripts read “scoffers shall come with scoffing”, a Hebrew-style doubling the King James does not carry. Jude 18 records the same warning: “there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.” The motive is named before the argument is heard: their theology serves their desires.

  4. 2 Peter 3:4

    “Fell asleep” is koimaomai, the Christian way of speaking of death, used of Stephen (Acts 7:60) and of the Thessalonian dead (1 Thessalonians 4:13). “The fathers” may be the patriarchs of Israel or the first generation of believers; if the second, the scoffers are pointing at graves of people who expected to see the coming.

  5. 2 Peter 3:5

    Genesis 1:6–9 divides the waters and has the dry land appear out of them, and Psalm 24:2 says God “hath founded it upon the seas”. “Standing” is synistemi, to hold together, the verb of Colossians 1:17, “by him all things consist”. The earth was formed out of water and held in the midst of water, which is why water could undo it.

  6. 2 Peter 3:6

    “Whereby” is plural in Greek, “through which”, pointing back to the waters, or to the water and the word together. The flood came from both directions, “the fountains of the great deep” below and “the windows of heaven” above (Genesis 7:11). The world “perished” in the sense of its order ending; the earth itself remained.

  7. 2 Peter 3:7

    Josephus records an old Jewish tradition that Adam foretold the destruction of the world twice, once by water and once by fire, so Seth’s children carved their learning on two pillars, one of brick and one of stone (Antiquities 1.70). Isaiah 66:15–16 has the LORD come “with fire” to plead with all flesh. “Perdition” is apoleia, destruction.

2 Peter 3:1-7

King James Version

1This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:

2That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:

3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.

5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

6Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

7But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

2 Peter 3:8-10

A Thousand Years, and a Thief

The delay receives two answers, and the first refuses the scale on which the complaint is measured. "One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" runs in both directions, drawing on the ninetieth Psalm without reducing the point to simple divine slowness. Human arithmetic cannot force the comparison either way. The second answer renames the same elapsed time. What some call "slackness" the Second Epistle of Peter calls longsuffering, and the distinction is purpose: the delay is joined to the Lord's unwillingness that any should perish and desire that all should come to repentance. The chapter does not define the reach of "any" and "all", though later readers have argued over it extensively. Then the tone snaps from patience to suddenness. The day arrives "as a thief in the night", followed by noise, heat, melting elements and the fate of the earth and its works, a closing clause whose oldest textual form remains notably difficult.

Deep dive

"One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" draws on the ninetieth Psalm, and the reciprocal form matters. It is not only that God is patient over long periods, but that both directions of the comparison hold. The scoffers' arithmetic has no purchase either way.

The second answer is the more direct. "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering." The word bradutes, slackness, is what the objection alleges; makrothymia, longsuffering, is offered in its place, and the two describe the same elapsed time. What looks like failure to arrive is described as unwillingness to arrive yet, "not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance". How wide that any and that all are meant to reach has been argued over ever since, and the chapter does not define it.

Then the tone changes without warning. The day comes "as a thief in the night", the image Jesus uses in the Gospels and Paul uses to the Thessalonians, and what follows is dissolution: a great noise, elements melting with fervent heat, the earth and its works burned up. The oldest manuscripts read not burned up but found, heurethesetai, which would make the sentence say that the earth and its works are discovered rather than destroyed. It is one of the genuinely difficult textual problems in the New Testament and nothing in the chapter settles it.

Words to trace: Lord, years, beloved, burned, concerning, count

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 3:8

    “Be not ignorant” answers verse 5: the scoffers choose not to know; the beloved must not share that ignorance. Jubilees 4:30 used the same psalm to explain why Adam died at 930, within the “day” he ate the fruit. The early Epistle of Barnabas (15:4) built on it the idea that history would run six thousand years.

  2. 2 Peter 3:9

    Ezekiel 18:23 had put the same will as a question: “Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?” “Come to” is choreo, to make room for or advance toward repentance. The oldest manuscripts read “longsuffering toward you”, not “to us-ward”.

  3. 2 Peter 3:10

    “With a great noise” is rhoizedon, found only here, a word that imitates its sound: the whoosh of an arrow, the rush of wings, the roar of flame. “Elements” is stoicheia, the basic parts of anything, the letters of the alphabet, and so either the heavenly bodies or earth, water, air and fire. “Fervent heat” is kausoo, a medical word for burning fever.

2 Peter 3:8-10

King James Version

8But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

10But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

2 Peter 3:11-14

What Manner of Persons

After describing dissolution, the Second Epistle of Peter asks, "what manner of persons ought ye to be", but it does not answer with an elaborate programme. The immediate terms are holy conversation and godliness, with conversation carrying the older sense of one's whole manner of life. The paragraph then uses a phrase whose difficulty is easy to miss: believers are "looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God." The participle can mean hastening toward that day or hastening it on, and the second reading would make the defended delay less fixed than it first appears. The letter leaves the ambiguity standing. Against the image of heavens on fire and elements melting, it places the promise of "new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness." The verb is domestic. Righteousness is pictured as resident there, not as a visitor. The movement is therefore from dissolution to conduct and from conduct to a renewed world defined by what lives in it.

Deep dive

The question "what manner of persons ought ye to be" is put once and left standing. What follows it is not a programme but two words, conversation and godliness, where conversation carries its older sense of the whole manner of life.

Verse 12 contains a claim that later readers have found harder than the fire does. Believers are "looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God", and the participle speudontas can mean either hastening toward or hastening on. If the second, the letter allows that the delay it has just defended is not fixed. Commentators have divided on it since the Greek fathers, some of whom took the harder reading and did not soften it.

Against the melting elements the chapter sets what is promised: "new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness", the phrase taken from Isaiah. The expectation is not of escape from the world but of a world in which righteousness is resident. The word oikeo, dwelleth, is domestic. Righteousness lives there rather than visiting.

Words to trace: dissolved, heavens, look, seeing, beloved, blameless

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 3:11

    “Dissolved” is lyo, to loosen, as a building is taken apart, and it is present tense in Greek, “are being dissolved”, spoken as if the process were already under way. “Conversation” and “godliness” are both plural in Greek, holy acts and godly deeds, not a general mood of piety.

  2. 2 Peter 3:12

    “The day of God” is a rare phrase; the New Testament usually says “the day of the Lord”, and only Revelation 16:14 has anything close, “that great day of God Almighty”. The melting heavens come from the Greek of Isaiah 34:4, “all the powers of the heavens shall melt”, and Micah 1:4 has mountains “molten” under the LORD.

  3. 2 Peter 3:13

    The promise the scoffers mocked in verse 4 is the promise the believers wait on here; the word comes back deliberately. Isaiah speaks of new heavens and a new earth twice (65:17, 66:22), and Revelation 21:1 sees them. “New” is kainos, new in kind, not merely recent.

  4. 2 Peter 3:14

    “Without spot, and blameless”, aspiloi and amometoi, answers 2:13, where the false teachers were “spots… and blemishes”, spiloi and momoi. The same pair of roots marks the two groups: the teachers are the stains, the readers are to be found without them. “In peace” means found at peace with him when he comes.

2 Peter 3:11-14

King James Version

11Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,

12Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?

13Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

14Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless.

2 Peter 3:15-18

Paul's Letters, and the Last Word

"Account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation" compresses the chapter's answer to delay into a single line. The interval mocked as absence is treated by the Second Epistle of Peter as the space in which salvation is being worked, and Paul is immediately cited as having written in the same direction. He is called "our beloved brother", not an opponent to be corrected, yet the letter freely admits that some things in his epistles are "hard to be understood." Difficulty, however, is not made responsible for every abuse. The unlearned and unstable "wrest" those writings, using a verb that means twisting something as on a winch. The striking clause is "as they do also the other scriptures", which places Paul's letters in the same category as writings already called scripture without stopping to defend the classification. The letter then closes where it began, with knowledge. This time knowledge is not merely possessed. It is something in which the readers are to grow, and the final word is Amen.

Deep dive

"Account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation" gathers the chapter's argument into a sentence. The interval the scoffers read as absence is read here as the thing itself.

Paul is called "our beloved brother", and the letter agrees with him while admitting the difficulty: in his epistles "are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest". The verb streblousin means to twist on a winch, as a rope is tightened. The complaint is not that Paul is unclear but that clarity is not proof against determined handling.

The clause "as they do also the other scriptures" is among the most consequential half sentences in the New Testament, because it puts Paul's letters in the same category as the writings already called scripture, at a date when that category was not yet settled. The Second Epistle of Peter says it in passing, as an aside inside a warning about misreading, and does not argue for it.

The letter closes as it opened, with knowledge, now as something to grow in rather than something to have. The doxology is brief and the final word is Amen.

Words to trace: beloved, Lord, account, Amen, beware, both

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 3:15

    “Our beloved brother” is warm from the man Paul once opposed “to the face” at Antioch (Galatians 2:11). “The wisdom given unto him” echoes Paul’s own words, “according to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder” (1 Corinthians 3:10). Paul’s Romans 2:4 joins God’s longsuffering to repentance in the same way.

  2. 2 Peter 3:16

    “In all his epistles” implies a collection of Paul’s letters already circulating together. “Hard to be understood” is dysnoetos, found only here. Paul himself had to warn the Thessalonians against a letter “as from us” claiming the day of Christ had already come (2 Thessalonians 2:2), a case of his teaching on this very subject being bent.

  3. 2 Peter 3:17

    “Led away” is synapago, to be carried off along with others, the verb Paul uses at Antioch when “Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation” (Galatians 2:13), in the episode where Peter himself had drawn back. “Stedfastness” is sterigmos, firmness, found only here. “Know these things before” is proginosko, forewarned.

  4. 2 Peter 3:18

    “For ever” is literally “to the day of eternity”, eis hemeran aionos, a phrase found nowhere else in the New Testament, so the letter that argued about the day ends on one. The doxology is addressed plainly to Jesus Christ. “Grow” is auxano, the verb of 1 Peter 2:2, newborn babes growing by the milk of the word.

2 Peter 3:15-18

King James Version

15And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

17Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

18But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the audience, problem, argument, command, and pastoral purpose.
  2. Follow connecting words so that one sentence remains inside the author’s reasoning.
  3. Distinguish a universal theological claim from an instruction shaped by a particular situation.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 2 Peter 3?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of 2 Peter 3 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Scoffers ignoring creation and flood while believers wait for judgment and new heavens and new earth; A community pursuing peace, carefully reading difficult apostolic letters, and growing in grace without being carried away?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006