New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Teachers Who Sell What They Deny

2 Peter 2

The big picture

The Second Epistle of Peter's second chapter puts false teachers inside the community they damage and describes their work in commercial language. They deny the Lord who bought them while turning other people into merchandise. Their threatened judgment is answered from earlier judgments, yet the long sentence about angels, the flood and Sodom finally lands on the Lord's ability to deliver as well as reserve for punishment. From there the language grows deliberately animal and humiliating. Men boast about realities they do not understand, Balaam's madness is checked by an ass, and the teachers themselves become wells without water and clouds that fail to deliver rain. They promise liberty while already enslaved to corruption. The chapter closes with escape followed by entanglement and two proverbs, leaving the return itself starkly visible without settling the later theological arguments built around it.

In this chapter

2 Peter 2: The Teachers Who Sell What They Deny
Chapter scene2 Peter 2

Scripture beside the summary

2 Peter · King James Version · 22

2 Peter 2:1-3

They Arrive from Inside

The danger enters by analogy with Israel: "there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you." The location matters. The Second Epistle of Peter does not picture an obvious enemy shouting from outside the wall. These teachers arise within the same assembly they mislead, bringing their teaching in alongside what is already there. The paragraph then turns on language of purchase. They deny "the Lord that bought them", using a commercial verb, and in the next breath they "make merchandise of you." The same men who are described as bought begin treating other people as goods. Their instrument is "feigned words", language shaped for the transaction, and covetousness is named as the motive. The closing image answers any assumption that delay means inactivity. Judgment does not linger and damnation does not slumber. Both are personified as awake, which prepares the chapter's repeated insistence that nothing has been forgotten merely because it has not yet arrived.

2 Peter 2:1-3: They Arrive from Inside
Chapter scene2 Peter 2

Deep dive

The sentence begins "But there were false prophets also among the people", and the comparison does the work of a warning. Israel's false prophets were not foreign; they were part of the assembly they misled. So it will be here. The adverb privily, pareisaxousin, means to bring in alongside, and the same rare verb family appears in the letter of Jude for men who crept in unawares.

What they teach is described as "denying the Lord that bought them". The verb agorazo is commercial, to buy in the market, and it sits oddly beside the accusation in the next verse that they "make merchandise of you", emporeuomai, to trade in. The Second Epistle of Peter builds the paragraph on purchase twice over. These are men who were themselves bought, and who now treat a congregation as stock.

The final clause personifies what is coming: judgment does not linger and damnation does not slumber. Both verbs describe something awake and moving, which is the answer the chapter will give three times over to the assumption that nothing has happened yet.

Words to trace: false, bought, covetousness, damnable, damnation, denying

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 2:1

    “Heresies” is haireseis, originally choices, then schools or parties, as in “the sect of the Sadducees” (Acts 5:17); here it takes on the sense of teaching that divides. “Lord” is despotes, the ordinary word for a slave’s owner. “Damnable” and “destruction” translate the same noun, apoleia, which comes three times in the first three verses.

  2. 2 Peter 2:2

    Early believers called their faith “the Way” (Acts 9:2, 24:14), and this chapter uses the word four times: the way of truth, the right way, the way of Balaam, the way of righteousness. For “pernicious ways” the oldest manuscripts read “their licentiousness”, aselgeia. The complaint echoes Isaiah 52:5, God’s name blasphemed because of his own people.

  3. 2 Peter 2:3

    “Feigned” is plastos, moulded, from the verb for shaping clay: words formed to fit the customer. “Covetousness” is pleonexia, the appetite for more. “Of a long time” is ekpalai, from long ago; the verdict on such teachers was pronounced in the past and has simply been waiting.

2 Peter 2:1-3

King James Version

1But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

3And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

2 Peter 2:4-9

Three Judgments and Two Rescues

The Second Epistle of Peter compresses angels, the flood, Sodom, Noah and Lot into one long conditional sentence, and its grammar quietly decides where the weight falls. Three acts of judgment pile up in dependent clauses: if God did not spare the angels, if he did not spare the old world, if he reduced Sodom and Gomorrha to ashes. The sentence does not reach its main clause until verse 9, where the conclusion is that "the Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust" for judgment. Rescue and reservation share the final line. Along the way the chapter uses the New Testament's single instance of the verb behind "cast them down to hell", borrowed from Tartarus, without explaining what the angels did. Noah receives the title "a preacher of righteousness", which Genesis does not give him, while Lot is called just and described as daily vexed. The emphasis is less on polishing either man's character than on one stubborn fact: both were taken out.

Deep dive

Verses 4 to 9 are a single sentence in Greek, and its shape matters. The three protases, if God spared not the angels, and spared not the old world, and turned Sodom into ashes, all hang unresolved until verse 9 supplies the conclusion: "The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment". The grammar puts rescue in the main clause and judgment in the subordinate ones.

The angels are cast down to "hell", tartarosas, the only use of that verb in the New Testament and a word taken from Greek mythology rather than from the Hebrew scriptures. The Second Epistle of Peter uses it once and does not explain it. What the angels did is not stated here, and the letter of Jude, covering the same ground, says only that they left their own habitation.

Noah is "the eighth person", an idiom meaning one of eight, and is given a title the Book of Genesis never gives him: a preacher of righteousness. Lot is called just, and twice vexed, with the imperfect tense in verse 8 making it a daily condition rather than an episode. Neither description is drawn from the narrative in Genesis, where Lot in particular is presented with far less sympathy. The chapter is reading those accounts through a tradition, and its interest is not in the men's characters but in the fact that both were taken out.

Words to trace: delivered, judgment, righteous, spared, ungodly, vexed

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 2:4

    The manuscripts divide over one letter: some read “chains” of darkness, seirais, and others “pits”, sirois, the underground pits used to store grain. In 1 Enoch 10:4–6 the angel Azazel is bound hand and foot and thrown into darkness until the great day. “Reserved” is tereo, to keep under guard, a verb that recurs through this chapter and the next.

  2. 2 Peter 2:5

    “The flood” is kataklysmos, the source of “cataclysm”. Genesis 6:11 describes the old world as “filled with violence”. “Saved” is phylasso, to guard, so the angels are kept under guard for judgment while Noah is kept under guard for life: the same idea of custody, pointed in opposite directions.

  3. 2 Peter 2:6

    “Turning into ashes” is tephroo, found only here in the New Testament, a verb Greek writers used of ground covered by volcanic ash. Genesis 19:28 records Abraham looking toward the plain and seeing the smoke go up “as the smoke of a furnace”, and Deuteronomy 29:23 remembers a land of “brimstone, and salt, and burning”.

  4. 2 Peter 2:7

    “Vexed” here is kataponeo, to wear down or oppress, the word used of the Israelite Moses saw being beaten (Acts 7:24). “The wicked” is athesmoi, people with no settled law or custom, a word used only here and in 3:17. “Filthy conversation” is conduct without restraint, aselgeia again.

  5. 2 Peter 2:8

    Genesis never calls Lot righteous; the word here goes back to Abraham’s plea, “wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?” (Genesis 18:23), and Wisdom 10:6 calls him “the righteous man” who fled the fire of the five cities. This verse’s verb is basanizo, to torment, used of the disciples’ boat “tossed with waves” (Matthew 14:24).

  6. 2 Peter 2:9

    “Temptations” is peirasmos, trials of any kind, the “manifold temptations” of 1 Peter 1:6. “To be punished” is a present participle in Greek, “being punished”, which some read as punishment already under way while the unjust are kept for the day itself. “Knoweth how” means has the skill and the means.

2 Peter 2:4-9

King James Version

4For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

5And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

6And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

7And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:

8(For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)

9The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

2 Peter 2:10-16

Beasts That Revile What They Cannot See

The attack sharpens by contrasting noisy confidence with restraint. The false teachers "speak evil of dignities", most likely angelic powers, while angels greater in power and might do not bring the same kind of railing accusation. The Second Epistle of Peter then makes its language deliberately animal. These men are compared with "natural brute beasts" because they speak against things they do not understand. Their problem is not wicked cleverness but bold speech reaching beyond knowledge. The Balaam comparison finishes the point with almost comic severity. Balaam loves "the wages of unrighteousness", yet the prophet is checked by a "dumb ass speaking with man's voice." The seer, whose office implies sight, is stopped by the animal. The chapter's earlier concern with money is still present in the wages, while its concern with false claims to understanding now becomes visible in the reversal. A beast sees enough to halt a prophet who does not, and the paragraph lets that humiliation stand without softening it.

Beasts that revile what they cannot see
Chapter scene2 Peter 2

Deep dive

The charge is speaking evil of dignities, doxas, literally glories, most likely angelic powers. The argument in verse 11 is from the greater to the lesser: angels, who are stronger, bring no railing accusation. The letter of Jude makes the same point with a named incident, Michael disputing over the body of Moses. The Second Epistle of Peter leaves the incident out and keeps the principle, which is one of the clearer signs of the literary relationship between the two letters and of the direction it runs.

From verse 12 the language becomes deliberately animal. These men are "natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed", and they "speak evil of the things that they understand not". The accusation is not that they are wicked and clever but that they are confident about what is beyond them.

Verse 13 contains a pun that the King James cannot carry: they receive the reward, misthon, of unrighteousness, adikias, and in the next clause they are spots and blemishes, spiloi, sporting themselves in their own deceivings, apatais, where many manuscripts read agapais, love feasts. If that reading stands, the sentence places the men at the congregation's own table.

Balaam is named as the pattern, and named oddly, as the son of Bosor rather than Beor. The point of the comparison is the wages: he "loved the wages of unrighteousness" and was stopped by an animal. The Second Epistle of Peter puts it as understatement, that a dumb ass "forbad the madness of the prophet", which completes the paragraph's argument about who understands what. The beast saw what the seer did not.

Words to trace: evil, unrighteousness, accusation, adultery, afraid, angels

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 2:10

    “Government” is kyriotes, lordship or dominion, the word Paul uses for one of the angelic ranks in Colossians 1:16. “Presumptuous” is tolmetes, a daredevil, found only here. “Are not afraid” is tremo, to tremble: these men do not shake, where even the devils of James 2:19 shudder.

  2. 2 Peter 2:11

    When Joshua the high priest stood before the angel with Satan accusing him, the angel said only “The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan” (Zechariah 3:2), leaving the verdict to God. “Railing accusation” is a slanderous verdict, blasphemos krisis. Some manuscripts do not have the words “before the Lord”.

  3. 2 Peter 2:12

    “Made to be taken and destroyed” is literally “born for capture and destruction”, like animals bred for the hunt. The Greek repeats one root, phthora, in a grim echo: “in their destroying they shall be destroyed”. The King James renders it “shall utterly perish in their own corruption”.

  4. 2 Peter 2:13

    Feasting by day was a proverbial mark of decadence: “Woe to thee, O land, when… thy princes eat in the morning!” (Ecclesiastes 10:16). At Pentecost Peter had defended the disciples as sober, “seeing it is but the third hour of the day” (Acts 2:15). “Spots and blemishes” reverses the lamb “without blemish and without spot” of 1 Peter 1:19.

  5. 2 Peter 2:14

    “Full of adultery” is literally “full of an adulteress”, eyes always looking for one. Plutarch plays on the same idea, since the Greek kore means both a girl and the pupil of the eye. “Unstable” is asteriktos, unfixed, the opposite of the “established” of 1:12. “Exercised” is gymnazo: their hearts have been trained, like an athlete, in greed.

  6. 2 Peter 2:15

    The angel who blocked Balaam’s road told him, “thy way is perverse before me” (Numbers 22:32). Later Numbers 31:16 blames Balaam’s counsel for the seduction of Israel by the women of Moab, and Revelation 2:14 remembers him for teaching Balak “to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel”.

  7. 2 Peter 2:16

    “Rebuked” is elenxis, a reproof, and “madness” is paraphronia, being out of one’s mind; both words appear only here in the New Testament. “Dumb” is aphonos, voiceless. The ass saw the angel three times before its rider did (Numbers 22:23–27), and it was the LORD who “opened the mouth of the ass” (22:28).

2 Peter 2:10-16

King James Version

10But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

11Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.

12But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

2 Peter 2:17-19

Wells Without Water

"Wells without water" and clouds driven away by a tempest are not random insults. Both are things whose apparent purpose is to deliver something needed, and both fail at the decisive moment. The Second Epistle of Peter uses those images for teachers whose speech is equally oversized and empty, "great swelling words of vanity." Their targets are described with care: people who had clean escaped from those living in error, recent escapees who are out but still close enough to be drawn back. The means of recapture is not force but promise, especially the promise of liberty. The paragraph then exposes the contradiction without using the ordinary charge of hypocrisy. These teachers are themselves "servants of corruption", and the proof is a maxim: whatever overcomes a person becomes that person's master. Their freedom is therefore not merely false in presentation. It is not theirs to distribute. A dry well cannot give water, and a slave cannot hand someone else the liberty he does not possess.

Wells without water
Chapter scene2 Peter 2

Deep dive

A well without water and a cloud driven off by a storm are both things that exist to deliver and do not. In a dry country neither image needs explaining. The letter of Jude expands the same figure into a run of six; the Second Epistle of Peter uses two and moves on.

The people at risk are named precisely: "those that were clean escaped from them who live in error". These are recent converts, out but not far out, and the means of recapture is speech. "Great swelling words of vanity" is hyperonka mataiotetos, oversized and empty, language whose bulk is the whole of it.

Verse 19 states the trade plainly. They promise liberty and are themselves servants of corruption, and the proof offered is a maxim that would have been familiar from both Greek moral philosophy and Roman law: whoever is overcome by something is that thing's slave. The chapter does not accuse them of hypocrisy in the ordinary sense. It says the freedom is not theirs to give.

Words to trace: allure, bondage, carried, clean, clouds, corruption

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 2:17

    “Mist of darkness” is zophos, the murky gloom Homer used for the land of the dead, the same word as the “darkness” of the chains in verse 4. “Clouds” here is homichlai, low mists that bring no rain, where Jude 12 has proper clouds, nephelai.

  2. 2 Peter 2:18

    “Allure” is deleazo, to bait a hook, the same verb as “beguiling” in verse 14. The King James “clean escaped” follows copies reading “truly”; the oldest manuscripts read “barely escaped”, oligos, people only just out. “Wantonness” is aselgeia once more, the chapter’s recurring word.

  3. 2 Peter 2:19

    Jesus had said, “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin” (John 8:34), and Paul argues the same in Romans 6:16. “Liberty” may be these teachers’ own slogan, perhaps borrowed from Paul’s letters, which 3:16 says some twist; that is an inference. “Overcome” is hettaomai, to be defeated in battle.

2 Peter 2:17-19

King James Version

17These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.

18For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.

19While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

2 Peter 2:20-22

The Proverb of the Dog and the Sow

The chapter ends with people who "have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" and are then entangled and overcome again. The Second Epistle of Peter does not soften either half of that sequence. The escape is described as escape, the knowledge as knowledge, and the later condition as worse than the beginning. Readers have long used the passage to argue opposite conclusions about whether the people described were ever truly converted or whether a converted person can finally be lost, but the letter itself does not settle that dispute. It moves instead to two animal proverbs. The dog returning to its vomit comes from the Book of Proverbs. The washed sow returning to the mire comes from a wider stock of sayings. Together they make the same disturbing observation from two directions: cleaning has occurred, but the animal returns to what it had left. The chapter ends there, on return, without adding a final explanation of what the return proves.

The proverb of the dog and the sow
Chapter scene2 Peter 2

Deep dive

"The latter end is worse with them than the beginning" echoes a saying of Jesus recorded in the Gospels according to Matthew and Luke, about the unclean spirit that returns to a swept house with seven others. The Second Epistle of Peter applies it to people who had known "the way of righteousness" and turned from "the holy commandment delivered unto them".

The passage has been read in opposite directions for as long as it has been read, as evidence that such a person was never converted and as evidence that a converted person may be lost. The letter itself does not adjudicate. It describes a real escape followed by a real entanglement and declines to say what that proves about the escape.

The two proverbs are unequal. The first, the dog returning to its vomit, is quoted from the Book of Proverbs. The second, the washed sow going back to the mire, is not in the Hebrew scriptures at all and appears to come from a wider stock of sayings. Together they make one point: neither animal has changed by being cleaned. The chapter closes on that observation and passes no further sentence.

Words to trace: known, beginning, better, Christ, commandment, delivered

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 2 Peter 2:20

    “Pollutions” is miasmata, defilements, the source of the English “miasma”, used only here. “Entangled” is emploko, to weave in, the verb Paul uses of the soldier who “entangleth himself with the affairs of this life” (2 Timothy 2:4). “Overcome” picks up the defeat of verse 19.

  2. 2 Peter 2:21

    “Better… than” is the form of Jesus’ saying about his betrayer: “good were it for that man if he had never been born” (Mark 14:21). “Delivered” is paradidomi, handed down as a trust, the verb of Jude 3, “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints”. “Turn” is hypostrepho, to turn back.

  3. 2 Peter 2:22

    Proverbs 26:11 in full reads “As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly”; the unquoted half names the fool. The sow saying is found in the ancient tale of Ahikar, where a son is compared to a pig that went to the baths and then rolled in the first muddy ditch it saw. “Was washed” is middle voice: she bathed herself.

2 Peter 2:20-22

King James Version

20For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the audience, problem, argument, command, and pastoral purpose.
  2. Follow connecting words so that one sentence remains inside the author’s reasoning.
  3. Distinguish a universal theological claim from an instruction shaped by a particular situation.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 2 Peter 2?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of 2 Peter 2 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: False teachers exploiting a congregation, with remembered judgments from Noah, Lot, and Balaam used as warnings?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

No exact media match is cataloged for this passage yet. New material can be connected when it becomes available.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006