New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Prohibitions Have Stated Consequences

Leviticus 20

The big picture

Leviticus 20 returns to several prohibitions from earlier chapters but changes the emphasis by naming consequences. The chapter distinguishes death penalties, being cut off, childlessness, bearing iniquity, and divine judgment rather than turning every forbidden act into one legal formula. Molech worship receives both communal punishment and the LORD's declared opposition, and the people themselves become accountable if they deliberately hide their eyes from the offense. Sexual prohibitions likewise receive specific sanctions, often naming both participants where the law assigns liability to both. The final movement reconnects those penalties to the land, to Israel's separation from surrounding peoples, and to the distinctions between clean and unclean. The chapter's closing verse then treats practitioners of spirit consultation separately from those who seek them. The result is severe but precise: Leviticus is not merely repeating that certain conduct is wrong. It is showing that different acts carry different stated consequences within Israel's covenantal law.

In this chapter

Leviticus 20: The Prohibitions Have Stated Consequences
Chapter sceneLeviticus 20

Scripture beside the summary

Leviticus · King James Version · 27

Leviticus 20:1-8

Looking Away Does Not Make the Offense Disappear

Molech worship is not presented as an offense that disappears when the community refuses to look at it. Leviticus assigns a public penalty to the person who gives offspring to Molech and also declares that the LORD will set his face against the offender because the act defiles the sanctuary and profanes the holy name. Then the law anticipates deliberate concealment. If the people "hide their eyes," their failure to act does not erase what has happened or transfer all responsibility back to the original offender. The threatened judgment widens to the family and to others who follow the same worship. Consultation with familiar spirits is placed under the same language of unfaithfulness, and the call to holiness follows. The section therefore holds two forms of responsibility together: Israel is to sanctify itself through keeping the statutes, yet the LORD also says, "I am the LORD which sanctify you." Neither claim cancels the other.

Leviticus 20:1-8: Looking Away Does Not Make the Offense Disappear
Chapter sceneLeviticus 20

Deep dive

The law names the people of the land as those who execute the penalty for giving offspring to Molech. The LORD also declares that he will set his face against the offender because the act defiles his sanctuary and profanes his holy name. The violation is not confined to the location where the action physically occurs. It affects Israel’s relation to the divine presence among them.

Verses 4–5 then address the possibility that the community will deliberately hide its eyes. Failure to act is not treated as proof that nothing happened. The threatened judgment reaches the offender’s household and those who follow the same worship. The paragraph makes concealment part of the problem rather than leaving responsibility solely with the original individual.

Consulting familiar spirits is likewise described through the language of unfaithfulness. The call to sanctify themselves and keep the statutes follows, joined to the LORD’s declaration that he sanctifies Israel. The people’s conduct and the LORD’s separating action are both present; neither is used to make the other unnecessary.

Words to trace: people, Molech, face, Israel, LORD, seed

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Leviticus 20:1

    Much of this chapter restates chapter 18, but in a different grammar. There the laws were mostly commands, thou shalt not; here they are mostly cases with sentences attached, if a man, then this penalty. The two chapters read best side by side.

  2. Leviticus 20:2

    Again points back to 18:21, where Molech was first forbidden. The people of the land, ‘am ha’arets, means the whole citizen body acting together. By the time of John 7:49 the same phrase had become a term of contempt for the unlearned crowd.

  3. Leviticus 20:3

    Why would giving a child to Molech defile the sanctuary? Ezekiel 23:39 answers: when they had slain their children to their idols, then they came the same day into my sanctuary. The worshipper carried the one act straight into the other.

  4. Leviticus 20:4

    Hide their eyes is doubled in Hebrew, ha‘lem ya‘limu, if hiding they hide. The verb ‘alam was used in 5:2–4 of sin that is hidden from a person, done without knowing. Here the hiding is deliberate: the people know, and look away.

  5. Leviticus 20:5

    His family is mishpachto, his clan, the wider kin group. Whoredom with Molech pictures the god as a lover and the worshipper as unfaithful; all who follow the man into it are counted in the same breach of covenant.

  6. Leviticus 20:6

    Turning to mediums brings the LORD’s own cutting off, without a human penalty named. 1 Chronicles 10:13 says that Saul died for his transgression, including asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, the act of 1 Samuel 28.

  7. Leviticus 20:7

    Sanctify yourselves is hitqaddishtem, the reflexive form first used in 11:44. Israel acts upon itself, setting itself apart. The command sits between the prohibitions on Molech and mediums and the list of penalties that follows.

  8. Leviticus 20:8

    I am the LORD which sanctify you is meqaddishkhem, a title that recurs in 21:8, 22:9, 22:16 and 22:32, and that Exodus 31:13 attaches to the sabbath. Israel sanctifies itself in verse 7, and in the next breath God says he is the one who sanctifies.

Leviticus 20:1-8

King James Version

1And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

2Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.

3And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.

4And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not:

5Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.

6And the soul that turneth after such as have familiar spirits, and after wizards, to go a whoring after them, I will even set my face against that soul, and will cut him off from among his people.

7Sanctify yourselves therefore, and be ye holy: for I am the LORD your God.

8And ye shall keep my statutes, and do them: I am the LORD which sanctify you.

Leviticus 20:9-16

The Penalties Name Both Participants in Several Unions

This paragraph states capital sanctions with a bluntness that should not be softened into symbolism. Cursing father or mother, adultery, several prohibited family unions, male same-sex intercourse, and sexual acts with animals are each assigned death in the legal wording. In a number of cases, both participants are named, and the repeated formula "their blood shall be upon them" places responsibility for the stated penalty within the law's own framework. The union involving a woman and her mother receives a distinct burning sanction, showing again that proximity does not make every consequence identical. The section is legal instruction, not a report of specific prosecutions. It supplies no trial transcript, no evidence hearing, and no biographies of the people imagined by the statutes. That limitation matters. The severity of the law can remain fully visible without inventing personal motives, consent questions, courtroom procedures, or actual cases that Leviticus does not describe.

Leviticus 20:9-16: The Penalties Name Both Participants in Several Unions
Chapter sceneLeviticus 20

Deep dive

The paragraph’s repeated formula is death, often accompanied by the declaration that the blood of those condemned is upon them. Within the chapter’s legal framework, that language assigns responsibility for the stated penalty. It should not be replaced with an account of purely symbolic consequences when the text is plainly prescribing death.

Adultery names both the man and the woman. The father’s wife, daughter-in-law, and male same-sex intercourse cases also name both parties, while the union involving a woman and her mother receives a distinct burning sanction. These are specified cases rather than a single vague prohibition on conduct regarded as improper. The animal cases likewise identify the person’s offense and prescribe the animal’s death without explaining every rationale for that additional requirement.

The section is legal instruction, not an account of particular prosecutions already carried out. It does not supply the evidence, deliberation, or personal circumstances of an individual case. Preserving that distinction allows the severity of the stated sanctions to remain visible without inventing either a trial or motives and experiences for people who are not individually described here.

Words to trace: death, surely, blood, beast, both, wife

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Leviticus 20:9

    Curseth is qillel, from qalal, to be light, so to curse is to treat as trivial. It is the exact opposite of kabbed, honour, from kaved, to be heavy. His blood shall be upon him means his death is his own doing, the formula of Joshua 2:19 and 2 Samuel 1:16.

  2. Leviticus 20:10

    The Hebrew repeats the adulterer clause, with another man’s wife, then with his neighbour’s wife, perhaps for emphasis, perhaps a scribal doubling. Both die. When scribes brought a woman to Jesus saying Moses commanded stoning (John 8:5), this verse named no method; Deuteronomy 22:24 did, for the betrothed.

  3. Leviticus 20:11

    Lying with a father’s wife was also a political act. Absalom went in to his father’s concubines on the palace roof in the sight of all Israel (2 Samuel 16:22) to show he had taken David’s place. The law names it simply as uncovering the father’s nakedness.

  4. Leviticus 20:12

    Confusion is tevel, the word used in 18:23 for sex with an animal, a mixing of what must stay apart. Here it is applied to a man and his daughter-in-law, treating the union as a confounding of the household’s lines.

  5. Leviticus 20:13

    Where 18:22 addressed the reader directly, thou shalt not lie, this verse states the case in the third person, if a man, and adds that both participants bear the sentence. The prohibition becomes case law in the same way as the other unions in this list.

  6. Leviticus 20:14

    Burning is the penalty elsewhere only for a priest’s daughter who turns to prostitution (21:9), and Judah ordered it for Tamar before he knew the truth (Genesis 38:24). Wickedness is zimmah, the word 18:17 attached to the same relation.

  7. Leviticus 20:15

    The animal is killed too, though it is guilty of nothing. The goring ox of Exodus 21:28 is also put to death. The Mishnah (Sanhedrin 7:4) explains that the beast is killed so that it would not be pointed to as the animal through which the offence took place.

  8. Leviticus 20:16

    Approach is qarav, the verb normally used for drawing near to the altar with an offering. Thou shalt kill shifts into the second person, addressing the community that carries out the sentence directly.

Leviticus 20:9-16

King James Version

9For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.

10And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

11And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

12And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them.

13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

14And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.

15And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.

16And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Leviticus 20:17-21

Not Every Sanction Is Worded as Execution

After a sequence dominated by death penalties, Leviticus changes vocabulary, and the change matters. A brother-sister union and intercourse during menstrual uncleanness are associated with being "cut off," while other prohibited family relations are described through bearing iniquity or childlessness. The section does not define one hidden punishment behind all these phrases, and it gives no human enforcement procedure for the childlessness declarations. That makes them different in form from explicit commands to stone or kill elsewhere in the chapter. Household continuity is part of the stakes, because several sanctions are expressed through the loss of descendants rather than immediate execution. The passage therefore resists a flattened summary such as "all sexual violations receive death." They do not. Leviticus preserves distinct formulas for distinct cases, and careful reading must preserve that legal texture even when the exact mechanism of a phrase like "cut off" is not explained within these verses.

Leviticus 20:17-21: Not Every Sanction Is Worded as Execution
Chapter sceneLeviticus 20

Deep dive

The wording changes after the preceding series of death penalties. A brother-sister union is associated with being cut off in the sight of the people; intercourse during menstrual uncleanness is also followed by being cut off. Other family relationships are described through bearing iniquity and the loss of descendants. The change in formula should not be flattened into one punishment merely because all the acts are prohibited.

The exact means of being "cut off" is not defined in this paragraph, and the childlessness declarations do not provide a procedure for officials to carry out. Those limits matter beside the explicit directions for stoning elsewhere. Leviticus can state divine consequences without giving a matching human enforcement mechanism for every one. The chapter’s concern with offspring also fits its larger attention to household boundaries and the continuity of Israel’s families. A forbidden union is not described only as a private event; its stated consequences can reach the continuation of the household itself.

Words to trace: nakedness, uncovered, bear, sister, brother’s, childless

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Leviticus 20:17

    Wicked thing is chesed, a word that almost everywhere else means steadfast love. Here it is a rare homonym meaning disgrace, as in Proverbs 14:34, sin is a reproach to any people. See her nakedness, and she see his, is the only mutual phrasing in the list.

  2. Leviticus 20:18

    Discovered in 1611 English means uncovered. Her fountain is maqor, the word for the source of the mother’s blood in 12:7. The law of 15:24 treated the same act as seven days of uncleanness; here it is a matter of being cut off, since here it is done knowingly.

  3. Leviticus 20:19

    A command, thou shalt not uncover, slips into the middle of the case law, repeating 18:12–13 in its original form. They shall bear their iniquity gives no human penalty; the consequence is left in God’s hands.

  4. Leviticus 20:20

    Childless is ‘ariri, stripped or bare, the word Abraham used when he complained, seeing I go childless (Genesis 15:2). Jeremiah 22:30 uses it of King Coniah: write ye this man childless. A household that ends with no heir is the sentence.

  5. Leviticus 20:21

    An unclean thing is niddah, the word for menstrual impurity, now used of a forbidden union. The exception is the levirate duty of Deuteronomy 25:5, which is why the Sadducees could pose their riddle of one wife and seven brothers (Mark 12:19–23).

Leviticus 20:17-21

King James Version

17And if a man shall take his sister, his father’s daughter, or his mother’s daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister’s nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.

18And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness; he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood: and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

19And thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister, nor of thy father’s sister: for he uncovereth his near kin: they shall bear their iniquity.

20And if a man shall lie with his uncle’s wife, he hath uncovered his uncle’s nakedness: they shall bear their sin; they shall die childless.

21And if a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing: he hath uncovered his brother’s nakedness; they shall be childless.

Leviticus 20:22-27

Separation Is Given a Practical Shape

The closing section ties conduct to Israel's continued life in the land. The same image from chapter 18 returns: the land can reject its inhabitants, so receiving Canaan is not a guarantee that Israel may then live without regard to the statutes. Separation from other peoples is given a practical shape through worship, behavior, and even food distinctions between clean and unclean animals. "Ye shall be holy unto me" is therefore not separation for separation's sake. The stated purpose is belonging to the LORD. The final verse sharpens one more distinction. Earlier, the chapter condemned the person who turns to familiar spirits and wizards for guidance. Here it addresses the male or female practitioner and assigns stoning. Seeking and supplying prohibited spiritual consultation both come under the law, but not in the same wording. The chapter ends as it has proceeded throughout: by making both the offense and its stated consequence as specific as the text allows.

Leviticus 20:22-27: Separation Is Given a Practical Shape
Chapter sceneLeviticus 20

Deep dive

The land’s threatened rejection returns from chapter 18. Israel must not adopt the customs attributed to the people being displaced, and the gift of a land flowing with milk and honey does not cancel that warning. The LORD has separated Israel from other peoples, and the distinctions concerning animals and food are included within that separation.

Verse 26 states the purpose as belonging to the LORD. The chapter is not presenting separation as an empty condition in which difference alone is sufficient. It has named conduct, worship, and boundaries that give that belonging a defined form.

The final prohibition concerns a man or woman who has a familiar spirit or is a wizard. This differs in focus from verse 6’s person who seeks such guidance: the closing line addresses the practitioner and specifies stoning by the community. Placing the two passages beside one another reveals the chapter’s attention to participation from more than one position. Both seeking prohibited guidance and supplying it come under the law, but the wording and stated sanctions must still be read separately.

Words to trace: land, unclean, clean, holy, LORD, people

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Leviticus 20:22

    The warning of 18:28 returns almost word for word. Whither I bring you to dwell therein pictures the land as a house Israel is being brought to live in, and a house can refuse to keep its tenants.

  2. Leviticus 20:23

    Abhorred is quts, to feel loathing or nausea. Numbers 21:5 uses it when Israel says our soul loatheth this light bread. The image of the land vomiting in verse 22 continues: God himself is sickened by what the nation did.

  3. Leviticus 20:24

    A land that floweth with milk and honey appears only here in Leviticus, the phrase first promised at the burning bush (Exodus 3:8). Separated is hivdil, the verb of dividing, and it runs through the next three verses like a thread.

  4. Leviticus 20:25

    Put difference is hivdaltem, the same verb as separated in verse 24. Because God has separated Israel from the peoples, Israel separates clean from unclean. The food laws of chapter 11 are recalled as the everyday form of the people’s own distinctness.

  5. Leviticus 20:26

    Severed is hivdil a third time. That ye should be mine, lihyoth li, echoes Exodus 19:5, a peculiar treasure unto me above all people. Holiness here is framed as belonging, the possessive at the end of the sentence.

  6. Leviticus 20:27

    The Hebrew says a man or woman in whom is an ’ov, as if the spirit lives in the practitioner. Isaiah 8:19 mocks wizards that peep, and that mutter, perhaps the thin whispering voice mediums used. The chapter ends with its heaviest penalty, stoning, and with its blood formula.

Leviticus 20:22-27

King James Version

22Ye shall therefore keep all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: that the land, whither I bring you to dwell therein, spue you not out.

23And ye shall not walk in the manners of the nation, which I cast out before you: for they committed all these things, and therefore I abhorred them.

24But I have said unto you, Ye shall inherit their land, and I will give it unto you to possess it, a land that floweth with milk and honey: I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people.

25Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean.

26And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine.

27A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the people addressed and the covenant setting.
  2. Distinguish rescue, worship, holiness, justice, and community responsibility.
  3. Read commands in their literary and covenant context before making a modern application.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Leviticus 20?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Leviticus 20 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Leviticus 20:1–27 completes a passage that was not covered by the original study-unit map. Its own wording and immediate context supply the focus.?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006