New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Defense Becomes an Appeal to Everyone in the Room

Acts 26

The big picture

The Book of Acts, chapter 26, turns Paul's defense into a public account of reversal, commission, and resurrection hope. Speaking before Agrippa, he begins with Israel's promise and his own strict Pharisaic past, then describes the violence he once directed against Jesus' followers. The Damascus encounter explains the change in authority: the man traveling to suppress the movement is sent by Jesus to become a witness and to carry light to both Israel and the Gentiles. Paul presents his later preaching as obedience to that vision and as fulfillment of Moses and the prophets. Festus calls him mad, Agrippa answers his appeal ambiguously, and Paul states that he wants everyone listening to share his faith but not his bonds. The officials finally agree on his innocence without agreeing to his message.

In this chapter

Acts 26: The Defense Becomes an Appeal to Everyone in the Room
Chapter sceneActs 26

Scripture beside the summary

Acts · King James Version · 32

Acts 26:1-8

Israel’s Hope Is the Subject of the Defense

Paul accepts Agrippa's permission to speak by identifying the king's familiarity with Jewish customs and disputed questions, not by offering a sweeping tribute to his rule. That expertise matters because the defense is about continuity with Israel's hope. The Book of Acts has Paul reach back to a publicly known youth and strict Pharisaic life before naming the promise made to the fathers as the reason he now stands judged. The twelve tribes serve God in hope of reaching that promise, and Paul places resurrection inside that expectation rather than presenting it as a detached foreign idea. His question, "Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?" directs attention away from whether resurrection is ordinary and toward the identity of the God who made the promise. The defense will not make the claim easier by shrinking it. It asks whether the God already confessed within Israel's hope is capable of the act Paul says has occurred in Jesus.

Acts 26:1-8: Israel’s Hope Is the Subject of the Defense
Chapter sceneActs 26

Deep dive

The permission to speak gives Paul an audience already framed by Festus's uncertainty. Paul does not begin by praising every aspect of Agrippa's rule. He names the king's familiarity with the customs and disputed questions relevant to the defense, asking for a patient hearing on that basis.

His Pharisaic past is presented as a publicly known manner of life. The witnesses could testify to its strictness, so the argument again resists the assumption that his Gentile mission arose from lifelong disregard for Israel's religion.

Paul then places the charge within the hope of the fathers and the twelve tribes' service of God. The crucial issue is not whether he has become interested in an unrelated foreign deity, but what God's promise means when applied to the resurrection of the dead. His challenge concerning its supposed incredibility directs the discussion to God's power. The defense will not make resurrection plausible by lowering it to something ordinary; it will explain why the God of the promise is the one to whom the claim belongs.

Words to trace: Jews, Agrippa, accused, hope, king, know

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:1

    Agrippa, not Festus, grants leave to speak, a courtesy the governor extends to his royal guest. The outstretched hand was the orator’s classic opening gesture, and in verse 29 Paul will mention the chain that went with it.

  2. Acts 26:2

    “Happy” is makarios, fortunate, the word of the Beatitudes. A speaker customarily congratulated himself on his judge, but Paul gives a real reason in the next verse rather than flattery.

  3. Acts 26:3

    “Expert” is gnostes, a connoisseur. Agrippa had charge of the high priest’s vestments and the right to appoint high priests, so he knew temple custom from the inside. “Patiently” is makrothymos: Paul is asking for a long hearing, and this is his longest defence.

  4. Acts 26:4

    “Manner of life” is biosis, a rare word for a person’s way of living. “At the first” means from the very beginning. Paul’s youth in Jerusalem is offered as public knowledge, something every Jew there could check.

  5. Acts 26:5

    “Most straitest” is a double superlative, since the Greek is already the superlative of strict. “Religion” is threskeia, religious practice and worship as others see it. “If they would testify” implies they could and will not.

  6. Acts 26:6

    “The promise made of God unto our fathers” is the phrase Paul used in the synagogue at Pisidian Antioch (13:32). The charge sheet says sedition and temple profanation; Paul says the real charge is hope.

  7. Acts 26:7

    “Our twelve tribes” is a single Greek word, dodekaphylon. Paul speaks of Israel as twelve tribes still, as James does (James 1:1). “Instantly” means earnestly, “day and night” as the prophetess Anna served in the temple (Luke 2:37). The irony is plain: accused by Jews for Israel’s own hope.

  8. Acts 26:8

    “You” is plural, so the question takes in the whole hall, Gentiles included. To most educated Romans a bodily resurrection was absurd, as the Athenians showed by mocking in 17:32. “Incredible” is apiston, not to be believed.

Acts 26:1-8

King James Version

1Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Thou art permitted to speak for thyself. Then Paul stretched forth the hand, and answered for himself:

2I think myself happy, king Agrippa, because I shall answer for myself this day before thee touching all the things whereof I am accused of the Jews:

3Especially because I know thee to be expert in all customs and questions which are among the Jews: wherefore I beseech thee to hear me patiently.

4My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Jews;

5Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.

6And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers:

7Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews.

8Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?

Acts 26:9-11

Conviction Once Gave the Violence Its Momentum

Paul's former violence began with conviction. He thought he ought to do many things against the name of Jesus of Nazareth, and the Book of Acts refuses to soften what that conviction produced. Saints were imprisoned under authority from the chief priests, Paul gave his voice against people put to death, punishment reached through the synagogues, and he tried to compel blasphemy. His hostility even crossed city boundaries. The phrase about voting or giving his voice against the condemned expresses responsibility for their deaths without proving every institutional office later readers have sometimes inferred from it. Paul's own description of his rage as exceedingly mad gives the passage an edge because Festus will soon call Paul's present testimony madness. The Book of Acts lets those two uses sit near one another. The deeper reversal is not from passion to calm or inactivity to action. It is from zeal used to destroy Jesus' people to a commission that now requires Paul to witness in Jesus' name.

Deep dive

Paul begins this admission with what he had thought he ought to do. The account does not soften persecution into a well-meaning misunderstanding with no victims. His conviction produced concrete actions against the saints, supported by authority from the chief priests.

The phrase about giving his voice against those put to death expresses his approval of their condemnation. It has sometimes been used to infer formal membership in the ruling council, but this statement alone does not establish that office. Acts gives the responsibility plainly without supplying a complete institutional biography.

Punishment in synagogues, coercion toward blasphemy, and pursuit into other cities show the widening reach of his hostility. Paul himself describes the intensity as excessive madness. Later, Festus will call his present testimony madness, creating a pointed contrast between the violence Paul now condemns and the witness the governor dismisses. The change is not from an inactive life to an active one; it is a change in the authority obeyed and the end toward which that energy is directed.

Words to trace: authority, blaspheme, chief, cities, compelled, contrary

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:9

    “I” is emphatic in Greek: I myself once thought so too. “The name of Jesus of Nazareth” was precisely what the council forbade the apostles to speak in (4:17–18), and Saul had set himself against the same name.

  2. Acts 26:10

    “Saints” is hagioi, the word Paul uses in his letters for believers, spoken here before a king. “Gave my voice” is literally “cast my pebble”; votes were cast with stones, and a dark pebble condemned.

  3. Acts 26:11

    The tense of “compelled” suggests effort rather than success: I tried to force them to blaspheme. “Exceedingly mad” is emmainomenos, raging. “Strange cities” means foreign ones, beyond Judaea, and Damascus was the first on the list.

Acts 26:9-11

King James Version

9I verily thought with myself, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth.

10Which thing I also did in Jerusalem: and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them.

11And I punished them oft in every synagogue, and compelled them to blaspheme; and being exceedingly mad against them, I persecuted them even unto strange cities.

Acts 26:12-18

The Man Overtaken by Light Is Sent to Open Eyes

The journey to Damascus begins under authority from the chief priests and is interrupted by an authority Paul did not seek. A light brighter than the midday sun surrounds the travelers, all fall to the earth, and Jesus identifies himself as the one Paul is persecuting. The Book of Acts makes that identification personal: violence against Jesus' followers is addressed by the risen Jesus as violence against him. The image of kicking against the pricks describes resistance that wounds the resisting animal, but it does not provide permission to invent an unrecorded period of private doubts before the encounter. Paul is told to stand and is given a new role as minister and witness. The commission then carries the imagery of his own experience outward: opening eyes, turning people from darkness to light, and moving them from Satan's power to God. The intended end is forgiveness and inheritance among those sanctified by faith in Jesus, not admiration for Paul's unusual experience on the road.

The man overtaken by light is sent to open eyes
Chapter sceneActs 26

Deep dive

The journey begins under the chief priests' authority, but the voice from heaven establishes a different commission. The light exceeds the midday sun, and the whole traveling company falls. Jesus identifies himself with the people Paul persecutes, making the supposed defense of God's cause an assault upon the risen Lord.

The KJV's "pricks" are the pointed goads used to direct animals. The image describes resistance that injures the one resisting. It does not by itself establish a hidden period of private conviction before Damascus or justify inventing thoughts Paul never reports.

The charge to stand leads directly to service and witness. In this telling, the commission is concentrated in Jesus' address; chapter 22 also gives Ananias a role in explaining the calling. The accounts emphasize different parts of the same claimed reversal rather than providing identical transcripts. Opening eyes and turning people from darkness to light echo Paul's own encounter with overwhelming light and restored sight. The intended result is not admiration for an extraordinary experience, but forgiveness and an inheritance among people sanctified by faith in Jesus.

Words to trace: light, persecutest, Saul, appear, appeared, authority

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:12

    “Commission” is epitrope, a delegated mandate; the man who held one was an epitropos, the Greek title of a Roman procurator. Paul rode out as the chief priests’ agent with full powers.

  2. Acts 26:13

    “O king” breaks in at the decisive moment. “Above the brightness of the sun” appears only in this telling. Paul also makes a point of the light surrounding his companions, so that the event was not a private illness.

  3. Acts 26:14

    Only this account says the voice spoke “in the Hebrew tongue”, and only this one adds the saying about the pricks. A prick was an ox goad, and the proverb is Greek, found in Euripides’ Bacchae and in Aeschylus; Jesus speaks a Greek saying to Saul in his own tongue.

  4. Acts 26:15

    The exchange is the one part of the event that never varies across the three tellings in chapters 9, 22 and 26. Whatever else is shortened or expanded, the question and the name stay the same.

  5. Acts 26:16

    “Rise, and stand upon thy feet” echoes the call of Ezekiel, who fell on his face and heard “stand upon thy feet, and I will speak unto thee” (Ezekiel 2:1). “Minister” is hyperetes, an attendant, the word Luke uses for the “ministers of the word” (Luke 1:2).

  6. Acts 26:17

    “Delivering” can also mean choosing out; both senses fit Paul’s life. “The people” is laos, Israel, set beside the Gentiles, and “I send thee” is apostello, the verb of an apostle.

  7. Acts 26:18

    Opening eyes and bringing out of darkness are the tasks of the Servant in Isaiah 42:7 and 42:16. The man who was blinded is sent to make others see. “Inheritance among them which are sanctified” repeats Paul’s words to the Ephesian elders (20:32).

Acts 26:12-18

King James Version

12Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests,

13At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.

14And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.

15And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.

16But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;

17Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,

18To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

Acts 26:19-23

The Vision Issues in Public Speech and Changed Conduct

Paul's answer to the heavenly vision is described through geography and public conduct. Damascus, Jerusalem, Judaea, and the Gentiles receive preaching about repentance, turning to God, and works appropriate to repentance. The Book of Acts therefore does not leave the vision as a private experience that can be admired without consequence. It becomes a course of speech and changed allegiance visible across places and audiences. Paul says this mission is why opponents seized him in the temple and tried to kill him, yet he continues because he has obtained help from God. That help has carried his witness to "small and great," a phrase made concrete by the present room of rulers and officials. The content he claims has not changed for rank. Christ's suffering, resurrection, and light to both the people and the Gentiles are presented as what Moses and the prophets said would come. Continuity with Scripture is joined to the claim that something decisive has happened in Jesus.

The vision issues in public speech and changed conduct
Chapter sceneActs 26
Paul’s journeys
Paul’s journeys

Deep dive

The response to the vision is traced through places and audiences: Damascus, Jerusalem, Judaea, and the Gentiles. Paul presents the mission as a course of obedience, not a private possession he could retain without speaking. The announcement includes repentance, turning to God, and conduct appropriate to that turning. The works are described as fitting repentance, rather than as a denial that repentance changes anything visible.

God's help explains Paul's continued witness to small and great. The phrase fits this hearing exactly: the man who has spoken in households and marketplaces now addresses rulers, but does not announce that they require a different gospel because of their rank.

The summary returns to the Christ's suffering, resurrection, and light for both Israel and the Gentiles. Jesus' primacy in resurrection is not merely the earliest restoration of a dead person to ordinary life; Paul's fuller explanation in 1 Corinthians 15:20–23 presents him as the firstfruits of the resurrection still to come. The claim of continuity with Moses and the prophets therefore concerns their promised fulfillment, not a denial that something decisive has happened in Jesus.

Words to trace: first, Gentiles, Agrippa, both, caught, causes

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:19

    “Not disobedient” is understatement for complete obedience. “Vision” is optasia, the word Luke uses for what Zechariah saw in the temple (Luke 1:22) and for the angels seen at the tomb (Luke 24:23).

  2. Acts 26:20

    Damascus, Jerusalem, Judaea, then the Gentiles: the order follows the commission of 1:8 outward. “Works meet for repentance” echoes John the Baptist’s “fruits worthy of repentance” (Luke 3:8), so Paul’s preaching carries the same moral demand.

  3. Acts 26:21

    “For these causes” points to the preaching to Gentiles just described. Paul boils the temple riot of chapter 21 down to its root; the Trophimus rumour is not even mentioned.

  4. Acts 26:22

    “Help” is epikouria, a military word for allied reinforcements. Paul was rescued by Roman soldiers more than once, yet he names the ally as God. “Small and great” takes in the slave and the king in the front row.

  5. Acts 26:23

    Each “should” renders a Greek “whether”, as though Paul lists the questions argued in synagogues: whether Messiah must suffer, whether he would be first to rise. “Light unto the people, and to the Gentiles” echoes Isaiah 49:6 and Simeon’s song over the infant Jesus (Luke 2:32).

Acts 26:19-23

King James Version

19Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:

20But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judæa, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.

21For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me.

22Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:

23That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.

Acts 26:24-29

Paul Wants Their Freedom, Not Their Chains

Festus interrupts loudly and calls Paul mad, blaming much learning, but Paul answers in the vocabulary of truth and soberness. The Book of Acts does not portray faith as requiring the abandonment of rational speech. Paul appeals to the public character of the events and to Agrippa's familiarity with them, then turns the hearing directly toward the king by asking whether he believes the prophets. Agrippa's famous KJV reply, "Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian," is less transparent in Greek than the English wording can sound. It may indicate being moved by a little persuasion or may be evasive or ironic. The Book of Acts does not reveal Agrippa's inner state or report a conversion, so the line cannot securely become a portrait of a king nearly believing. Paul's own purpose, however, is unmistakable. He wants Agrippa and everyone listening to become as he is in relation to Jesus, with one explicit exception: he does not wish his bonds upon them.

Paul wants their freedom, not their chains
Chapter sceneActs 26

Deep dive

Festus raises his voice, but Paul answers with the language of truth and sober judgment. He appeals to Agrippa's knowledge and to the public character of the events. His defense does not ask the room to accept a message on the ground that rational examination is forbidden.

Agrippa's reply is less transparent than the familiar KJV "Almost" can suggest. The Greek expression en oligo can concern a little time or a small amount of persuasion. Some hear a serious admission that Paul has moved him; others hear an ironic or evasive response to the prospect of becoming a Christian so readily. Acts does not describe his inner state or record a conversion, so the exchange cannot securely be turned into a portrait of a king trembling on the brink of belief.

Paul's answer removes any uncertainty about his own purpose. His desire reaches Agrippa and everyone else listening, with the explicit exception of his bonds. He wishes them to share his relation to Jesus, not the injuries or restraints attached to this hearing. The exception brings the prisoner's physical condition back into view just as his speech has enlarged its audience beyond the king.

Words to trace: Paul, Agrippa, believest, Festus, king, altogether

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:24

    “Much learning” is literally “many letters”, perhaps Paul’s appeals to written prophets, perhaps his evident education. “Beside thyself” is mainomai, to rave. A Roman official hears resurrection and assumes a scholar has read himself into lunacy.

  2. Acts 26:25

    “Soberness” is sophrosyne, sound-mindedness, one of the cardinal virtues of Greek moral philosophy and the exact opposite of mania. “Speak forth” is apophthengomai, the verb used at Pentecost for the Spirit giving utterance (2:4).

  3. Acts 26:26

    “Not done in a corner” was a stock phrase used against philosophers who hid from public life; Plato has a critic sneer at men who whisper in a corner with three or four boys. The death and resurrection of Jesus happened in public, and Agrippa’s own family was involved.

  4. Acts 26:27

    Paul answers his own question before the king can. The trap is neat: a yes invites the prophets’ testimony about Jesus, and a no would ruin Agrippa’s standing with his Jewish subjects.

  5. Acts 26:28

    The Greek en oligo can mean “in a little time” or “with little effort”: so quickly you think to make me a Christian? “Christian” appears only three times in the New Testament (11:26; 1 Peter 4:16), always as a name outsiders used.

  6. Acts 26:29

    Paul turns the king’s phrase: “both almost, and altogether” is en oligo kai en megalo, in little and in much, whether it takes a short time or a long one. “I would to God” is a verb of prayer. The chain on his raised hand provides the final exception.

Acts 26:24-29

King James Version

24And as he thus spake for himself, Festus said with a loud voice, Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad.

25But he said, I am not mad, most noble Festus; but speak forth the words of truth and soberness.

26For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner.

27King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest.

28Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.

29And Paul said, I would to God, that not only thou, but also all that hear me this day, were both almost, and altogether such as I am, except these bonds.

Acts 26:30-32

They Agree About His Innocence, Not His Message

When Agrippa rises, the hearing ends and the officials withdraw to discuss the prisoner. Their conclusion is one of the clearest legal judgments in the Book of Acts: Paul is doing nothing worthy of death or bonds. That assessment joins earlier statements by Lysias and Festus and makes the continued confinement more striking rather than less. Agrippa adds that Paul could have been set at liberty if he had not appealed to Caesar. The Book of Acts does not turn that sentence into an explicit condemnation of the appeal as foolish or faithless. The preceding chapters have shown a dangerous proposal to move Paul back toward Jerusalem, and the Lord had already told him that he would testify in Rome. The officials agree about the weakness of the criminal case, but the book carefully stops short of saying they agree with Paul's resurrection testimony. Innocence and belief are different conclusions. Paul leaves the hearing still a prisoner, with the route to Caesar still open before him.

They agree about his innocence, not his message
Chapter sceneActs 26

Deep dive

The king's rising ends the hearing. The private discussion afterward concerns the absence of an offense deserving death or bonds, adding another explicit judgment to the sequence already given by Lysias and Festus. The repeated assessment does not produce the release that might be expected from it.

Agrippa says Paul could have been set free had he not appealed to Caesar. The remark should not be made into an explicit judgment by Acts that the appeal was a foolish failure of faith. The preceding chapter has shown the dangerous proposed transfer Paul resisted, and chapter 23 has already attached Rome to the Lord's promise.

The officials have recognized the weakness of the criminal case, but Acts does not say they have accepted the resurrection testimony. Those are different conclusions. The chapter closes with a prisoner whose defense has been heard and whose onward journey remains in place, ready for the maritime account that will carry the promise of Rome through a different kind of danger.

Words to trace: Agrippa, appealed, aside, Bernice, bonds, death

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Acts 26:30

    Royal protocol ended a hearing when the king stood. The list of those rising runs in rank order: king, governor, Bernice, then the rest.

  2. Acts 26:31

    “Doeth nothing” is in the present tense: the officials judge the man’s ongoing conduct, not only a single past act. The verdict is spoken in private, among themselves, where it costs nothing.

  3. Acts 26:32

    Once an appeal was lodged, the case belonged to the emperor. For a governor to release the prisoner then would have slighted Caesar’s jurisdiction, so Festus is bound by an appeal that his own proposal of a Jerusalem trial had provoked (25:9–11).

Acts 26:30-32

King James Version

30And when he had thus spoken, the king rose up, and the governor, and Bernice, and they that sat with them:

31And when they were gone aside, they talked between themselves, saying, This man doeth nothing worthy of death or of bonds.

32Then said Agrippa unto Festus, This man might have been set at liberty, if he had not appealed unto Cæsar.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
  2. Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
  3. Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Acts 26?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Acts 26 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Acts 26 develops its own movement around Agrippa, king, Jews, Paul, both?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006