The big picture
A man of God confronts Jeroboam’s altar with a prophecy naming Josiah and an immediate sign that authenticates the distant warning. Jeroboam’s attempt to seize him ends with a useless hand and a broken altar, and the king must ask the very messenger he threatened to pray for his restoration. The man of God then refuses royal food and reward because his commission forbids eating, drinking, or returning by the same route. He keeps that command until an older prophet claims an angel has revised it. The Book of 1 Kings calls the claim a lie. Yet at the meal, a genuine word of judgment does come through the same older prophet, and the deceived messenger dies by a lion for disobeying the command he originally received. The old prophet retrieves and buries him, asks eventually to share his grave, and insists that the prophecy against Bethel will still come true. The chapter closes with the most consequential refusal to return: despite signs, mercy, warning, and death, Jeroboam does not turn from his high-place system.
In this chapter
- The Altar Breaks, and the Reaching Hand Fails 1 Kings 13:1-6
The man of God does not begin by debating Jeroboam.
- The Messenger Refuses the Royal Table 1 Kings 13:7-10
Jeroboam changes tactics from force to hospitality.
- A Claim of Revelation That the Book Calls a Lie 1 Kings 13:11-19
The old prophet reaches the man of God through perfectly ordinary information.
- The Liar Now Speaks an Actual Judgment 1 Kings 13:20-25
At the table, the same old prophet who lied now receives an actual word from the LORD.
- The Grave Preserves a Future Witness 1 Kings 13:26-32
The old prophet recognizes the report immediately and interprets the death as the announced consequence of disobedience.
- Everything Happens, and Jeroboam Does Not Return 1 Kings 13:33-34
The chapter ends by returning to the king, and the decisive return is the one Jeroboam refuses to make.

Scripture beside the summary
1 Kings · King James Version · 341 Kings 13:1-6
The Altar Breaks, and the Reaching Hand Fails
The man of God does not begin by debating Jeroboam. He speaks to the altar. That choice makes the unauthorized worship site itself the target, and the message reaches far beyond the moment by naming Josiah as the future figure who will defile it. Because that fulfillment lies in the future, an immediate sign is supplied: the altar will split and its ashes spill. Jeroboam answers by stretching out his hand to have the messenger seized, only to find the commanding hand suddenly useless. Then the altar breaks exactly as announced. The king’s posture changes at once. The man he wanted arrested becomes the man he asks to pray. His hand is restored, but the prophecy is not retracted. That distinction controls the scene. Personal mercy to Jeroboam does not equal approval of the altar, and physical restoration does not cancel future judgment. One sign has already happened before the king’s eyes, giving weight to a promise whose final fulfillment lies generations away.

Deep dive
The message is addressed first to the altar, making the unauthorized place of worship itself the object of the confrontation. Josiah is named as a future descendant of David who will defile it with human bones. An immediate sign accompanies that distant announcement: the altar will split and its ashes spill. The book thus distinguishes a present authentication from the future event the message concerns.
Jeroboam reaches out to order the messenger seized, but the hand issuing the order becomes powerless. The altar then breaks as announced. The king’s speech changes from a command to an appeal, asking the man of God to intercede with the LORD. The hand is restored, but the altar’s announced future is not withdrawn. A bodily recovery and a canceled judgment are different things in this scene. Second Kings 23:15–18 later identifies Josiah’s action at Bethel with this word, including the significance of the prophet’s burial.
Words to trace: altar, LORD, hand, sign, word, ashes
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:1
“By the word of the LORD” is the chapter’s refrain, bidbar YHWH, returning again and again until verse 32. The man of God is never named; Josephus later calls him Jadon. Jeroboam is caught at the altar exactly where chapter 12 left him.
- 1 Kings 13:2
The prophet addresses the altar, not the king, and doubles the address, “O altar, altar”. Burning human bones on it would make it permanently unclean, since contact with the dead defiles (Numbers 19:16). Josiah will reign some three centuries later.
- 1 Kings 13:3
“Sign” is mopheth, a wonder, the word used for the signs Moses worked before Pharaoh (Exodus 7:9). The ashes, soaked with sacrificial fat, were supposed to be carried to a clean place (Leviticus 6:11); spilling them profanes the altar.
- 1 Kings 13:4
“Dried up” is yabesh, to wither or stiffen. The king’s arm is frozen stretched out toward the prophet, the hand that had been holding incense a moment before, and he cannot draw it back.
- 1 Kings 13:5
The sign comes true in the reverse of the order it was given: the hand fails first, then the altar splits. Jeroboam loses the use of his body and his shrine in the same moment.
- 1 Kings 13:6
“Intreat the face” is chillah pene, literally “soften the face”, the idiom used of Moses pleading for Israel after the golden calf (Exodus 32:11). The calf-maker needs someone to do for him what Moses did then. He says “the LORD thy God”, not “my God”.
1 Kings 13:1-6
King James Version1And, behold, there came a man of God out of Judah by the word of the LORD unto Beth-el: and Jeroboam stood by the altar to burn incense.
2And he cried against the altar in the word of the LORD, and said, O altar, altar, thus saith the LORD; Behold, a child shall be born unto the house of David, Josiah by name; and upon thee shall he offer the priests of the high places that burn incense upon thee, and men’s bones shall be burnt upon thee.
3And he gave a sign the same day, saying, This is the sign which the LORD hath spoken; Behold, the altar shall be rent, and the ashes that are upon it shall be poured out.
4And it came to pass, when king Jeroboam heard the saying of the man of God, which had cried against the altar in Beth-el, that he put forth his hand from the altar, saying, Lay hold on him. And his hand, which he put forth against him, dried up, so that he could not pull it in again to him.
5The altar also was rent, and the ashes poured out from the altar, according to the sign which the man of God had given by the word of the LORD.
6And the king answered and said unto the man of God, Intreat now the face of the LORD thy God, and pray for me, that my hand may be restored me again. And the man of God besought the LORD, and the king’s hand was restored him again, and became as it was before.
1 Kings 13:7-10
The Messenger Refuses the Royal Table
Jeroboam changes tactics from force to hospitality. The king invites the man of God home for food and offers a reward, but the messenger’s refusal is absolute enough to exclude bargaining: even half the royal house would not change his answer. The reason is not personal dislike of Jeroboam or a universal ban on eating with compromised rulers. He has received a specific command for this mission. No bread, no water, and no return by the same route. The Book of 1 Kings repeats those restrictions so clearly that the later failure cannot be blamed on a forgotten or ambiguous instruction. At this point the man of God obeys all of them. He refuses the royal table, rejects the reward, and leaves Bethel by another way. He has survived both intimidation and generosity from the throne. The danger that succeeds will not look like either one. It will arrive from someone who claims to share his prophetic office and to possess newer information from God.

Deep dive
After coercion fails, Jeroboam offers hospitality and a gift. The man of God’s answer makes clear that the refusal is not a negotiation for a better reward. Even half the royal house would not change it. He has received a particular instruction not to eat or drink in this place and not to return by the same route.
The passage does not give a full explanation for each restriction, and they should not be turned into universal prohibitions against receiving meals from every compromised person. They belong to this commission. Their repetition nevertheless makes their clarity unmistakable before the later deception occurs. At this point the messenger keeps them: he declines the meal and leaves by another road. He has withstood both a royal threat and a royal offer. The danger that succeeds will arrive bearing the language of a fellow prophet.
Words to trace: bread, drink, king, water, Beth, camest
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:7
“Refresh thyself” means to sustain oneself with food. A shared meal in the ancient world implied fellowship and acceptance, so a royal dinner would have looked like the prophet ratifying the king’s altar.
- 1 Kings 13:8
The answer echoes Balaam, who told Balak that a house full of silver and gold would not move him past the word of the LORD (Numbers 22:18). Even half the palace is not a price.
- 1 Kings 13:9
The three bans are eating, drinking and returning. “Turn again” is shub, the chapter’s other key verb: it will be used for the prophet going back, for his being brought back, and finally for the king who never turns back from his way.
- 1 Kings 13:10
“Way” is the third word the chapter keeps repeating: the way he came, the way he went, the way the lion met him, and at the end Jeroboam’s evil way. On this road, the man of God is still obedient.
1 Kings 13:7-10
King James Version7And the king said unto the man of God, Come home with me, and refresh thyself, and I will give thee a reward.
8And the man of God said unto the king, If thou wilt give me half thine house, I will not go in with thee, neither will I eat bread nor drink water in this place:
9For so was it charged me by the word of the LORD, saying, Eat no bread, nor drink water, nor turn again by the same way that thou camest.
10So he went another way, and returned not by the way that he came to Beth-el.
1 Kings 13:11-19
A Claim of Revelation That the Book Calls a Lie
The old prophet reaches the man of God through perfectly ordinary information. His sons saw what happened and noticed which road the visitor took. He rides after him, finds him under an oak, and repeats Jeroboam’s invitation to eat. The first answer is still firm. The man from Judah remembers the command and quotes its restrictions back. Then the old prophet changes the terms. He claims equal prophetic status and says an angel has brought a newer word authorizing the meal. The Book of 1 Kings immediately removes any suspense for the reader: “he lied unto him.” This is not a puzzle in which two revelations possess equal credibility. The original command remains genuine, and the supposed update is false. What the chapter does not provide is the liar’s motive. Curiosity, envy, loneliness, or politics would all be inventions. What it does provide is the painful result. The messenger who resisted a king’s threat and reward is deceived by a colleague’s religious vocabulary and turns back.

Deep dive
The old prophet learns the day’s events from his sons, who also know which road the visitor took. That ordinary chain of information brings him to the oak where the man of God rests. His invitation initially receives the same refusal as Jeroboam’s, including a repetition of the divine prohibition. The command has not become vague or forgotten.
The older man’s second approach claims matching status and newer information: he too is a prophet, and an angel has supposedly authorized the return. The Book of 1 Kings immediately identifies the statement as a lie. The reader is not asked to choose between two equally endorsed revelations. The claimed update is false, and the first instruction remains the genuine command.
The motive for the lie is not supplied. Curiosity, envy, nostalgia, political loyalty, and desire for companionship are possible reconstructions, not details in the account. The result is supplied: the man of God returns and eats. His earlier resistance to the king does not prevent him from being deceived by someone who speaks as a colleague. The contrast is specific and painful without requiring an invented account of either man’s feelings.
Words to trace: bread, water, drink, sons, back, Beth
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:11
A prophet living in Bethel, beside the calf shrine, has said nothing about it as far as the book records. The Hebrew begins with a singular “his son came” and then switches to “they told”, as if one son spoke first and the rest joined in.
- 1 Kings 13:12
The Hebrew says his sons “had seen” the road; the Greek and Syriac read “showed him”, which needs only a change of vowels. Either way, the family knows exactly where to find the man.
- 1 Kings 13:13
Saddling in the Hebrew is literally “binding” the donkey, putting on the harness. The same animal will have a part to play after the lion.
- 1 Kings 13:14
“An oak” is ha’elah, a terebinth, and the article suggests a known landmark tree. The man of God is sitting down, no longer moving, still close enough to Bethel to be caught up by an old man on a donkey.
- 1 Kings 13:15
The invitation is the king’s invitation of verse 7 stripped of its reward: no gift, just bread. A plainer offer, from a colleague rather than a king.
- 1 Kings 13:16
The refusal now includes the word “return”, “I may not return with thee”, which the man of God used only implicitly to the king. He names the exact thing he is about to do.
- 1 Kings 13:17
This is the third time the command is repeated, and the man quotes it accurately. The book leaves no possibility that he misunderstood.
- 1 Kings 13:18
The old prophet claims an angel as intermediary, set against the direct word the man of God received himself. “He lied unto him” is two Hebrew words, kichesh lo, a flat verdict dropped at the end of the sentence.
- 1 Kings 13:19
“Went back” is the forbidden verb, shub, now obeyed in reverse. The verse lists bread and water separately, ticking off each item of the ban as it is broken.
1 Kings 13:11-19
King James Version11Now there dwelt an old prophet in Beth-el; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day in Beth-el: the words which he had spoken unto the king, them they told also to their father.
12And their father said unto them, What way went he? For his sons had seen what way the man of God went, which came from Judah.
13And he said unto his sons, Saddle me the ass. So they saddled him the ass: and he rode thereon,
14And went after the man of God, and found him sitting under an oak: and he said unto him, Art thou the man of God that camest from Judah? And he said, I am.
15Then he said unto him, Come home with me, and eat bread.
16And he said, I may not return with thee, nor go in with thee: neither will I eat bread nor drink water with thee in this place:
17For it was said to me by the word of the LORD, Thou shalt eat no bread nor drink water there, nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest.
18He said unto him, I am a prophet also as thou art; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. But he lied unto him.
19So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water.
1 Kings 13:20-25
The Liar Now Speaks an Actual Judgment
At the table, the same old prophet who lied now receives an actual word from the LORD. The Book of 1 Kings marks the difference sharply enough that neither message can borrow legitimacy from the other. The earlier claim was false; the later judgment is real. That genuine word condemns the man of God for disobeying the command he had personally received and announces that his body will not enter his fathers’ tomb. After the meal he leaves, a lion kills him, and the body remains on the road. The old prophet is not punished in parallel within this chapter, and the account does not invent a hidden balancing sentence to satisfy modern expectations of symmetry. Instead it concentrates on the messenger’s accountability to a word he knew was genuine before another voice contradicted it. The scene becomes even stranger because the lion does not consume the body and the donkey does not flee. Travelers see the tableau and carry news back to the city, making the judgment public.


Deep dive
The distinction between the two messages is unusually stark. Verse 18 called the old prophet’s claimed revelation a lie; verse 20 says the word of the LORD actually comes to him. His earlier falsehood does not prevent him from becoming the bearer of a true judgment. Nor does this later true word retroactively make the deception legitimate. The same mouth has spoken both, and the account differentiates them.
The judgment names the man of God’s disobedience to the command he had received. It says that his body will not come to his fathers’ tomb. The ensuing lion attack makes the sentence concrete, but the passage gives no equivalent punishment for the old prophet within this chapter. That unequal distribution of narrated consequences is not resolved by an explanation of secret motives or unrecorded later events.
The death is public enough for travelers to observe and report. Body, donkey, and lion remain beside the road in an arrangement that will become even more unusual when the older prophet arrives. The messenger’s failure has not rendered the divine word powerless. The chapter instead presents a man who truly carried that word and was still answerable to its command.
Words to trace: carcase, LORD, back, bread, lion, prophet
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:20
The true word arrives at the table itself, in the middle of the meal. The old man is now described only by what he did, “the prophet that brought him back”.
- 1 Kings 13:21
“Disobeyed the mouth of the LORD” is literally “rebelled against the mouth”, the charge laid against Moses and Aaron at Meribah (Numbers 20:24, 27:14). There too the penalty was about where the body would lie.
- 1 Kings 13:22
“Carcase” is nebelah, a corpse. To be buried with one’s fathers was the ordinary hope of an Israelite, “gathered unto his people”. The sentence is not death alone but death away from his family’s tomb.
- 1 Kings 13:23
“To wit” means namely. The host provides the donkey, so the animal found standing beside the body is probably the old prophet’s own. The same household that brought him back sends him on his way.
- 1 Kings 13:24
Lions lived in the Jordan thickets and the hill country; Jeremiah speaks of a lion coming up from the swelling of Jordan (49:19). Nothing about a lion on the road is unnatural. Everything about how it behaves afterward is.
- 1 Kings 13:25
The passers-by report to “the city where the old prophet dwelt”, without naming Bethel. The Book of 1 Kings keeps the city in the background and lets the news travel to the one man who will understand it.
1 Kings 13:20-25
King James Version20And it came to pass, as they sat at the table, that the word of the LORD came unto the prophet that brought him back:
21And he cried unto the man of God that came from Judah, saying, Thus saith the LORD, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the LORD, and hast not kept the commandment which the LORD thy God commanded thee,
22But camest back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place, of the which the LORD did say to thee, Eat no bread, and drink no water; thy carcase shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers.
23And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, that he saddled for him the ass, to wit, for the prophet whom he had brought back.
24And when he was gone, a lion met him by the way, and slew him: and his carcase was cast in the way, and the ass stood by it, the lion also stood by the carcase.
25And, behold, men passed by, and saw the carcase cast in the way, and the lion standing by the carcase: and they came and told it in the city where the old prophet dwelt.
1 Kings 13:26-32
The Grave Preserves a Future Witness
The old prophet recognizes the report immediately and interprets the death as the announced consequence of disobedience. When he reaches the road, the lion is still there, the donkey is still there, and the body has not been eaten. The animal that killed the man has not behaved like a predator continuing a meal, and that restraint allows the old prophet to recover the corpse. He brings the man back, mourns him as “my brother,” and places him in his own grave. The shared language of prophetic identity now appears in grief after having been used in deception. The Book of 1 Kings records that grief without announcing that it fully resolves the old prophet’s guilt. His final request looks beyond both men: when he dies, he wants his bones laid beside the messenger’s because he believes the word against Bethel will certainly happen. The dead prophet’s failure has not made his true prophecy false. The grave becomes a long-term witness to a judgment still waiting for its day.

Deep dive
The lion has neither eaten the body nor killed the donkey. The repeated attention to those details distinguishes the scene from a feeding attack. The animal’s restraint allows the body to be recovered, and the old prophet himself interprets the death in relation to the command and judgment. The account supplies no method by which he safely approaches beyond recording that he does.
The old prophet mourns the man as a brother and places him in his own grave. That address takes up the shared prophetic identity he had invoked during the deception, now in the act of burial. The text records grief but does not label it a complete repentance or explain the full meaning of his earlier behavior.
His final instructions place his own future bones beside the dead messenger’s because the announced judgment on Bethel will certainly come. Death has not discredited the first prophecy. Second Kings 23:17–18 later gives this shared burial a practical consequence when Josiah leaves the prophets’ bones undisturbed. Within the present chapter, the tomb joins two compromised lives to a word that the old prophet still recognizes as true.
Words to trace: carcase, LORD, lion, prophet, spake, word
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:26
“Torn him” is shabar, broken. The old prophet cites “the word of the LORD, which he spake unto him”, the judgment he himself delivered at the table. He is interpreting his own oracle.
- 1 Kings 13:27
The command “Saddle me the ass” is repeated word for word from verse 13. The same instruction frames the journey out to deceive and the journey out to recover the body.
- 1 Kings 13:28
The verse repeats the passers-by’s report almost word for word and then adds what they could not see from the road: the body uneaten and the donkey unharmed. The witnesses’ account is confirmed by a second look.
- 1 Kings 13:29
The donkey that carried the man away from Bethel now carries his body back into it. He enters the city he was told not to eat in, and stays there.
- 1 Kings 13:30
“Alas, my brother!” is hoy ’achi, the standard cry of a funeral lament, used again in Jeremiah 22:18. The old prophet gives up his own family tomb, a rock-cut chamber, to the man he deceived.
- 1 Kings 13:31
Family tombs in Israel held generations together, the bones gathered as each new body was laid in. To ask for one’s bones beside another’s is to claim kinship in death with a man who was not family.
- 1 Kings 13:32
Samaria did not yet exist. Omri would buy the hill and found the city some fifty years later (16:24). “Cities of Samaria” is the name of the region from the book’s later vantage, placed in the old prophet’s mouth.
1 Kings 13:26-32
King James Version26And when the prophet that brought him back from the way heard thereof, he said, It is the man of God, who was disobedient unto the word of the LORD: therefore the LORD hath delivered him unto the lion, which hath torn him, and slain him, according to the word of the LORD, which he spake unto him.
27And he spake to his sons, saying, Saddle me the ass. And they saddled him.
28And he went and found his carcase cast in the way, and the ass and the lion standing by the carcase: the lion had not eaten the carcase, nor torn the ass.
29And the prophet took up the carcase of the man of God, and laid it upon the ass, and brought it back: and the old prophet came to the city, to mourn and to bury him.
30And he laid his carcase in his own grave; and they mourned over him, saying, Alas, my brother!
31And it came to pass, after he had buried him, that he spake to his sons, saying, When I am dead, then bury me in the sepulchre wherein the man of God is buried; lay my bones beside his bones:
32For the saying which he cried by the word of the LORD against the altar in Beth-el, and against all the houses of the high places which are in the cities of Samaria, shall surely come to pass.
1 Kings 13:33-34
Everything Happens, and Jeroboam Does Not Return
The chapter ends by returning to the king, and the decisive return is the one Jeroboam refuses to make. His hand has failed and been restored. His altar has split. A man of God has announced judgment, died under a separate judgment, and been buried by a prophet who still insists the original word will come true. None of that turns Jeroboam from the religious system he built. He continues appointing priests for the high places, allowing anyone he chooses to be consecrated into the role. The persistence matters because it prevents the messenger’s death from becoming an excuse to dismiss his message. The prophecy remains standing even when the prophet falls. The Book of 1 Kings therefore closes this strange chapter not with the lion, the grave, or the old prophet, but with Jeroboam’s policy. His house is now linked to the sin he keeps institutionalizing. Extraordinary signs have occurred around him, and the ordinary machinery of his alternative worship simply continues.

Deep dive
The final return is the one that does not happen. The man of God wrongly returned for a meal, the old prophet brought his body back, and Jeroboam’s hand was restored. Yet Jeroboam does not return from his evil way. The brief closing notice draws the long and troubling prophetic encounter back to the king standing behind the altar system.
His continued appointments make the failure concrete. Whoever desires the role can be consecrated into this priesthood, extending the arrangement already condemned. The account does not present the prophet’s death as a loophole permitting the king to disregard the prophecy. It closes instead by linking Jeroboam’s continuing practice to the cutting off of his house. An altar has broken, a hand has failed and recovered, a messenger has died, and the warning remains. The king’s religious policy remains as well.
Words to trace: became, high, Jeroboam, places, priests, thing
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Kings 13:33
“Consecrated him” is literally “filled his hand”, the Hebrew idiom for ordaining a priest (Exodus 28:41), since the new priest’s hands were filled with portions of the offering. The king whose hand was withered and restored keeps filling other men’s hands.
- 1 Kings 13:34
The phrase “this thing became sin” repeats 12:30 word for word. The cutting off will come in 15:29, when Baasha kills every member of Jeroboam’s house.
1 Kings 13:33-34
King James Version33After this thing Jeroboam returned not from his evil way, but made again of the lowest of the people priests of the high places: whosoever would, he consecrated him, and he became one of the priests of the high places.
34And this thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam, even to cut it off, and to destroy it from off the face of the earth.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
- Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
- Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 1 Kings 13?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of 1 Kings 13 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: 1 Kings 13 develops its own movement around LORD, altar, bread, carcase, word?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.





