New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The King Bargains Over Who and What May Leave

Exodus 10

The big picture

By Exodus 10, even Pharaoh's servants are asking how long the refusal can continue. The next plague is already framed for future retelling, while locusts are announced against the vegetation left by the hail. Pharaoh tries a new limit by permitting only the men to go, but Moses insists that the feast includes young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. The locusts arrive on an east wind, consume the remaining green growth, and disappear on a strong west wind after another urgent confession and request for intercession. Release still does not follow. Three days of thick darkness then stop ordinary movement in Egypt while Israel has light. Pharaoh makes one final bargain, allowing the families but holding the livestock. Moses answers that not even a hoof will remain. The meeting ends not with agreement but with Pharaoh threatening Moses' life.

In this chapter

Exodus 10: The King Bargains Over Who and What May Leave
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Scripture beside the summary

Exodus · King James Version · 29

Exodus 10:1-6

The Signs Are Already Being Prepared for Retelling

Before the locusts appear, Exodus steps beyond Pharaoh's court and tells Israel how these events are meant to live in memory. The signs will be told to children and grandchildren so that later generations know the LORD through what happened in Egypt. That future-facing purpose sits beside Pharaoh's present refusal to humble himself. The locust warning then makes the cumulative nature of the plagues explicit. They will not attack a fresh landscape. They will eat what escaped the hail, filling houses and consuming the remaining growth. Egypt's ruin is therefore being layered rather than reset after each judgment. Moses delivers the warning and leaves without softening it into a negotiable estimate. The scene joins two timelines at once: Pharaoh's immediate decision and Israel's future retelling, when the king who now refuses will survive mainly as part of the account families teach their children.

Exodus 10:1-6: The Signs Are Already Being Prepared for Retelling
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Deep dive

The opening looks beyond the immediate audience in Pharaoh's court. The signs are to be spoken of to children and grandchildren so that Israel will know the LORD. This makes the coming instructions about Passover and its questions part of a purpose already announced during the plagues. The events are not to disappear when the current negotiators die. Their meaning will be carried into households and future generations.

The locust warning is cumulative. It concerns what has escaped the hail, not a freshly restored landscape that Exodus has neglected to describe. The language of unprecedented devastation reaches backward to the ancestors of Pharaoh's people, while the instruction about remembrance reaches forward through Israel's descendants. Against those two horizons stands the king's present refusal to humble himself. Moses delivers the warning and turns to leave; he does not remain to soften its consequences into a more acceptable estimate. The next intervention comes from Pharaoh's own servants.

Words to trace: earth, fathers, houses, LORD, Pharaoh, heart

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Exodus 10:1

    “I have hardened” is kaved again, now in God’s mouth: “I have made his heart heavy”, the verb Pharaoh used of himself in 8:15. The servants are included, which is surprising given verse 7, where those same servants plead with him to give way.

  2. Exodus 10:2

    “Tell in the ears” is the language of instruction handed down; the Passover Haggadah draws its name from the related verb higgadta in 13:8. “What things I have wrought” is hitalalti, a verb that can mean “made sport of” or “dealt harshly with”, used in 1 Samuel 6:6 of these same plagues.

  3. Exodus 10:3

    “Humble thyself” is from anah, the verb used in 1:11–12 for the Egyptians afflicting Israel. The one who afflicted is now asked to bow down. “How long” is the complaint of the Psalms turned into a demand on a king.

  4. Exodus 10:4

    “Coast” in the King James means border or territory, not shoreline. Locusts were among the most feared disasters in the ancient world. A swarm can cover hundreds of square miles and eat its own weight in vegetation every day.

  5. Exodus 10:5

    “Face of the earth” is literally “the eye of the land”, an idiom also used in Numbers 22:5 of Israel covering Moab’s view. The locusts will blind the ground. “The residue of that which is escaped” names the hail’s survivors twice over, residue and escaped, to leave nothing out.

  6. Exodus 10:6

    The warning ends without waiting for Pharaoh’s answer: Moses “turned himself, and went out”, the first time he walks out unbidden. The appeal to fathers and fathers’ fathers is borrowed by Joel 1:2–3 for a later locust plague: “Hath this been in your days, or even in the days of your fathers? Tell ye your children of it.”

Exodus 10:1-6

King James Version

1And the LORD said unto Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh: for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his servants, that I might shew these my signs before him:

2And that thou mayest tell in the ears of thy son, and of thy son’s son, what things I have wrought in Egypt, and my signs which I have done among them; that ye may know how that I am the LORD.

3And Moses and Aaron came in unto Pharaoh, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD God of the Hebrews, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me.

4Else, if thou refuse to let my people go, behold, to morrow will I bring the locusts into thy coast:

5And they shall cover the face of the earth, that one cannot be able to see the earth: and they shall eat the residue of that which is escaped, which remaineth unto you from the hail, and shall eat every tree which groweth for you out of the field:

6And they shall fill thy houses, and the houses of all thy servants, and the houses of all the Egyptians; which neither thy fathers, nor thy fathers’ fathers have seen, since the day that they were upon the earth unto this day. And he turned himself, and went out from Pharaoh.

Exodus 10:7-11

The Court Sees the Ruin Before the King Yields

Pharaoh's own servants now say aloud what the king still resists admitting: Egypt is being destroyed. Their plea brings Moses and Aaron back, but Pharaoh's permission immediately turns into a question about who is actually allowed to go. Moses answers with the whole community: young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. The feast is not an event for adult men while families remain under Egyptian control. Pharaoh rejects that scope and offers only the men. The restriction would leave the departing group tied to everyone and everything still held behind, even if Exodus does not use the formal language of hostages. The disagreement is therefore not a minor argument over attendance. It exposes the continuing question of ownership. Pharaoh is willing to loosen his grip only if he still decides which parts of Israel remain within it.

Exodus 10:7-11: The Court Sees the Ruin Before the King Yields
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Deep dive

The servants' protest marks another fracture within the court. They describe Moses as a snare and ask whether Pharaoh has yet recognized Egypt's ruin. These are not Israelite spokesmen delivering another accusation. They are the king's own people confronting the cost of his continued refusal. Their intervention brings Moses and Aaron back, but the king's apparent permission immediately turns into a question about who will go.

Moses answers with an inclusive list: young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. The feast belongs to the community, not only to adult men representing it. Pharaoh rejects that scope and orders the men alone to go. Keeping the families behind would leave the departing men tied to dependents still under Egyptian control, though Exodus does not use the language of hostages. The disagreement is therefore not a small adjustment to a passenger list. It concerns whether Israel may leave as a people. The brothers are driven from the king's presence without accepting the restricted permission.

Words to trace: LORD, serve, Moses, Pharaoh’s, Aaron, daughters

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Exodus 10:7

    “Snare” is moqesh, the bait-stick of a bird trap. The servants use the name Moses once gave, “the LORD their God”. “Let the men go” uses the word anashim, adult men, which may be what gave Pharaoh the idea for his offer in verse 11.

  2. Exodus 10:8

    “Were brought again” is passive; the servants fetch Moses and Aaron back. Pharaoh begins with “Go, serve” and at once adds a question that undoes it: “who are they that shall go?”, literally “who and who are going?”, asking for names.

  3. Exodus 10:9

    Moses’ list comes in four pairs, young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds, and ends with “we must hold a feast”, chag, the pilgrimage festival word from 5:1. Nothing of Israel is left out of the list.

  4. Exodus 10:10

    The King James “Let the LORD be so with you” is sarcasm: “The LORD had better be with you, if I ever let you go with your little ones!” “Evil is before you” may mean “you have wicked intentions”, or be a pun on Ra, the Egyptian sun god: “Ra is against you.”

  5. Exodus 10:11

    “Men” here is gevarim, adult males, a different word from verse 7. Pharaoh claims this is what they asked for, which it was not. “They were driven out” is passive and abrupt; the audience ends in expulsion, the verb garash, used of Adam driven from Eden.

Exodus 10:7-11

King James Version

7And Pharaoh’s servants said unto him, How long shall this man be a snare unto us? let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God: knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed?

8And Moses and Aaron were brought again unto Pharaoh: and he said unto them, Go, serve the LORD your God: but who are they that shall go?

9And Moses said, We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters, with our flocks and with our herds will we go; for we must hold a feast unto the LORD.

10And he said unto them, Let the LORD be so with you, as I will let you go, and your little ones: look to it; for evil is before you.

11Not so: go now ye that are men, and serve the LORD; for that ye did desire. And they were driven out from Pharaoh’s presence.

Exodus 10:12-20

What Survived the Hail Does Not Survive the Locusts

The east wind blows through the day and night before bringing locusts across Egypt in the morning. Their arrival is timed, commanded, and devastating. They consume the vegetation and fruit left by the hail until no green thing remains in the fields. The land darkens under their number before the next plague brings darkness by another means. Pharaoh reacts with urgency, confesses sin against the LORD and against Moses and Aaron, asks forgiveness, and begs for "this death" to be removed. Moses intercedes, and a strong west wind carries every locust into the Red Sea. The insects disappear completely, but the eaten crops do not return with them. Relief from the active plague does not undo the accumulated loss. Pharaoh still refuses release, so Egypt enters the next judgment with fewer resources than it had before the locusts arrived.

Exodus 10:12-20: What Survived the Hail Does Not Survive the Locusts
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Deep dive

The locusts arrive through an east wind that blows through day and night before their appearance in the morning. The detail gives the event a process without reducing the account to an uncontrolled natural sequence. Moses acts at the command, the timing follows the warning, and the insects consume precisely the remaining vegetation. The land is darkened by their number before the next plague brings darkness of another kind.

Pharaoh's haste now contrasts with his earlier resistance to the warning. He confesses sin against the LORD and against Moses and Aaron, asks forgiveness, and calls the plague a death to be removed. The language acknowledges personal wrong, but his immediate request remains relief from this particular judgment. Moses intercedes, and the direction of the wind changes, carrying the locusts into the Red Sea until none remain in Egypt.

That complete removal does not restore the crops already eaten, nor does it secure release. The LORD hardens Pharaoh's heart, and the people are still held. The sequence prevents a mistaken picture in which every plague simply vanishes and returns Egypt to its starting condition. The insects are gone; the lost food remains lost. The cumulative cost of refusal continues after the immediate crisis has ended.

Words to trace: land, Egypt, LORD, locusts, Moses, wind

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Exodus 10:12

    “Stretch out thine hand” is repeated from 9:22, but the rod is not named in God’s command; verse 13 shows Moses using it anyway. “All that the hail hath left” names the target precisely, so the plagues are presented as working together.

  2. Exodus 10:13

    An east wind blowing “all that day, and all that night” would bring locusts from Arabia across the Red Sea, the direction swarms actually travel into Egypt. The same wind is used at the sea in 14:21, a “strong east wind all that night”.

  3. Exodus 10:14

    “Rested” is nuach, to settle down, the same verb used of the ark resting on Ararat in Genesis 8:4. Joel 2:2 says of another locust army that there has never been the like; both statements are claims of uniqueness in their own context.

  4. Exodus 10:15

    “The land was darkened” is a physical detail of dense swarms blocking the sun, and it foreshadows the next plague. “Not any green thing” echoes the “green herb” given as food in Genesis 1:30. Egypt is stripped to the ground.

  5. Exodus 10:16

    “In haste” is mihar, the first time Pharaoh hurries. He now names two offences, against the LORD and against Moses and Aaron. The confession is wider than 9:27, but still borrows Moses’ phrase “your God”, not his own.

  6. Exodus 10:17

    “Only this once” is a phrase Abraham used in bargaining with God in Genesis 18:32. “This death” is Pharaoh’s own description of the locusts: a famine is death to a land that lives on its harvest. He asks Moses, not the LORD, for forgiveness.

  7. Exodus 10:18

    Moses “went out”, as he promised he would in 9:29, and prayed. The account is brief: no words of the prayer are given. Each time Moses prays, the answer is immediate.

  8. Exodus 10:19

    “West wind” is literally “sea wind”, yam, since the Mediterranean lies west of Israel. “Red sea” is yam suf, the Sea of Reeds, the same body of water Israel will cross. The locusts drown in the sea that will swallow the army.

  9. Exodus 10:20

    Chazaq again, with God as subject. The phrase is short and repeated, and after the confession of verse 16 the hardening closes the plague without any further speech from Pharaoh.

Exodus 10:12-20

King James Version

12And the LORD said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand over the land of Egypt for the locusts, that they may come up upon the land of Egypt, and eat every herb of the land, even all that the hail hath left.

13And Moses stretched forth his rod over the land of Egypt, and the LORD brought an east wind upon the land all that day, and all that night; and when it was morning, the east wind brought the locusts.

14And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the coasts of Egypt: very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such.

15For they covered the face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened; and they did eat every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left: and there remained not any green thing in the trees, or in the herbs of the field, through all the land of Egypt.

16Then Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron in haste; and he said, I have sinned against the LORD your God, and against you.

17Now therefore forgive, I pray thee, my sin only this once, and intreat the LORD your God, that he may take away from me this death only.

18And he went out from Pharaoh, and intreated the LORD.

19And the LORD turned a mighty strong west wind, which took away the locusts, and cast them into the Red sea; there remained not one locust in all the coasts of Egypt.

20But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so that he would not let the children of Israel go.

Exodus 10:21-23

A Darkness Measured in Separation and Stillness

Darkness comes without a recorded negotiation and is measured less by spectacle than by what people cannot do. Egyptians cannot see one another and do not rise from their places for three days. Ordinary movement, contact, and activity stop. Exodus describes the darkness as thick enough to be felt, but it does not identify a physical mechanism or assign the plague to a named Egyptian deity. The contrast the passage itself supplies is simpler and more forceful: Israel has light in its dwellings. The same land now holds two radically different conditions. Pharaoh, who once increased Israel's work because he feared they had too much rest, cannot secure ordinary movement for his own people. No added speech is needed to announce the reversal. The conditions themselves display a boundary the king cannot cross and a darkness he cannot dismiss by retreating into his palace.

Exodus 10:21-23: A Darkness Measured in Separation and Stillness
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Deep dive

This plague arrives without a recorded advance negotiation. Moses stretches out his hand, and the darkness is described as thick enough to be felt. Exodus then measures it through its effects: people cannot see one another and do not rise from their places for three days. The account moves from damaged resources to interrupted human contact and movement. Even where no new injury is separately described, ordinary life is brought to a halt.

Israel's light is stated as a deliberate contrast. The passage does not identify a weather system, explain the physical properties of the darkness, or name an Egyptian deity as its individual target. Those reconstructions should remain distinct from the text. Its own claim is that Egypt's darkness and Israel's light coexist under the same divine action. Pharaoh, who ordered Israel's work extended in chapter 5, cannot now secure ordinary movement for his own people. The reversal is made through the conditions described, without the need for an added speech announcing it.

Words to trace: darkness, days, Egypt, hand, heaven, land

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Exodus 10:21

    No warning is given for the ninth plague, as none was for the third and sixth. “Darkness which may be felt” is literally “and one shall feel darkness”, the verb mashash, to grope, used of the blind in Deuteronomy 28:29.

  2. Exodus 10:22

    “Thick darkness” is two words for darkness together, choshekh afelah, gloom upon gloom. Three days is a long time in a land that worshipped the sun. The sun god, Ra, was the chief deity of Egypt, so his failure was the most public of all.

  3. Exodus 10:23

    “Rose any from his place” suggests that people were unable to move. Israel had light “in their dwellings”, literally in their settlements, not simply by lamps. The Book of Wisdom 17 later elaborates this darkness with nightmares, an ancient reading and not the text’s own.

Exodus 10:21-23

King James Version

21And the LORD said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand toward heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even darkness which may be felt.

22And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven; and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days:

23They saw not one another, neither rose any from his place for three days: but all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings.

Exodus 10:24-29

Not Even a Hoof Becomes a Bargaining Chip

Pharaoh's final bargain sounds generous only until the condition appears. Families may go, but the flocks and herds must stay. Moses refuses because those animals are not incidental property. Israel will need them for sacrifice, and the precise requirements of worship will not be known until the people reach the appointed place. Leaving the livestock behind would keep the permitted worship dependent on resources Pharaoh still controls. "There shall not an hoof be left behind" therefore states the completeness of the departure rather than merely supplying a memorable phrase. The king's response is no longer another practical compromise. He orders Moses away and threatens death if they meet again. Moses accepts the end of the audience. The bargaining process has reached its limit: Pharaoh would rather threaten the messenger than release Israel on terms he cannot define.

Exodus 10:24-29: Not Even a Hoof Becomes a Bargaining Chip
Chapter sceneExodus 10

Deep dive

The king's latest offer concedes the families while withholding the livestock. Moses answers in terms of the very purpose Pharaoh claims to permit: Israel will need animals for sacrifices, and the full requirements will not be known until they arrive. Leaving the herds in Egypt would make the permitted worship dependent on resources the king still controls. The memorable insistence that no hoof remain is therefore not ornamental bravado. It states the practical completeness of the departure being demanded.

Pharaoh's refusal ends in a threat that Moses will die if he sees his face again. Moses accepts the ending of these encounters. The chapter division can obscure the flow, because chapter 11 continues with a final announcement and only then explicitly records Moses leaving Pharaoh. The night summons in Exodus 12:31 raises a further question about whether a personal meeting or a message is involved; the wording does not describe the delivery in detail. The clear development here is the collapse of bargaining. Pharaoh has shifted from setting conditions on worship to threatening the messenger who will not accept them.

Words to trace: LORD, face, Moses, serve, Pharaoh, behind

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Exodus 10:24

    Pharaoh’s third condition: everyone may go, but not the flocks and herds. “Stayed” is yatsag, to set down or leave in place, like a deposit left as security against their return. The little ones are included this time, which he forbade in verse 10.

  2. Exodus 10:25

    Moses turns the bargain around: Pharaoh must give them animals as well. “Sacrifices” are zevachim, meals shared with God, and “burnt offerings” are olot, wholly burnt. Egypt will in fact send them away laden (12:32–36).

  3. Exodus 10:26

    “Not an hoof” is parsah, a split hoof, the part of the animal least likely to be counted. “We know not with what we must serve” is honest: God has not yet given the Law, so no one knows which animals will be required. The details await Sinai.

  4. Exodus 10:27

    The same short phrase as verse 20, but here it follows a refusal rather than a relief. The hardening now comes after each plague without delay.

  5. Exodus 10:28

    “See my face no more” uses the language of court: to see a king’s face was to be admitted to his presence. Pharaoh banishes Moses from the palace on pain of death, the first time he threatens Moses’ life directly.

  6. Exodus 10:29

    “Thou hast spoken well” is a sharp reply: you are right. Moses will not see Pharaoh’s face again; the next time Pharaoh summons Moses, in 12:31, the book does not say they met face to face. Moses’ final words to Pharaoh continue into the next chapter.

Exodus 10:24-29

King James Version

24And Pharaoh called unto Moses, and said, Go ye, serve the LORD; only let your flocks and your herds be stayed: let your little ones also go with you.

25And Moses said, Thou must give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings, that we may sacrifice unto the LORD our God.

26Our cattle also shall go with us; there shall not an hoof be left behind; for thereof must we take to serve the LORD our God; and we know not with what we must serve the LORD, until we come thither.

27But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he would not let them go.

28And Pharaoh said unto him, Get thee from me, take heed to thyself, see my face no more; for in that day thou seest my face thou shalt die.

29And Moses said, Thou hast spoken well, I will see thy face again no more.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the people addressed and the covenant setting.
  2. Distinguish rescue, worship, holiness, justice, and community responsibility.
  3. Read commands in their literary and covenant context before making a modern application.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Exodus 10?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Exodus 10 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Exodus 10 develops its own movement around LORD, Moses, Egypt, land, Pharaoh?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006