New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

An Empty Seat Reveals the Cost of Jonathan's Covenant

1 Samuel 20

The big picture

An empty chair at a royal meal becomes the instrument by which David and Jonathan test what safety means now. Jonathan begins from trust in his access to Saul, while David insists the king may be hiding his plan precisely because he knows of their friendship. The two move from immediate danger to future obligation, renewing a covenant that must protect Jonathan's household even if David one day holds the power. The practical test is almost modest: David misses the new moon feast, Jonathan offers the agreed explanation, and Saul's response will reveal his intent. What follows is not subtle. Saul declares that David must die, tells Jonathan that David's life threatens Jonathan's kingdom, and then throws a javelin at the son whose future he claims to be defending. Jonathan no longer needs a report. The arrow signal tells David what the spear has told him. Their farewell joins grief to covenant, and the chapter ends with two friends bound before the LORD precisely as they are forced to go in opposite directions.

In this chapter

1 Samuel 20: An Empty Seat Reveals the Cost of Jonathan's Covenant
Chapter scene1 Samuel 20

Scripture beside the summary

1 Samuel · King James Version · 42

1 Samuel 20:1-11

David's Danger and Jonathan's Incomplete Knowledge

David comes from Ramah asking for a charge against him: what sin or iniquity explains Saul's pursuit? Jonathan initially rejects the premise because he assumes his father would not hide an important plan from him. David supplies a reason that loyalty itself might create the blind spot. Saul knows Jonathan loves David and could conceal the killing to spare his son's grief. The Book of 1 Samuel lets both men be sincere without pretending they possess the same information. Jonathan's confidence is real, and David's danger is real. Their test uses David's expected seat at the new moon meal. He will hide in the field while Jonathan reports a family sacrifice in Bethlehem and watches Saul's response. The Bethlehem explanation is therefore a test statement, not a record that David actually made the trip. David also puts his innocence under the covenant: if Jonathan truly finds iniquity in him, he may kill David himself rather than deliver him to Saul. The dispute remains about cause, not merely escape.

Deep dive

Jonathan's confidence depends on the assumption that Saul tells him everything important. David offers a reason that this assumption may now fail: Saul knows their attachment and may conceal the intended killing to spare Jonathan's grief. The exchange does not make Jonathan indifferent to danger. It distinguishes sincere loyalty from complete information. His willingness to help becomes firm even before he accepts David's assessment of his father.

David's empty seat will supply a test because attendance at the royal meal is expected. The explanation about a family sacrifice in Bethlehem is the account Jonathan is to give while David actually hides in the field. Its function is to provoke a revealing response, not to document a journey to Bethlehem during the interval. David also submits himself to Jonathan's judgment under their covenant, asking not to be handed over as though guilt had already been established. The question of innocence remains central even in planning the escape.

Words to trace: father, David, Jonathan, field, servant, certainly

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 1 Samuel 20:1

    Saul was still lying stripped at Naioth (19:24), which may be what gave David the start he needed. His three questions use three words for wrongdoing, and they echo Jacob’s protest when Laban chased him: “What is my trespass? what is my sin, that thou hast so hotly pursued after me?” (Genesis 31:36).

  2. 1 Samuel 20:2

    “Great or small” means anything at all. Jonathan is sure his father confides in him, though in 19:1 Saul announced his intent openly and Jonathan had to warn David himself. “It is not so” is two words in Hebrew, “not this”, a flat denial.

  3. 1 Samuel 20:3

    “A step” is pesa’, a single pace, a word found only here. The double oath, by the life of the LORD and by the life of the listener, is used again by Abigail to David (25:26). David’s point is precise: Saul would hide the plan from Jonathan exactly because of Jonathan’s love.

  4. 1 Samuel 20:4

    “Thy soul” is nefesh, the word for Jonathan’s love for David “as his own soul” (18:1) and for the life Saul is seeking in verse 1. The reply is a blank promise: whatever David wants, Jonathan will do, before any plan is on the table.

  5. 1 Samuel 20:5

    The new moon was a monthly festival marked with sacrifices (Numbers 28:11–15), and the king held a meal at which his officers were expected. The Hebrew doubles the verb, “sitting I should sit”, to stress how certain David’s attendance was. He plans to hide through two nights.

  6. 1 Samuel 20:6

    “Earnestly asked leave” doubles the verb sha’al, to ask, the root of Saul’s name. A “yearly sacrifice” for the whole clan recalls Elkanah’s annual sacrifice at Shiloh (1:21). A family festival was one of the few reasons that could outrank a royal meal.

  7. 1 Samuel 20:7

    The test is set by the king’s temper. A calm “It is well” means peace; burning anger means evil has been “determined”, the verb kalah, to complete or decide. Saul will not need to say a word; his face will answer.

  8. 1 Samuel 20:8

    “Deal kindly” is chesed, covenant loyalty. David calls their pact “a covenant of the LORD”, putting God into it as party and witness. He also calls himself “thy servant” three times in one verse, speaking to Jonathan as a subject to a prince.

  9. 1 Samuel 20:9

    “Far be it from thee” repeats chalilah from verse 2, the strongest refusal Hebrew has. Jonathan’s sentence is broken and tumbles over itself; it ends as a hurt question. He is not only reassuring David but defending his own honesty.

  10. 1 Samuel 20:10

    “Who shall tell me?” is a practical question: if Jonathan is watched, how will word reach a man in hiding? “Roughly” is qashah, harshly, the word used when Joseph spoke roughly to his brothers (Genesis 42:7). Jonathan has no answer until verse 18.

  11. 1 Samuel 20:11

    Inside the town walls there were servants and listeners. The Hebrew repeats “the field” twice, and it is the place David will hide (verse 5), where the arrows will fly (verse 35), and where the two men now make terms without witnesses.

1 Samuel 20:1-11

King James Version

1And David fled from Naioth in Ramah, and came and said before Jonathan, What have I done? what is mine iniquity? and what is my sin before thy father, that he seeketh my life?

2And he said unto him, God forbid; thou shalt not die: behold, my father will do nothing either great or small, but that he will shew it me: and why should my father hide this thing from me? it is not so.

3And David sware moreover, and said, Thy father certainly knoweth that I have found grace in thine eyes; and he saith, Let not Jonathan know this, lest he be grieved: but truly as the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, there is but a step between me and death.

4Then said Jonathan unto David, Whatsoever thy soul desireth, I will even do it for thee.

5And David said unto Jonathan, Behold, to morrow is the new moon, and I should not fail to sit with the king at meat: but let me go, that I may hide myself in the field unto the third day at even.

6If thy father at all miss me, then say, David earnestly asked leave of me that he might run to Beth-lehem his city: for there is a yearly sacrifice there for all the family.

7If he say thus, It is well; thy servant shall have peace: but if he be very wroth, then be sure that evil is determined by him.

8Therefore thou shalt deal kindly with thy servant; for thou hast brought thy servant into a covenant of the LORD with thee: notwithstanding, if there be in me iniquity, slay me thyself; for why shouldest thou bring me to thy father?

9And Jonathan said, Far be it from thee: for if I knew certainly that evil were determined by my father to come upon thee, then would not I tell it thee?

10Then said David to Jonathan, Who shall tell me? or what if thy father answer thee roughly?

11And Jonathan said unto David, Come, and let us go out into the field. And they went out both of them into the field.

1 Samuel 20:12-17

The Covenant Reaches a Household Not Yet Established

Jonathan's promise suddenly reaches far beyond the next few days. He swears to discover Saul's disposition, warn David honestly, and send him away in peace if danger is intended. Then the king's son asks the fugitive for something that makes sense only if he expects their positions to reverse. David is to show him "the kindness of the LORD" while he lives and must not cut that kindness off from Jonathan's house even after David's enemies are removed. The Book of 1 Samuel therefore gives the covenant a dynastic horizon without reducing it to private affection. Jonathan names the LORD's presence with David "as he hath been with my father," acknowledging a transfer of divine favour more directly than Saul can bear to do. Later, David's kindness to Mephibosheth will make this promise concrete, but the request already has force here. A prince whose father hunts David is asking that the future king refuse the ordinary logic of wiping out a displaced royal house.

Deep dive

Jonathan moves from protecting David now to asking protection from David later. The reversal of their present circumstances is striking: the king's son petitions the endangered fugitive for kindness that will outlive both the current danger and any future defeat of David's enemies. He invokes the LORD's presence with David as it has been with Saul, so the anticipated change is framed through divine appointment rather than merely Jonathan's friendship.

The requested kindness must extend to his house and must not be cut off. Their covenant is therefore personal without being limited to private affection. It addresses what power might do to the family of a displaced ruler. Second Samuel 9:1–7 later makes this connection explicit when David asks for someone from Saul's house to whom he may show kindness for Jonathan's sake and receives Mephibosheth. That later action gives this promise a concrete future, rather than leaving it as generous language exchanged during a crisis.

Words to trace: LORD, David, Jonathan, father, loved, shew

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 1 Samuel 20:12

    The oath begins abruptly with the divine name, “the LORD God of Israel”, and some translators supply “be witness” to complete it. “Sounded” is chaqar, to search out or probe, the word for testing a matter to the bottom. The sentence runs on into the next verse before it resolves.

  2. 1 Samuel 20:13

    “The LORD do so and much more” is the self-curse formula, calling down unnamed harm if the promise is broken (Ruth 1:17). To “send away in peace” was how a host honourably released a guest, as Abimelech sent Isaac away “in peace” (Genesis 26:29).

  3. 1 Samuel 20:14

    “The kindness of the LORD” is chesed of the kind God shows, loyalty beyond what is owed. “That I die not” names a real danger: new dynasties routinely killed the old royal house, as Baasha did to Jeroboam’s (1 Kings 15:29) and Jehu to Ahab’s (2 Kings 10:11).

  4. 1 Samuel 20:15

    The verse turns on the verb karat, to cut. David is not to “cut off” his kindness even when the LORD has “cut off” his enemies, and in the next verse Jonathan “cuts” a covenant. The same verb names the promise, the danger and the protection.

  5. 1 Samuel 20:16

    “The house of David” appears here for the first time in the book, spoken by the heir of Saul. The same phrase, bytdwd, is found on the Tel Dan inscription of the ninth century BC, the earliest mention of David outside the Bible. “Require it” means call to account.

  6. 1 Samuel 20:17

    The Greek reads that Jonathan swore again to David, rather than making David swear. The Hebrew explains the second oath by love, twice: he loved him, he loved him as his own soul. Love is the reason for the covenant, not a substitute for it.

1 Samuel 20:12-17

King James Version

12And Jonathan said unto David, O LORD God of Israel, when I have sounded my father about to morrow any time, or the third day, and, behold, if there be good toward David, and I then send not unto thee, and shew it thee;

13The LORD do so and much more to Jonathan: but if it please my father to do thee evil, then I will shew it thee, and send thee away, that thou mayest go in peace: and the LORD be with thee, as he hath been with my father.

14And thou shalt not only while yet I live shew me the kindness of the LORD, that I die not:

15But also thou shalt not cut off thy kindness from my house for ever: no, not when the LORD hath cut off the enemies of David every one from the face of the earth.

16So Jonathan made a covenant with the house of David, saying, Let the LORD even require it at the hand of David’s enemies.

17And Jonathan caused David to swear again, because he loved him: for he loved him as he loved his own soul.

1 Samuel 20:18-23

A Message Hidden in an Ordinary Practice Session

The signal is ingenious because it can be completely public and completely secret at the same time. Jonathan will shoot arrows as though practicing at a mark and send a boy to retrieve them. The boy needs no knowledge of David, Saul's plan, or the covenant. Only the direction in which Jonathan calls him will matter. "On this side" means David may come out; "beyond thee" means he must leave. The ordinary equipment of a prince becomes a communications system that does not recruit the servant into the conspiracy of survival. Jonathan also frames the worse outcome in theological language: if the arrows send David away, "the LORD hath sent thee away." That does not make the separation painless or imply that Saul's hostility is righteous. It places even unwanted distance beneath the continuing witness of God. The final line reaches beyond the signal itself: "the LORD be between thee and me for ever." The agreement must hold when physical nearness can no longer keep it alive.

Jonathan plans the arrow signal
Chapter scene1 Samuel 20

Deep dive

The plan separates the public action from its private meaning. A boy retrieving arrows will hear practical instructions; David will hear either permission to emerge or a warning to leave. The direction of the arrow relative to the runner, not a secret object or obscure riddle, carries the message. Jonathan's ordinary equipment becomes a means of preserving David without requiring the servant to become knowingly involved in the dispute.

The two alternatives are not emotionally symmetrical. A safe result would allow David to return, while the other is described as the LORD sending him away. Jonathan places even the unwanted separation within their continuing relation to God. The repeated assurance that the LORD stands between them does not mean that they can remain together or avoid every consequence. It names the enduring witness to an agreement that must hold when physical presence can no longer maintain it.

Words to trace: arrows, LORD, side, business, David, days

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 1 Samuel 20:18

    The Hebrew puns on the verb paqad: “thou shalt be missed” and “thy seat will be empty” are two forms of it. An empty place at a royal table is itself a message, and Saul will read it.

  2. 1 Samuel 20:19

    “When the business was in hand” is literally “on the day of the deed”, probably the earlier hiding of 19:2–3. Ezel may mean “departure”, an apt name for the stone where a leave-taking will happen; the Greek reads “that mound” instead.

  3. 1 Samuel 20:20

    A “mark” is a target, the word Job uses when he says God has set him up for his mark (Job 16:12). Jonathan was known as an archer; David’s lament will say “the bow of Jonathan turned not back” (2 Samuel 1:22). An archer practising in a field drew no attention.

  4. 1 Samuel 20:21

    “On this side of thee” means short of the boy, between him and the archer. “No hurt” is literally “no thing”, nothing wrong. Jonathan puts an oath, “as the LORD liveth”, inside the signal itself, so the arrows carry a sworn word.

  5. 1 Samuel 20:22

    “Young man” here is elem, the rare word for a youth that Saul used of David in 17:56. “Sent thee away” is the verb Jonathan used of himself in verse 13; the second signal attributes the sending to the LORD. The same shout will tell the boy where to run and David where to go.

  6. 1 Samuel 20:23

    “The LORD be between thee and me” recalls Laban’s words at Mizpah: “The LORD watch between me and thee, when we are absent one from another” (Genesis 31:49). Laban meant it as a warning; Jonathan means it as a bond.

1 Samuel 20:18-23

King James Version

18Then Jonathan said to David, To morrow is the new moon: and thou shalt be missed, because thy seat will be empty.

19And when thou hast stayed three days, then thou shalt go down quickly, and come to the place where thou didst hide thyself when the business was in hand, and shalt remain by the stone Ezel.

20And I will shoot three arrows on the side thereof, as though I shot at a mark.

21And, behold, I will send a lad, saying, Go, find out the arrows. If I expressly say unto the lad, Behold, the arrows are on this side of thee, take them; then come thou: for there is peace to thee, and no hurt; as the LORD liveth.

22But if I say thus unto the young man, Behold, the arrows are beyond thee; go thy way: for the LORD hath sent thee away.

23And as touching the matter which thou and I have spoken of, behold, the LORD be between thee and me for ever.

1 Samuel 20:24-34

Saul Protects Jonathan's Future by Throwing a Spear at Him

The first empty seat can be explained away. Saul assumes ritual uncleanness. On the second day he asks, and Jonathan gives the prepared account about Bethlehem. Saul's answer finally says the dynastic fear out loud: as long as David lives, Jonathan and Jonathan's kingdom will not be established. The king is trying to persuade his son with the very future Jonathan has already surrendered to the covenant. Jonathan asks the question Saul still cannot answer with a charge: "Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?" Saul's reply is a javelin. The contradiction is almost brutal in its simplicity. He claims to be protecting Jonathan's throne while trying to kill Jonathan for defending the man who threatens it. At that moment Jonathan knows with certainty that David's assessment was correct because his father's violence has reached him personally. He leaves the table in fierce anger and grief, and the royal feast that began with one empty place effectively ends with another. Fellowship has been broken by the king trying to preserve it on his own terms.

Saul throws a javelin at Jonathan
Chapter scene1 Samuel 20

Deep dive

On the first day Saul explains the absence through possible ritual uncleanness. The second day removes that easy explanation, and Jonathan supplies the agreed account. Saul's response reveals his dynastic calculation: David's continued life prevents Jonathan's kingdom from being established. The son to whom Saul appeals has already entered a covenant that protects David and anticipates kindness from him. Father and son are discussing the same future from opposite commitments.

Jonathan asks for the offence that warrants death. Saul throws the javelin at him. The contradiction is contained in the action: a king claiming to secure his son's future endangers that son's life for asking about an innocent man. Jonathan now knows the intent against David because the violence has reached him directly. His departure in fierce anger and grief is expressly recorded, so those emotions do not need to be invented. The royal meal, arranged around expected fellowship, ends with an empty seat becoming two.

Words to trace: Jonathan, Saul, David, father, Jesse, meat

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 1 Samuel 20:24

    “Meat” in 1611 English means food in general, not only flesh. The verse puts the two men in their places: David hidden in the field, the king seated at the table. The narrative will now stay at the table.

  2. 1 Samuel 20:25

    The king’s seat by the wall kept his back covered, an arrangement that looks different after two spears thrown at walls. “Jonathan arose” is puzzling in the Hebrew; the Greek suggests Jonathan sat facing the king. King, heir, general, champion: four places, one empty.

  3. 1 Samuel 20:26

    Sacrificial meals required ritual purity (Leviticus 7:20–21), and ordinary causes such as an emission made a man unclean until evening (Leviticus 15:16). Saul supplies an explanation for himself and repeats it: “surely he is not clean.” He is reassuring himself.

  4. 1 Samuel 20:27

    This is the first time Saul calls David simply “the son of Jesse”, refusing him his name. “Neither yesterday, nor to day” recalls “as in times past” (19:7), literally “as yesterday and the day before”. The old routine is broken, and Saul has counted the days.

  5. 1 Samuel 20:28

    Jonathan opens with exactly the words David scripted in verse 6, “earnestly asked leave”, down to the doubled verb. The script is followed faithfully, and in the next verse Jonathan adds to it.

  6. 1 Samuel 20:29

    Jonathan embroiders the excuse: a brother, probably Eliab, has ordered David to come. “Let me get away” is nimlat, “let me escape”, the verb used for David’s escapes from the spear and the window (19:10, 12). Jonathan uses the fugitive’s own word in front of the king.

  7. 1 Samuel 20:30

    The insult attacks Jonathan through his mother: literally “son of a perverse woman of rebellion”. “The confusion of thy mother’s nakedness” means the shame of the womb that bore him. “Chosen” may be “companion” in the Greek, which differs by a letter. Saul curses his own wife to wound his son.

  8. 1 Samuel 20:31

    “Established” is kun, the verb Samuel used when he told Saul the LORD would have “established” his kingdom for ever (13:13). Saul offers Jonathan the security he himself forfeited. “He shall surely die” is literally “he is a son of death”, the idiom David uses in 26:16.

  9. 1 Samuel 20:32

    Jonathan’s question is nearly the same Hebrew as David’s in verse 1, “What have I done?”, asked now on David’s behalf. It is the question of 19:5 again, without the speech this time. Jonathan still asks for a charge.

  10. 1 Samuel 20:33

    The verb for casting the spear is the one used when Saul hurled it at David (18:11). “Determined” is kalah, the word David used in verse 7 for the sign of evil intent. The test gets its answer in its own vocabulary, and from the javelin rather than the tongue.

  11. 1 Samuel 20:34

    “Fierce anger” is literally “burning of anger”. Jonathan fasts through a feast, eating nothing on the second day of the new moon. “His father had done him shame” leaves “him” open: it can mean David, whom Saul slandered, or Jonathan, whom Saul humiliated at table.

1 Samuel 20:24-34

King James Version

24So David hid himself in the field: and when the new moon was come, the king sat him down to eat meat.

25And the king sat upon his seat, as at other times, even upon a seat by the wall: and Jonathan arose, and Abner sat by Saul’s side, and David’s place was empty.

26Nevertheless Saul spake not any thing that day: for he thought, Something hath befallen him, he is not clean; surely he is not clean.

27And it came to pass on the morrow, which was the second day of the month, that David’s place was empty: and Saul said unto Jonathan his son, Wherefore cometh not the son of Jesse to meat, neither yesterday, nor to day?

28And Jonathan answered Saul, David earnestly asked leave of me to go to Beth-lehem:

29And he said, Let me go, I pray thee; for our family hath a sacrifice in the city; and my brother, he hath commanded me to be there: and now, if I have found favour in thine eyes, let me get away, I pray thee, and see my brethren. Therefore he cometh not unto the king’s table.

30Then Saul’s anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother’s nakedness?

31For as long as the son of Jesse liveth upon the ground, thou shalt not be established, nor thy kingdom. Wherefore now send and fetch him unto me, for he shall surely die.

32And Jonathan answered Saul his father, and said unto him, Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?

33And Saul cast a javelin at him to smite him: whereby Jonathan knew that it was determined of his father to slay David.

34So Jonathan arose from the table in fierce anger, and did eat no meat the second day of the month: for he was grieved for David, because his father had done him shame.

1 Samuel 20:35-42

The Signal Gives Way to a Farewell

The arrows go beyond the boy, and Jonathan's shouted instructions carry the message exactly as planned. The servant knows nothing beyond the practical business of retrieving equipment. Once he is sent back to the city with the bow and arrows, however, covert communication gives way to an open farewell. David emerges, bows three times, and the two men kiss and weep. The Book of 1 Samuel does not hide their grief behind military restraint. It states that both wept and that David's grief exceeded Jonathan's. Jonathan's last words do not add a new bargain. They repeat the old one under the pressure that now makes it costly: the LORD stands between them and between their descendants for ever. The covenant is not a way to prevent separation. It is what survives the separation. David rises and departs toward the uncertain life of a fugitive, while Jonathan returns to the city and to the household whose king has just tried to kill him. Their directions divide, but their sworn obligation does not.

Jonathan and David part
Chapter scene1 Samuel 20

Deep dive

The boy follows instructions without knowing the matter, exactly as planned. The KJV's "artillery" means the bow-and-arrow equipment here, not a later kind of weapon. Once the servant has been sent back to the city, the covert signal is followed by direct meeting. This does not make the plan pointless: it first communicates the danger and then clears the setting for a private farewell.

David bows three times, and both men kiss and weep. Their grief is stated openly, with David's described as exceeding Jonathan's. The account does not require emotional restraint to give the covenant weight. Jonathan's final words extend the LORD's witness to their descendants, returning from the present sorrow to the obligation that must survive it. They then go in different directions: Jonathan to the city, David away. The agreement holds them together precisely where the closing movements separate them.

Words to trace: Jonathan, David, arrow, arose, arrows, city

Verse-by-verse path

  1. 1 Samuel 20:35

    “The time appointed” is mo’ed, the word for the set time Saul failed to keep at Gilgal (13:8, 11). Jonathan keeps his. The boy is called a “little lad”, perhaps chosen because a child would ask no questions, though that is an inference.

  2. 1 Samuel 20:36

    One arrow is enough; the plan of three arrows in verse 20 is quietly reduced. “Beyond him” is literally “to make it pass over him”, the verb of crossing. Jonathan shoots while the boy is still running, so the arrow lands beyond him.

  3. 1 Samuel 20:37

    Jonathan phrases the signal as a question, “Is not the arrow beyond thee?”, which sounds to the boy like a helpful hint. For David, hiding within earshot, it is the verdict of the new moon feast in one short question.

  4. 1 Samuel 20:38

    “Make speed, haste, stay not” are three commands for a child fetching arrows, far more urgency than the errand needs. They are for the man in hiding. The boy obeys the words; David hears their meaning.

  5. 1 Samuel 20:39

    The Hebrew says the boy knew “not anything at all”. Only Jonathan and David knew “the matter”, the same word for the thing “which thou and I have spoken of” in verse 23. The secret stays between the two men who swore it.

  6. 1 Samuel 20:40

    Jonathan hands the boy all his weapons and sends him home. The prince who gave David his sword and bow in 18:4 now empties his hands of bow and arrows before the meeting. The boy walks back to Gibeah alone, taking the only witness with him.

  7. 1 Samuel 20:41

    The Hebrew has David rise “from beside the south”; the Greek reads “from beside the mound”, matching its reading in verse 19. Bowing three times is the deference of a subject to a prince. “Until David exceeded” is obscure, perhaps meaning David wept the more, or recovered himself last.

  8. 1 Samuel 20:42

    The oath now reaches both men’s descendants, and 2 Samuel 21:7 records David sparing Mephibosheth “because of the LORD’s oath that was between them”. In the Hebrew Bible, “And he arose and departed” begins chapter 21, so the chapter break falls between the two men walking apart.

1 Samuel 20:35-42

King James Version

35And it came to pass in the morning, that Jonathan went out into the field at the time appointed with David, and a little lad with him.

36And he said unto his lad, Run, find out now the arrows which I shoot. And as the lad ran, he shot an arrow beyond him.

37And when the lad was come to the place of the arrow which Jonathan had shot, Jonathan cried after the lad, and said, Is not the arrow beyond thee?

38And Jonathan cried after the lad, Make speed, haste, stay not. And Jonathan’s lad gathered up the arrows, and came to his master.

39But the lad knew not any thing: only Jonathan and David knew the matter.

40And Jonathan gave his artillery unto his lad, and said unto him, Go, carry them to the city.

41And as soon as the lad was gone, David arose out of a place toward the south, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times: and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, until David exceeded.

42And Jonathan said to David, Go in peace, forasmuch as we have sworn both of us in the name of the LORD, saying, The LORD be between me and thee, and between my seed and thy seed for ever. And he arose and departed: and Jonathan went into the city.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
  2. Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
  3. Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 1 Samuel 20?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of 1 Samuel 20 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: 1 Samuel 20 develops its own movement around Jonathan, David, father, LORD, arrows?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006