The big picture
Acts 18 opens in verse 1 with “After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;”, reaches its middle movement near verse 14 with “And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a…”, and closes in verse 28 with “For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that…” Repeated or prominent terms include Jews, Paul, synagogue, Lord, Aquila. Together, those details trace this chapter’s own movement from its opening to its conclusion.
Scripture beside the summary
Acts · King James Version · 28Acts 18:1-7
1–7: After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;
Acts 18:1–7 opens with “After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;” and reaches “And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man’s house, named Justus, one that…” by its final verse. That movement develops the focus on Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos, with particular weight carried by Jews, certain, departed.
Deep dive
The movement opens with “After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;” By verse 4, the text has turned to “And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.” It lands on “And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man’s house, named Justus, one that…” The distance between those lines matters as much as any isolated phrase. The passage has a voice and pulse of its own, including 1 verse with a speech marker, 1 verse naming the LORD or God. Those features reveal where the narrative slows down, speaks directly, or changes direction.
The narrator makes meaning through who acts first, who responds, what changes, and which consequences remain. A reported action is not automatically an approved action. Words such as Jews, certain, departed, house, named, Paul tie the complete block together. The central idea, “Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos,” should remain answerable to the text. Some conclusions are explicit, some gather support across several verses, and others remain strong inferences or interpretations.
Names or load-bearing terms in this scene include Jews, Paul, Aquila, Athens, Christ, Claudius. Its number language includes one. The nearest hinge to the center comes in verse 1: “After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;” That detail helps separate the opening situation from what the passage changes next.
Words to trace: Jews, certain, departed, house, named, Paul
Verse-by-verse path
- Acts 18:1
“After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;” Naming Athens and Corinth keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:2
“And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla; (because that…” The command cannot be understood from the verb alone. Its recipient, purpose, and place in the larger covenant or argument define the responsibility.
- Acts 18:3
“And because he was of the same craft, he abode with them, and wrought: for by their occupation they were tentmakers.” The line’s distinctive content terms include abode, craft, occupation. Its relationship to verses 2 and 4 shows what work it does in this passage.
- Acts 18:4
“And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.” Naming Greeks and Jews keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:5
“And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit, and testified to the Jews that…” Naming Christ and Jesus keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:6
“And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your…” Naming Gentiles and Your keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:7
“And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man’s house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house…” The number one makes the report concrete. Ask whether it measures time, people, distance, repetition, or completeness before deciding what weight it carries.
Acts 18:1-7
King James Version1After these things Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth;
2And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla; (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart from Rome:) and came unto them.
3And because he was of the same craft, he abode with them, and wrought: for by their occupation they were tentmakers.
4And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
5And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit, and testified to the Jews that Jesus was Christ.
6And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.
7And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man’s house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house joined hard to the synagogue.
Acts 18:8-14
8–14: Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all…
Acts 18:8–14 opens with “And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many…” and reaches “And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a matter of…” by its final verse. That movement develops the focus on Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos, with particular weight carried by Jews, Paul, believed.
Deep dive
The movement opens with “And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and…” By verse 11, the text has turned to “And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.” It lands on “And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a…” The distance between those lines matters as much as any isolated phrase. The passage has a voice and pulse of its own, including 2 verses with a speech marker, 1 stated contrast, 4 verses naming the LORD or God. Those features reveal where the narrative slows down, speaks directly, or changes direction.
The narrator makes meaning through who acts first, who responds, what changes, and which consequences remain. A reported action is not automatically an approved action. Words such as Jews, Paul, believed, Gallio, Lord, accord tie the complete block together. The central idea, “Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos,” should remain answerable to the text. Some conclusions are explicit, some gather support across several verses, and others remain strong inferences or interpretations.
Names or load-bearing terms in this scene include Jews, Paul, Gallio, God, Lord, Achaia. Its number language includes six, one. The nearest hinge to the center comes in verse 9: “Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:” That detail helps separate the opening situation from what the passage changes next.
Words to trace: Jews, Paul, believed, Gallio, Lord, accord
Verse-by-verse path
- Acts 18:8
“And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians…” Naming Corinthians and Crispus keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:9
“Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:” Naming Paul keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:10
“For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city.” This line supplies a reason, result, or conclusion. It should stay attached to the claim or action that gives it meaning.
- Acts 18:11
“And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.” The number six makes the report concrete. Ask whether it measures time, people, distance, repetition, or completeness before deciding what weight it carries.
- Acts 18:12
“And when Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to…” The number one makes the report concrete. Ask whether it measures time, people, distance, repetition, or completeness before deciding what weight it carries.
- Acts 18:13
“Saying, This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law.” Naming Saying keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:14
“And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked…” Naming Jews and Gallio keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
Acts 18:8-14
King James Version8And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized.
9Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:
10For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city.
11And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.
12And when Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to the judgment seat,
13Saying, This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law.
14And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you:
Acts 18:15-21
15–21: If it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it…
Acts 18:15–21 opens with “But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no…” and reaches “But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem…” by its final verse. That movement develops the focus on Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos, with particular weight carried by Ephesus, judgment, sailed.
Deep dive
The movement opens with “But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no…” By verse 18, the text has turned to “And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren…” It lands on “But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in…” The distance between those lines matters as much as any isolated phrase. The passage has a voice and pulse of its own, including 3 stated contrasts, 1 verse naming the LORD or God. Those features reveal where the narrative slows down, speaks directly, or changes direction.
The narrator makes meaning through who acts first, who responds, what changes, and which consequences remain. A reported action is not automatically an approved action. Words such as Ephesus, judgment, sailed, seat, synagogue, took tie the complete block together. The central idea, “Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos,” should remain answerable to the text. Some conclusions are explicit, some gather support across several verses, and others remain strong inferences or interpretations.
Names or load-bearing terms in this scene include Ephesus, Aquila, Cenchrea, Gallio, God, Greeks. The nearest hinge to the center comes in verse 17: “Then all the Greeks took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and beat him before the judgment seat. And Gallio cared for…” That detail helps separate the opening situation from what the passage changes next.
Words to trace: Ephesus, judgment, sailed, seat, synagogue, took
Verse-by-verse path
- Acts 18:15
“But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters.” The line’s distinctive content terms include judge, look, matters. Its relationship to verses 16 shows what work it does in this passage.
- Acts 18:16
“And he drave them from the judgment seat.” The line’s distinctive content terms include drave, judgment, seat. Its relationship to verses 15 and 17 shows what work it does in this passage.
- Acts 18:17
“Then all the Greeks took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and beat him before the judgment seat. And…” Naming Gallio and Greeks keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:18
“And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into…” Naming Aquila and Cenchrea keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:19
“And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.” Naming Ephesus and Jews keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:20
“When they desired him to tarry longer time with them, he consented not;” The line’s distinctive content terms include consented, desired, longer. Its relationship to verses 19 and 21 shows what work it does in this passage.
- Acts 18:21
“But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again…” The command cannot be understood from the verb alone. Its recipient, purpose, and place in the larger covenant or argument define the responsibility.
Acts 18:15-21
King James Version15But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters.
16And he drave them from the judgment seat.
17Then all the Greeks took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and beat him before the judgment seat. And Gallio cared for none of those things.
18And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having shorn his head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow.
19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.
20When they desired him to tarry longer time with them, he consented not;
21But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again unto you, if God will. And he sailed from Ephesus.
Acts 18:22-28
22–28: When he had landed at Cæsarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he…
Acts 18:22–28 opens with “And when he had landed at Cæsarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he went down to Antioch.” and reaches “For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was…” by its final verse. That movement develops the focus on Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos, with particular weight carried by disciples, Lord, scriptures.
Deep dive
The movement opens with “And when he had landed at Cæsarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he went down to…” By verse 25, the text has turned to “This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake…” It lands on “For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus…” The distance between those lines matters as much as any isolated phrase. The passage has a voice and pulse of its own, including 1 verse with a speech marker, 2 verses naming the LORD or God. Those features reveal where the narrative slows down, speaks directly, or changes direction.
The narrator makes meaning through who acts first, who responds, what changes, and which consequences remain. A reported action is not automatically an approved action. Words such as disciples, Lord, scriptures, Achaia, Alexandria, Antioch tie the complete block together. The central idea, “Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos,” should remain answerable to the text. Some conclusions are explicit, some gather support across several verses, and others remain strong inferences or interpretations.
Names or load-bearing terms in this scene include Lord, Achaia, Alexandria, Antioch, Apollos, Aquila. The nearest hinge to the center comes in verse 25: “This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the…” That detail helps separate the opening situation from what the passage changes next.
Words to trace: disciples, Lord, scriptures, Achaia, Alexandria, Antioch
Verse-by-verse path
- Acts 18:22
“And when he had landed at Cæsarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he went down to Antioch.” Naming Antioch keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:23
“And after he had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia in order…” Naming Galatia and Phrygia keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:24
“And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.” Naming Alexandria and Apollos keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:25
“This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the…” Naming John keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:26
“And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and…” Naming Aquila keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:27
“And when he was disposed to pass into Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him: who, when he…” Naming Achaia keeps the account rooted in particular people or places. Follow where the name returns and what changes around it.
- Acts 18:28
“For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ.” This line supplies a reason, result, or conclusion. It should stay attached to the claim or action that gives it meaning.
Acts 18:22-28
King James Version22And when he had landed at Cæsarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he went down to Antioch.
23And after he had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples.
24And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.
25This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John.
26And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.
27And when he was disposed to pass into Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him: who, when he was come, helped them much which had believed through grace:
28For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
- Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
- Do not assume the narrator approves every action that is reported.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Acts 18?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral story?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Acts 18 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Paul working with Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth and Priscilla and Aquila explaining the way more fully to Apollos?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
