The big picture
Exodus 16 turns hunger into a test of memory as much as appetite. Israel remembers Egypt as a place of full bread and cooking pots, leaving the brick quotas out of the recollection, while the LORD answers the real need with quail and unfamiliar bread. Manna is not merely dropped into the camp as a supply. Its gathering is structured by household need, daily limits, and a sixth-day exception that prepares for Sabbath rest. Attempts to redesign the gift fail in opposite directions: ordinary portions kept overnight spoil, while people who go looking on the seventh day find nothing. The chapter then stretches beyond the first week by preserving a measured portion for generations not yet born and by noting that Israel ate manna for forty years. Daily food becomes both discipline and memorial, tangible enough to measure, taste, gather, lose, keep, and remember.
In this chapter
- The Remembered Menu Leaves Out the Bricks Exodus 16:1-8
Hunger makes Egypt look better in memory than it looked while Israel was living there.
- The Answer Appears in the Direction of the Wilderness Exodus 16:9-15
The people have been looking backward toward Egypt, but the Book of Exodus turns their faces toward the wilderness.
- Enough Is Measured by the People in the Tent Exodus 16:16-21
The measure follows the people in the tent, not a rule that everyone must return with the same pile.
- The Day with No Gathering Already Has Its Bread Exodus 16:22-30
The sixth day makes the earlier spoilage impossible to explain as mere shelf life.
- One Portion Is Kept for People Not Yet Born Exodus 16:31-36
The Book of Exodus ends the chapter by turning breakfast into evidence.

Scripture beside the summary
Exodus · King James Version · 36Exodus 16:1-8
The Remembered Menu Leaves Out the Bricks
Hunger makes Egypt look better in memory than it looked while Israel was living there. The Book of Exodus lets the complaint expose its own editing: flesh pots and bread “to the full” remain in view, while quotas, beatings, and groaning have vanished from the remembered menu. The distortion does not make the present hunger imaginary. It makes the accusation about the purpose of the exodus the real issue. The people say they were brought out to die, and the answer is bread that arrives with instructions. Daily gathering and a doubled sixth day mean the gift will test how it is received, especially what Israel does with the question of tomorrow. Moses and Aaron therefore refuse to treat the complaint as merely personal criticism of leadership. In this particular charge, the deliverance itself is being described as a murder plan. Evening and morning will answer that claim with food and identify again who actually brought Israel out of Egypt.

Deep dive
The date places the company in the second month after departure. The wilderness of Sin is a place name, not an English moral label attached to the complaint. Hunger is the immediate problem, but the people's description of Egypt turns their former life into a scene of full meals beside cooking pots. The brick quotas, beatings, and groaning have disappeared from that recollection. Exodus lets the difference between earlier chapters and this complaint expose the selectivity without denying that the present need for food is real.
The answer is both provision and instruction. Bread will be given each day in a stated amount, with a different pattern on the sixth day. The test therefore concerns how the people receive a gift, not whether they can produce food from the wilderness by their own ingenuity. Their relationship to the next day's supply will become part of the test.
Moses and Aaron identify the complaint as directed ultimately against the LORD, because the charge is that the departure itself was designed to kill the people. They are not claiming that a leader's every administrative decision is beyond criticism. They are answering this particular accusation about the deliverance the LORD has commanded and accomplished. Evening and morning will provide a fresh answer to the question of who brought Israel out.
Words to trace: LORD, children, Israel, Moses, bread, Egypt
Verse-by-verse path
- Exodus 16:1
The wilderness of Sin takes its name from the region of Sinai, not from the English word, and may come from Sin, the moon god. The date is exact: the fifteenth of the second month, a month to the day after they left Egypt on the fifteenth of the first (Numbers 33:3).
- Exodus 16:2
“Whole congregation” for the first time turns against both leaders together. The murmuring of 15:24 was about water; this is about food, and it comes a month into the journey, when supplies brought from Egypt would have run out.
- Exodus 16:3
“Would to God we had died” is literally “who would give our dying”, a Hebrew idiom of wishing. “By the hand of the LORD” means by the plagues, the same death that struck Egypt. “Flesh pots” are cooking pots for meat; slaves were rarely fed that well.
- Exodus 16:4
“Rain bread from heaven” uses the verb of the hail in 9:23, where God “rained hail”; the same sky that rained ruin on Egypt now rains bread on Israel. “A certain rate every day” is literally “a day’s portion in its day”, the phrase behind “Give us this day our daily bread”.
- Exodus 16:5
“Prepare” is hekhinu, to make ready. The sixth day is set apart for preparation before the Sabbath has even been named, the idea behind the Gospels’ “preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath” (Mark 15:42). The rhythm is laid down before the rule is explained.
- Exodus 16:6
“At even, then ye shall know” answers verse 3 point for point. The people said “ye have brought us forth”; Moses says it was the LORD who brought them out. The evening’s sign, the quails, is meant to correct who they think is responsible.
- Exodus 16:7
“Glory” is kavod, weight or heaviness, the root of Pharaoh’s heavy heart. The morning’s sign is the bread, yet Moses also promises they will see the glory, which appears in verse 10. “What are we” is literally “and we, what?”
- Exodus 16:8
Moses repeats verse 7 with more force, and the word for “murmurings” appears three times. His reasoning is that complaint against God’s servants is complaint against God. The same point is made to Samuel in 1 Samuel 8:7: “they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me.”
Exodus 16:1-8
King James Version1And they took their journey from Elim, and all the congregation of the children of Israel came unto the wilderness of Sin, which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the second month after their departing out of the land of Egypt.
2And the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness:
3And the children of Israel said unto them, Would to God we had died by the hand of the LORD in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the flesh pots, and when we did eat bread to the full; for ye have brought us forth into this wilderness, to kill this whole assembly with hunger.
4Then said the LORD unto Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law, or no.
5And it shall come to pass, that on the sixth day they shall prepare that which they bring in; and it shall be twice as much as they gather daily.
6And Moses and Aaron said unto all the children of Israel, At even, then ye shall know that the LORD hath brought you out from the land of Egypt:
7And in the morning, then ye shall see the glory of the LORD; for that he heareth your murmurings against the LORD: and what are we, that ye murmur against us?
8And Moses said, This shall be, when the LORD shall give you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the full; for that the LORD heareth your murmurings which ye murmur against him: and what are we? your murmurings are not against us, but against the LORD.
Exodus 16:9-15
The Answer Appears in the Direction of the Wilderness
The people have been looking backward toward Egypt, but the Book of Exodus turns their faces toward the wilderness. That is where the glory appears in the cloud and where the answer to hunger arrives. Quails cover the camp in the evening. In the morning, the dew lifts and leaves a small substance across the ground, unfamiliar enough that the people’s first response is essentially a question. The KJV’s “It is manna” sits beside the explanation that they do not know what it is, preserving the connection between the name and their bewilderment. Moses does not solve the moment by offering a botanical label. He identifies the substance by its significance: this is the bread the LORD has given them to eat. The place accused of being a death trap becomes the direction from which provision appears. This quail episode also stands on its own terms. Exodus gives food here without importing the later judgment attached to quails in the Book of Numbers.

Deep dive
The people look toward the wilderness and see the LORD's glory in the cloud. That direction matters after their backward-looking description of Egypt. The place they have accused Moses of bringing them to for death becomes the place where provision appears. Quails cover the camp in the evening, and the morning dew leaves behind the small substance that Exodus compares to frost. This quail episode should not be merged with the later deaths associated with quails in Numbers 11; Exodus records provision here without that later judgment.
The KJV's "It is manna" is immediately followed by the explanation that the people do not know what it is. The Hebrew phrase man hu can be understood as the question of what the substance is, which explains the connection between their puzzlement and its name. Their first encounter supplies no expert identification. Moses explains its significance rather than giving a botanical classification: it is the bread the LORD has given them to eat. The food arrives before the people possess a familiar category for it. Their bewilderment does not prevent it from being sufficient for the purpose stated.
Words to trace: LORD, children, Israel, Moses, spake, Aaron
Verse-by-verse path
- Exodus 16:9
“Come near before the LORD” is the language later used for approaching the sanctuary. No tabernacle exists yet, so the phrase means presenting themselves before the pillar of cloud. Aaron is again the voice, as in chapter 4.
- Exodus 16:10
They “looked toward the wilderness”, away from Egypt, the direction they had just wished to return to. The glory of the LORD appears “in the cloud”, the first time the glory is seen by the whole people, before Sinai.
- Exodus 16:11
A bare introduction, but the order has changed. Moses had already told the people what would happen in verses 6–8; now God confirms it to Moses. The servant spoke ahead of the word, and the word agreed.
- Exodus 16:12
“Ye shall know that I am the LORD your God” is the phrase used of Egypt in the plagues, now given to Israel through food. The same knowledge Egypt gained through judgment Israel will gain through provision.
- Exodus 16:13
Quails migrate across the Sinai in spring and autumn and, exhausted, often land in great numbers, where they can be caught by hand. “Came up” and “covered” are simple verbs, with no suggestion of the plague of quails in Numbers 11. “Dew” is tal, part of the manna’s appearance.
- Exodus 16:14
“Small round thing” is mechuspas, a word found nowhere else, perhaps “flaky” or “scale-like”. “Hoar frost” is kefor, frost, an image familiar even in the Sinai’s cold nights. The description is careful because no one had seen it before.
- Exodus 16:15
“It is manna” translates man hu, which is better read “What is it?”, since man is an old form of mah, what. The King James takes it as a name. The people’s question becomes the name of the food. John 6:31–35 recalls this bread when Jesus says, “I am the bread of life.”
Exodus 16:9-15
King James Version9And Moses spake unto Aaron, Say unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, Come near before the LORD: for he hath heard your murmurings.
10And it came to pass, as Aaron spake unto the whole congregation of the children of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and, behold, the glory of the LORD appeared in the cloud.
11And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
12I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel: speak unto them, saying, At even ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall know that I am the LORD your God.
13And it came to pass, that at even the quails came up, and covered the camp: and in the morning the dew lay round about the host.
14And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground.
15And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, It is manna: for they wist not what it was. And Moses said unto them, This is the bread which the LORD hath given you to eat.
Exodus 16:16-21
Enough Is Measured by the People in the Tent
The measure follows the people in the tent, not a rule that everyone must return with the same pile. Some gather more and some less because households differ, and the omer per person defines enough by the number who need to eat. The Book of Exodus emphasizes the result: no surplus beyond need for the one who gathered much, no lack for the one who gathered little. Then the command reaches tomorrow. An ordinary day’s portion is not to be kept overnight, so a reserve assembled against the instruction becomes worms and stink rather than security. The lesson is not that storing food is inherently wrong. The later Sabbath exception will prove that. Here the daily pattern makes continued provision something received again rather than privately captured all at once. Even the sun imposes a schedule, melting what remains outside as the day warms. The manna is sufficient, but it is not available on whatever terms a gatherer chooses.


Deep dive
An omer is assigned per person, and those gathering collect for the members of their tents. Some therefore gather more and others less without either amount automatically proving greed or laziness. The measure is household need. When the food is measured, those with more have no surplus beyond that need and those with less have no lack. The passage does not describe the exact process by which the measured result was achieved, but it is clear about the result it emphasizes: the people have enough.
The ban on keeping an ordinary day's portion until morning makes tomorrow's supply a matter of renewed dependence. Those who disregard it gain worms and an offensive smell, not a useful reserve. Moses' anger is explicitly recorded. The rising sun also sets a boundary on the morning gathering by melting what remains outside. Provision has a daily rhythm that the people cannot redesign simply by collecting at any time or storing indefinitely.
Paul quotes this passage in 2 Corinthians 8:15 while discussing material assistance between congregations. His use turns on the balance between abundance and lack, not on the claim that all gatherers originally brought back identical quantities. The quotation makes a specific feature of Exodus central to his appeal: provision is described in relation to people having what they need.
Words to trace: gathered, eating, morning, Moses, some, omer
Verse-by-verse path
- Exodus 16:16
An omer is a dry measure of about two litres, perhaps two to four pounds of the substance. As a measure the word appears only in this chapter. “For them which are in his tents” makes the head of each household gather for everyone in it, including those unable to gather.
- Exodus 16:17
“Some more, some less” is simple, without blame: those who gathered more had more mouths to feed, or simply gathered more. The people “did so”, the first obedience recorded in the chapter.
- Exodus 16:18
“Mete” means measure. Paul quotes this verse in 2 Corinthians 8:15 to urge the churches to share money for the poor in Jerusalem. The Hebrew implies that when measured at home, every portion came out right, whatever had been gathered.
- Exodus 16:19
“Leave” is yatar, to keep over. The prohibition is simple: no reserves. The same verb describes the Passover lamb in 12:10, where nothing was to remain till morning.
- Exodus 16:20
“Bred worms” is literally “raised worms”, rum, the verb for rising or growing. The worms appear first and the stink after. “Moses was wroth” is qatsaf, and it is the first time his anger at the people is recorded.
- Exodus 16:21
“Every morning” is literally “in the morning, in the morning”, the doubling marking daily repetition. What remained on the ground melted in the sun, so the gift could not be collected at leisure. Even laziness had a deadline.
Exodus 16:16-21
King James Version16This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded, Gather of it every man according to his eating, an omer for every man, according to the number of your persons; take ye every man for them which are in his tents.
17And the children of Israel did so, and gathered, some more, some less.
18And when they did mete it with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; they gathered every man according to his eating.
19And Moses said, Let no man leave of it till the morning.
20Notwithstanding they hearkened not unto Moses; but some of them left of it until the morning, and it bred worms, and stank: and Moses was wroth with them.
21And they gathered it every morning, every man according to his eating: and when the sun waxed hot, it melted.
Exodus 16:22-30
The Day with No Gathering Already Has Its Bread
The sixth day makes the earlier spoilage impossible to explain as mere shelf life. The same food that bred worms when kept against instruction now remains sound because keeping it is the instruction. The Book of Exodus makes the difference rest in the day and the command, not in a new variety of manna. A double portion arrives before the Sabbath so that rest does not depend on hunger. Preparation happens on the sixth day, and the seventh has no fresh supply waiting in the field. Some people still manage to fail in both directions: first keeping what was not to be kept, then going out to gather what was never going to be there. There is a dry kind of humor in that reversal, but the rebuke is serious. The giver of the bread also gives its rhythm. Work is not condemned, and rest is not empty. The day with no gathering has already been provided for.

Deep dive
The exception proves that the rule is not simply a lesson in the ordinary shelf life of an unfamiliar food. The sixth day's portion can be kept without worms or stench because it has been set apart for the coming rest. The same act of retaining food that violated the command earlier now fulfills it. The difference lies in the instruction attached to the day, not in a change from one kind of manna to another.
The Sabbath is named here before the commandments at Sinai. It is presented as something the LORD has given, and the double portion makes rest possible without requiring the people to go hungry. Preparation on the sixth day includes baking and boiling, so the seventh day's food does not depend on going out to collect a new supply.
Some people manage to miss the instructions in opposite directions: they keep what was not to be kept, then go looking for what will not be there. The humor lies in the reversal, while the LORD's rebuke identifies a continuing refusal to keep his commands. The section ends with the people resting. The point is not that effort has become bad, but that the giver of the bread also determines the rhythm in which it is gathered and received.
Words to trace: LORD, Moses, sabbath, seventh, bake, bread
Verse-by-verse path
- Exodus 16:22
“Rulers of the congregation” are nesi’im, leaders or princes, who come to report as if something had gone wrong. The double gathering, “two omers for one man”, happens naturally, and the leaders do not yet know why.
- Exodus 16:23
The first time the word “sabbath”, shabbat, appears in Scripture. The phrase is shabbaton shabbat qodesh, “a rest, a holy sabbath”. “Seethe” means boil. The instruction to cook ahead is the origin of preparing Sabbath food the day before.
- Exodus 16:24
The contrast with verse 20 is exact: “it did not stink, neither was there any worm therein”. The order is reversed: in verse 20 worms came first, then stink; here the stink is denied first, then the worms.
- Exodus 16:25
“To day” occurs three times in the verse. The emphasis is on the present day, the Sabbath, as a day already begun. Moses speaks of the Sabbath as a gift to eat, not only a day to abstain.
- Exodus 16:26
“Six days” and “the seventh” recall creation in Genesis 2:2–3, when God rested on the seventh day. The Sabbath is kept before the Ten Commandments, which is why 20:8 says “remember” the Sabbath rather than introducing it.
- Exodus 16:27
The people went out “for to gather”, deliberately, not by accident. “They found none” is two Hebrew words, and the failure needs no comment.
- Exodus 16:28
“How long refuse ye” is plural: the rebuke is addressed through Moses to all the people. The phrase echoes God’s question to Pharaoh in 10:3, “How long wilt thou refuse?” Israel is spoken to in the words used for Egypt’s king.
- Exodus 16:29
“Abide ye every man in his place” became the basis of later rules limiting travel on the Sabbath, the Sabbath day’s journey of Acts 1:12. “Hath given you” presents the Sabbath as a gift, not a burden.
- Exodus 16:30
“Rested” is shavat, the verb from which shabbat comes. The sentence is four Hebrew words, and it is the first time Israel is recorded keeping the Sabbath, before any stone tablet has named it.
Exodus 16:22-30
King James Version22And it came to pass, that on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one man: and all the rulers of the congregation came and told Moses.
23And he said unto them, This is that which the LORD hath said, To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the LORD: bake that which ye will bake to day, and seethe that ye will seethe; and that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept until the morning.
24And they laid it up till the morning, as Moses bade: and it did not stink, neither was there any worm therein.
25And Moses said, Eat that to day; for to day is a sabbath unto the LORD: to day ye shall not find it in the field.
26Six days ye shall gather it; but on the seventh day, which is the sabbath, in it there shall be none.
27And it came to pass, that there went out some of the people on the seventh day for to gather, and they found none.
28And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my commandments and my laws?
29See, for that the LORD hath given you the sabbath, therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread of two days; abide ye every man in his place, let no man go out of his place on the seventh day.
30So the people rested on the seventh day.
Exodus 16:31-36
One Portion Is Kept for People Not Yet Born
The Book of Exodus ends the chapter by turning breakfast into evidence. Manna is described by color, comparison, and taste: white, like coriander seed, and like wafers made with honey. Then one omer is deliberately kept, not as the disobedient reserve that rotted earlier, but as a commanded memorial for people who were not present in the wilderness. The same act of keeping can mean distrust or testimony depending on the instruction attached to it. The notice about placing the portion before the Testimony also widens the chapter’s time frame, because the sanctuary arrangements have not yet been described. So does the statement that Israel ate manna for forty years until reaching the land’s borders. Exodus briefly looks back across the whole wilderness period from beyond its first days. The final definition of an omer as a tenth of an ephah is almost stubbornly material. This provision can be remembered in a measured quantity, not only in a vague memory of being fed.

Deep dive
The description supplies color, size by comparison, and taste: white like coriander seed, with the taste of honey wafers. The passage gives enough detail to distinguish the food in memory without providing a recipe that would reproduce it. An omer is then set aside for later generations to see. This keeping is different from the disobedient stockpiling earlier in the chapter. The preserved portion is commanded as testimony to provision, not accumulated as a private alternative to the next day's gift.
The reference to placing the pot before "the Testimony" looks ahead to arrangements that have not yet been described, and the statement about forty years similarly surveys the whole period from beyond its opening days. Exodus has momentarily widened its time frame. These closing notices should not be read as saying that the ark, the completed sanctuary, and four decades of travel all existed in the first month of the manna.
The final explanation that an omer is one tenth of an ephah serves readers who need the measure clarified. Even that small note belongs to the chapter's concern with material reality: the food was gathered in portions, eaten, preserved in a measured amount, and remembered as the sustenance of a long journey. The account closes with a defined quantity rather than an attempt to make the provision less tangible.
Words to trace: manna, kept, land, LORD, Moses, omer
Verse-by-verse path
- Exodus 16:31
Coriander seed is small, round and pale grey or white. Numbers 11:7–8 adds that it was like bdellium, and tasted “as the taste of fresh oil”. “Wafers” is tsappichit, a word that appears only here, perhaps a flat cake. The “house of Israel” names it, a phrase unusual in Exodus.
- Exodus 16:32
“Fill an omer” means one person’s daily portion is to be kept for all the generations. “That they may see” makes the memorial visual. Later generations who never tasted manna will see how much fed one person for a day.
- Exodus 16:33
“A pot” is tsintsenet, a jar, a word found only here. Hebrews 9:4 describes it as “the golden pot that had manna”, placed in the ark. The Greek of this verse already calls it golden.
- Exodus 16:34
“The Testimony” is the tablets of the covenant, later kept in the ark, which does not yet exist. The instruction is carried out at a later time than the chapter describes, when the tabernacle had been built.
- Exodus 16:35
Forty years is a round number of a generation. Joshua 5:12 records that the manna stopped the day after Israel first ate the produce of Canaan. “A land inhabited” means a settled land, a place where food could be grown.
- Exodus 16:36
An ephah is a dry measure of about twenty litres or three-fifths of a bushel, so an omer is roughly two litres. The note is a gloss, explaining an old measure to later readers who no longer used it.
Exodus 16:31-36
King James Version31And the house of Israel called the name thereof Manna: and it was like coriander seed, white; and the taste of it was like wafers made with honey.
32And Moses said, This is the thing which the LORD commandeth, Fill an omer of it to be kept for your generations; that they may see the bread wherewith I have fed you in the wilderness, when I brought you forth from the land of Egypt.
33And Moses said unto Aaron, Take a pot, and put an omer full of manna therein, and lay it up before the LORD, to be kept for your generations.
34As the LORD commanded Moses, so Aaron laid it up before the Testimony, to be kept.
35And the children of Israel did eat manna forty years, until they came to a land inhabited; they did eat manna, until they came unto the borders of the land of Canaan.
36Now an omer is the tenth part of an ephah.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Identify the people addressed and the covenant setting.
- Distinguish rescue, worship, holiness, justice, and community responsibility.
- Read commands in their literary and covenant context before making a modern application.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Exodus 16?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Exodus 16 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Families gathering manna across the wilderness floor at dawn?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.






