The big picture
Jeremiah 23 sets failed leadership beside promises of restored leadership, then turns the same scrutiny on prophetic speech. Shepherds who scattered God's flock are held responsible for the care they withheld, while God promises to gather the remnant and provide shepherds who actually feed it. The chapter then raises a righteous Branch for David, a king defined by judgment, justice, safety, and a new act of gathering. After that promise, the language becomes an extended examination of false prophecy. Priests and prophets can occupy sacred offices while spreading profaneness through the land. Speakers can run without being sent, promise peace to people determined not to turn, claim dreams, steal one another's words, and borrow formulas that sound authoritative. Jeremiah answers with images of counsel, wheat, chaff, fire, and a hammer. The decisive question is not how confident or familiar the message sounds, but whether God actually spoke and sent the speaker, and whether the word confronts rather than protects wrongdoing.
In this chapter
- The Shepherds Will Receive the Attention They Withheld Jeremiah 23:1-4
The flock belongs to God, which makes the shepherds' authority entrusted rather than absolute.
- A Living Branch After the Cedars Fall Jeremiah 23:5-8
After chapter 22's cut cedars and failed kings, the image of a living Branch carries immediate force.
- False Speech Has Consequences in the Land Jeremiah 23:9-15
Jeremiah's reaction to the prophets is bodily: a broken heart, shaking bones, and a condition compared with drunkenness under the weight of God's holy words.
- They Ran Without Being Sent Jeremiah 23:16-22
The problem with the prophets' message is not that peace is always false.
- The Stolen Formula Does Not Supply the Voice Jeremiah 23:23-32
The God invoked by the false prophets is not absent from the private places where their claims are invented.
- The Burden Becomes the Speaker’s Own Words Jeremiah 23:33-40
The chapter ends by turning a familiar prophetic expression against those who misuse it.

Scripture beside the summary
Jeremiah · King James Version · 40Jeremiah 23:1-4
The Shepherds Will Receive the Attention They Withheld
The flock belongs to God, which makes the shepherds' authority entrusted rather than absolute. They were supposed to feed and care for sheep that were not theirs to use, yet Jeremiah says they destroyed, scattered, and drove them away. Their failure is therefore not presented as an unfortunate shortfall in management. It is a reversal of the office's purpose. The word "visit" turns the accusation back on them. They did not visit the flock with care, so God will visit them concerning the evil of their deeds. Neglected oversight becomes coming accountability. At the same time, God says that he also drove the people into the countries from which he will now gather them, holding human failure and divine judgment in the same account without reducing exile to one agency. Restoration is measured through the condition of the sheep: they return to folds, become fruitful, lose fear, and are no longer lacking. The quality of the new shepherds is seen in what happens to the flock, not in the leaders' self-description.

Deep dive
The possessive language establishes whose sheep these are. The pasture and flock belong to God, while the shepherds are responsible for their care. Their failure is not described as an unfortunate inability to keep every animal together. They have destroyed, scattered, and driven the sheep away. Authority has been used in a way that contradicts its entrusted purpose.
The repeated verb "visit" gives the reply its point. The shepherds have not visited the flock with care; God will visit the shepherds concerning their deeds. Neglect has not made them invisible. The same word turns omitted oversight into approaching accountability.
God also describes himself as having driven the people into the lands from which he will gather them. The chapter therefore holds together the leaders' culpable scattering and divine judgment rather than explaining exile by one agency alone. Restoration reverses the resulting conditions through fruitful increase, renewed folds, and shepherds who actually feed. The promise that none will be lacking answers the losses named at the beginning. The measure of the new leadership is the condition of the flock, not the shepherds' claim to importance.
Words to trace: LORD, driven, feed, flock, pastors, countries
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:1
Kings across the ancient Near East called themselves shepherds; Hammurabi opens his law code as “the shepherd”. Coming straight after the oracles on Shallum, Jehoiakim and Coniah, the shepherds here are Judah’s rulers. “Sheep of my pasture” is the phrase of Psalm 100:3. Ezekiel 34 later builds a whole chapter on this verse.
- Jeremiah 23:2
“Driven them away” is nadach, and in the very next verse God uses the same verb of himself: “whither I have driven them”. The shepherds scattered; God drove. The book lets both statements stand side by side without reducing one to the other.
- Jeremiah 23:3
“Be fruitful and increase” is the blessing of creation (Genesis 1:28) and of the new start after the flood (Genesis 9:1), here spoken over a returning remnant. “Folds” is naveh, a pasture homestead, the settled place where a flock is kept safe at night.
- Jeremiah 23:4
“Neither shall they be lacking” uses paqad a third time, the verb translated “visit” in verse 2: when the shepherd counts, none will be missing. The promise of shepherds, plural, picks up 3:15, “I will give you pastors according to mine heart”.
Jeremiah 23:1-4
King James Version1Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD.
2Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD.
3And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.
4And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them: and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall they be lacking, saith the LORD.
Jeremiah 23:5-8
A Living Branch After the Cedars Fall
After chapter 22's cut cedars and failed kings, the image of a living Branch carries immediate force. God will raise a righteous king for David, and the adjective matters as much as the lineage. This ruler will actually execute the judgment and justice that earlier Davidic kings were commanded to practice. His reign is described through the safety of Judah and Israel rather than through palace dimensions or royal display. The title "THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS" places righteousness at the center of the promise. Christian interpretation identifies this promised king with Christ, though interpreters differ over whether the title by itself functions as a direct declaration of the king's divinity or primarily locates the people's righteousness in the Lord. Jeremiah 33 applies similar naming language to Jerusalem, which keeps the phrasing from doing more work than the text itself assigns. The promise then widens into another exodus-shaped return, gathering the dispersed from the north and other lands so that righteous kingship and restored dwelling belong to the same future.

Deep dive
The contrast with chapter 22 is almost physical. Its magnificent cedars were cut down or made into the setting for an unjust king's display; here a living Branch is raised up for David. The image announces renewed royal life, but righteousness distinguishes it from mere dynastic continuation. The king will actually perform the judgment and justice repeatedly demanded from David's house. His rule is described through the safety of Judah and Israel, not the dimensions of his residence.
The KJV gives the name as "THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS". It also echoes the divine name and righteousness language within the name Zedekiah, although a name's meaning is not evidence that its bearer fulfills it. Christian interpretation identifies the promised king with Christ. Within that reading, interpreters differ over whether this title directly identifies the king as divine or primarily declares the Lord to be the source of his people's righteousness. Jeremiah 33:15–16 must remain in view because it repeats the Branch promise and applies the same naming language to Jerusalem. The connection makes the confession of divine righteousness central without allowing the wording alone to settle every later doctrinal question.
Verses 7 and 8 place that hope within a new defining act of deliverance. As in chapter 16, return from the north and the lands of dispersion reshapes the oath once centred on the exodus from Egypt. The destination is dwelling in their own land. The future is not simply a new ruler installed over the same unresolved scattering; righteous kingship and the regathering of the people belong in the same promise.
Words to trace: LORD, days, Israel, dwell, land, liveth
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:5
“Branch” is tsemach, a shoot springing from the ground; Zechariah takes it up as a title, “my servant the BRANCH” (Zechariah 3:8, 6:12). “Reign and prosper” is better “reign and deal wisely”, the verb hiskil used of the servant who “shall deal prudently” in Isaiah 52:13.
- Jeremiah 23:6
“Israel” means the northern tribes, scattered since Samaria fell in 722 BC; they are included beside Judah, the reunion promised in 3:18. “Dwell safely” is the security Moses spoke of in Deuteronomy 33:28, Israel dwelling “in safety alone”. The name reappears in 33:16, there given to the city.
- Jeremiah 23:7
These words repeat 16:14. In the Greek Septuagint, verses 7 and 8 do not stand here at all but at the end of the chapter, after verse 40, closing the section on false prophets with a promise rather than a curse.
- Jeremiah 23:8
Compared with 16:15, the wording adds a second verb, “and which led”, and names “the seed of the house of Israel”, the seed promised to Abraham. The oath now describes a journey guided all the way home, not only a departure.
Jeremiah 23:5-8
King James Version5Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.
6In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.
7Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that they shall no more say, The LORD liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt;
8But, The LORD liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land.
Jeremiah 23:9-15
False Speech Has Consequences in the Land
Jeremiah's reaction to the prophets is bodily: a broken heart, shaking bones, and a condition compared with drunkenness under the weight of God's holy words. That physical distress stands in sharp contrast to the easy reassurance associated with the speakers he condemns. The damage also reaches beyond a private disagreement among religious professionals. The land mourns, pleasant places dry up, and profaneness spreads outward. Jerusalem cannot congratulate itself for avoiding Samaria's exact form of Baal prophecy. Its own prophets commit adultery, walk in lies, and strengthen the hands of evildoers so that people do not turn from wickedness. That last effect exposes the ministry's direction. The prophetic office has become a structure that helps wrongdoing remain comfortable. The comparison with Sodom and Gomorrah comes from the Lord's accusation and removes any automatic immunity attached to Jerusalem or the temple. Wormwood and bitter water answer a corruption that begins among leaders but does not stay confined to them.

Deep dive
Jeremiah describes broken-heartedness, shaking bones, and a condition like drunkenness under the weight of God's holy words. The physical language distinguishes this encounter with the word from the reassuring ease produced by the prophets he is about to confront. The surrounding land also mourns and dries up. The chapter gives their corruption consequences beyond a private disagreement among religious speakers.
The comparison with Samaria does not allow Jerusalem to congratulate itself on using the correct sacred name. Samaria's prophets led Israel astray through Baal; Jerusalem's prophets commit adultery, walk in lies, and strengthen evildoers. The decisive result is that people do not turn from wickedness. Their ministry has become a means of sustaining the very conduct that the true prophetic word challenges.
The likeness to Sodom and Gomorrah belongs to God's accusation within the passage. It removes any automatic protection supplied by Jerusalem's name or temple. Wormwood and bitter water answer a profaneness that has spread from the prophets into the whole land. The office meant to communicate God's word has become a point from which the contrary influence travels.
Words to trace: prophets, LORD, land, evil, Jerusalem, seen
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:9
The Hebrew opens with a heading, “Concerning the prophets”, a title for everything from here to verse 40, like the headings over the oracles to the nations (46:2). Jeremiah reels like the drunken kings and priests of 13:13, but his drunkenness comes from “the words of his holiness”.
- Jeremiah 23:10
“Swearing” is alah, the curse, the sanctions of the covenant (Deuteronomy 29:20), so the land mourns under a curse; Isaiah 24:6 says “the curse devoured the earth”. “Their course” is their running, the race they are set on, and their “force” is might used for the wrong ends.
- Jeremiah 23:11
“In my house” is the temple itself. Ezekiel’s vision of the temple court in the same years shows elders burning incense to images and women weeping for Tammuz (Ezekiel 8). Jeremiah had charged in 7:30 that they set their abominations in the house called by God’s name.
- Jeremiah 23:12
Psalm 35:6 prays that the wicked’s way be “dark and slippery”, a hill path at night with a push from behind. “The year of their visitation” is the phrase used against the men of Anathoth who plotted Jeremiah’s death (11:23).
- Jeremiah 23:13
“Folly” is tiflah, tastelessness, the word Job uses of food “unsavoury... without salt” (Job 6:6). The prophets of Samaria were the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal kept by Ahab and Jezebel (1 Kings 18:19). The next verse will call Jerusalem’s worse.
- Jeremiah 23:14
Ezekiel 13:22 lays exactly the same charge: the prophets “strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way”. Isaiah had already addressed Jerusalem’s leaders as “ye rulers of Sodom” (Isaiah 1:10), so the comparison had a history in the city’s own prophets.
- Jeremiah 23:15
The same sentence, wormwood to eat and poisoned water to drink, was pronounced against the whole people in 9:15. Now it is served to the prophets in particular. Wormwood is a bitter plant; the “water of gall” is water laced with a poisonous herb, as in 8:14.
Jeremiah 23:9-15
King James Version9Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness.
10For the land is full of adulterers; for because of swearing the land mourneth; the pleasant places of the wilderness are dried up, and their course is evil, and their force is not right.
11For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, saith the LORD.
12Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, saith the LORD.
13And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria; they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel to err.
14I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah.
15Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts concerning the prophets; Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink the water of gall: for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land.
Jeremiah 23:16-22
They Ran Without Being Sent
The problem with the prophets' message is not that peace is always false. Jeremiah has already announced real future safety. The problem is the audience to whom these speakers promise immunity: people who despise God and keep walking after their own hearts. They say, "No evil shall come upon you," without a word from the source they claim. Jeremiah therefore asks who has stood in the Lord's counsel, perceived his word, heard it, and paid attention to it. Those verbs make prophetic authority a matter of received speech before it becomes public delivery. By contrast, these prophets run though they were not sent and prophesy though God did not speak to them. Speed and confidence cannot substitute for commission. The final test includes effect as well as origin. Had they stood in God's counsel, they would have caused people to hear his words and turn from evil ways. Their reassurance is false because it is unsent and because it shields the conduct the true word seeks to expose.


Deep dive
The promised peace is addressed specifically to people who despise God and follow their own hearts. That audience matters. The problem is not that peace can never be spoken by a true prophet; this chapter has itself promised safety. It is that these speakers announce immunity from disaster to people continuing in the conduct against which God has spoken.
The question about standing in God's counsel tests access to the message's claimed source. Seeing, hearing, attending, and causing the people to hear all belong to the description. Against that, the prophets are pictured running without having been sent and prophesying without God having spoken. Their speed is no substitute for a commission.
The announced whirlwind contradicts the comfortable forecast, while the final verse identifies the effect authentic hearing should have had: a turn from evil ways and deeds. The test joins origin and outcome. A message is not authenticated by the confidence of its delivery, the familiarity of its formula, or the hearers' pleasure in receiving it. Here its falseness is exposed through its asserted source and its active protection of the wrongdoing God's word confronts.
Words to trace: LORD, evil, heart, counsel, prophets, stood
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:16
“They make you vain” is literally they fill you with hevel, breath, vapour, the empty stuff of idols. A vision “of their own heart” is set against speech “out of the mouth of the LORD”, the phrase God used of speaking with Moses “mouth to mouth” (Numbers 12:8).
- Jeremiah 23:17
“They say still” is a Hebrew construction of repeated action: they keep saying it. The Septuagint reads “to them that despise the word of the LORD” instead of “despise me”. The reassurance is aimed at exactly those who most need the warning.
- Jeremiah 23:18
“Counsel” is sod, the inner council. Micaiah saw the LORD enthroned with the host of heaven around him deliberating over Ahab (1 Kings 22:19–22), and Amos 3:7 says God reveals his sod to his servants the prophets. The verse piles up four verbs of perceiving.
- Jeremiah 23:19
Verses 19 and 20 recur almost verbatim at 30:23–24. The whirlwind is se’arah, the storm that took Elijah up (2 Kings 2:11). “Fall grievously upon the head” pictures a storm that whirls down and twists about the head of the wicked.
- Jeremiah 23:20
“In the latter days” is literally at the end of the days, the far horizon of what is being announced. “Consider it perfectly” doubles the verb, you will understand it with understanding: what the prophets of peace could not see now, hindsight will make plain.
- Jeremiah 23:21
Runners carried royal messages. Ahimaaz once insisted on running to David after Absalom’s death although he had no clear tidings, and when he arrived could only say he saw a great tumult and knew not what it was (2 Samuel 18:19–29). The false prophets are Ahimaaz without the honesty.
- Jeremiah 23:22
“Their evil way, and... the evil of their doings” is the pair Jeremiah used in 18:11 and 25:5. Zechariah 1:4 later sums up all “the former prophets” with the same two phrases, so this double call to turn became the recognised mark of a true prophet.
Jeremiah 23:16-22
King James Version16Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD.
17They say still unto them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you.
18For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it?
19Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked.
20The anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have executed, and till he have performed the thoughts of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly.
21I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.
22But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings.
Jeremiah 23:23-32
The Stolen Formula Does Not Supply the Voice
The God invoked by the false prophets is not absent from the private places where their claims are invented. The questions about nearness, distance, secrecy, and heaven and earth answer the fantasy that a public religious formula can hide a private fabrication. God says he has heard the repeated "I have dreamed" and identifies the deeper damage as forgetfulness of his name. The chapter then distinguishes dream from word without claiming that every dream is impossible as revelation. A person with a dream can tell it as a dream; the person with God's word must speak that word faithfully. Chaff and wheat, fire and hammer expose the difference in substance and effect. False speakers steal words from one another, use their tongues to say "He saith," and tell dreams with a lightness that leads people astray. Borrowed phrasing does not provide a missing commission. The recurring charge is devastatingly simple: God did not send or command them, so their abundance of religious speech brings the people no profit.
Deep dive
The questions about nearness, distance, and hiding answer the possibility that private invention might escape the God invoked in public. God fills heaven and earth and has heard the repeated claims to dreams. The damage is relational as well as factual: these dreams make people forget his name, repeating an estrangement once associated with Baal even while speakers use religious language.
The distinction between a dream and God's word is stated before the contrasts of chaff and wheat, fire and hammer. A speaker with a dream can identify it as a dream; a speaker with the word must speak it faithfully. The passage attacks false attribution rather than supplying a rule that God can never use a dream. Straw cannot nourish as grain does, and words invented for reassurance do not perform the exposing, breaking work represented by fire and the hammer.
The final accusations concern theft, tongues claiming divine speech, and false dreams told with misleading lightness. Borrowing another speaker's words does not provide the commission that the borrower lacks. The chapter repeatedly returns to the same source question: God did not send or command these speakers. Their abundance of speech brings the people no benefit because the claimed divine voice has been replaced by their own.
Words to trace: LORD, prophets, lies, name, people, prophesy
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:23
The Greek Septuagint reads it as a statement, “I am a God at hand, and not a God afar off.” As a question it attacks the false prophets’ idea of a local deity close enough to be managed, and sets against it a God whose reach no distance limits.
- Jeremiah 23:24
“Secret places” is mistarim, the word used in 13:17 of Jeremiah weeping in secret. At the temple’s dedication Solomon had said that the heaven of heavens cannot contain God (1 Kings 8:27). “Saith the LORD” comes twice in one verse.
- Jeremiah 23:25
The doubled cry, chalamti chalamti, “I have dreamed, I have dreamed”, is a claim to credentials. Dreams were a recognised channel of revelation (Numbers 12:6), but Deuteronomy 13:1–5 had warned against a “dreamer of dreams” whose message leads away from the LORD.
- Jeremiah 23:26
The Hebrew syntax breaks off, “How long? Is it in the heart of the prophets...?”, as though the sentence itself runs out of patience. The deceit of their own heart was one of the four sources of false prophecy named in 14:14.
- Jeremiah 23:27
Judges 3:7 records that Israel “forgat the LORD their God, and served Baalim”. Hosea 2:17 promised that God would take the names of Baalim out of her mouth. Here the dreams do Baal’s old work by pushing the LORD’s name out of memory, while using it.
- Jeremiah 23:28
“Chaff” is teven, straw, the food of animals: Isaiah 11:7 has the lion eat straw like the ox. Wheat feeds people. The line concedes the dream a place, “let him tell a dream”, so long as it is called a dream and not passed off as a word.
- Jeremiah 23:29
The fire echoes 5:14, “I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood”, and Jeremiah’s own burning bones in 20:9. The hammer is a smith’s or a quarryman’s, heavy enough to split rock. Neither image is gentle; both describe what the word does to what it meets.
- Jeremiah 23:30
Three sentences in a row begin “I am against the prophets”, one for each offence. Stealing words from a neighbour may mean copying one another’s oracles, or, as some suggest, lifting genuine lines from true prophets and reusing them for a different message.
- Jeremiah 23:31
“Say, He saith” renders a verb coined from ne’um, the solemn formula “saith the LORD”, found only here: they “oracle an oracle”. “Saith the LORD” occurs twenty-one times in this chapter of the King James alone, which shows how easily the formula could be borrowed.
- Jeremiah 23:32
“Lightness” is pachazut, recklessness or swagger. Zephaniah, Jeremiah’s contemporary, used the same root: “her prophets are light and treacherous persons” (Zephaniah 3:4). Their only product, the verse ends, is that they “shall not profit this people at all”.
Jeremiah 23:23-32
King James Version23Am I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off?
24Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD.
25I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed.
26How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart;
27Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.
28The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD.
29Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?
30Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.
31Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith.
32Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD.
Jeremiah 23:33-40
The Burden Becomes the Speaker’s Own Words
The chapter ends by turning a familiar prophetic expression against those who misuse it. The Hebrew word translated "burden" can refer both to a load and to a prophetic pronouncement, and the exchange exploits that double sense. Asking for "the burden of the LORD" can become a way to mock Jeremiah's unwelcome message or to wrap one's own speech in borrowed seriousness. God refuses to let the formula control the conversation. The people are instead told to ask what the Lord has answered and what he has spoken, which brings the question back to actual source rather than verbal packaging. The precise wording of verse 33 is textually difficult, with readings that either answer the question about the burden or identify the questioners themselves as a burden to be cast away. What follows is clearer: each person's own word becomes his burden because the living God's words have been perverted. Religious vocabulary cannot protect speech that has detached itself from the voice it claims.
Deep dive
The Hebrew noun massa can mean a load or burden and also a prophetic pronouncement. The closing exchange turns on that double sense. A familiar way of asking for an oracle can carry contempt for the unwelcome weight of Jeremiah's message or lend borrowed gravity to a person's own claims. The reply refuses to let the formula control the encounter.
The exact response in verse 33 is disputed. The KJV gives a question about the burden followed by the announcement of abandonment; another reading identifies the questioners themselves as the burden to be cast away. Either way, the following verses make the reversal explicit: each person's own word will become his burden because the words of the living God have been perverted.
The permitted questions concern what the Lord has answered and spoken. The issue is not a mysterious power attached to a forbidden syllable, but a formula being used to distort the relation between speaker and source. The final loss includes the city given to the fathers, while the announced shame will not be forgotten. The people who have made God's name forgettable through false speech face a remembrance attached to their own disgrace.
Words to trace: LORD, burden, prophet, forsake, people, priest
Verse-by-verse path
- Jeremiah 23:33
“The burden of the LORD” was a standard heading for an oracle, as in Isaiah 13:1, “The burden of Babylon”. The questioners are asking for the latest word with a smirk. “Forsake” is natash, to let drop or leave lying, as one sets down a load.
- Jeremiah 23:34
The order of speakers changes from verse 33: prophet, priest, people. The punishment is “that man and his house”, one household at a time, for using one phrase. The verb for “punish” is paqad again, the visitation language that has run through the chapter since verse 2.
- Jeremiah 23:35
The approved questions are plain: what has the LORD answered, what has he spoken? “Every one to his neighbour” is the third time the chapter mentions neighbour talk, after the dreams told to a neighbour (verse 27) and words stolen from a neighbour (verse 30).
- Jeremiah 23:36
“The living God” is rare in Jeremiah; its only other use is 10:10, where the living God is set against idols that cannot move. Perverting the words of a living God treats his speech like that of a dumb idol, something the speaker can shape at will.
- Jeremiah 23:37
The instruction narrows from “every one to his neighbour” to “the prophet”, singular: Jeremiah is given the question to put to any prophet directly, a test of source rather than of style.
- Jeremiah 23:38
The phrase “The burden of the LORD” occurs three times in this one verse, as the people’s habit is quoted back to them. God had sent word forbidding the phrase; they used it anyway, which makes the offence one of refusing an explicit instruction.
- Jeremiah 23:39
“Utterly forget you” doubles the verb nashah. Several Hebrew manuscripts and the ancient versions read nasa instead, “I will surely lift you up”, the root of massa, burden: God would pick them up like a load and throw them away. Either reading answers the forgetting of his name in verse 27.
- Jeremiah 23:40
The words nearly repeat 20:11, where Jeremiah said of his persecutors “their everlasting confusion shall never be forgotten”. Those who made God’s name forgettable are given a shame that cannot be.
Jeremiah 23:33-40
King James Version33And when this people, or the prophet, or a priest, shall ask thee, saying, What is the burden of the LORD? thou shalt then say unto them, What burden? I will even forsake you, saith the LORD.
34And as for the prophet, and the priest, and the people, that shall say, The burden of the LORD, I will even punish that man and his house.
35Thus shall ye say every one to his neighbour, and every one to his brother, What hath the LORD answered? and, What hath the LORD spoken?
36And the burden of the LORD shall ye mention no more: for every man’s word shall be his burden; for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God.
37Thus shalt thou say to the prophet, What hath the LORD answered thee? and, What hath the LORD spoken?
38But since ye say, The burden of the LORD; therefore thus saith the LORD; Because ye say this word, The burden of the LORD, and I have sent unto you, saying, Ye shall not say, The burden of the LORD;
39Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:
40And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Identify the historical crisis, covenant failure, warning, and promised hope.
- Distinguish the prophet’s immediate audience from later biblical connections.
- Do not turn present-day headlines into confident fulfillment claims without textual evidence.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Jeremiah 23?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Jeremiah 23 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Jeremiah 23 develops its own movement around LORD, prophets, burden, people, word?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.




