New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

Cedar Cannot Make a King Righteous

Jeremiah 22

The big picture

Jeremiah 22 subjects the house of David to a test that cedar, ancestry, and royal display cannot pass on its behalf. At the palace gate, king, servants, and people are commanded to practice judgment and righteousness, protect the stranger, fatherless, and widow, and refuse innocent blood. The chapter then names royal failures one by one. Shallum will die in exile and never see his native land again. Jehoiakim's wide rooms, cedar paneling, and vermilion are read through the unpaid labor inside them, while Josiah's justice for the poor becomes the true contrast with his son's reign. Jerusalem's prosperous confidence is exposed as a long refusal to hear, and its cedar nest cannot shelter it from coming distress. Finally, Coniah is compared with a signet that can still be plucked away. His descendants are not erased, but their successful continuation on David's throne in Judah is denied. Royal legitimacy here is measured by conduct and divine purpose, not architecture or inherited entitlement.

In this chapter

Jeremiah 22: Cedar Cannot Make a King Righteous
Chapter sceneJeremiah 22

Scripture beside the summary

Jeremiah · King James Version · 30

Jeremiah 22:1-9

The Palace Gate Opens Onto a Case for Justice

Jeremiah is sent directly to the king's house, and the audience includes the ruler, his servants, and the people passing through the palace gates. The demand is public and administrative: execute judgment and righteousness, rescue the spoiled person, do no violence to the stranger, fatherless, or widow, and shed no innocent blood. The future of the house is then placed beside those duties. Continued Davidic royal life, with kings entering in chariots and on horses, is attached to actual obedience. Refusal leads to desolation. Even the palace's comparison with Gilead and Lebanon cannot preserve it. Choice cedars can be cut down and burned, turning the material of royal magnificence into fuel. When foreign passers-by later ask why such a great city was ruined, the answer names forsaken covenant and other gods. Worship and public justice are not separated into unrelated categories. The covenant invoked in the explanation has just been expressed through the palace's treatment of vulnerable people.

Jeremiah 22:1-9: The Palace Gate Opens Onto a Case for Justice
Chapter sceneJeremiah 22

Deep dive

The instruction takes Jeremiah down to the king's house, where the audience includes the ruler, his servants, and his people. The speech is not a private assessment of royal manners. It concerns the exercise of authority through the palace and its gates. The person robbed, the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow make the standard visible in those most exposed to misuse of power.

The alternatives preserve both promise and warning. Actual obedience would allow kings on David's throne to continue entering with the signs of royal life. Refusal would make the house desolate. Its prestigious comparison with Gilead and Lebanon does not protect it: the choice cedars can become fuel. The very material that advertises grandeur is capable of feeding the fire.

Foreign passers-by will ask why such a great city has met this end, and the answer names the forsaken covenant and service to other gods. The juxtaposition prevents worship and public conduct from being separated into unrelated matters. The covenant invoked in the explanation has just been expressed through justice at the palace gate.

Words to trace: LORD, house, Judah, city, David, enter

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Jeremiah 22:1

    The palace stood below the temple on the southern slope of the ridge, so one went “down” from the one to the other, as the scribes do in 36:12. Jeremiah is sent to deliver the word on the king’s own ground rather than waiting to be summoned.

  2. Jeremiah 22:2

    The king is addressed by his seat, “that sittest upon the throne of David”, and not by his name. No king is named in the chapter until verse 11, so the standard is laid down before any particular man is measured against it.

  3. Jeremiah 22:3

    “Do no wrong” is yanah, to maltreat, the verb of Exodus 22:21, “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him”. Stranger, fatherless and widow are the three the law singles out for protection (Deuteronomy 24:17–21); the same list stood in the temple sermon of 7:6.

  4. Jeremiah 22:4

    The Hebrew doubles the verb, “if doing ye do this thing”. The throne of David had always carried a condition: Psalm 132:12 promised that the sons would sit on it “if thy children will keep my covenant”. Chariots and horses mark a royal house still riding out in state.

  5. Jeremiah 22:5

    “I swear by myself” is the oath God swore to Abraham after the binding of Isaac (Genesis 22:16), an oath with no higher name to invoke. “This house” carries both senses of bayit, the palace and the dynasty, the double meaning on which Nathan’s promise to David turned (2 Samuel 7:11–16).

  6. Jeremiah 22:6

    Gilead, the wooded highland east of the Jordan, was famous for its balm (8:22), and the head of Lebanon is its high snowy crown. God calls the palace both, lush and lofty, in the same breath as he promises to make it a wilderness.

  7. Jeremiah 22:7

    “Prepare” is qiddash, to consecrate, the verb of 6:4, “prepare ye war”, literally sanctify war. The destroyers are set apart as for a holy campaign. Isaiah 13:3 calls the army mustered against Babylon “my sanctified ones”.

  8. Jeremiah 22:8

    The scene is foretold almost word for word to Solomon at the dedication of the temple: passers-by will be astonished and ask, “Why hath the LORD done thus unto this land, and to this house?” (1 Kings 9:8). The foreign traveller asks the question Judah never asked.

  9. Jeremiah 22:9

    The reply echoes Deuteronomy 29:25, “Because they have forsaken the covenant of the LORD God of their fathers”. The foreigners supply the answer themselves, as if the logic of the covenant were plain to everyone except those inside it.

Jeremiah 22:1-9

King James Version

1Thus saith the LORD; Go down to the house of the king of Judah, and speak there this word,

2And say, Hear the word of the LORD, O king of Judah, that sittest upon the throne of David, thou, and thy servants, and thy people that enter in by these gates:

3Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.

4For if ye do this thing indeed, then shall there enter in by the gates of this house kings sitting upon the throne of David, riding in chariots and on horses, he, and his servants, and his people.

5But if ye will not hear these words, I swear by myself, saith the LORD, that this house shall become a desolation.

6For thus saith the LORD unto the king’s house of Judah; Thou art Gilead unto me, and the head of Lebanon: yet surely I will make thee a wilderness, and cities which are not inhabited.

7And I will prepare destroyers against thee, every one with his weapons: and they shall cut down thy choice cedars, and cast them into the fire.

8And many nations shall pass by this city, and they shall say every man to his neighbour, Wherefore hath the LORD done thus unto this great city?

9Then they shall answer, Because they have forsaken the covenant of the LORD their God, and worshipped other gods, and served them.

Jeremiah 22:10-12

The Living Exile Receives the Lament

The command not to weep for the dead is comparative rather than a universal ban on mourning. The intense lament is redirected toward Shallum, the living king carried away from his land, because his exile contains an irreversible loss of its own. He will not return, will die where he has been taken, and will never see his native country again. The repetition matters. Life continues for him, but it continues inside separation from the place that defined his royal identity and belonging. Jeremiah does not invent his private emotions or describe scenes of homesickness. The loss is already sharp enough in the geography: the land from which he went out, the country of his birth, and the place he will never again see. The section therefore treats exile as something more severe than temporary inconvenience. A living person can inhabit a loss so permanent that the chapter tells Judah to direct its mourning toward him rather than toward someone whose death has already completed another kind of separation.

Jeremiah 22:10-12: The Living Exile Receives the Lament
Chapter sceneJeremiah 22

Deep dive

The command not to weep for the dead is comparative in its immediate force. The passage directs intense mourning toward the person going away, because he will never see his native land again. It is not a general prohibition of grief after death. Its severity lies in locating another kind of irreversible loss among the living.

Shallum is identified as Josiah's son and successor, and the declaration about him is repeated: he will not return. The second statement adds that death will occur in the place of captivity. Exile is therefore not treated as a brief interruption in royal life before normal succession resumes.

The land is named through belonging and sight. It is his native country, the place from which he went out, and the land he will not see again. Those repetitions give the judgment an intimate dimension without inventing the king's unrecorded thoughts. The living ruler remains alive long enough to inhabit the absence of what he has lost.

Words to trace: Josiah, place, return, weep, bemoan, captive

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Jeremiah 22:10

    “The dead” is Josiah, killed by Pharaoh Necho at Megiddo in 609 BC (2 Kings 23:29) and mourned by Jeremiah in a lament that became a custom in Israel (2 Chronicles 35:25). “Him that goeth away” is his son, taken to Egypt three months later.

  2. Jeremiah 22:11

    Shallum is the personal name of the king called Jehoahaz in 2 Kings 23:30–34; 1 Chronicles 3:15 lists Shallum among Josiah’s sons. He reigned three months before Necho put him in chains at Riblah and carried him off to Egypt.

  3. Jeremiah 22:12

    2 Kings 23:34 records the end: “he came to Egypt, and died there”. He is the first of David’s line recorded as dying in foreign captivity. The verse makes sight the measure of the loss: he will never see this land again.

Jeremiah 22:10-12

King James Version

10Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep sore for him that goeth away: for he shall return no more, nor see his native country.

11For thus saith the LORD touching Shallum the son of Josiah king of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went forth out of this place; He shall not return thither any more:

12But he shall die in the place whither they have led him captive, and shall see this land no more.

Jeremiah 22:13-19

A Large House with Unpaid Labour in Its Walls

Jehoiakim's house receives the detailed description its owner might have admired: broad rooms, windows, cedar, and vermilion. Jeremiah then reads the building through the wages missing from its walls. The indictment is not against attractive architecture itself. It is against a palace enlarged through a neighbor's labor without paying what that labor was owed. Splendor cannot make the account book righteous. The comparison with Josiah sharpens the point. His father ate and drank, so ordinary enjoyment is not the problem. He also practiced judgment and justice, especially for the poor and needy, and that conduct is identified with knowing God. "Shalt thou reign, because thou closest thyself in cedar?" exposes the difference between displaying kingship and performing its obligations. Jehoiakim's eyes and heart are instead associated with covetousness, innocent blood, oppression, and violence. His announced dishonorable burial beyond Jerusalem's gates reverses the visual logic of the palace. The grand rooms and the discarded royal body become opposite ends of one accusation.

Jeremiah 22:13-19: A Large House with Unpaid Labour in Its Walls
Chapter sceneJeremiah 22
Assyria and Babylon
Assyria and Babylon

Deep dive

The building is described with the attention its owner would have wanted: wide rooms, windows, cedar, and vermilion. Jeremiah then reads its splendour through the labour for which the neighbour was not paid. The charge is not that every attractive room is wicked. It is that this room has been made possible by withholding what the worker is owed. The palace's finish cannot conceal its account book.

The contrast with Josiah is equally exact. His father ate and drank; the text does not make ordinary enjoyment itself the royal fault. He also exercised judgment and justice, particularly for the poor and needy. Knowing God is then identified with that conduct. The question of whether cedar makes a king exposes the gap between displaying kingship and doing the work that the office requires.

Jehoiakim's eyes and heart are directed instead toward covetousness, innocent blood, oppression, and violence. The announced end reverses the display: neither the customary lament nor an honourable burial will sustain his royal image. The "burial of an ass" names humiliating disposal beyond Jerusalem's gates. This passage announces that fate; it does not narrate its later circumstances. The grand house and the dishonoured body stand at opposite ends of the same accusation.

Words to trace: LORD, cedar, chambers, house, lament, well

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Jeremiah 22:13

    “Woe” is hoy, the cry of a funeral lament, so the builder is mourned while still alive. The law required a hired man’s wages to be paid before nightfall (Leviticus 19:13; Deuteronomy 24:14–15). Jehoiakim was also taxing the land to pay Egypt’s tribute (2 Kings 23:35).

  2. Jeremiah 22:14

    Large windows were a luxury in a hot country. “Cieled” is the 1611 spelling of ceiled, meaning lined or panelled; the ceiling was the inner covering of walls as well as roof. “Vermilion” is shashar, a red pigment Ezekiel 23:14 mentions on Chaldean wall paintings.

  3. Jeremiah 22:15

    “Closest thyself in cedar” is literally “compete in cedar”, the verb of 12:5, “how canst thou contend with horses?” Jehoiakim is vying with other kings by the square foot of panelling. “Then it was well with him” is the promise Deuteronomy attaches to obedience (Deuteronomy 6:18).

  4. Jeremiah 22:16

    “Judged the cause” is a doubled word, din din, pleading a case to its end. The advice of King Lemuel’s mother is the same: “plead the cause of the poor and needy” (Proverbs 31:9). The sentence repeats “then it was well with him” from the verse before, as if underlining it.

  5. Jeremiah 22:17

    “Covetousness” is betsa’, gain cut out of someone else, profit taken by force. The innocent blood is specific: in 26:20–23 Jehoiakim had the prophet Urijah extradited from Egypt, killed with the sword, and his body thrown among the graves of the common people.

  6. Jeremiah 22:18

    Four cries of mourning are denied him, each beginning with hoy: my brother, sister, lord, his glory. “Alas, my brother!” is the cry over the old prophet’s grave in 1 Kings 13:30. The first two were probably mourners calling to one another, the last two cries over the king himself.

  7. Jeremiah 22:19

    An ass was not buried; its carcass was dragged out and left. The threat is repeated in 36:30, where his body is to lie in the heat by day and the frost by night. 2 Kings 24:6 says only that Jehoiakim “slept with his fathers”, and records no burial.

Jeremiah 22:13-19

King James Version

13Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong; that useth his neighbour’s service without wages, and giveth him not for his work;

14That saith, I will build me a wide house and large chambers, and cutteth him out windows; and it is cieled with cedar, and painted with vermilion.

15Shalt thou reign, because thou closest thyself in cedar? did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice, and then it was well with him?

16He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him: was not this to know me? saith the LORD.

17But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.

18Therefore thus saith the LORD concerning Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah; They shall not lament for him, saying, Ah my brother! or, Ah sister! they shall not lament for him, saying, Ah lord! or, Ah his glory!

19He shall be buried with the burial of an ass, drawn and cast forth beyond the gates of Jerusalem.

Jeremiah 22:20-23

A Nest in Cedar Is Still Exposed to the Wind

Jerusalem is told to cry from Lebanon, Bashan, and the passages because the network on which it relied is collapsing. Lovers, shepherds, and allies disappear together, stripping away the relationships that helped the city imagine itself secure. The explanation does not begin with disaster. It reaches back to prosperity, when God spoke and the response was already, "I will not hear." Crisis has not created the underlying problem. It has exposed a habit that was easier to ignore while circumstances were favorable. The cedar imagery returns as a nest high in Lebanon, suggesting height, beauty, and apparent protection. Yet a nest in cedar is still exposed to wind, and elevation does not prevent labor pains when distress arrives. The irony is deliberate. Impressive surroundings can make danger feel remote without changing the city's relation to the word it has long refused. The security represented by altitude, timber, and allies proves far less durable than Jerusalem's confidence assumed.

Deep dive

The address widens from the individual king to the community represented as a woman calling from Lebanon, Bashan, and the passages. Her lovers are destroyed, and her shepherds and allies are carried away. The language gathers the dependencies through which Jerusalem expected to remain secure, then removes them together.

The explanation looks back to prosperity. God spoke then, and the response was refusal to hear. Disaster has not suddenly created a problem that was absent during the good years. It has exposed a long-standing relation to the word, a pattern described as reaching back to youth.

The nest in the cedars returns to the chapter's architectural material, but now the image stresses height and exposure. An elevated dwelling may look remote from danger until wind and labour pains undo that appearance. The address is ironic rather than admiring. The person at home among impressive cedars will discover that neither the altitude nor the timber determines how the coming distress is experienced.

Words to trace: Lebanon, lovers, voice, ashamed, Bashan, captivity

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Jeremiah 22:20

    The three heights ring the land: Lebanon to the north, Bashan to the north-east across the Jordan, and the “passages”, Abarim, the Moabite range from which Moses viewed Canaan (Numbers 27:12). The city is told to climb and shout from each.

  2. Jeremiah 22:21

    “Prosperity” is shalvah, ease, the calm of a people who feel secure. The book once remembered Israel’s youth as a honeymoon, “the kindness of thy youth” (2:2); here youth is where the habit of not listening began, as the people confessed in 3:25.

  3. Jeremiah 22:22

    The Hebrew is a pun: “the wind shall shepherd all thy shepherds”, ro’ayikh tir’eh, the rulers themselves herded off by the east wind. “Pastors”, as in 17:16, is the 1611 word for shepherds, here meaning the kings and officials.

  4. Jeremiah 22:23

    “How gracious shalt thou be” follows one derivation of the Hebrew. Most modern versions read it from a verb for groaning: “how you will groan”. The inhabitant of Lebanon is the king in his cedar palace, whose timber came from Lebanon.

Jeremiah 22:20-23

King James Version

20Go up to Lebanon, and cry; and lift up thy voice in Bashan, and cry from the passages: for all thy lovers are destroyed.

21I spake unto thee in thy prosperity; but thou saidst, I will not hear. This hath been thy manner from thy youth, that thou obeyedst not my voice.

22The wind shall eat up all thy pastors, and thy lovers shall go into captivity: surely then shalt thou be ashamed and confounded for all thy wickedness.

23O inhabitant of Lebanon, that makest thy nest in the cedars, how gracious shalt thou be when pangs come upon thee, the pain as of a woman in travail!

Jeremiah 22:24-30

The Signet Is Removed, Not Merely Misplaced

Coniah is granted the strongest image of royal closeness before that image is denied as a guarantee. Even if he were a signet on God's right hand, he could still be plucked from there and handed over to Nebuchadnezzar. His mother shares the exile, and the land of their birth becomes the place they desire but will not regain. Then Jeremiah turns from the signet to a despised vessel and summons the earth three times to hear the verdict. "Write ye this man childless" cannot mean that Coniah has no biological descendants, because the preceding verse has already mentioned his seed. Verse 30 supplies the scope: none of his descendants will prosper by sitting on David's throne and ruling in Judah. The judgment is dynastic rather than a denial of offspring. Later genealogy can therefore name his descendants without contradicting this specific royal prohibition. What is cut off is the confident continuation of successful rule through this reigning line, not the mere existence of children after exile.

Deep dive

A signet on the right hand is an image of closeness, value, and authority. The sentence grants the strongest possible comparison only to deny that it can guarantee Coniah's security. Even there, he could be plucked away and given into the hands he fears. His mother shares the announced removal, and the desired return to their birth country is explicitly denied.

The next image is a despised vessel, recalling the book's recent pottery signs. The earth is summoned three times to hear the final verdict. "Write ye this man childless" cannot simply mean that he has no biological descendants: verse 28 has already spoken of his seed. The explanation in verse 30 concerns their failure to prosper while occupying David's throne and ruling in Judah. It is a dynastic judgment with a stated royal scope.

Matthew 1:11–12 later includes Jechonias in the genealogy around the Babylonian captivity and continues through his descendants. That genealogy does not say that those descendants resumed the succession forbidden here. The two passages therefore require the distinction Jeremiah itself supplies between having offspring and sustaining successful royal rule in Judah. The chapter closes a reigning line's confident expectation; the following chapter will reopen the question of Davidic hope on a different basis.

Words to trace: hand, earth, LORD, Coniah, Judah, king

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Jeremiah 22:24

    A signet was a seal ring, pressed into clay to sign with the owner’s authority. Haggai 2:23 reverses this sentence for Coniah’s grandson Zerubbabel: “I will make thee as a signet: for I have chosen thee.” Coniah is a shortened form of Jeconiah (24:1), the king called Jehoiachin in Kings.

  2. Jeremiah 22:25

    “Into the hand” comes four times. Jehoiachin reigned three months before surrendering to Nebuchadrezzar in 597 BC (2 Kings 24:8–12). “Them whose face thou fearest” names the dread that decided his surrender: he went out to the king of Babylon himself.

  3. Jeremiah 22:26

    The queen mother was Nehushta, daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem (2 Kings 24:8). An Elnathan son of Achbor is the officer sent to fetch Urijah back from Egypt in 26:22, perhaps the same man, which would make the king’s grandfather an agent of Jehoiakim’s violence. That link is an inference.

  4. Jeremiah 22:27

    “Desire” is literally lift up their soul, a longing with the whole self. Jehoiachin lived thirty-seven years in Babylon; the book ends with his release from prison and a seat at Evil-merodach’s table (52:31–34), but never with a road home.

  5. Jeremiah 22:28

    The “idol” is etsev, a thing shaped from clay, and the “vessel wherein is no pleasure” is a phrase Hosea used of Israel among the nations (Hosea 8:8). The questions are asked with something like pity. The verse moves from he to they, drawing his children into the fall.

  6. Jeremiah 22:29

    Erets can mean the earth or the land, so either the whole world or Judah’s own soil is summoned as a witness. A word said three times is the Hebrew way of saying it absolutely, as in Ezekiel 21:27, “I will overturn, overturn, overturn it”.

  7. Jeremiah 22:30

    “Write ye” is the language of a civic register, the roll of citizens (Ezekiel 13:9). “Childless” is ariri, the word Abram used, “I go childless” (Genesis 15:2). Babylonian ration tablets list oil for “Yaukin, king of the land of Yahud” and his five sons, so the sentence is about the throne, not about heirs.

Jeremiah 22:24-30

King James Version

24As I live, saith the LORD, though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah were the signet upon my right hand, yet would I pluck thee thence;

25And I will give thee into the hand of them that seek thy life, and into the hand of them whose face thou fearest, even into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of the Chaldeans.

26And I will cast thee out, and thy mother that bare thee, into another country, where ye were not born; and there shall ye die.

27But to the land whereunto they desire to return, thither shall they not return.

28Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not?

29O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the LORD.

30Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the historical crisis, covenant failure, warning, and promised hope.
  2. Distinguish the prophet’s immediate audience from later biblical connections.
  3. Do not turn present-day headlines into confident fulfillment claims without textual evidence.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Jeremiah 22?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Jeremiah 22 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Jeremiah 22 develops its own movement around LORD, Judah, hand, house, king?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006