New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

Five Daughters Claim a Promise; Joseph Asks for More

Joshua 17

The big picture

Joshua 17 keeps legal promise, complicated geography, and unfinished occupation in the same frame. Zelophehad's five daughters are named because an earlier ruling has now become actual property, not merely remembered precedent. Manasseh's borders then refuse to behave like simple walls: towns and surrounding lands can belong to different tribal arrangements, while Canaanites remain even after Israel grows strong enough to exact tribute. The chapter closes with Joseph's descendants calling themselves a great people and asking for more usable room. Joshua accepts the description and turns it back on them. Great numbers and great strength mean woodland can be cleared and strong opponents can be faced. The chapter is unusually practical about inheritance. Receiving land does not make every difficulty disappear, and claiming strength does not excuse a people from using it.

In this chapter

Joshua 17: Five Daughters Claim a Promise; Joseph Asks for More
Chapter sceneJoshua 17

Scripture beside the summary

Joshua · King James Version · 18

Joshua 17:1-6

The Daughters Are Named, and the Ruling Becomes Land

Five women stop a genealogy from moving past them as if they were an administrative exception. Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah are named one by one, and that naming matters because their claim is not being created on the spot. They come before Eleazar, Joshua, and the princes with an earlier command already behind them. The Book of Joshua therefore presents their inheritance as obedience to a ruling, not generosity toward an unusual household. What had been decided in the wilderness has now acquired acreage in Canaan. The legal language and the family register meet at the point where principle becomes possession. Ten portions fall to Manasseh, and the daughters' share is counted among them without apology or disguise. The remarkable feature is how unremarkably the promised ruling is finally administered: a command once argued for is now simply land that must be given.

Joshua 17:1-6: The Daughters Are Named, and the Ruling Becomes Land
Chapter sceneJoshua 17

Deep dive

After listing Manasseh's male family lines, the Book of Joshua stops over one household with no sons. Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah are individually named. Their approach to Eleazar, Joshua, and the princes is not a request that the authorities feel generously disposed toward an unusual case. They appeal to a command already given.

Numbers 27:1–11 records their earlier petition and the LORD's judgement that their claim was right. Here that ruling reaches the point of distribution. The chapter repeats that they receive their share according to the LORD's command, giving their claim the same stated authority as the other allotments. The explicit contrast between daughters and sons explains why this family receives particular attention. An inheritance law announced in the wilderness has become a portion within the land. The five names prevent that fulfilment from disappearing into an anonymous total.

Words to trace: children, Manasseh, Gilead, daughters, inheritance, sons

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 17:1

    Gilead is both a man and a region: Machir is “the father of Gilead”, and his descendants took the land that bore the name (Numbers 32:39–40). “A man of war” explains the grant: the eastern tableland went to a clan able to hold it against raiders from the desert.

  2. Joshua 17:2

    Abiezer was the clan of Gideon, whose trumpet “gathered” the Abiezrites after him (Judges 6:11, 34). Pottery notes found at Samaria, from the eighth century BC, record several of these names, Abiezer, Helek, Asriel, Shechem and Shemida, as districts sending oil and wine to the capital.

  3. Joshua 17:3

    Some of the daughters’ names are also place names. Tirzah became the northern kingdom’s early capital, and Hoglah and Noah appear as districts on the same Samaria pottery notes. The Book of Numbers lists the five in two different orders (26:33; 36:11).

  4. Joshua 17:4

    Numbers 36 had added a condition to their inheritance: they must marry within their father’s tribe, so that the land would not pass to another tribe, and they married their cousins (Numbers 36:6–11). The daughters come to the commission as Joshua’s fellow Manassites, “among our brethren”.

  5. Joshua 17:5

    The arithmetic can be traced: Manasseh had six clans (verse 2), and Hepher’s share passed through Zelophehad to his five daughters. Five male clans and five daughters make the ten portions west of the Jordan, besides the eastern lands.

  6. Joshua 17:6

    Job 42:15 uses almost the same phrase for Job’s daughters, to whom “their father gave them inheritance among their brethren”. Here the phrase describes a law; there a father’s free gift. The verse sets the daughters in the list of heirs as sons.

Joshua 17:1-6

King James Version

1There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh; for he was the firstborn of Joseph; to wit, for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead: because he was a man of war, therefore he had Gilead and Bashan.

2There was also a lot for the rest of the children of Manasseh by their families; for the children of Abiezer, and for the children of Helek, and for the children of Asriel, and for the children of Shechem, and for the children of Hepher, and for the children of Shemida: these were the male children of Manasseh the son of Joseph by their families.

3But Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but daughters: and these are the names of his daughters, Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

4And they came near before Eleazar the priest, and before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the princes, saying, The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brethren. Therefore according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the brethren of their father.

5And there fell ten portions to Manasseh, beside the land of Gilead and Bashan, which were on the other side Jordan;

6Because the daughters of Manasseh had an inheritance among his sons: and the rest of Manasseh’s sons had the land of Gilead.

Joshua 17:7-13

The Boundary Is Intricate; the Failure Is Plain

The border work is intricate enough to require careful distinctions, but the chapter's moral geography is much easier to see. Tappuah can have land assigned one way and the town another; Manasseh can hold cities inside Issachar and Asher. Tribal inheritance is not drawn as a set of sealed boxes. Yet the notice about the Canaanites becomes sharper precisely because it is less complicated. At first Manasseh cannot drive them out. Later Israel is strong enough to put them under tribute, and still does not complete the removal. The Book of Joshua marks that change in capacity rather than allowing "could not" to explain every later condition. Tribute proves control of a kind, but the text refuses to call it the same thing as expulsion. The border register therefore records both possession and an unfinished obedience without confusing one for the other.

Joshua 17:7-13: The Boundary Is Intricate; the Failure Is Plain
Chapter sceneJoshua 17
Canaan and the surrounding lands
Canaan and the surrounding lands

Deep dive

Tappuah demonstrates how carefully the account distinguishes a town from its surrounding territory: the land belongs to Manasseh, while the town belongs to Ephraim. Manasseh in turn has cities within Issachar and Asher. These arrangements qualify any assumption that tribal boundaries function as uninterrupted walls around completely separate populations.

The notice about the Canaanites is less complicated. First the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants; then, when Israel grew strong, they imposed tribute without completing the removal. The change from inability to strength matters. Continued Canaanite residence cannot be explained at every stage simply by Israel's military weakness. Tribute made the existing population subject to Israel, but the Book of Joshua expressly distinguishes that result from driving them out. The chapter's land claims are detailed; its account of incomplete occupation is equally deliberate.

Words to trace: Manasseh, inhabitants, towns, Asher, border, children

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 17:7

    “On the right hand” means southward: Hebrew geography faced east, so the right hand pointed south, and the word for right hand, yamin, gives Yemen its name. The border runs past Shechem, the old city of Jacob’s well and Joseph’s grave (24:32).

  2. Joshua 17:8

    The split between town and fields at Tappuah is the same arrangement the Book of Joshua later uses at Hebron, where the city goes to the priests and “the fields of the city, and the villages thereof” to Caleb (21:11–12). Ownership of a place could be divided in layers.

  3. Joshua 17:9

    The verse restates 16:9 from the other side. There Ephraim had separate cities among Manasseh’s; here the cities of Ephraim sit south of the brook Kanah among Manasseh’s towns. The two descriptions agree, told once from each tribe’s point of view.

  4. Joshua 17:10

    Manasseh’s northern edge is not traced town by town; the text simply names its neighbours, Asher to the north and Issachar to the east. With the sea on the west, the tribe’s land is defined by who surrounded it.

  5. Joshua 17:11

    Every town here has later history. Saul’s body was fastened to the wall of Beth-shean (1 Samuel 31:10); Jehu’s men shot King Ahaziah near Ibleam (2 Kings 9:27); Saul consulted the woman at Endor (1 Samuel 28:7). “Three countries” may mean “the three heights”, perhaps including the heights of Dor.

  6. Joshua 17:12

    “Would dwell” is yoel, “were determined to dwell”: the Canaanites insisted on staying. Judges 1:27–28 repeats this list of five cities almost exactly in the record of what Manasseh did not take.

  7. Joshua 17:13

    Deuteronomy 20:11 permitted a city to be made tributary only when it was one of the distant cities that accepted terms of peace. Putting Canaanite towns inside the land to forced labour used the law meant for far off cities on the peoples near at hand.

Joshua 17:7-13

King James Version

7And the coast of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethah, that lieth before Shechem; and the border went along on the right hand unto the inhabitants of En-tappuah.

8Now Manasseh had the land of Tappuah: but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim;

9And the coast descended unto the river Kanah, southward of the river: these cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh: the coast of Manasseh also was on the north side of the river, and the outgoings of it were at the sea:

10Southward it was Ephraim’s, and northward it was Manasseh’s, and the sea is his border; and they met together in Asher on the north, and in Issachar on the east.

11And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Beth-shean and her towns, and Ibleam and her towns, and the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Endor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Taanach and her towns, and the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns, even three countries.

12Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities; but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

13Yet it came to pass, when the children of Israel were waxen strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute; but did not utterly drive them out.

Joshua 17:14-18

Great People, Available Woodland

Joseph's descendants make their case with a compliment to themselves: they are a great people because the LORD has blessed them. Joshua does not cut them down to size. He agrees, then makes the claim expensive. If they are numerous and powerful, wooded country can be cleared and more of their allotment can be made usable. When they answer with the iron chariots of the valley, Joshua still does not pretend the obstacle is imaginary. The chapter lets trees be trees and chariots be chariots. The available inheritance requires labour in one direction and courage in another. Joshua's response is not a bureaucratic reshuffling that transfers difficulty to somebody else's portion. He keeps returning their own description of themselves to them. "Thou art a great people" becomes not the reason they should receive an easier map, but the reason the hard ground need not remain unusable.

Joshua 17:14-18: Great People, Available Woodland
Chapter sceneJoshua 17

Deep dive

The children of Joseph bring two assertions: they are a great people, and the LORD has blessed them. Joshua does not deny either. He makes their greatness the basis of his answer. A people with great numbers and strength can clear the wooded country. The argument for additional room comes back with an assignment involving trees.

Their reply shifts from the narrow hill country to the iron chariots of the valley. The available territory is not simply vacant, ready-to-use land. Woodland demands labour; the plains contain formidable opponents. Joshua's answer acknowledges both conditions rather than pretending they do not exist. He promises a wider possession through clearing and conquest, not a rearrangement that allows the difficulty to vanish from somebody else's map.

The reference to "one lot" belongs to this complaint about the effective extent of Joseph's territory. It does not erase the preceding grants to Ephraim and Manasseh. Joshua addresses them together in verse 17, just as they approached him together. His final statement returns their description of their own strength while refusing their conclusion that the chariots must decide the extent of their inheritance.

Words to trace: Joseph, Joshua, people, Canaanites, chariots, children

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 17:14

    The “me” is Joseph speaking as one person, a whole house talking in the first person singular. Jacob had blessed Joseph as “a fruitful bough” (Genesis 49:22), and Moses gave him “the ten thousands of Ephraim” (Deuteronomy 33:17). They are claiming the blessing’s arithmetic.

  2. Joshua 17:15

    “Cut down” is bara, in a form that means to clear or hew, the same root as “God created” in Genesis 1:1. Joshua tells the tribe to make its own room. The forested hills of the Perizzites and the Rephaim were land they could take with axes.

  3. Joshua 17:16

    “Chariots of iron” were chariots fitted with iron, fearsome on the flat. Judah met the same obstacle (Judges 1:19), and Sisera would bring nine hundred such chariots into this very valley of Jezreel (Judges 4:3).

  4. Joshua 17:17

    Joshua was himself of Ephraim (Numbers 13:8), so he is answering his own tribe, and he gives it no favour beyond the challenge. He speaks to both, Ephraim and Manasseh, and repeats their boast back to them in the affirmative.

  5. Joshua 17:18

    “Though they be strong” uses chazaq, the verb of Joshua’s own commission. In the valley of Jezreel the iron chariots were finally broken in Deborah’s day, when the river Kishon swept them away (Judges 5:21).

Joshua 17:14-18

King James Version

14And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua, saying, Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit, seeing I am a great people, forasmuch as the LORD hath blessed me hitherto?

15And Joshua answered them, If thou be a great people, then get thee up to the wood country, and cut down for thyself there in the land of the Perizzites and of the giants, if mount Ephraim be too narrow for thee.

16And the children of Joseph said, The hill is not enough for us: and all the Canaanites that dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron, both they who are of Beth-shean and her towns, and they who are of the valley of Jezreel.

17And Joshua spake unto the house of Joseph, even to Ephraim and to Manasseh, saying, Thou art a great people, and hast great power: thou shalt not have one lot only:

18But the mountain shall be thine; for it is a wood, and thou shalt cut it down: and the outgoings of it shall be thine: for thou shalt drive out the Canaanites, though they have iron chariots, and though they be strong.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
  2. Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
  3. Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Joshua 17?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Joshua 17 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Joshua 17 develops its own movement around Manasseh, children, towns, inhabitants, land?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006