The big picture
Mark 10 keeps asking what people hold, receive, leave, or request as Jesus moves toward Jerusalem. A test about divorce sends Jesus back from legal permission to creation. Children are blocked by the disciples and then welcomed into Jesus' arms as he speaks of receiving the kingdom. A man with great possessions runs up seeking eternal life and leaves grieving when the answer reaches what he cannot release. Peter then asks, in effect, what leaving everything means for the disciples, and Jesus includes persecution in the promised return. The road to Jerusalem becomes explicit, along with another detailed prediction of suffering. James and John still ask for honored seats. Jesus answers with service and the Son of man's life given as a ransom for many. The chapter closes with Bartimaeus asking not for rank but sight, receiving it, and joining Jesus on the road.
In this chapter
- Permission Is Not the Same as the Beginning Mark 10:1-12
The Pharisees ask about divorce as a test, and Jesus first makes them state what Moses allows.
- The Disciples Block the Very People He Receives Mark 10:13-16
The disciples have recently been taught to receive a child, yet here they rebuke the people bringing children to Jesus.
- The Possession That Makes Departure Difficult Mark 10:17-27
The man approaches with urgency, kneels, and asks what he must do to inherit eternal life.
- The Reward List Includes Persecution Mark 10:28-34
Peter speaks after the wealthy man leaves: the disciples have left everything and followed.
- A Request for the Seats, an Answer About Service Mark 10:35-45
James and John try to secure agreement before naming their request, but Jesus makes them say what they want: seats beside him in glory.
- The Last Request Is for Sight Mark 10:46-52
Bartimaeus begins beside the road while the crowd and Jesus are moving on it.

Scripture beside the summary
Mark · King James Version · 52Mark 10:1-12
Permission Is Not the Same as the Beginning
The Pharisees ask about divorce as a test, and Jesus first makes them state what Moses allows. Their answer is a written permission for dismissal. He does not deny that provision, but the Book of Mark refuses to let permission define the beginning. Jesus locates the concession within hardness of heart and then turns to creation, where male and female, leaving, cleaving, and becoming one flesh describe the union before later fracture enters the discussion. The interpretive move is not Scripture against Scripture. It asks how a concession in the law relates to the purpose named at creation. In private, Jesus speaks of remarriage after dismissal as adultery against the spouse and includes the case of a woman dismissing her husband. Mark does not supply Matthew's exception wording here. The passage therefore has to be heard in its own form rather than silently expanded into another Gospel's phrasing.

Deep dive
The Pharisees ask what is lawful, and Jesus first directs them to Moses. Their reply names the writing that allows dismissal. Jesus does not deny that such a provision exists; he places it within an explanation involving hardness of heart. He then moves from the permitted concession to Genesis 1:27 and 2:24, bringing creation and the joining of two into one flesh into the discussion. The interpretive difference is therefore not between having Scripture and ignoring it. It concerns how a concession within the law relates to the purpose expressed at the beginning.
The private explanation treats remarriage after dismissal as a wrong against the spouse and explicitly addresses a woman dismissing her husband as well as a man dismissing his wife. Mark's phrasing does not allow the issue to remain exclusively a discussion of a husband's options. It also does not include the exception wording found in Matthew's account. Christian interpretations differ over how these passages are related and over the scope of their application, but that larger synthesis should not be quietly inserted into Mark's sentences. Here the emphasis falls on the distinction Jesus has drawn: the existence of a legal means of separation does not by itself define the intention of the union.
Words to trace: wife, adultery, asked, committeth, flesh, Moses
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:1
“The farther side of Jordan” is Perea, east of the river. Galilean pilgrims often went south that way to avoid Samaria and crossed back near Jericho, which is where this chapter ends. “As he was wont” means as was his custom: the teaching goes on even on the road to Jerusalem.
- Mark 10:2
Perea belonged to Herod Antipas, the ruler who had John beheaded for condemning his marriage (6:18). A question about divorce asked in his territory was not an idle one. “Put away” is apolysai, to release or dismiss, and “tempting” is again the verb for testing.
- Mark 10:3
Jesus asks what Moses “commanded”, and in the next verse they answer with what Moses “suffered”, permitted. The difference between command and permission becomes the hinge of the argument. “You” is pointed: Moses’ instruction to you.
- Mark 10:4
The provision is Deuteronomy 24:1–4. The “bill of divorcement” was a document that freed the woman to remarry without being charged with adultery. The schools of Shammai and Hillel disputed what grounds it required; Hillel’s school allowed it even if she spoiled a meal (Mishnah Gittin 9:10).
- Mark 10:5
“Hardness of your heart” is sklērokardia, the word the Greek Old Testament uses in Deuteronomy 10:16, “Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked”. “Precept” is entolē, commandment; Jesus grants that Moses wrote it and gives the reason.
- Mark 10:6
The quotation is Genesis 1:27, “male and female created he them”. A Qumran text, the Damascus Document, cites the same words against a man taking a second wife, so Jesus is not alone in reading a marriage law from the creation account.
- Mark 10:7
The words are Genesis 2:24. “Cleave” is proskollēthēsetai, to be glued to, to stick fast. It is the man who leaves his parents in this line, though in the village custom of the day the bride usually moved to the husband’s family home. Some older manuscripts lack “and cleave to his wife”.
- Mark 10:8
“Twain” is the 1611 word for two. The Greek Old Testament, which Jesus quotes, has “the two” where the Hebrew of Genesis 2:24 reads simply “they shall be one flesh”. The conclusion that follows depends on exactly that number: no more two.
- Mark 10:9
“Joined together” is synezeuxen, yoked together, the word for oxen under one yoke. “Put asunder” is chōrizetō, separate. “Man” is anthrōpos, a human being, which could be a husband issuing the bill or a court approving it.
- Mark 10:10
The house again becomes the classroom, as in 7:17 and 9:28. Matthew 19:10 records how the disciples took the teaching: “If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.” Mark gives only the fact that they asked.
- Mark 10:11
“Against her” is the surprise. In Jewish law adultery was an offence against a husband; a man could not commit it against his own wife. Here the wife is named as the one wronged.
- Mark 10:12
Jewish law gave a wife no right to divorce her husband, but Roman law did. Josephus records Herod the Great’s sister Salome sending her husband a bill of divorce, against Jewish law, and Herodias herself had left her first husband. Only Mark includes this clause, suited to readers under Roman law.
Mark 10:1-12
King James Version1And he arose from thence, and cometh into the coasts of Judæa by the farther side of Jordan: and the people resort unto him again; and, as he was wont, he taught them again.
2And the Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife? tempting him.
3And he answered and said unto them, What did Moses command you?
4And they said, Moses suffered to write a bill of divorcement, and to put her away.
5And Jesus answered and said unto them, For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept.
6But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
7For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
8And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
9What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
10And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same matter.
11And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
12And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.
Mark 10:13-16
The Disciples Block the Very People He Receives
The disciples have recently been taught to receive a child, yet here they rebuke the people bringing children to Jesus. Mark gives no flattering motive for their intervention. Whatever they intended, the effect is simple: they are blocking access. Jesus is "much displeased" and reverses their action directly. The Book of Mark then speaks of receiving the kingdom as a little child, not earning it by displaying a catalogue of childlike virtues the passage never names. The comparison rests on reception, and it stands beside disciples who have been preoccupied with rank and control. Jesus' actions make the point bodily. He takes the children in his arms, lays his hands on them, and blesses them. What the disciples treat as an interruption becomes the scene through which the kingdom is described. Their boundary and his welcome are visible at the same time, with no need for Mark to explain the contrast further.
Deep dive
The previous chapter placed a child in Jesus' arms while he explained reception. Here the disciples obstruct people who are bringing children for his touch. Mark supplies Jesus' response directly: he is "much displeased." The account does not need a theory that the disciples are protecting his dignity, managing his fatigue, or following a particular social rule. Their action blocks access, and Jesus reverses it. The practical result is unmistakable even though their private rationale remains unstated.
The saying about receiving the kingdom as a little child concerns receiving, not achieving a superior position within it. Nothing in the passage declares that children are without fault, unusually insightful, or models of every imaginable virtue. Those additions would make the comparison carry more than Mark gives it. Its force lies beside the disciples' recent competition: the kingdom is spoken of as something received, and these children are not to be barred from Jesus. His actions complete the saying. He takes them in his arms, lays hands on them, and blesses them. The movement from rebuke at the approach to blessing in his arms makes the difference between the disciples' boundary and his welcome visible.
Words to trace: children, kingdom, little, arms, blessed, child
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:13
Parents brought children to respected teachers and elders for a blessing, a custom later rabbinic sources describe on the Day of Atonement. “Young children” is paidia, and Luke 18:15 calls some of them infants. “Touch them” means the laying on of hands in blessing.
- Mark 10:14
“Much displeased” is ēganaktēsen, indignant, and this is the only place in the Gospels where the verb is used of Jesus. Mark uses it again in verse 41 for the ten fuming at James and John. “Of such” means those like them: the kingdom belongs to people of this kind.
- Mark 10:15
The Greek can be taken two ways: receive the kingdom as a child receives it, or receive the kingdom as one receives a child, which would echo 9:37, “Whosoever shall receive one of such children”. Most readers take the first, but the phrase allows both.
- Mark 10:16
“Blessed” is kateulogei, an intensified form of the verb found only here in the New Testament, and the tense is imperfect: he kept blessing them, child after child. The order is embrace, then hands, then blessing, more than the parents had asked for.
Mark 10:13-16
King James Version13And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and his disciples rebuked those that brought them.
14But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.
15Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
16And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them.
Mark 10:17-27
The Possession That Makes Departure Difficult
The man approaches with urgency, kneels, and asks what he must do to inherit eternal life. Mark does not call him young or a ruler, but it does give one detail that keeps the hard answer from being mistaken for contempt: Jesus looks at him and loves him. Then the demand reaches the place of attachment. Sell, give to the poor, take up the cross, and follow. The man leaves grieving because he has great possessions. The Book of Mark names wealth as the point at which his desire to follow meets resistance. Jesus then turns the private encounter into teaching about the difficulty of entering the kingdom while trusting in riches. The camel and the needle do not describe a challenging but manageable squeeze through a convenient city gate. The image is impossible on purpose. The disciples hear it correctly enough to ask who can be saved, and Jesus relocates the possibility from human ability to God.
Deep dive
Mark introduces a man who runs, kneels, and asks about inheriting eternal life. It does not call him young or identify him as a ruler. His reply about keeping the commandments is followed by an unusually direct statement: Jesus beholds him and loves him. The demanding answer that follows is therefore not presented as evidence of contempt. Selling, giving to the poor, taking up the cross, and following bring the question of life into the same costly direction announced in chapter 8. The man goes away grieved because he has great possessions. His riches are not incidental background; Mark explicitly connects them to his departure.
Jesus then describes the difficulty of entering the kingdom while trusting in riches. The camel and the needle exaggerate scale to the point of impossibility. Mark names no accommodating city gate through which the animal can squeeze by trying harder. The disciples recognize the force of the image and ask who can be saved. Jesus answers by distinguishing what is impossible with men from what is possible with God. The conclusion does not quietly convert the man's difficulty into an achievable technique. It relocates the possibility altogether. The man asked what he should do, and the discussion ends with a statement about what God can do.
Words to trace: Jesus, enter, good, kingdom, astonished, disciples
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:17
“Good Master” was an unusual address; scholars have found no example of a rabbi being called “good teacher” in Jewish sources of the period. “Inherit” is the language of receiving land, used here for “eternal life”, a phrase first found in Daniel 12:2, “everlasting life”.
- Mark 10:18
“None good but one, that is, God” echoes the Shema, “The LORD our God is one LORD” (Deuteronomy 6:4). Interpreters differ on whether Jesus is deflecting the compliment or inviting the man to think about what he has just said. The question is left for the reader too.
- Mark 10:19
The list is from the second table of the Ten Commandments, with one addition: “Defraud not” is not among the Ten. It may stand in for coveting, or recall the law against withholding a hired servant’s wages (Deuteronomy 24:14). Either way, it is the commandment most likely to trouble a rich man.
- Mark 10:20
The man drops the adjective: before it was “Good Master”, now simply “Master”. “From my youth” probably means since he became answerable to the Law as a boy. He has kept the commandments he was asked about, and nothing in Mark says he is lying.
- Mark 10:21
“Beholding” is emblepsas, looking straight at him. “Treasure in heaven” was a Jewish phrase for giving to the poor; Tobit 4:8–9 says that giving alms lays up “a good treasure” against the day of need. “Take up the cross” is absent from older manuscripts here.
- Mark 10:22
“Sad” is stygnasas, his face darkened, a word used of a lowering sky; Matthew 16:3 uses it of weather, “the sky is red and lowring”. “Great possessions” is ktēmata polla, and ktēmata often meant landed property, fields and estates.
- Mark 10:23
“How hardly” means with what difficulty. The disciples’ shock makes sense against a common reading of the Law, in which wealth was a mark of God’s blessing on the faithful (Deuteronomy 28:1–14; Job 42:10). If the rich find it hard, the disciples reckon, everyone does.
- Mark 10:24
“Children” is tekna, the only time in Mark that Jesus addresses the disciples this way. The older manuscripts lack “for them that trust in riches” and read simply “how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God!”, which makes the saying harder still, since it then applies to anyone.
- Mark 10:25
The camel was the largest animal a Galilean would see. Later rabbinic sayings use an elephant passing through the eye of a needle as a figure for the impossible (Talmud, Berakhot 55b). A few late manuscripts read kamilon, rope, for kamēlon, camel, softening the image, but the reading has little support.
- Mark 10:26
“Out of measure” is perissōs, beyond bounds. The passage uses three phrases for one thing: inherit eternal life (verse 17), enter the kingdom (verse 23), and now be saved. The disciples treat them as interchangeable, and Jesus does not correct them.
- Mark 10:27
“Looking upon them” is emblepsas, the same steady look he gave the rich man in verse 21. “With God all things are possible” recalls the question put to Sarah, “Is any thing too hard for the LORD?” (Genesis 18:14), and Job’s confession, “I know that thou canst do every thing” (Job 42:2).
Mark 10:17-27
King James Version17And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
18And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
19Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.
20And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.
21Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
22And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.
23And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!
24And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!
25It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
26And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved?
27And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
Mark 10:28-34
The Reward List Includes Persecution
Peter speaks after the wealthy man leaves: the disciples have left everything and followed. Jesus acknowledges costly relinquishment for his sake and the gospel's, but the promised return refuses to become a clean prosperity formula. Houses, family relationships, and lands appear in the list, and so does "with persecutions." The Book of Mark will not let reward be separated from the road it has been describing. Eternal life is placed in the world to come, while first and last are reversed again before anybody can convert sacrifice into rank. Then the geography turns explicit. They are going up to Jerusalem, Jesus is walking ahead, and those following are amazed and afraid. He gathers the twelve and names what lies there in greater detail than before: condemnation, Gentile custody, mocking, scourging, spitting, death, and resurrection. The next request for status will therefore come after the path has been explained with painful clarity.

Deep dive
Peter's statement that the disciples have left everything contrasts with the man who has just departed because of what he possesses. Jesus recognizes relinquishment for his sake and the gospel's, but the promised hundredfold is not a simple inventory of private acquisitions. Houses and family relationships appear within a widened field of belonging, and the list includes "with persecutions." That phrase will not fit into a calculation of guaranteed comfort. Eternal life is named in the world to come, while the reversal of first and last prevents Peter's accounting from becoming an uncontested claim to rank.
On the road to Jerusalem, Jesus goes ahead. Mark records amazement and fear among those with him, then describes another deliberate gathering of the twelve for instruction. This third prediction is more detailed: delivery to the chief priests and scribes, condemnation, transfer to the Gentiles, mocking, scourging, spitting, death, and resurrection. Jerusalem is not approached as an accident waiting to surprise him. The specificity also sharpens what follows. The next request for privileged places will be made after this account of humiliation has been put directly before the disciples. Mark gives their ambition no shelter in the claim that the subject has never been explained.
Words to trace: began, brethren, children, first, followed, Jerusalem
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:28
Peter’s “we” is emphatic, set against the man who just walked away. Both verbs are perfects: we have left and stay left; we have followed and are still following. It reads as both claim and question, and Jesus answers the question.
- Mark 10:29
The list has seven items. “Or wife” is missing from older manuscripts of Mark, though Luke 18:29 has it. “For my sake, and the gospel’s” is the same pairing Mark gave in 8:35: the message is set beside the person.
- Mark 10:30
“Hundredfold” is the top yield of the good ground in the sower (4:8, 20). The new list mirrors the old one, with one difference: “father” is missing. Those who leave fathers gain brothers, sisters, mothers and children, but in this list God alone is left as Father, which many commentators think deliberate.
- Mark 10:31
Mark records this saying only here; Matthew uses it twice, around the parable of the labourers (19:30, 20:16). Coming straight after Peter’s “we have left all”, it cuts both ways: the disciples may be first, but claiming to be first is already risky.
- Mark 10:32
“Going up” is exact: the road from Jericho, about 850 feet below sea level, climbs more than 3,000 feet in some fifteen miles to Jerusalem. “Went before them” is proagōn, the verb the young man at the tomb uses: “he goeth before you into Galilee” (16:7).
- Mark 10:33
This third prediction adds something the first two did not: the Gentiles. There are two handings over: first to the chief priests and scribes, then by them to the Gentiles. “Condemn” is katakrinousin, a formal sentence, the verb used when the council condemns him in 14:64.
- Mark 10:34
Each item is fulfilled in Mark’s passion account: spitting (14:65, 15:19), mocking (15:20, 31), scourging (15:15), death, and rising on the third day. This is the most detailed of the three predictions, given on the steepest stretch of road.
Mark 10:28-34
King James Version28Then Peter began to say unto him, Lo, we have left all, and have followed thee.
29And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel’s,
30But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.
31But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.
32And they were in the way going up to Jerusalem; and Jesus went before them: and they were amazed; and as they followed, they were afraid. And he took again the twelve, and began to tell them what things should happen unto him,
33Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles:
34And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him: and the third day he shall rise again.
Mark 10:35-45
A Request for the Seats, an Answer About Service
James and John try to secure agreement before naming their request, but Jesus makes them say what they want: seats beside him in glory. Their ambition arrives immediately after another detailed prediction of humiliation. He answers with the cup and baptism he must undergo, images of an experience that will engulf him rather than decorate a throne. Their quick "We can" is not accepted as proof of understanding. The Book of Mark then widens the correction to all twelve when the other ten become indignant. Jesus contrasts the familiar exercise of lordship with the pattern required among his followers. Greatness becomes service; first place becomes servanthood. The decisive explanation is his own mission. The Son of man does not come to be served but to serve and to give his life "a ransom for many." Rank is measured against self-giving, not access to the best seat.

Deep dive
The brothers begin by asking Jesus to agree before hearing the request. He makes them state it. Their desired places, one on each side in glory, concern distinction within the future they expect him to establish. Jesus responds with the cup and baptism he must undergo, images of an experience that will engulf him rather than decorate his position. Their ready assurance that they can share it is not treated as proof that they understand it. He predicts participation in his suffering while refusing to distribute the seats on their terms.
The ten become indignant, but Mark does not say that their anger arises from a more mature grasp of service. Jesus gathers them all and contrasts the exercise of lordship among the Gentiles with the pattern required in his company. Greatness is defined through service, and first place through being servant of all. Verse 45 grounds that reversal in the Son of man's own work. The Greek lutron means a ransom price securing release (Thayer's Greek Lexicon, 3083). His life is given "a ransom for many," not exchanged for a higher seat. The saying does not identify a recipient to whom the ransom is paid, so that detail should not be invented. It does explain why the coming death belongs at the center of the teaching about rank: the one they follow gives himself for others.
Words to trace: baptized, drink, hand, Jesus, baptism, exercise
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:35
“Master” is didaskale, teacher. Matthew 20:20 puts the request in the mouth of their mother; Mark has the brothers speak for themselves. They begin with a blank request, whatever we ask, before naming what they want.
- Mark 10:36
Herod had given a blank promise to a girl and been trapped by it (6:22–23). Jesus does the opposite: he gives no oath and asks what they want before promising anything. The Greek is compact and a little awkward, as though interrupting them mid-request.
- Mark 10:37
The right hand was the place of highest honour beside a king, as in Psalm 110:1, “Sit thou at my right hand”; the left was second. “In thy glory” shows they remembered 8:38, the Son of man coming in the glory of his Father, and took it to mean a throne room.
- Mark 10:38
The cup was a prophetic picture of God’s judgment poured out to be drunk (Isaiah 51:17, Psalm 75:8); in Gethsemane Jesus will pray, “take away this cup from me” (14:36). Baptism as being overwhelmed by waters recalls Psalm 69:1–2, “the waters are come in unto my soul”.
- Mark 10:39
James was the first of the twelve to be killed, put to death with the sword by Herod Agrippa about AD 44 (Acts 12:2). Tradition about John divides: most early sources say he lived long and died in Ephesus. The prediction came true for James within about fifteen years.
- Mark 10:40
“Prepared” is hētoimastai, a perfect passive: already prepared, by someone other than Jesus. The next time Mark mentions a right and a left, it is at the cross, where two thieves are crucified “the one on his right hand, and the other on his left” (15:27).
- Mark 10:41
“The ten” is Mark’s count of everyone else, dividing the twelve into two and ten. Their anger is described with the same word as Jesus’ indignation in verse 14. That the ten are angry rather than amused suggests they wanted the seats too, though that is an inference Mark leaves to be drawn.
- Mark 10:42
“Which are accounted to rule” is hoi dokountes archein, those reputed or seeming to rule, a hint that their rule is more appearance than substance. “Exercise lordship” is katakyrieuousin, to lord it down over; 1 Peter 5:3 uses the same verb warning elders not to lord it over the flock.
- Mark 10:43
Older manuscripts read “it is not so among you”, a statement of fact, where the King James has a future, “shall not be”. “Minister” is diakonos, the servant who waits at table.
- Mark 10:44
The steps go down: in verse 43 the great one is a diakonos, a table servant; here the first is a doulos, a slave, owned and without rights. “Of all” widens it from “among you” in the verse before.
- Mark 10:45
“Ransom” is lytron, the price paid to free a slave or a prisoner of war. “For many” is anti pollōn, in place of many. “Many” is the word of Isaiah 53:11–12, where the servant “shall justify many” and “bare the sin of many”.
Mark 10:35-45
King James Version35And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, come unto him, saying, Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.
36And he said unto them, What would ye that I should do for you?
37They said unto him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.
38But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask: can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?
39And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:
40But to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.
41And when the ten heard it, they began to be much displeased with James and John.
42But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.
43But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
44And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.
45For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.
Mark 10:46-52
The Last Request Is for Sight
Bartimaeus begins beside the road while the crowd and Jesus are moving on it. He cannot see, but he identifies Jesus as Son of David and refuses to be silenced when others tell him to stop. The crowd's attitude changes as soon as Jesus calls him, and the same people who rebuked him now tell him to rise and take courage. Mark makes that reversal almost abrupt. Then Jesus asks Bartimaeus the same basic question he asked James and John: what do you want me to do for you? Their answer concerned position; his concerns sight. The Book of Mark lets the contrast speak without turning it into a lecture. Bartimaeus receives his sight immediately, is told that his faith has made him whole, and then follows Jesus "in the way." The man who began unable to see beside the road now joins the road whose destination has just been explained.

Deep dive
The crowd initially tells the blind beggar to be quiet, then becomes the bearer of encouragement when Jesus calls him. Mark makes the reversal almost abrupt enough to hear the change in tone. Bartimaeus has not changed his request; Jesus' response has changed the crowd's behavior. He casts away his garment and comes. The movement is urgent, but the text does not identify the garment as his entire property or attach a symbolic valuation to it. His repeated address, "Son of David," introduces a royal identification that will become important as the journey reaches Jerusalem.
Jesus asks what he wants done for him, echoing the question put to James and John earlier in the chapter. Their answer concerned positions of honor; his concerns the ability to see. The contrast gains force from Mark's repeated accounts of sight and misunderstanding. Jesus identifies faith in the encounter, Bartimaeus receives sight immediately, and he follows Jesus "in the way." That final phrase is geographically simple and structurally important. The road is the one on which suffering has just been announced again. The man who began beside it, unable to see, now joins it behind Jesus. Mark ends the chapter with following rather than bargaining over the destination's seating arrangements.
Words to trace: Jesus, blind, David, Jericho, mercy, sight
Verse-by-verse path
- Mark 10:46
Herodian Jericho, with Herod’s winter palace, lay about a mile from the ancient mound of Joshua’s Jericho, and some explain Luke’s “as he was come nigh” (18:35) against Mark’s “as he went out” by the two sites. Bartimaeus is Aramaic, bar Timai, son of Timaeus. He is the only person healed in Mark whose name is given.
- Mark 10:47
No one in Mark has yet called Jesus “Son of David”, the royal title promised through 2 Samuel 7:12–16. A blind beggar is the first. “Have mercy on me” is eleēson, the cry of the Psalms (Psalm 51:1), which the church later kept in its Greek form as Kyrie eleison.
- Mark 10:48
“Many charged him” is epetimōn, rebuked him, the word the disciples used on those who brought the children in verse 13. The crowd tries to silence the beggar as the disciples tried to keep the children away. “Cried” is imperfect: he kept shouting.
- Mark 10:49
The man who walked ahead of everyone on the road up (verse 32) now stops. “Be of good comfort” is tharsei, take courage, the word Jesus used on the water in 6:50. The verb “call” comes three times in one verse, as the summons passes from Jesus to the crowd to the man.
- Mark 10:50
The garment is the himation, the outer cloak a beggar spread out to catch coins and slept in at night; the Law required a poor man’s cloak taken in pledge to be returned by sunset (Exodus 22:26–27). Older manuscripts read “sprang up” for “rose”.
- Mark 10:51
Where the King James has “Lord”, the Greek is Rabbouni, a heightened form of rabbi, “my master”, the word Mary Magdalene uses at the tomb in John 20:16. “Receive my sight” is anablepsō, to look up again, which suggests he had once seen.
- Mark 10:52
Unlike the blind man at Bethsaida, healed privately with spittle and two touches (8:23–25), Bartimaeus is healed in public by a word alone. He is told “Go thy way”, and the way he goes is Jesus’ way, up to Jerusalem.
Mark 10:46-52
King James Version46And they came to Jericho: and as he went out of Jericho with his disciples and a great number of people, blind Bartimæus, the son of Timæus, sat by the highway side begging.
47And when he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to cry out, and say, Jesus, thou Son of David, have mercy on me.
48And many charged him that he should hold his peace: but he cried the more a great deal, Thou Son of David, have mercy on me.
49And Jesus stood still, and commanded him to be called. And they call the blind man, saying unto him, Be of good comfort, rise; he calleth thee.
50And he, casting away his garment, rose, and came to Jesus.
51And Jesus answered and said unto him, What wilt thou that I should do unto thee? The blind man said unto him, Lord, that I might receive my sight.
52And Jesus said unto him, Go thy way; thy faith hath made thee whole. And immediately he received his sight, and followed Jesus in the way.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Watch what Jesus says and does, and how people respond.
- Trace kingdom, discipleship, opposition, cross, and resurrection in the evangelist’s own sequence.
- Let later doctrine clarify the scene without erasing its immediate setting.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Mark 10?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Mark 10 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Jesus blessing children, the rich man leaving sorrowful, servant leadership taught, and Bartimaeus calling from the roadside?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.



