The big picture
Numbers 27 addresses continuity first within a family and then within national leadership. Zelophehad's five daughters, already named in the census, publicly ask why their father's name should disappear from his family simply because he has no son. Moses brings the case before the LORD, and the answer is direct: "The daughters of Zelophehad speak right." Their inheritance is granted, and the ruling becomes a statute governing similar cases. The chapter then turns to Moses himself. He will see the land but will not lead Israel into it because the sentence of Meribah still stands. His recorded response is concern for the congregation, asking that they not be left "as sheep which have no shepherd." Joshua is chosen, publicly commissioned before Eleazar and the people, and given authority while Moses is still alive. Both halves of the chapter protect continuity without pretending death is absent: a father's line retains its holding, and a departing leader does not leave Israel directionless.
In this chapter
- Five Daughters Bring a Case, Not a Rebellion Numbers 27:1-5
Zelophehad's daughters come forward in the most public place possible, standing before Moses, Eleazar, the princes, and the congregation at the tabernacle entrance.
- The Answer Becomes a Rule Beyond This Household Numbers 27:6-11
The divine answer begins with an unusually plain approval: "The daughters of Zelophehad speak right." They are not given a special exception out of pity while the ordinary principle remains untouched.
- Moses Asks About the Flock He Will Leave Numbers 27:12-17
Moses is told to climb Mount Abarim and look at the land he will not enter as Israel's leader.
- Joshua Receives Authority Before Witnesses Numbers 27:18-23
Joshua's appointment is public before it is powerful.

Scripture beside the summary
Numbers · King James Version · 23Numbers 27:1-5
Five Daughters Bring a Case, Not a Rebellion
Zelophehad's daughters come forward in the most public place possible, standing before Moses, Eleazar, the princes, and the congregation at the tabernacle entrance. Their argument is not a rejection of Israel's inheritance structure but a demand to be included within its logic. Their father died in the wilderness, they say, but not as part of Korah's company. They do not present him as sinless or invent a heroic death; he "died in his own sin," and Numbers leaves that sin unnamed. Their question is about disappearance: why should their father's name be removed from his family because he had no son? The fact that all five daughters are standing there already proves the family itself has not vanished. Moses does not classify the challenge as rebellion simply because it exposes a gap in the existing arrangement. He carries their cause before the LORD. That quiet procedural move makes this petition unlike the accusatory confrontations that dominate much of Numbers, and the answer will confirm that bringing the problem forward was right.

Deep dive
The five women stand before Moses, Eleazar, the princes, and the congregation at the tabernacle entrance. Their setting is fully public, and their argument works within the promised inheritance rather than against it. They ask why the absence of a son should erase their father's name from his family. The point is not that their family has disappeared. They are standing there to demonstrate that it has not.
Their description of Zelophehad is carefully limited. He died in his own sin, but he was not part of Korah's company. They do not claim a flawless father, and Numbers does not identify his particular offence. Nothing here authorizes attaching his name to an otherwise unnamed death elsewhere in the wilderness account. Moses brings the case to the LORD. The contrast with the complaints surrounding much of the journey is important: an appeal that challenges an apparent gap is not automatically classified as rebellion. This one will receive a direct statement that the petitioners are right.
Words to trace: father, company, congregation, daughters, died, LORD
Verse-by-verse path
- Numbers 27:1
“Then came” is vattiqravnah, “they drew near”, the verb used for approaching the sanctuary. Their pedigree runs six generations back to Joseph, a full lineage given to prove the claim before they speak. It is the same list of five names as 26:33, in the same order.
- Numbers 27:2
The door of the tabernacle is where Korah’s two hundred and fifty stood with their censers in 16:18. The same ground now hears a different kind of challenge. The women address five audiences at once, Moses, Eleazar, the princes and the whole congregation, and leave no one unaware of the case.
- Numbers 27:3
“Died in his own sin” most likely means the death shared by the whole generation sentenced at Kadesh in 14:29–35, not a crime of his own; that is how most commentators read it. The phrase for Korah’s men, “gathered themselves together”, is the verb of 16:11.
- Numbers 27:4
“Be done away” is the Hebrew gara, to be diminished or withheld. It is the verb the unclean men used in 9:7, “wherefore are we kept back”, when they asked about the Passover. Both petitions in Numbers that begin “why should we lose out” end in a new law.
- Numbers 27:5
In Hebrew manuscripts the last letter of mishpatan, “their cause”, is written oversized, one of the enlarged letters the scribes preserved. Moses has taken a case to the LORD this way before: the blasphemer in Leviticus 24:12, the unclean men in 9:8, the wood gatherer in 15:34.
Numbers 27:1-5
King James Version1Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these are the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah.
2And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,
3Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons.
4Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.
5And Moses brought their cause before the LORD.
Numbers 27:6-11
The Answer Becomes a Rule Beyond This Household
The divine answer begins with an unusually plain approval: "The daughters of Zelophehad speak right." They are not given a special exception out of pity while the ordinary principle remains untouched. Their father's inheritance is ordered to pass to them, and the decision immediately becomes a rule for Israel. If a man dies without a son, his daughter inherits. If there is no daughter, the line moves to his brothers, then his father's brothers, then the nearest kinsman within the family. The order preserves the family holding rather than allowing it to evaporate when one expected heir is missing. Its scope is also exact. Numbers does not say that daughters and sons always inherit identically when sons are present, nor does it dismantle the tribal organization of the land. It answers the no-son case. The ruling has consequences beyond this hearing: Joshua will later implement it, and Numbers 36 will address how marriage could affect tribal location. Five women's petition has changed the law Israel will use in settlement.

Deep dive
The response begins with approval of the women's claim. Their inheritance is not described as a gift granted out of pity while the governing principle remains unchanged. The LORD orders the father's holding to pass to them and then gives a rule for comparable cases. Where there is no son, a daughter inherits; in the absence of a daughter, the order proceeds through the deceased man's brothers, his father's brothers, and the nearest family kinsman.
That order is a genuine legal consequence of the petition, but its scope should remain exact. The passage does not establish identical shares for sons and daughters when sons are present, nor does it abandon the family structure of the land. It secures succession where a man has no son. Joshua 17:3–6 will later recall this command when Zelophehad's daughters receive their portions. Numbers 36 will address a further consequence involving marriage across tribal lines. Their successful petition is therefore not a decorative episode: it creates an inheritance that subsequent land arrangements must actually accommodate.
Words to trace: inheritance, brethren, cause, children, daughter, father
Verse-by-verse path
- Numbers 27:6
The answer comes to Moses alone, although Eleazar the priest stood beside him in verse 2. No lot is cast and no Urim is consulted; this ruling arrives as speech, the same way the laws of Sinai did.
- Numbers 27:7
“A possession of an inheritance” stacks two land words, achuzzah and nachalah, a holding and a heritage. The land is to lie “among their father’s brethren”, inside the clan’s own ground, which is exactly what chapter 36 will need to protect.
- Numbers 27:8
For the daughter the verb is “cause to pass”, ha’avarta. For the brothers and uncles in the next three verses it is plain “give”. The Talmud (Bava Batra 147a) noticed the difference; in the text itself the daughter carries her father’s holding on, while the others simply receive it.
- Numbers 27:9
The order leaves out the widow entirely, and the man’s sisters, and his mother. Israel’s land is kept with the male line of the father’s house, and the daughter is placed ahead of every male relative only because she is his own child.
- Numbers 27:10
The father of the dead man is passed over and his brothers named. Rabbinic law (Bava Batra 108a) reasoned that the father must come first, since the brothers inherit through him, but that is an inference; the verse moves straight to the uncles.
- Numbers 27:11
“A statute of judgment”, chuqqat mishpat, is a rare pairing that recurs only at 35:29, closing the laws of the cities of refuge. The ruling has passed from a single household’s hearing into the permanent law of Israel, still under the words “as the LORD commanded Moses”.
Numbers 27:6-11
King James Version6And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
7The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father’s brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.
8And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a man die, and have no son, then ye shall cause his inheritance to pass unto his daughter.
9And if he have no daughter, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren.
10And if he have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his father’s brethren.
11And if his father have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his kinsman that is next to him of his family, and he shall possess it: and it shall be unto the children of Israel a statute of judgment, as the LORD commanded Moses.
Numbers 27:12-17
Moses Asks About the Flock He Will Leave
Moses is told to climb Mount Abarim and look at the land he will not enter as Israel's leader. The reason has not faded with time or with the appointment of a new generation. Meribah is named again, and the LORD says Moses and Aaron rebelled against the command and failed to sanctify him before the people. Succession will not quietly erase that judgment. What Moses says next, however, is not a plea for the sentence to be canceled or a request that one of his sons inherit the office. He asks "the God of the spirits of all flesh" to appoint a man over the congregation who can go out and come in before them, lead them out, and bring them in. The paired movements describe active leadership, and the final image sharpens the concern: Israel must not be left "as sheep which have no shepherd." Moses has just been told about his own departure, yet the recorded focus falls on the people who must continue after him.


Deep dive
The two decisions stand close together. A father's name has just been secured in an inheritance he will not personally occupy; now Moses is told he will see the land but not enter it as Israel's leader. The reason is again Meribah. Numbers does not let the succession arrangements quietly dissolve that earlier sentence. Moses' death is announced here, but not yet narrated.
His recorded answer concerns the people who will remain. He addresses the LORD as the God of the spirits of all flesh and asks for a man who will go before them, lead them out, and bring them in. Those paired movements describe more than holding a title. The shepherd image makes the responsibility concrete: the congregation must not be left without someone to direct it. The text records no nomination of Moses' own son. Its emphasis falls on divine appointment and the needs of the flock, not on preserving a personal dynasty.
Words to trace: LORD, congregation, gathered, Moses, water, Aaron
Verse-by-verse path
- Numbers 27:12
Abarim means “the regions beyond” or “the crossings”, the range above the plains of Moab. Deuteronomy 32:49 names the peak within it: “this mountain Abarim, unto mount Nebo”. The land is described as already given, in the past tense.
- Numbers 27:13
“Gathered unto thy people” is said of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, who were buried with kin. Moses will be buried by the LORD in a valley of Moab, and “no man knoweth of his sepulchre” (Deuteronomy 34:6). The phrase means more than a family grave.
- Numbers 27:14
The verse puns twice. Meribah means strife, and “the strife of the congregation” is merivat, the same root. “Sanctify me” is lehaqdisheni, and the place is Kadesh, “holy”. The words of 20:13 play on both names, and here the pun turns into a verdict.
- Numbers 27:15
Numbers records no protest. Deuteronomy 3:23–26 tells what Moses left out: he pleaded to cross over and see “that goodly mountain, and Lebanon”, and was told, “speak no more unto me of this matter.” In Numbers his first words after the sentence concern someone else.
- Numbers 27:16
“The God of the spirits of all flesh” appears in the Bible only here and in 16:22, where Moses and Aaron fell on their faces and used it to plead for the congregation during Korah’s revolt. The one who knows every spirit is asked to pick the right man.
- Numbers 27:17
“To go out and to come in” is the idiom of a commander on campaign: said of David leading Saul’s troops (1 Samuel 18:13) and of Caleb, still strong at eighty five (Joshua 14:11). Micaiah will use the shepherdless sheep for a king about to die (1 Kings 22:17).
Numbers 27:12-17
King James Version12And the LORD said unto Moses, Get thee up into this mount Abarim, and see the land which I have given unto the children of Israel.
13And when thou hast seen it, thou also shalt be gathered unto thy people, as Aaron thy brother was gathered.
14For ye rebelled against my commandment in the desert of Zin, in the strife of the congregation, to sanctify me at the water before their eyes: that is the water of Meribah in Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin.
15And Moses spake unto the LORD, saying,
16Let the LORD, the God of the spirits of all flesh, set a man over the congregation,
17Which may go out before them, and which may go in before them, and which may lead them out, and which may bring them in; that the congregation of the LORD be not as sheep which have no shepherd.
Numbers 27:18-23
Joshua Receives Authority Before Witnesses
Joshua's appointment is public before it is powerful. The LORD identifies him as "a man in whom is the spirit" before Moses lays a hand upon him, so the ceremony is not presented as creating every qualification from nothing. Moses is to set Joshua before Eleazar and the whole congregation, lay his hand on him, give him a charge in their sight, and place some of his honor upon him. The people who will later follow Joshua are therefore witnesses to the transition while Moses is still present. Yet the succession is not a simple transfer of every feature of Moses' unique role. Joshua will stand before Eleazar, who will seek counsel through the judgment of Urim before the LORD. Leadership and priestly consultation now appear side by side. Numbers closes the chapter with Moses doing exactly as commanded. The future shepherd is not discovered after an empty office produces a contest. He is named, commissioned, and acknowledged before the present leader dies.

Deep dive
Joshua is described as a man in whom the spirit already is before Moses lays a hand on him. The ceremony is therefore not presented as creating every qualification from nothing. It publicly identifies and authorizes the chosen successor. Moses gives him a charge before Eleazar and the congregation and places some of his honour upon him so that Israel will obey. The commission is visible to the people who will later be asked to follow.
The arrangement also marks a difference from Moses' own position. Joshua is to stand before Eleazar, who will seek counsel through the judgment of Urim. Leadership and priestly consultation appear together; Joshua does not simply receive every aspect of Moses' unique role without distinction. The chapter closes by recording Moses' obedience to the instructions. The shepherd's replacement is appointed while the present shepherd is still there to commission him, giving Israel an acknowledged transition rather than an empty office and a dispute after the funeral.
Words to trace: congregation, LORD, Eleazar, Moses, priest, charge
Verse-by-verse path
- Numbers 27:18
Laying on the hand, semikhah, is the gesture of Leviticus 1:4, where the worshipper leans a hand on his offering, and of 8:10, where Israel lays hands on the Levites. Joshua has been Moses’ attendant since his youth (11:28) and led the fight against Amalek in Exodus 17.
- Numbers 27:19
“In their sight” is literally “before their eyes”, the phrase of verse 14, where Moses failed to sanctify the LORD “before their eyes”. The failure and the handover both happen in public. “Give him a charge” is the verb from which mitsvah, commandment, is formed.
- Numbers 27:20
“Honour” is hod, splendour or majesty, a word often used of kings. The Hebrew says “of thine honour”, a share and not the whole. A rabbinic saying (Bava Batra 75a) put it that the face of Moses was like the sun and Joshua’s like the moon.
- Numbers 27:21
In the Pentateuch the Urim always comes with the Thummim (Exodus 28:30; Leviticus 8:8; Deuteronomy 33:8), except here, where it stands alone. “At his word” is left open: it may be Eleazar’s word, or the word of the LORD given through him.
- Numbers 27:22
Joshua does nothing and says nothing in the chapter. Every verb in his commissioning has Moses as its subject: took, set, laid, charged. The one who will lead Israel across the Jordan receives his office without a line.
- Numbers 27:23
The LORD said “thine hand” in verse 18, singular. Moses lays on “his hands”, both of them. Deuteronomy 34:9 remembers it the same way: Joshua “was full of the spirit of wisdom; for Moses had laid his hands upon him.”
Numbers 27:18-23
King James Version18And the LORD said unto Moses, Take thee Joshua the son of Nun, a man in whom is the spirit, and lay thine hand upon him;
19And set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation; and give him a charge in their sight.
20And thou shalt put some of thine honour upon him, that all the congregation of the children of Israel may be obedient.
21And he shall stand before Eleazar the priest, who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim before the LORD: at his word shall they go out, and at his word they shall come in, both he, and all the children of Israel with him, even all the congregation.
22And Moses did as the LORD commanded him: and he took Joshua, and set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation:
23And he laid his hands upon him, and gave him a charge, as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Identify the people addressed and the covenant setting.
- Distinguish rescue, worship, holiness, justice, and community responsibility.
- Read commands in their literary and covenant context before making a modern application.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Numbers 27?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Numbers 27 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Numbers 27 develops its own movement around LORD, congregation, Moses, brethren, inheritance?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.




