New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Servants' Future Is Not the Rebels' Future

Isaiah 65

The big picture

Isaiah 65 answers the complaint of divine silence by showing that the LORD's hands have been stretched out while a rebellious people refused his call. Religious activity does not excuse that refusal; gardens, graves, forbidden food, rival sacred tables, and claims of superior holiness all become evidence of chosen ways. Yet the answer does not collapse everyone into one judgment. Like new wine preserved because a blessing remains in the cluster, servants are spared and given an inheritance. The chapter then expands the contrast between rebels and servants into two lived futures: hunger against eating, thirst against drinking, sorrow against songs, and a cursed name against a new one. From there the horizon becomes new creation. Jerusalem is joy, labor reaches its proper fruit, families endure, prayer is answered before speech is finished, and the holy mountain becomes a place where feeding no longer depends on violence.

In this chapter

Isaiah 65: The Servants' Future Is Not the Rebels' Future
Chapter sceneIsaiah 65

Scripture beside the summary

Isaiah · King James Version · 25

Isaiah 65:1-7

The Outstretched Hands Have Not Been Absent

The answer to the complaint about a hidden God begins with outstretched hands. The LORD says he has made himself available and called repeatedly while a rebellious people followed their own thoughts. That placement matters after Isaiah 64. The crisis cannot be reduced to faithful seekers pounding on a locked heavenly door. Gardens, graves, swine's flesh, abominable broth, and incense on the mountains give the rebellion a religious texture, and the sharpest detail may be the claim, "I am holier than thou." The people can label themselves pure while the LORD describes the effect as smoke in his nose. Even the repeated phrase "all the day" works in two directions: his hands have been extended all day, and their provocation has burned all day. The judgment to come is therefore presented as recompense for a continued pattern, including inherited patterns that the present generation has continued rather than rejected. Isaiah makes divine availability and human refusal answer each other directly.

Isaiah 65:1-7: The Outstretched Hands Have Not Been Absent
Chapter sceneIsaiah 65

Deep dive

The answer begins with divine initiative. The LORD has made himself available and spread out his hands, while the rebellious people have pursued their own thoughts. Set after Isaiah 64, the statement complicates the complaint about God's hidden face. The relationship cannot be explained simply as a people searching faithfully for a God who has refused every approach. Romans 10:20–21 later uses the opening declaration in connection with those beyond Israel and the following verse in connection with Israel's disobedience, drawing on the contrast already present in Isaiah's language.

Gardens, graves, prohibited food, and vessels containing abominable broth give the indictment concrete religious settings. The precise rituals are not all explained, but their practitioners' claim to superior holiness receives a clear answer. They tell others to keep away; the LORD describes them as irritating smoke. The repeated "all the day" joins his extended hands to the fire of their provocation. Their claim to holiness does not determine his assessment. The acknowledgment of both their sins and their ancestors' sins describes a continued pattern of rebellion, not a present generation exonerated by shifting every fault into the past.

Words to trace: bosom, burneth, incense, iniquities, people, recompense

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:1

    The verbs are tolerative: “I let myself be sought, I let myself be found”, God making himself available to people who never asked. “Behold me” is hinneni, said twice. “A nation that was not called by my name” picks up the prayer’s own words in 63:19, “they were not called by thy name”; the Greek reads “did not call on my name”.

  2. Isaiah 65:2

    Spreading out the hands was the posture of prayer; in 1:15 God refused to look when the people “spread forth your hands”. Now God stands with open hands before them, like a petitioner. “Rebellious” is sorer, the word for the stubborn son of Deuteronomy 21:18. “Their own thoughts” recalls 55:8, “my thoughts are not your thoughts”.

  3. Isaiah 65:3

    “To my face” is al panai, the phrase of the first commandment, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). The Law allowed altars only of earth or unhewn stone (Exodus 20:24–25); altars of fired brick break that rule, and brick was Babel’s building material (Genesis 11:3). The gardens are the sacred groves of 1:29.

  4. Isaiah 65:4

    Sitting among graves and spending nights in “the monuments”, hidden places or tombs, points to seeking oracles from the dead through dreams, the practice warned against in 8:19. Pork was forbidden in Leviticus 11:7. “Abominable things” is piggul, the Law’s term for sacrificial meat kept past its time (Leviticus 7:18).

  5. Isaiah 65:5

    The English phrase “holier than thou” comes from this verse. The Hebrew likely means “I would make you holy”, holiness treated as a charge that passes by touch, the way Ezekiel 44:19 has priests change garments “they shall not sanctify the people with their garments”. These worshippers think their rites make them untouchable. A “smoke in my nose” is the reverse of a sweet savour.

  6. Isaiah 65:6

    “It is written before me” pictures a record kept in the king’s presence, like the chronicles read to Ahasuerus on his sleepless night, where Mordecai’s deed was found (Esther 6:1–2). The “bosom” is the fold of a robe above the belt, used as a pocket; payment is poured into it as grain was measured into Ruth’s veil (Ruth 3:15).

  7. Isaiah 65:7

    The hilltop shrines are the ones Hosea 4:13 describes: “They sacrifice upon the tops of the mountains, and burn incense upon the hills.” “Measure” is the grain dealer’s verb, and “work” is pe’ullah, the word for wages that 61:8 promised to pay faithfully; these wages too are paid, measured out into the bosom of verse 6.

Isaiah 65:1-7

King James Version

1I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought me not: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by my name.

2I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walketh in a way that was not good, after their own thoughts;

3A people that provoketh me to anger continually to my face; that sacrificeth in gardens, and burneth incense upon altars of brick;

4Which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which eat swine’s flesh, and broth of abominable things is in their vessels;

5Which say, Stand by thyself, come not near to me; for I am holier than thou. These are a smoke in my nose, a fire that burneth all the day.

6Behold, it is written before me: I will not keep silence, but will recompense, even recompense into their bosom,

7Your iniquities, and the iniquities of your fathers together, saith the LORD, which have burned incense upon the mountains, and blasphemed me upon the hills: therefore will I measure their former work into their bosom.

Isaiah 65:8-12

A Cluster Is Preserved, but the Rival Table Is Judged

A grape cluster interrupts the movement toward total destruction. Someone sees new wine in it and says not to destroy it, and the LORD uses that picture to explain why his servants will be preserved. The image does not declare every grape sound. It shows that judgment can distinguish instead of treating annihilation as the only available response. Jacob and Judah still have an inheritance, and places once associated with trouble or open country become settled pasture for people who seek the LORD. The contrast sharpens around another table. Those who forget the holy mountain carefully prepare food and drink for Gad and Meni, powers associated with Fortune and Destiny. Then Isaiah turns their language against them: the LORD will "number" them to the sword. Their sacred table cannot control the outcome. The reason given is refusal. God called and they did not answer; he spoke and they did not hear, and their choices ran against what delighted him.

Isaiah 65:8-12: A Cluster Is Preserved, but the Rival Table Is Judged
Chapter sceneIsaiah 65

Deep dive

The grape cluster interrupts the movement toward comprehensive ruin. Wine-bearing fruit gives reason not to destroy the whole, and the LORD applies that image to preservation for his servants' sake. The promise does not pronounce every part of the community sound. It establishes that judgment can distinguish, preserving an inheritance through Jacob and Judah rather than treating destruction as the only possible outcome.

Sharon and Achor become places of settled pastoral life for the people who seek him. The contrast is the group that forgets his holy mountain while carefully preparing another sacred table. The KJV's "troop" and "number" represent Gad and Meni, divine names associated with Fortune and Destiny. The next verse's announcement that the LORD will "number" them to the sword turns the language of allotted destiny against the worshippers. Their chosen powers will not control the allocation that follows.

The stated charge is refusal: God called, but they did not answer; he spoke, but they did not hear. The judgment is not described as an arbitrary outcome concealed behind a game of chance. It answers choices made in the face of the LORD's own address. Their carefully furnished table becomes a particularly sharp setting for the hunger and thirst announced next.

Words to trace: destroy, LORD, number, servants, Achor, answer

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:8

    “Destroy it not”, al tashchitehu, is almost the phrase in the headings of Psalms 57, 58, 59 and 75, “Al-taschith”, which may name a tune. Many commentators think the saying about the cluster was a line from a vintage song. “New wine” is tirosh, the fresh juice still in the grape, visible in a single good bunch among spoilt ones.

  2. Isaiah 65:9

    After chapter 53 the singular Servant disappears, and from 54:17 onward the book speaks of “servants” in the plural; this chapter uses the word seven times. “My mountains” means the whole hill country of Israel, as in 14:25, not only the temple mount. The inheritor comes “out of Judah”, the tribe of the kings.

  3. Isaiah 65:10

    Sharon is the coastal plain on the west, and the valley of Achor lies near Jericho on the east, so the promise spans the land from sea to Jordan. Achor, “trouble”, was where Achan was stoned (Joshua 7:24–26), and Hosea 2:15 had already promised it would become “a door of hope”.

  4. Isaiah 65:11

    A god named Gad survives in the place name Baal-gad under Mount Hermon (Joshua 11:17), and Leah’s cry at a son’s birth, “A troop cometh”, puns on the same word, good fortune (Genesis 30:11). Meni is found only here. Spreading a table for a god was a known rite; Jeremiah 7:18 has families baking cakes for the queen of heaven.

  5. Isaiah 65:12

    The charge “when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear” returns word for word in 66:4, and Jeremiah uses it of the temple crowd (Jeremiah 7:13). “That wherein I delighted not” uses chaphets, the verb of delight that ran through chapter 58. They will kneel, not in worship but for the sword.

Isaiah 65:8-12

King James Version

8Thus saith the LORD, As the new wine is found in the cluster, and one saith, Destroy it not; for a blessing is in it: so will I do for my servants’ sakes, that I may not destroy them all.

9And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there.

10And Sharon shall be a fold of flocks, and the valley of Achor a place for the herds to lie down in, for my people that have sought me.

11But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number.

12Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not.

Isaiah 65:13-16

The Same Future Does Not Arrive at Both Tables

The chapter now lets two futures occupy the same sentences. "My servants" eat while others hunger, drink while others thirst, rejoice while others face shame, and sing from joy of heart while others cry from sorrow. The preserved cluster from the previous section is no longer just an image of survival. Preservation becomes a different lived condition. Names also divide the outcomes. One name remains as a curse, while the servants are called by another name that Isaiah does not specify here. That restraint matters because the verse should not be made to supply a later community's preferred title. Blessing and oath instead settle on the repeated phrase "God of truth," grounding the future in the reliability of the one who promises it. Former troubles are forgotten because a restored condition no longer lets them govern the servants' life. Isaiah does not say the rebellion was trivial. He says its trouble will not be the final environment of those preserved.

Isaiah 65:13-16: The Same Future Does Not Arrive at Both Tables
Chapter sceneIsaiah 65

Deep dive

The repeated contrast between "my servants" and the addressed rebels gives the passage its rhythm. Eating answers hunger, drinking answers thirst, and songs from a joyful heart answer cries from a distressed one. The earlier refusal to destroy the entire cluster now receives a fuller description. Preservation means a different lived condition, not merely a different label attached to the same calamity.

Names carry the contrast into public memory. The rebels' name becomes associated with a curse, while the servants receive another name. Isaiah does not spell out that new name here, so a later community's preferred designation should not be inserted as though the verse supplied it. The repeated title "God of truth" anchors blessing and oath in the LORD's reliability. Forgotten troubles belong to the restored condition he creates, not to a claim that rebellion was never serious. The passage moves from judgment remembered in a name to affliction no longer governing the servants' future. Both outcomes arise from the distinction the chapter has carefully maintained.

Words to trace: servants, earth, heart, Lord, name, truth

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:13

    Three times “behold” splits a sentence down the middle, servants on one side and rebels on the other, and verse 14 adds a fourth. The pairs reverse Deuteronomy 28:47–48, where Israel, having not served the LORD “with joyfulness”, serves its enemies “in hunger, and in thirst”. Eating and drinking pick up the harvest oath of 62:8–9.

  2. Isaiah 65:14

    “Vexation of spirit” is literally “a breaking of spirit”. “Howl” is yalal, the wailing the Book of Isaiah assigned to foreign nations under judgment: Babylon (13:6), Moab (15:2), the ships of Tarshish (23:1). The rebels inside Israel are handed the lament of Israel’s enemies.

  3. Isaiah 65:15

    A name left “for a curse” becomes a formula other people swear with. Jeremiah records one: “The LORD make thee like Zedekiah and like Ahab, whom the king of Babylon roasted in the fire” (Jeremiah 29:22). The pronouns switch from “ye” to a singular “thee”, as though the rebels are addressed as one man.

  4. Isaiah 65:16

    “The God of truth” is literally “the God of Amen”, a title found only here, twice over. Amen is the word said to confirm what is true, and Revelation 3:14 names Christ “the Amen, the faithful and true witness”. “Blesseth himself” is the form of Genesis 22:18, where the nations bless themselves by Abraham’s seed.

Isaiah 65:13-16

King James Version

13Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, my servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry: behold, my servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty: behold, my servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed:

14Behold, my servants shall sing for joy of heart, but ye shall cry for sorrow of heart, and shall howl for vexation of spirit.

15And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord GOD shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name:

16That he who blesseth himself in the earth shall bless himself in the God of truth; and he that sweareth in the earth shall swear by the God of truth; because the former troubles are forgotten, and because they are hid from mine eyes.

Isaiah 65:17-20

New Creation Is Announced in the Language of Fulfilled Life

"Behold, I create" changes the scale of the chapter. The promise is no longer only a repaired city or recovered harvest but new heavens and a new earth, with Jerusalem itself created as rejoicing and her people as joy. The LORD's own rejoicing answers the weeping that once filled the city, so restoration is heard as much as seen. Yet verse 20 refuses an easy simplification. Age, death, and the sinner under a curse still appear in the imagery. A person dying at one hundred is described as young, making the point extraordinary fullness of days rather than a plain assertion that death has vanished from every line of the scene. Interpreters therefore differ over how this longevity language relates to the new creation announcement. Revelation later speaks of new creation with death removed, but Isaiah's wording has its own shape. The connection is substantial without making the two descriptions verbally identical.

Assyria and Babylon
Assyria and Babylon

Deep dive

The repeated verb "create" enlarges the promise beyond returning the city to an earlier arrangement. New heavens and a new earth form its horizon, while Jerusalem itself becomes rejoicing and its people become joy. The LORD also rejoices in them. The city is no longer defined by the cries that made desolation audible; the announcement reaches both its condition and the sound of life within it.

Verse 20 nevertheless continues to use the language of age, death, and the sinner under a curse. It should not be paraphrased as an unqualified statement that nobody dies. The point of the hundred-year figure is extraordinary fullness of days: a death at that age would count as young within the scene. Infancy cut short and old age deprived of completion no longer characterize the community.

Interpreters differ over the relation of these images to the new creation. Some understand a future age of greatly prolonged mortal life; others take the longevity language as a prophetic picture of complete blessing. Revelation 21:1–4 returns to new creation and the removal of weeping, but explicitly announces the end of death. That later declaration is important without being silently substituted for Isaiah's own wording. The connection is real, and so is the difference in how the visions describe life.

Words to trace: create, days, Jerusalem, people, rejoice, voice

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:17

    “Create” is bara, the verb of Genesis 1:1, and it comes three times in these two verses; the pair heaven and earth comes straight from that first verse as well. “The former shall not be remembered” extends 43:18–19: “Remember ye not the former things... Behold, I will do a new thing.”

  2. Isaiah 65:18

    “A rejoicing” and “a joy” are abstract nouns, gilah and masos: the city is not merely made glad, it is made out of gladness. The command “be ye glad” comes before the thing to be glad about is described, so the joy is ordered in advance. Bara, the verb of creating the cosmos, is here used of making a city.

  3. Isaiah 65:19

    “The voice of weeping” is the sound Jeremiah would hear in Ramah, Rachel weeping for her children (Jeremiah 31:15), and “crying” is the outcry of the wronged that God heard from Sodom and from Egypt. Both sounds are named precisely so they can be said never to be heard again. God’s own joy comes first in the verse.

  4. Isaiah 65:20

    “An infant of days” is a baby who lives only days. “Filled his days” recalls the covenant promise of Exodus 23:26, “the number of thy days I will fulfil”. The ordinary span in Psalm 90:10 is “threescore years and ten”; the “child” who dies at a hundred is na’ar, the word for a lad.

Isaiah 65:17-20

King James Version

17For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

18But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.

19And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.

20There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

Isaiah 65:21-23

The Builders Finally Inhabit What They Build

The great phrase "new heavens and a new earth" immediately comes down to houses and vineyards. People will build and actually live in what they build. They will plant and actually eat what grows. Isaiah makes insecurity visible by reversing the familiar tragedy in which work succeeds but the worker loses its benefit to someone else. Restoration reunites action with its intended fruit. The comparison to the days of a tree adds rooted endurance, and the promise that the elect will long enjoy the work of their hands does not abolish labor. It abolishes futility and dispossession as labor's expected outcome. The same continuity reaches families. Children do not arrive only for trouble, and the blessing extends beyond one relieved generation. That matters after the community has appealed to God as Father and Potter. The future envisioned here is stable enough for work to matter and long enough for descendants to share what has been built rather than merely inherit another cycle of loss.

Deep dive

The pairs are deliberately ordinary: building and inhabiting, planting and eating. Their separation has been one of the forms of insecurity addressed throughout Isaiah. A house may stand while its builder loses it; a vineyard may bear while someone else takes the fruit. The promise joins the action to its intended result. Restoration can therefore be recognized at a doorway and a harvest table, not only through the vast language of new heavens.

The comparison with the days of a tree gives endurance a rooted, living form. The people will long enjoy the work of their hands, and their offspring will share the blessing rather than arriving only for trouble. This is not a picture of restoration that abolishes meaningful labor. Work remains, but futility and dispossession no longer determine its outcome. The references to descendants also keep the future from shrinking to a single generation's relief. The community that appealed to its Father and Potter is promised a settled continuity in which both its work and its children can have a future.

Words to trace: build, days, inhabit, plant, blessed, elect

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:21

    The promise undoes a named covenant curse: “thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes” (Deuteronomy 28:30). The Law also sent home from battle any man who had planted a vineyard and not yet eaten from it (Deuteronomy 20:6).

  2. Isaiah 65:22

    Olive trees and terebinths in the land live for centuries, and the Greek translation made the link explicit: “as the days of the tree of life”. “Long enjoy” is the verb for wearing something out, used of the clothes that “waxed not old” in the wilderness (Deuteronomy 8:4): the elect will use their work until it is worn through.

  3. Isaiah 65:23

    “In vain” is lariq, for emptiness, the complaint of the servant in 49:4: “I have laboured in vain, I have spent my strength for nought.” “Bring forth for trouble” means bearing children only to lose them to sudden disaster; the word is behalah, sudden terror. Both labour and childbirth, the two sorrows of Genesis 3:16–17, are touched.

Isaiah 65:21-23

King James Version

21And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.

22They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

23They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD, and their offspring with them.

Isaiah 65:24-25

An Answer Before the Call, and Feeding Without Violence

Earlier in the chapter, the accusation was that the LORD called and the people did not answer. By the end, the relationship has been reversed so completely that God answers before his servants finish calling and hears while they are still speaking. The promise is not a shorter waiting period. It is responsiveness pictured as already moving before the petition is complete. The final animal images give the same reversal a physical form. Wolf and lamb feed together, and the lion eats straw like the ox. The altered menu is central because the stronger creature no longer receives food by destroying the weaker. The serpent still eats dust, recalling humiliation rather than universal elevation, but the holy mountain itself is freed from hurt and destruction. That mountain had earlier been forgotten by people who prepared a rival table. Isaiah ends this chapter at a different table entirely, where feeding does not require another creature's injury and communion is no longer answered by refusal.

Deep dive

The promise to answer before the people call is especially striking after the chapter's earlier accusation that God called and they did not answer. The restored relationship is not represented by a better managed delay. The LORD's response precedes the completed petition, and hearing occurs while speech is still in progress. The crisis of unanswered address has been reversed.

Wolf and lamb feeding together, and the lion eating the ox's food, return to the peace envisioned in Isaiah 11:6–9. The altered meal matters: the stronger creature no longer obtains its provision through the destruction of the weaker. The serpent's dust recalls Genesis 3:14, keeping an image of humiliation within the peaceful scene rather than announcing the serpent's elevation. The final statement concerns the absence of hurt and destruction across the LORD's holy mountain. That same mountain was forgotten by the rival worshippers in verse 11. The chapter ends not with their alternative table but with a place where feeding no longer requires another creature's injury.

Words to trace: answer, bullock, call, destroy, dust, feed

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Isaiah 65:24

    In 58:9 the order was call, then answer: “Then shalt thou call, and the LORD shall answer.” Here the answer overtakes the call. Daniel later records exactly this timing: “At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth” (Daniel 9:23), the reply dispatched before the prayer was finished.

  2. Isaiah 65:25

    The verse compresses 11:6–9 and quotes two of its lines word for word: the lion eating straw like the ox, and “They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain”. What changes is the ending. Chapter 11 closed with the earth full of the knowledge of the LORD; this one sets the serpent and its dust in that place.

Isaiah 65:24-25

King James Version

24And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.

25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Identify the historical crisis, covenant failure, warning, and promised hope.
  2. Distinguish the prophet’s immediate audience from later biblical connections.
  3. Do not turn present-day headlines into confident fulfillment claims without textual evidence.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Isaiah 65?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Isaiah 65 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Isaiah 65 develops its own movement around LORD, servants, people, days, create?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006