The big picture
The Book of Luke 10 widens the circle of messengers, then steadily narrows the field until the kingdom is being tested in a ditch and a kitchen. Seventy others go ahead of Jesus in pairs, dependent on hospitality yet carrying an announcement that remains true whether a town receives them or refuses them. Their joyful return after demons submit becomes an occasion for Jesus to relocate joy from exercised power to names written in heaven. Privilege also increases accountability: cities that have seen much are judged by their response to what happened among them. A lawyer then supplies the right summary of the law himself but tries to define the neighbor tightly enough to justify his position. Jesus answers with a Samaritan whose mercy has verbs, expenses, transportation, lodging, time, and an open account. The final household scene refuses another kind of narrowing. Martha's service is real service, but it cannot be used to remove Mary from hearing at Jesus' feet. Mission, mercy, and attention all expose what receiving the kingdom looks like.
In this chapter
- A Mission Carried Ahead in Pairs Luke 10:1-12
The word "other" matters at the beginning.
- Greater Privilege and a Different Ground for Joy Luke 10:13-24
Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum are judged not by lack of exposure but by the abundance of it.
- The Expert Supplies the Answer Himself Luke 10:25-28
The lawyer begins with a large question about inheriting eternal life, but Jesus turns the examination around and asks the professional reader to read.
- The Neighbor Turns Out to Be the One Who Stops Luke 10:29-37
The injured man is deliberately thin on identity.
- Martha Tries to Recruit the Guest Into the Dispute Luke 10:38-42
Martha's first action deserves to survive the comparison: she receives Jesus into her house.

Scripture beside the summary
Luke · King James Version · 42Luke 10:1-12
A Mission Carried Ahead in Pairs
The word "other" matters at the beginning. These seventy are not replacements for the Twelve but a wider company sent two by two ahead of Jesus into places he intends to visit. Their mission is therefore preparatory by design. They do not arrive as the main event. The harvest image makes the scale enormous while the instructions make the messengers vulnerable: no purse, bag, or spare footwear, and no lingering social exchanges along the road. Yet the same people told not to waste time greeting travelers are told to begin a household with "Peace," which shows that urgency is not rudeness elevated into a principle. They are to eat what is set before them, remain in the same house, heal, and announce that God's kingdom has drawn near. Reception changes their public response, but it does not change the truth of that announcement. Even a rejecting town hears that the kingdom has come near. Dust may be wiped away; responsibility for hearing cannot be shaken off with it.

Deep dive
The word "other" links this mission with that of the Twelve without simply repeating it. The company is larger, and the messengers go in pairs to places Jesus himself intends to visit. Their task is preparatory and representative: the attention is directed toward the one coming after them, not toward building an independent reputation in each town.
The instruction to greet no one on the way belongs to the urgency of this assignment. It is not a general ban on courtesy, especially since their first words inside a house are to offer peace. They are also to receive the food provided and remain in the same household. The mission is not a tour of competing dinner invitations. "The labourer is worthy of his hire" gives their support the dignity of legitimate provision, wording later echoed in 1 Timothy 5:18.
Acceptance and rejection produce different public actions, but the announcement that God's kingdom has drawn near remains in both cases. The town's response does not create the kingdom or keep it at a safe distance. Dust can be shaken away; accountability cannot. The reference to Sodom establishes the seriousness of refusing the message without authorizing the messengers to execute judgment themselves.
Words to trace: city, house, enter, harvest, peace, kingdom
Verse-by-verse path
- Luke 10:1
The manuscripts divide between seventy and seventy-two, and both numbers have a background. Genesis 10 lists seventy nations in the Hebrew and seventy-two in the Greek, and Moses shared his spirit with seventy elders (Numbers 11:16-25). Pairs gave each messenger a witness and a companion on the road.
- Luke 10:2
Harvest was a prophetic picture of God’s final gathering (Joel 3:13). “Send forth” is ekballō, a forceful verb, to throw out, the one used for casting out devils: the Lord of the harvest is asked to drive workers into the field.
- Luke 10:3
Matthew 10:16 has sheep among wolves; Luke has arnes, lambs, still younger and more defenceless. The sending is spoken with “behold”, calling attention to a danger they are being walked into on purpose.
- Luke 10:4
The “purse” is a money bag, a word only Luke uses in the New Testament, and no shoes probably means no spare sandals. Elisha gave Gehazi the same order when sending him on an urgent errand: “if thou meet any man, salute him not” (2 Kings 4:29). Eastern greetings on the road could take a long time.
- Luke 10:5
Shalom was the ordinary Jewish greeting, and here it is the first word spoken inside a house. David’s young men were sent to Nabal with “Peace be to thine house” (1 Samuel 25:6) and were refused hospitality, a precedent for what verse 10 anticipates.
- Luke 10:6
“Son of peace” is a Hebrew idiom for someone marked by peace or ready to receive it, as “son of perdition” means one bound for ruin. Peace is pictured as a thing that can alight and stay, epanapauomai, to rest upon, or come back to the one who spoke it.
- Luke 10:7
“Such things as they give” is literally “the things from them”, whatever the host’s own table holds. “Go not from house to house” uses metabainō, to move one’s lodging, and makes explicit what was only implied when the Twelve were sent (9:4).
- Luke 10:8
The same rule appears in almost the same words in Paul, “whatsoever is set before you, eat” (1 Corinthians 10:27). For Jewish messengers in mixed towns the instruction had an edge: questions about tithes and purity were not to hold up the table.
- Luke 10:9
In the sending of the Twelve preaching came before healing (9:2); here healing comes first. “Is come nigh” is a perfect tense, ēngiken, has drawn near and is now at hand, the word of Jesus’ first preaching in Mark 1:15.
- Luke 10:10
The streets are plateiai, the broad open places of a town, so leaving becomes a public statement rather than a quiet exit. The messengers do not slip away; they say something first.
- Luke 10:11
“Cleaveth” is kollaō, to stick, and “wipe off” is apomassō, to wipe clean: even the dust clinging to their sandals is handed back. Some manuscripts lack “unto you” in the last clause, making it a flat statement that the kingdom has come near, whether or not the town is ready.
- Luke 10:12
“That day” is the prophets’ phrase for the day of the LORD. Ezekiel 16:49 lists Sodom’s sins as pride, fulness of bread and neglect of the poor, and Genesis 19 adds violence against guests, which makes the comparison with a town that refuses messengers pointed.
Luke 10:1-12
King James Version1After these things the Lord appointed other seventy also, and sent them two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself would come.
2Therefore said he unto them, The harvest truly is great, but the labourers are few: pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he would send forth labourers into his harvest.
3Go your ways: behold, I send you forth as lambs among wolves.
4Carry neither purse, nor scrip, nor shoes: and salute no man by the way.
5And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house.
6And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it: if not, it shall turn to you again.
7And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.
8And into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you:
9And heal the sick that are therein, and say unto them, The kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
10But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say,
11Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
12But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.
Luke 10:13-24
Greater Privilege and a Different Ground for Joy
Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum are judged not by lack of exposure but by the abundance of it. Jesus' comparisons with Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom make privilege itself part of accountability. Familiarity with mighty works does not automatically become repentance, and belonging to a favored setting cannot substitute for response. The seventy return from mission thrilled that devils submit in Jesus' name, which is understandable. Jesus does not deny the reality of that authority. He places it inside the larger overthrow of hostile power and then moves their joy somewhere deeper: "rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven." Exercised power is not the most durable possession in the scene. Jesus' own rejoicing follows, directed to the Father who reveals what the self-consciously wise can miss and "babes" can receive. The contrast is about dependence in receiving revelation, not contempt for thought. The disciples' eyes are blessed because they are seeing what prophets and kings longed to see, not because they have become inherently superior to earlier generations.
Deep dive
The comparison with Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom overturns an easy assumption that familiar religious surroundings guarantee the better response. Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum are measured by what has occurred in their midst. The greater exposure to mighty works increases responsibility. The judgment is attached to named communities and their response, not presented as a blanket verdict on an ethnicity.
The seventy return delighted that demons submit in Jesus' name. His statement about seeing Satan fall places their work within a conflict larger than the individual encounters. Interpreters differ over whether the saying describes a vision associated with the mission, a heavenly event, or the anticipated completion of Satan's defeat. Its immediate function is clearer than its precise chronology: the mission manifests the overthrow of hostile power.
Jesus then relocates the center of joy from command over spirits to names written in heaven. Authority exercised is not the deepest privilege received. His own rejoicing in the Spirit follows, celebrating the Father's disclosure to "babes" rather than the self-sufficiently wise. The contrast concerns the reception of revelation, not the elimination of thought. The disciples are blessed because they witness what earlier prophets and kings desired to see, not because they have outperformed every earlier generation.
Words to trace: Father, despiseth, heaven, hear, heareth, Lord
Verse-by-verse path
- Luke 10:13
Chorazin appears only here and in Matthew 11:21; its black basalt ruins lie about two miles north of Capernaum. Tyre and Sidon, the Phoenician ports, were the targets of Isaiah 23 and Ezekiel 26-28. Sackcloth was coarse goat-hair cloth, and sitting in ashes was the posture of public mourning.
- Luke 10:14
Luke has already said that people from “the sea coast of Tyre and Sidon” came to hear Jesus and be healed (6:17), so the comparison uses cities whose people had shown up. “The judgment” is krisis, the final verdict.
- Luke 10:15
The line borrows the taunt against the king of Babylon, who said “I will ascend into heaven” and was “brought down to hell” (Isaiah 14:13-15). “Hell” here is hadēs, the realm of the dead, answering to the Hebrew Sheol, not the place of fire.
- Luke 10:16
“Despiseth” is atheteō, to set aside as invalid, the verb for the Pharisees rejecting God’s counsel in 7:30. The chain rests on a principle of Jewish law, that a man’s agent is as the man himself: to refuse the messenger is to refuse the one who sent him.
- Luke 10:17
Their instructions in verse 9 mentioned healing, not exorcism, which explains the “even” in their report: the devils too have yielded. “Through thy name” gives the source, and the seventy do not claim the authority as their own.
- Luke 10:18
“I beheld” is imperfect, I was watching, as of a sight held for a while. The same chapter of Isaiah behind verse 15 speaks of the day star fallen from heaven (Isaiah 14:12). Lightning is sudden, bright and downward, and cannot be taken back.
- Luke 10:19
Serpents and scorpions were the hazards of the wilderness Israel crossed (Deuteronomy 8:15), and Psalm 91:13 promises the faithful will tread on the adder. Paul shakes off a viper on Malta without harm (Acts 28:3-5). The Greek piles up negatives: nothing, by no means, shall hurt.
- Luke 10:20
“Are written” is a perfect tense, stand written, recorded and still on the register. The picture is the roll of citizens or the book of Moses’ prayer, “blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book” (Exodus 32:32), and Daniel 12:1 speaks of everyone “found written in the book”.
- Luke 10:21
“Rejoiced” is agalliaō, exulted, the verb of Mary’s “my spirit hath rejoiced” (1:47); many manuscripts read “in the Holy Spirit”. “Babes” are nēpioi, infants too young to speak. “Seemed good” is eudokia, good pleasure, the word of the angels’ song, “good will toward men” (2:14).
- Luke 10:22
This saying sounds so much like the Gospel of John that scholars have called it a bolt from the Johannine sky, falling in the middle of Luke and Matthew. “Delivered” is paradidōmi, the verb of 9:44: the Father hands all things to the Son, and men will hand the Son over.
- Luke 10:23
Jesus turns from speaking to the Father to speaking to the disciples, “privately”, kat’ idian, away from the crowd. The blessing is on eyes, the plainest organ, as though the privilege lies simply in being present at this time.
- Luke 10:24
Matthew 13:17 has “prophets and righteous men”; Luke has “prophets and kings”, the rulers of Israel who waited and did not see. “Desired” is epithymeō, strong longing, the verb behind the prodigal who “would fain” have eaten the swine’s husks (15:16).
Luke 10:13-24
King James Version13Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon, which have been done in you, they had a great while ago repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes.
14But it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment, than for you.
15And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted to heaven, shalt be thrust down to hell.
16He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.
17And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name.
18And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.
19Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you.
20Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.
21In that hour Jesus rejoiced in spirit, and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes: even so, Father; for so it seemed good in thy sight.
22All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him.
23And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see:
24For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
Luke 10:25-28
The Expert Supplies the Answer Himself
The lawyer begins with a large question about inheriting eternal life, but Jesus turns the examination around and asks the professional reader to read. "What is written in the law? how readest thou?" The man answers by joining wholehearted love of God with love of neighbor, bringing Deuteronomy and Leviticus together without needing Jesus to supply an unfamiliar command. Jesus calls the answer right. The tension arrives in the final verb: "this do." Expertise has now been moved from recitation to performance. That shift explains why the conversation does not end with congratulations. The lawyer "willing to justify himself" asks who counts as his neighbor, looking for the border of the command he has just summarized. The Book of Luke therefore frames the coming parable as an answer to attempted narrowing, not as a rejection of the law or a new ethic dropped in from somewhere else. The interpreter already possesses the words. The question is what his own reading will be allowed to require of him.

Deep dive
The lawyer asks about inheriting eternal life, but Luke immediately identifies the question as a test. Jesus does not begin by supplying unfamiliar material. He asks what the law says and how the lawyer reads it, allowing the professional interpreter to state the issue in his own terms.
The answer brings together Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18. The full devotion directed toward God stands beside love for the neighbor, with neither command treated as decorative. Jesus calls the answer correct and connects life with doing it. The exchange has therefore moved the discussion from possession of expertise to the demands of the text the expert already knows.
That movement explains the next question. The lawyer is not short of a verse to quote. He wishes to justify himself, and the definition of the neighbor offers a possible place to narrow what his own answer has required. The parable will address that attempted narrowing rather than replace the law with an unrelated ethical ideal.
Words to trace: answering, certain, eternal, heart, inherit, lawyer
Verse-by-verse path
- Luke 10:25
A teacher sat and a questioner stood to address him. “Tempted” is ekpeirazō, to put to the test, the very verb of Jesus’ reply to the devil, “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God” (4:12). “Inherit eternal life” is the rich ruler’s question word for word in 18:18.
- Luke 10:26
Two questions: what the law says, and how the man reads it. Joachim Jeremias suggested that “how readest thou” means “how do you recite”, pointing to the Shema said daily, which is exactly what the lawyer quotes next.
- Luke 10:27
Deuteronomy 6:5 names three faculties in Hebrew, heart, soul and might; the Greek traditions add “mind”, dianoia, and Luke’s version has all four. Leviticus 19:18 is joined on, where the neighbour is one of “the children of thy people”; sixteen verses later the same chapter extends that love to the stranger (19:34).
- Luke 10:28
“This do, and thou shalt live” echoes Leviticus 18:5, where the man who keeps God’s statutes “shall live in them”. The imperative is present tense, keep on doing this: an ongoing way of life rather than a single act.
Luke 10:25-28
King James Version25And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
Luke 10:29-37
The Neighbor Turns Out to Be the One Who Stops
The injured man is deliberately thin on identity. He is stripped, wounded, and half dead, but the Book of Luke does not tell us his nationality, occupation, moral history, or worthiness. Need reaches the road before biography does. The priest sees and passes by. The Levite comes, looks, and also passes by. The Book of Luke gives neither ritual impurity nor fear of ambush nor urgent religious business as the motive, which leaves their inaction exposed without speculative excuses. Then the Samaritan sees and has compassion, and the verbs begin to pile up: he approaches, binds wounds, pours oil and wine, places the man on his own animal, takes him to an inn, cares for him, pays the host, and promises to cover additional cost. Mercy takes transport, lodging, time, and credit. All three men see. The difference is what seeing becomes. Jesus' final question reverses the lawyer's original one. Instead of asking who qualifies as neighbor, it asks who became one. The lawyer can only answer by naming the mercy shown.
Deep dive
The wounded man's identity is left undescribed. Luke does not state his nationality, profession, moral history, or religious standing. His need is placed before the question of whether he qualifies for assistance. The priest and Levite both see him and pass on the other side. Explanations based on ritual purity, fear of ambush, or urgent duties may be conceivable, but none is supplied as their motive.
The Samaritan is distinguished first by compassion and then by a remarkable chain of verbs. He approaches, binds wounds, pours oil and wine, places the man on his own animal, takes him to an inn, cares for him, pays, and promises to cover additional expense. Mercy acquires transportation, lodging, time, and an open account. The contrast is not between people who notice and someone who notices; all three see the man. The difference is what seeing becomes.
Jesus' concluding question reverses the lawyer's original angle. Instead of determining who belongs inside a fixed circle of neighbors, it asks who became a neighbor to the injured man. The lawyer answers by naming the action, "he that shewed mercy," rather than the Samaritan's group. The final command grows directly from that concession.
Words to trace: certain, Jesus, care, departed, fell, likewise
Verse-by-verse path
- Luke 10:29
“Justify himself” uses dikaioō, the verb of 7:29 and 7:35, and Jesus will tell the Pharisees “ye are they which justify yourselves” in 16:15. “Neighbour”, plēsion, literally means the one near, which is exactly what the lawyer is trying to measure.
- Luke 10:30
The road from Jerusalem to Jericho ran about seventeen miles and dropped some 3,300 feet through desert ravines, notorious for robbers. It passed the ascent of Adummim (Joshua 15:7), “red place”, which later travellers called the ascent of blood. “Half dead” is hēmithanēs, one word, near to death.
- Luke 10:31
“By chance” is synkyria, coincidence, a word found only here in the New Testament. Many priests lived in Jericho and served in Jerusalem in weekly courses, and this one is “coming down”, away from the city. “On the other side” is a double compound verb: he passed by opposite.
- Luke 10:32
Levites were the temple’s assistants, below the priests. This one “came and looked”, going nearer than the priest had, before crossing to the far side of the road. The same verb as in verse 31 closes both men’s part in the account.
- Luke 10:33
Samaritans kept the five books of Moses and worshipped on Mount Gerizim, and Jews “have no dealings” with them (John 4:9). He is the one traveller of the three who is not on home ground: a Samaritan on a Judean road, as exposed to robbers as the man in the ditch.
- Luke 10:34
Oil soothed and wine cleansed; both were standard in ancient wound care, and the Hippocratic writings recommend wine for dressing wounds. The inn is a pandocheion, a “receive-all”, a commercial lodging house, not the kataluma of 2:7. Setting the man on “his own beast” means the Samaritan walked.
- Luke 10:35
Two denarii were two days’ wages, enough for several days’ board at an inn. Since a man with nothing could be held for debt, the promise to settle “whatsoever thou spendest more” may be meant to protect the victim from the innkeeper as well as from hunger. “I will repay” is emphatic in Greek: I, myself.
- Luke 10:36
“Thinkest thou” is literally “seems to thee”: as with Simon in 7:42, Jesus makes the listener deliver the verdict. The question is put in the form “of these three”, so the lawyer must choose among a priest, a Levite and a Samaritan.
- Luke 10:37
“Shewed mercy” is literally “did mercy”, poieō, the verb that has run through the exchange: “what shall I do” (verse 25), “this do” (verse 28), and now “go, and do thou likewise”. The lawyer’s opening question has been answered with his own verb.
Luke 10:29-37
King James Version29But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?
30And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
31And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
32And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.
33But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,
34And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
35And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
36Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
37And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
Luke 10:38-42
Martha Tries to Recruit the Guest Into the Dispute
Martha's first action deserves to survive the comparison: she receives Jesus into her house. Hospitality is not the villain in this room, and service is not a lesser category throughout the Book of Luke. The problem grows when "much serving" becomes distraction, anxiety, and a complaint that attempts to recruit the guest as an enforcer against Mary. Mary is sitting at Jesus' feet hearing his word, a posture of discipleship rather than mere inactivity. Martha's request treats that attention as abandonment of proper work and asks Jesus to order her sister away from it. His doubled "Martha, Martha" makes the answer personal rather than turning the scene into a universal ban on cooking. "Many things" have crowded the household; "one thing" is needful. Mary's good portion will not be taken from her. That final clause answers Martha's request exactly. The Book of Luke does not turn the sisters into permanent personality types. In this moment, legitimate service has become too crowded to recognize that hearing the one being served cannot be confiscated in service's name.

Deep dive
Martha welcomes Jesus into her house, and the welcome should not disappear beneath the familiar contrast between the sisters. Serving is not treated elsewhere in Luke as an inferior activity; Jesus will describe himself as one who serves in Luke 22:27. The problem here is the way Martha's many tasks have become distraction and grievance, leading her to ask the guest to order her sister into the kitchen.
Mary is described as sitting at Jesus' feet and hearing his word. The focus is not inactivity but attention to teaching. Martha's complaint attempts to make that attention the cause of her own burden. Jesus' doubled address, "Martha, Martha," brings the response back to the person rather than issuing a ruling on household staffing.
The contrast between "many things" and the "one thing" needed gives the scene its shape. Mary has chosen a good portion that will not be taken from her, answering Martha's request precisely. Luke does not turn the sisters into permanent personality types or announce that food preparation no longer matters. In this encounter, necessary service cannot be used to deprive Mary of hearing the one being served.
Words to trace: Martha, certain, Jesus, Mary, sister, care
Verse-by-verse path
- Luke 10:38
Luke does not name the village; John 11:1 places Martha and Mary at Bethany near Jerusalem, though Luke’s journey is still far from there. Martha is Aramaic for “lady” or “mistress”, fitting for the woman whose house it is. “Received him” is hypodechomai, the welcome Zacchaeus gives in 19:6.
- Luke 10:39
“Which also sat” suggests Mary joined in the welcome and then took her place among the listeners. A woman sitting before a teacher as a pupil was unusual, and “heard” is imperfect: she kept listening, word after word.
- Luke 10:40
“Cumbered” is perispaō, pulled in every direction, found only here in the New Testament. “Serving” is diakonia, the word Acts 6:1 uses for the church’s daily ministration. Martha’s “dost thou not care” echoes the disciples in Mark’s storm (Mark 4:38), words Luke left out of his own account of that night.
- Luke 10:41
“Careful” in 1611 meant full of care, anxious; the Greek merimnaō is the root of the “cares” that choked the seed (8:14). “Troubled” is thorybazō, stirred up as a noisy crowd is. The doubled name is how Jesus addresses Simon in 22:31 and the risen Lord addresses Saul in Acts 9:4.
- Luke 10:42
Some manuscripts read “few things are needful, or one”, a gentler line that looks back at the meal. “Part” is meris, a portion or helping at table: Martha’s many dishes against Mary’s one portion. The Levites were told that the LORD was their portion (Numbers 18:20).
Luke 10:38-42
King James Version38Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.
39And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.
40But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.
41And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:
42But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Watch what Jesus says and does, and how people respond.
- Trace kingdom, discipleship, opposition, cross, and resurrection in the evangelist’s own sequence.
- Let later doctrine clarify the scene without erasing its immediate setting.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Luke 10?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Luke 10 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: The seventy sent, the Good Samaritan caring for the wounded traveler, and Mary listening while Martha serves?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.



