New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

Much Land Remains, and Joshua Will Not Live Forever

Joshua 13

The big picture

Joshua is old, and much land still remains to be possessed. The next phase of the book begins by holding those facts together rather than hiding either one. Joshua must distribute territory that still contains peoples Israel has not expelled, because allotment cannot wait for his life or the conquest to become complete. The chapter then reviews the eastern inheritance already granted by Moses to Reuben, Gad, and half Manasseh, including explicit notices that some peoples remain there too. The tribal lists turn former kingdoms into family possessions through boundaries, cities, and villages, while even Balaam's death enters the land record as a reminder of the conflict behind possession. Levi repeatedly interrupts the geography with a different kind of inheritance, tied first to sacrificial provision and finally to the LORD himself. Israel's inheritance is therefore neither perfectly occupied nor perfectly uniform. It is allocated under promise while unfinished work and differing tribal roles remain visible.

In this chapter

Joshua 13: Much Land Remains, and Joshua Will Not Live Forever
Chapter sceneJoshua 13

Scripture beside the summary

Joshua · King James Version · 33

Joshua 13:1-7

An Unfinished Map and a Finite Lifetime

Joshua is old, the Book of Joshua says it, and then the LORD says it again. The repetition turns age into part of the assignment. There is still "very much land to be possessed," but the remaining work cannot be postponed until Joshua personally completes every future occupation. He must divide the inheritance while districts still contain peoples Israel has not displaced. Philistine centres, northern regions, Lebanon, and other areas remain on the map as unfinished business. That makes allotment a statement of claim and promise, not a census proving that every assigned place is already empty. God promises to drive out the remaining inhabitants, while Joshua is told to distribute the land now. The book therefore refuses two easy fictions at once: the conquest is not fully complete, and Joshua is not going to live forever. Administration becomes urgent because both facts are true.

Joshua 13:1-7: An Unfinished Map and a Finite Lifetime
Chapter sceneJoshua 13

Deep dive

Joshua's age is stated twice in the opening verse, first by the Book of Joshua and then by the LORD. The repetition leaves little room for the fiction of an indefinitely available commander. Yet the answer is not to abandon the remaining land. It is to divide it. Joshua has work that belongs to his remaining years, even though the full occupation will extend beyond them.

The list of unfinished districts deliberately follows the sweeping victories of chapters 10–12. Philistine centres, northern territories, and the country toward Lebanon still have inhabitants to be displaced. The Book of Joshua knows the difference between breaking major royal coalitions and occupying every district. Verse 6 holds promise and instruction together: God will drive out the inhabitants; Joshua is to assign the inheritance. The allotment records a claim upon land still to be possessed, not a report that every name on the map has become an empty address.

Words to trace: land, borders, divide, inheritance, Lebanon, Philistines

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 13:1

    “Old and stricken in years” is said of Abraham and Sarah (Genesis 18:11; 24:1) and of David on his deathbed (1 Kings 1:1). The phrase marks the moment when a life’s work has to be handed on. Joshua will die at a hundred and ten (24:29).

  2. Joshua 13:2

    “Borders” is gelilot, circuits or districts, the word that gives Galilee its name, the circle. This Geshur lies in the south near Philistia, a different people from the northern Geshur by Bashan; David later raided these southern Geshurites from Ziklag (1 Samuel 27:8).

  3. Joshua 13:3

    Sihor, “the black one”, can mean the Nile (Isaiah 23:3), but here it is probably the Brook of Egypt, the Wadi el-Arish. “Lords” is seranim, a title used only of Philistine rulers, often compared with the Greek tyrannos. The Avites are the Avim of Deuteronomy 2:23, displaced by settlers from Caphtor.

  4. Joshua 13:4

    Mearah means “the cave”, perhaps a district of caves near Sidon. This Aphek is a northern one, not the Aphek in the Sharon; some place it at Afqa, at the source of a river in the Lebanon mountains. The unfinished land runs up the Phoenician coast.

  5. Joshua 13:5

    The Giblites are the people of Gebal, the port the Greeks called Byblos. Papyrus traded through it gave Greek its word for a book, biblos, and so the word Bible. Giblites cut stone for Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 5:18). “The entering into Hamath” was the ideal northern border (Numbers 34:8).

  6. Joshua 13:6

    “Lot” is goral, originally a pebble drawn or thrown, and the word came to mean one’s portion in life: “thou maintainest my lot” (Psalm 16:5). Proverbs 16:33 gives the belief behind the method: “The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.”

  7. Joshua 13:7

    The arithmetic works because Joseph counts as two tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh, while Levi receives no territory. Twelve landed tribes remain: two and a half east of the Jordan, nine and a half west. This verse gives Joshua his half of the work.

Joshua 13:1-7

King James Version

1Now Joshua was old and stricken in years; and the LORD said unto him, Thou art old and stricken in years, and there remaineth yet very much land to be possessed.

2This is the land that yet remaineth: all the borders of the Philistines, and all Geshuri,

3From Sihor, which is before Egypt, even unto the borders of Ekron northward, which is counted to the Canaanite: five lords of the Philistines; the Gazathites, and the Ashdothites, the Eshkalonites, the Gittites, and the Ekronites; also the Avites:

4From the south, all the land of the Canaanites, and Mearah that is beside the Sidonians, unto Aphek, to the borders of the Amorites:

5And the land of the Giblites, and all Lebanon, toward the sunrising, from Baal-gad under mount Hermon unto the entering into Hamath.

6All the inhabitants of the hill country from Lebanon unto Misrephoth-maim, and all the Sidonians, them will I drive out from before the children of Israel: only divide thou it by lot unto the Israelites for an inheritance, as I have commanded thee.

7Now therefore divide this land for an inheritance unto the nine tribes, and the half tribe of Manasseh,

Joshua 13:8-14

The Eastern Inheritance Belongs in the Same Account

The eastern tribes re-enter the account so their inheritance is not treated as a footnote to the western distribution. Reuben, Gad, and half Manasseh received their land from Moses, repeatedly called the servant of the LORD, and the Book of Joshua gives those grants the same covenantal dignity as the allotments Joshua will oversee. Yet even in this already distributed territory, the record names peoples who remain: Geshurites and Maachathites still live among Israel. Victory over Sihon and Og did not produce a perfectly emptied map. Then Levi interrupts the geography altogether. The tribe receives no comparable territorial inheritance because its provision is tied to the sacrifices of the LORD. That does not leave Levites homeless, since later chapters assign cities and surrounding land. It means inheritance can take a different form without making Levi less a part of Israel.

Joshua 13:8-14: The Eastern Inheritance Belongs in the Same Account
Chapter sceneJoshua 13

Deep dive

The repeated naming of Moses matters. The eastern tribes did not acquire an unofficial second-class inheritance while the rest of Israel received the proper one. Their lands were given by Moses, expressly identified as the LORD's servant. The river divides territories, but these verses do not divide the authority behind their grants.

Even here, the record distinguishes victory from complete removal. Moses defeated the kingdoms of Sihon and Og; Geshurites and Maachathites nevertheless remained among Israel. Then Levi interrupts the geography. Sacrificial provision, rather than a comparable tribal district, is called that tribe's inheritance. This does not mean that Levites will have nowhere to live. Chapter 21 will assign them cities and surrounding land. The exception concerns the form of their share, not their exclusion from the people whose inheritance is being recorded.

Words to trace: gave, Geshurites, inheritance, Maachathites, Moses, Bashan

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 13:8

    From here to verse 33 the chapter looks back across the river and repeats the eastern allotments already recorded in Numbers 32 and Deuteronomy 3:12–17. The Hebrew opening, “with him”, is abrupt, and the Greek version smooths it; the sense is that the eastern tribes already hold their share.

  2. Joshua 13:9

    “The plain of Medeba” is the mishor, the high tableland north of the Arnon. Medeba is modern Madaba in Jordan, where a sixth century mosaic floor showing a map of the Holy Land, with Jerusalem at its centre, was found in a church in the 1880s.

  3. Joshua 13:10

    Ammon’s own land had been withheld from Israel (Deuteronomy 2:19), but Sihon had earlier taken part of it. Centuries later the king of Ammon demanded this very territory back, and Jephthah answered with a long history of how Israel took it from Sihon, not from Ammon (Judges 11:12–27).

  4. Joshua 13:11

    Deuteronomy 3:9 records that the Sidonians called Hermon Sirion and the Amorites called it Shenir. The mountain, snow covered most of the year, marks the northern limit of the eastern allotment; its melt feeds the Jordan.

  5. Joshua 13:12

    “Giants” is Rephaim, which is also the Hebrew word for the shades of the dead: Isaiah 26:14 uses it of the dead who “shall not rise”, and Isaiah 14:9 of the shades stirred up in Sheol. Og is called the last of an old people whose name also meant ghosts.

  6. Joshua 13:13

    “Nevertheless” begins a series of admissions that runs through the allotment chapters: Jebusites in Jerusalem (15:63), Canaanites in Gezer (16:10), Canaanites in Manasseh’s cities (17:12–13). The Book of Joshua records the gaps in its own victory.

  7. Joshua 13:14

    “Sacrifices... made by fire” is ishshe YHWH, the fire offerings. Deuteronomy 18:3 lists what the priests actually received: “the shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw”. Levi’s inheritance comes to it in portions of meat and grain from every tribe’s altar.

Joshua 13:8-14

King James Version

8With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance, which Moses gave them, beyond Jordan eastward, even as Moses the servant of the LORD gave them;

9From Aroer, that is upon the bank of the river Arnon, and the city that is in the midst of the river, and all the plain of Medeba unto Dibon;

10And all the cities of Sihon king of the Amorites, which reigned in Heshbon, unto the border of the children of Ammon;

11And Gilead, and the border of the Geshurites and Maachathites, and all mount Hermon, and all Bashan unto Salcah;

12All the kingdom of Og in Bashan, which reigned in Ashtaroth and in Edrei, who remained of the remnant of the giants: for these did Moses smite, and cast them out.

13Nevertheless the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites, nor the Maachathites: but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites until this day.

14Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance; the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance, as he said unto them.

Joshua 13:15-23

Balaam Appears in the Land Register

Reuben's inheritance reads like a land record until Balaam suddenly appears among the names. Cities, plains, villages, and boundaries are tied to the former kingdom of Sihon, then the Book of Joshua notes that Balaam son of Beor, "the soothsayer," was killed among the defeated. The interruption keeps the register from becoming bare geography. This territory came through conflict, and the people associated with that conflict remain part of its memory. Balaam is not presented here as the man whose words blessed Israel despite Balak's plan. That feature will return later when Joshua recalls God's protection. Here the emphasis is his end among Israel's enemies. The chapter then returns to border language and closes Reuben's portion "according to their families." Land once described under a king is now described in terms of households, cities, and villages receiving an inheritance.

Joshua 13:15-23: Balaam Appears in the Land Register
Chapter sceneJoshua 13
Canaan and the surrounding lands
Canaan and the surrounding lands

Deep dive

The boundaries and settlements make Reuben's inheritance a family possession rather than a vague stretch of territory. The recurring phrase "according to their families" carries the distribution below the level of tribal leadership. Cities and their villages belong to the grant together.

Balaam's name suddenly interrupts the list. He is identified here as "the soothsayer" and numbered among those killed, not celebrated for the blessing associated with him. Joshua 24:9–10 will recall that blessing as God's action despite Balak's intention. The two notices have different subjects: one records Balaam's end; the other records God's protection of Israel. The later speech credits God with overruling the intended curse, while this register places Balaam among the defeated. Within this land register, his death anchors the inheritance to the conflict through which the region passed into Israel's hands.

Words to trace: children, Beth, cities, plain, Reuben, baal

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 13:15

    Reuben comes first as Jacob’s firstborn, even east of the Jordan. “According to their families” refers to the clans of Numbers 26:5–7: Hanoch, Pallu, Hezron and Carmi. Each allotment in these chapters is framed by that phrase at start and finish.

  2. Joshua 13:16

    “The city that is in the midst of the river” is never named, here or in Deuteronomy 2:36; it seems to have stood on the floor of the Arnon gorge. The list begins at the south edge of Reuben’s land and moves north.

  3. Joshua 13:17

    Dibon is Dhiban, where the Mesha Stele was found in 1868. On it King Mesha of Moab, the rebel of 2 Kings 3:4–5, boasts of taking back Medeba, Nebo, Jahaz and other towns from Israel. Bamoth-baal, “high places of Baal”, is where Balak took Balaam to view Israel’s camp (Numbers 22:41).

  4. Joshua 13:18

    Jahaz is where Sihon came out to fight Israel and lost (Numbers 21:23). From “the wilderness of Kedemoth” Moses had sent messengers to Sihon asking for peaceful passage (Deuteronomy 2:26). Mephaath was later given to the Levites (21:37).

  5. Joshua 13:19

    Sibmah was famous for its vines. Isaiah 16:8–9 and Jeremiah 48:32 lament over them when Moab is judged: “I will bewail with the weeping of Jazer the vine of Sibmah.” Zareth-shahar means “splendour of the dawn”; Kirjathaim means “double town”.

  6. Joshua 13:20

    These three places lay around Israel’s last camp before the crossing. Moses was buried “in a valley in the land of Moab, over against Beth-peor” (Deuteronomy 34:6), and the slopes of Pisgah were where he had climbed to see the land. His grave is in Reuben’s portion.

  7. Joshua 13:21

    The five are the kings of Midian killed in Numbers 31:8. Here they are called “dukes of Sihon”, nesikhim, a word for installed princes or vassals. Zur was the father of Cozbi, the Midianite woman killed with Zimri at the tent door (Numbers 25:15).

  8. Joshua 13:22

    “Soothsayer” is qosem, a diviner, one who practised qesamim, the arts forbidden in Deuteronomy 18:10. Numbers 31:16 names him as the man who counselled the Midianite women to lead Israel astray at Peor, and 31:8 records his death with the five kings.

  9. Joshua 13:23

    After this, Reuben almost disappears from the history. Deborah’s song reproaches the tribe for staying behind: “For the divisions of Reuben there were great searchings of heart. Why abodest thou among the sheepfolds?” (Judges 5:15–16).

Joshua 13:15-23

King James Version

15And Moses gave unto the tribe of the children of Reuben inheritance according to their families.

16And their coast was from Aroer, that is on the bank of the river Arnon, and the city that is in the midst of the river, and all the plain by Medeba;

17Heshbon, and all her cities that are in the plain; Dibon, and Bamoth-baal, and Beth-baal-meon,

18And Jahazah, and Kedemoth, and Mephaath,

19And Kirjathaim, and Sibmah, and Zareth-shahar in the mount of the valley,

20And Beth-peor, and Ashdoth-pisgah, and Beth-jeshimoth,

21And all the cities of the plain, and all the kingdom of Sihon king of the Amorites, which reigned in Heshbon, whom Moses smote with the princes of Midian, Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, which were dukes of Sihon, dwelling in the country.

22Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer, did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.

23And the border of the children of Reuben was Jordan, and the border thereof. This was the inheritance of the children of Reuben after their families, the cities and the villages thereof.

Joshua 13:24-28

Gad's Portion Has Both Cities and Villages

Gad's portion is given with the same family-scale precision as Reuben's. The Book of Joshua moves through Jazer, Gilead, Heshbon, Mahanaim, the Jordan valley, and the edge of the sea of Chinnereth, tying towns to wider regions and former royal territory. The KJV's word "coast" is doing old-fashioned work here: it means boundary or borderland, not that every place listed sits beside a shoreline. The map would become extremely strange if it did. What matters is the record's deliberate movement from Sihon's kingdom to Gad's inheritance. Political geography is being rewritten as family possession. The closing formula gathers cities and villages together, reminding the reader that inheritance is more than a few famous fortified centres. Smaller settlements and the people attached to them belong in the account of what the tribe receives.

Joshua 13:24-28: Gad's Portion Has Both Cities and Villages
Chapter sceneJoshua 13

Deep dive

Gad's grant moves through named towns, regional borders, and the valley beside Jordan toward the sea of Chinnereth. The KJV word "coast" here means a boundary or bordering territory, not necessarily a shoreline. Reading every occurrence as a beach would produce a remarkably wet map.

As with Reuben, the closing formula joins families, cities, and villages. Sihon's former kingdom is being described in a different political and domestic vocabulary: land once gathered under a king now appears as an inheritance distributed among households. The repetition is the point. Each tribal grant receives its own recorded identity, rather than being swallowed by a general statement that Israel obtained territory east of the river.

Words to trace: children, Beth, border, cities, families, Heshbon

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 13:24

    Gad’s name was explained at his birth as “a troop cometh” or “good fortune” (Genesis 30:11), and Jacob’s blessing plays on it: “Gad, a troop shall overcome him: but he shall overcome at the last” (Genesis 49:19). The clans are listed in Numbers 26:15–17.

  2. Joshua 13:25

    Jazer was the grazing land the Gadites first coveted, “a place for cattle” (Numbers 32:1). This Aroer, “before Rabbah”, near the Ammonite capital, is a different town from the Aroer on the Arnon in verse 16. “Half the land of the children of Ammon” was land Sihon had already taken.

  3. Joshua 13:26

    Mahanaim, “two camps”, was named by Jacob when angels met him (Genesis 32:2); it later served as Ish-bosheth’s capital and as David’s refuge from Absalom (2 Samuel 2:8; 17:24). Betonim means pistachio nuts. The “Debir” here may be Lo-debar, where Mephibosheth lived (2 Samuel 9:4).

  4. Joshua 13:27

    Succoth, “booths”, was where Jacob built shelters for his cattle (Genesis 33:17), and where Gideon later taught the elders “with thorns of the wilderness and briers” for refusing his men bread (Judges 8:16). Zaphon means north.

  5. Joshua 13:28

    “Villages” are chatserim, unwalled settlements around a walled town. Leviticus 25:31 treated their houses differently in law: “the houses of the villages which have no wall round about them shall be counted as the fields of the country.”

Joshua 13:24-28

King James Version

24And Moses gave inheritance unto the tribe of Gad, even unto the children of Gad according to their families.

25And their coast was Jazer, and all the cities of Gilead, and half the land of the children of Ammon, unto Aroer that is before Rabbah;

26And from Heshbon unto Ramath-mizpeh, and Betonim; and from Mahanaim unto the border of Debir;

27And in the valley, Beth-aram, and Beth-nimrah, and Succoth, and Zaphon, the rest of the kingdom of Sihon king of Heshbon, Jordan and his border, even unto the edge of the sea of Chinnereth on the other side Jordan eastward.

28This is the inheritance of the children of Gad after their families, the cities, and their villages.

Joshua 13:29-33

A Divided Tribe and a Different Inheritance

The repeated word "half" matters because Manasseh is divided across Jordan. This paragraph concerns the eastern families, especially the descendants of Machir, and names Bashan, the towns of Jair, Gilead, Ashtaroth, and Edrei within their possession. The former centres of Og's kingdom now appear inside a tribal inheritance, continuing the chapter's movement from defeated monarchies to family land. Then Levi returns for the chapter's final line, and the wording grows stronger than before. Earlier, sacrifices were called Levi's inheritance; now "the LORD God of Israel was their inheritance." The two statements are not rivals. One concerns provision, the other the tribe's distinctive relationship and role within Israel. The chapter therefore refuses to make equality mean identical allotments. Most tribes receive territories. Levi's place will be distributed through cities and worship rather than through one comparable block of land.

Joshua 13:29-33: A Divided Tribe and a Different Inheritance
Chapter sceneJoshua 13

Deep dive

The repeated "half" keeps Manasseh's position clear. The tribe has an inheritance on both sides of Jordan, but this paragraph concerns the eastern families, including the descendants of Machir. Bashan, the towns associated with Jair, and the royal centres Ashtaroth and Edrei make the northern extent of that eastern share concrete.

The final statement about Levi deepens verse 14. There the sacrifices were called Levi's inheritance; here the LORD himself is. Material provision and relationship to God are not competing explanations. The provision belongs to the tribe's distinct place in Israel's worship. The chapter therefore ends without assigning every tribe an equivalent patch of ground. Its account of inheritance has room for both territorial families and a tribe whose support and dwelling places will be woven through the others.

Words to trace: Bashan, half, inheritance, children, Manasseh, Moses

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Joshua 13:29

    Two words for property meet here: “inheritance”, nachalah, land passed down in a family, and “possession”, achuzzah, land held and occupied. The half tribe is given both, and the verse says so twice, as if to make its standing east of the river unmistakable.

  2. Joshua 13:30

    “The towns of Jair” are Havoth-jair, the tent villages of Jair (Numbers 32:41). The Book of Judges will tell of a later Jair of Gilead who had thirty sons riding thirty ass colts, with thirty cities called Havoth-jair (Judges 10:3–4). “Threescore cities” matches 1 Kings 4:13.

  3. Joshua 13:31

    Machir was Manasseh’s son and the father of Gilead. Genesis 50:23 ends Joseph’s life with a picture of him: “the children also of Machir the son of Manasseh were brought up upon Joseph’s knees.” Joseph’s great grandchildren now hold Og’s royal cities.

  4. Joshua 13:32

    “In the plains of Moab... by Jericho” is the location formula that closes the Book of Numbers (36:13). Everything east of the Jordan was settled there, under Moses, before a single tribe crossed.

  5. Joshua 13:33

    Ezekiel’s vision of a restored temple repeats this for the priests: “I am their inheritance: and ye shall give them no possession in Israel: I am their possession” (Ezekiel 44:28). Psalm 16:5 turns it into a personal confession: “The LORD is the portion of mine inheritance.”

Joshua 13:29-33

King James Version

29And Moses gave inheritance unto the half tribe of Manasseh: and this was the possession of the half tribe of the children of Manasseh by their families.

30And their coast was from Mahanaim, all Bashan, all the kingdom of Og king of Bashan, and all the towns of Jair, which are in Bashan, threescore cities:

31And half Gilead, and Ashtaroth, and Edrei, cities of the kingdom of Og in Bashan, were pertaining unto the children of Machir the son of Manasseh, even to the one half of the children of Machir by their families.

32These are the countries which Moses did distribute for inheritance in the plains of Moab, on the other side Jordan, by Jericho, eastward.

33But unto the tribe of Levi Moses gave not any inheritance: the LORD God of Israel was their inheritance, as he said unto them.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
  2. Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
  3. Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Joshua 13?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Joshua 13 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Joshua 13 develops its own movement around children, inheritance, Moses, cities, gave?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006