New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

The Crucified King and the Witnesses Who Remain

Mark 15

The big picture

Mark 15 moves Jesus from council to governor, from sentence to mock coronation, and from crucifixion to a sealed tomb, while one title keeps following him: "King of the Jews." Pilate recognizes the chief priests' envy but still chooses the course that will satisfy the crowd. Soldiers turn royal symbols into instruments of humiliation, and the written accusation remains above Jesus at Golgotha. Those watching demand that he prove himself by coming down, even though Mark has already defined his mission through giving his life for many. Darkness covers the land, Jesus cries the words of Psalm 22, the temple veil tears, and a centurion calls the dead man the Son of God. The chapter closes with women still watching and with Joseph placing the verified body in a known tomb.

In this chapter

Mark 15: The Crucified King and the Witnesses Who Remain
Chapter sceneMark 15

Scripture beside the summary

Mark · King James Version · 47

Mark 15:1-5

The Accusation Changes Its Setting

The setting changes at daybreak, and with it the form of the question. The council binds Jesus and delivers him to Pilate, matching the course Jesus had already described when he said he would be condemned and handed to the Gentiles. The high priest asked about the Christ and the Son of the Blessed; Pilate asks, "Art thou the King of the Jews?" Jesus answers that direct formulation with "Thou sayest it," then returns to silence while the chief priests multiply accusations Mark does not spell out. Nothing in the account invites those missing charges to be reconstructed. Pilate marvels at the refusal to answer. That reaction is not the same as understanding, and it does not yet tell what the governor will do. Mark has already shown Jesus capable of answering opponents sharply. His silence here is not speechlessness. The prisoner refuses to let the volume of accusation become the final explanation of who he is.

Mark 15:1-5: The Accusation Changes Its Setting
Chapter sceneMark 15

Deep dive

Morning brings the formal movement from the assembled religious authorities to Pilate. The binding and delivery correspond to the course Jesus described on the road to Jerusalem, where condemnation and transfer to the Gentiles were named in advance. Pilate's question foregrounds a royal title: King of the Jews. The high priest's question concerned the Christ and the Son of the Blessed; the new setting gives that identity a form immediately relevant to the governor's hearing. Mark does not report the entire content of the chief priests' many accusations, so their missing details should not be reconstructed as though supplied.

The answer "Thou sayest it" acknowledges Pilate's formulation without providing an extended explanation of kingship. It is followed by silence before the accusations. That silence continues the pattern of the previous hearing, where Jesus declined to answer conflicting witnesses but responded when asked directly about his identity. His refusal to conduct a defense is not portrayed as an inability to speak. Mark has spent the preceding chapters showing him answer opponents with precision; the silence here belongs to a different moment in the course he has already announced.

Pilate marvels. The reaction is familiar in Mark, but its presence does not establish that the governor has understood Jesus or intends to follow the implications of what he recognizes. The next scene will distinguish perception from action with particular clarity. For now, the account has transferred the prisoner and changed the leading title without changing the central tension: the one being judged does not allow the accusations to determine the full meaning of who he is.

Words to trace: Pilate, nothing, asked, chief, Jesus, priests

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:1

    Roman officials held court from first light, so the council had to be ready at dawn. Mark introduces Pilate without a word of explanation, as if every reader knew the name. A stone found at Caesarea in 1961 bears it: Pontius Pilatus, prefect of Judea, who governed from AD 26 to 36.

  2. Mark 15:2

    The Greek puts the pronoun first, which can carry surprise: you are the King of the Jews? “Thou sayest it” neither accepts nor refuses Pilate’s wording outright; it grants the title while leaving its meaning in Pilate’s mouth. It is the only answer Jesus gives the governor.

  3. Mark 15:3

    “Many things” can also be read as an adverb: they accused him vehemently, at length. Either way the prosecution now falls to the chief priests themselves, since the witnesses of the night hearing have been set aside.

  4. Mark 15:4

    Pilate’s “Answerest thou nothing?” is the high priest’s question from 14:60, almost word for word. Under Roman procedure a man who offered no defence could be condemned by default, so the question is also an opening Pilate is holding out to him.

  5. Mark 15:5

    “Yet answered nothing” is emphatic in Greek: no longer anything at all. Some hear an echo of Isaiah 52:15 in the Greek Old Testament, where many nations marvel at the servant and kings shut their mouths before him.

Mark 15:1-5

King James Version

1And straightway in the morning the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council, and bound Jesus, and carried him away, and delivered him to Pilate.

2And Pilate asked him, Art thou the King of the Jews? And he answering said unto him, Thou sayest it.

3And the chief priests accused him of many things: but he answered nothing.

4And Pilate asked him again, saying, Answerest thou nothing? behold how many things they witness against thee.

5But Jesus yet answered nothing; so that Pilate marvelled.

Mark 15:6-15

A Recognized Motive Does Not Prevent the Sentence

Pilate knows something important and still acts against what that knowledge suggests. Barabbas is introduced among men involved in insurrection and murder, and the crowd asks for the customary prisoner release. Pilate offers Jesus, repeatedly using the title "King of the Jews," because Mark says he knows the chief priests delivered him "for envy." Recognition of motive does not become resistance to the outcome. The chief priests move the people toward Barabbas, and when Pilate asks what evil Jesus has done, the answer is not evidence but a louder cry for crucifixion. Mark then names Pilate's governing consideration: he is "willing to content the people." Barabbas is released, Jesus is scourged, and the governor delivers him to be crucified. The passage names the participants rather than spreading blame beyond them. Its severity does not need enlargement: a man associated with insurrection goes free while the accused king is handed over for execution.

Mark 15:6-15: A Recognized Motive Does Not Prevent the Sentence
Chapter sceneMark 15

Deep dive

Barabbas is introduced in connection with men involved in insurrection and murder. The crowd asks Pilate to follow his customary release practice, and he proposes the one he calls King of the Jews. Mark then states what Pilate knows: the chief priests have delivered Jesus because of envy. This is not an inference the commentary needs to supply about their motives. It is part of the account's explanation of the exchange. Knowledge of that motive, however, does not settle what Pilate will do.

The chief priests move the people to seek Barabbas instead. When Pilate asks what should happen to Jesus and then what evil he has done, the answer becomes a louder demand for crucifixion rather than an evidentiary reply. Mark identifies Pilate's determining consideration as his willingness to content the people. He releases Barabbas, has Jesus scourged, and delivers him to be crucified. The governor is not written out of responsibility simply because the demand comes from others. The action that authorizes the outcome remains his.

The scene also should not be made to say more about the crowd than it does. Mark does not identify these people as exactly the same individuals who spread garments at the entry, and it does not assign responsibility to every Jewish person. It names the participants and the actions within this proceeding. Those distinctions matter in a book whose disciples, petitioners, women witnesses, and Jesus himself belong to the same people. The immediate reversal is already severe without enlarging the accusation: a prisoner associated with insurrection is released while Jesus is handed over under the royal title Pilate has repeatedly used.

Words to trace: Pilate, Barabbas, chief, cried, Crucify, delivered

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:6

    No source outside the gospels mentions this Passover release, and historians still debate how it worked. Mark presents it as a standing custom of the feast. “Whomsoever they desired” is literally “whomever they were asking for”.

  2. Mark 15:7

    Barabbas is Aramaic for “son of the father”, and some manuscripts of Matthew 27:16 call him Jesus Barabbas. Mark says “the insurrection”, as if his readers would know which uprising was meant, though no other record names it.

  3. Mark 15:8

    The crowd arrives asking for the customary favour before Jesus’ name has come up. “As he had ever done” means as he always did. The initiative for the release comes from them, and Pilate sees in it a way to use them.

  4. Mark 15:9

    “Will ye” is the verb for wanting or wishing, and Pilate uses it again in verse 12. He hands the choice to the crowd’s will twice, and from verse 11 onward that will belongs to the chief priests.

  5. Mark 15:10

    “He knew” is imperfect: he had been aware of it all along. Mark has already shown what they envied: in 11:18 the leaders feared him “because all the people was astonished at his doctrine”. Envy of a teacher’s following is the motive, and Pilate can see it.

  6. Mark 15:11

    “Moved” means stirred up, the word for an agitator shaking a crowd. In Luke’s account the accusers charge Jesus with exactly this, “He stirreth up the people” (Luke 23:5), using the same verb. In Mark it is the chief priests who do it.

  7. Mark 15:12

    “Whom ye call” shifts the title onto the crowd, as if it were their claim, not his. Pilate asks what to do with Jesus instead of simply releasing him, which is how a governor avoids owning a decision.

  8. Mark 15:13

    “Again” can mean back, in reply; this is the first time Mark has them shout it. Crucifixion was Rome’s penalty for slaves, bandits and rebels, and Cicero called it the cruellest and foulest of punishments. It was not a Jewish method of execution.

  9. Mark 15:14

    “What evil hath he done?” is the only question about guilt asked in the Roman hearing, and no one answers it. The crowd replies only by shouting louder, “the more exceedingly”.

  10. Mark 15:15

    “Willing to content the people” reflects a Latin idiom, satis facere, to do enough to satisfy, one of several Latin turns in Mark that suggest readers in Rome. Roman scourging used a whip weighted with bone or metal, with no legal limit on strokes, unlike the Jewish forty.

Mark 15:6-15

King James Version

6Now at that feast he released unto them one prisoner, whomsoever they desired.

7And there was one named Barabbas, which lay bound with them that had made insurrection with him, who had committed murder in the insurrection.

8And the multitude crying aloud began to desire him to do as he had ever done unto them.

9But Pilate answered them, saying, Will ye that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

10For he knew that the chief priests had delivered him for envy.

11But the chief priests moved the people, that he should rather release Barabbas unto them.

12And Pilate answered and said again unto them, What will ye then that I shall do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews?

13And they cried out again, Crucify him.

14Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? And they cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify him.

15And so Pilate, willing to content the people, released Barabbas unto them, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged him, to be crucified.

Mark 15:16-20

A Coronation Performed as Abuse

The soldiers stage a coronation in which every royal sign is converted into abuse. They call together the whole band, dress Jesus in purple, put a crown of thorns on his head, salute him as "King of the Jews," bow their knees, spit on him, and strike his head with a reed. Mark explicitly calls the performance mockery, so the KJV's statement that they "worshipped him" cannot be mistaken for sincere recognition. Their intention is contempt. Yet the title they choose has already become one of the chapter's central questions, which creates an irony the soldiers do not need to understand for Mark's reader to hear it. The gestures imitate honor while inflicting humiliation. When the performance ends, the purple is removed and his own clothes are restored. The costume was put on for ridicule and taken off when ridicule had done its work. They then lead him out to die beneath the same royal claim they had treated as a joke.

Deep dive

The whole band is called together, so the abuse is not presented as a private exchange with a single soldier. Purple clothing, a crown, a salute, and bent knees supply the outward elements of royal honor. Each is placed within an action Mark explicitly calls mocking. The reed strikes his head rather than serving as an emblem held by him in this account, and the spitting continues the humiliation already inflicted after the council's verdict. The gestures of honor do not soften the violence; they become part of its form.

The KJV's word "worshipped" in this scene describes the soldiers' enacted bowing, not sincere faith in the person before them. Mark gives their purpose plainly enough to prevent the action from being misread as conversion. Yet their chosen title is not meaningless to the reader. The identity that the soldiers use for ridicule belongs to the book's continuing question of kingship. Their intention and the account's larger significance do not coincide. The contradiction gives the scene its force without requiring the claim that the soldiers secretly understand what they are doing.

When the mockery ends, they remove the purple, restore his own clothes, and lead him out. Mark's concrete sequence keeps the ceremonial cruelty from dissolving into a generalized description of suffering. The garment is put on for the performance and removed when its purpose is finished. The crown and salute have not changed the sentence; they have made the condemned man's claimed identity another instrument of contempt. The execution now proceeds under the same title that has passed from accusation to staged homage.

Words to trace: head, purple, band, began, bowing, call

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:16

    The Praetorium was the governor’s residence when he stayed in Jerusalem, probably Herod’s palace on the western hill. A “band” is a cohort, nominally six hundred men. Josephus says the auxiliaries in Judea were recruited from Gentile towns such as Caesarea and Sebaste and had little love for Jews.

  2. Mark 15:17

    Purple was the royal and imperial colour; Matthew calls it a scarlet robe, perhaps a soldier’s faded red cloak. Some scholars suggest the thorns were set to radiate outward like the spiked crown on emperors’ coins, which would make the mockery more exact. That is a suggestion, not a fact in the text.

  3. Mark 15:18

    The salute parodies the acclamation of an emperor, “Ave, Caesar”. The Roman crowd greeted its ruler with that cry, and the soldiers make up the same cry for a Jew with a bleeding head.

  4. Mark 15:19

    In 10:34 Jesus foretold that the Gentiles would “mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him”. By the end of this chapter all four verbs have come to pass, and the spitting here is done by the Gentile soldiers just as the prediction said.

  5. Mark 15:20

    Executions took place outside the city, as Leviticus 24:14 required even for Israel’s own capital cases; Hebrews 13:12 notes that Jesus “suffered without the gate”. His own clothes are put back on so that he can be stripped of them again at the cross (verse 24).

Mark 15:16-20

King James Version

16And the soldiers led him away into the hall, called Prætorium; and they call together the whole band.

17And they clothed him with purple, and platted a crown of thorns, and put it about his head,

18And began to salute him, Hail, King of the Jews!

19And they smote him on the head with a reed, and did spit upon him, and bowing their knees worshipped him.

20And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple from him, and put his own clothes on him, and led him out to crucify him.

Mark 15:21-28

The Places on the Right and Left Are Occupied

Golgotha brings together a compelled passerby, a written royal accusation, divided garments, two condemned men, and scriptural echoes without turning any of them into decoration. Simon of Cyrene is forced to carry the cross. Mark names his sons, Alexander and Rufus, but gives no explanation that would justify building a larger identity around them. At the place of a skull, Jesus refuses wine mingled with myrrh, and no motive for that refusal is supplied. The crucifixion itself is reported with restraint while attention falls on garments divided by lot, the third hour, and the inscription "THE KING OF THE JEWS." Two thieves are placed on his right and left, positions that recall the places James and John once requested in glory. Mark does not say these men receive those honors. The contrast exposes how different the actual road is from the disciples' ambition. In the KJV, the scene is also framed by Isaiah's words about being numbered with transgressors.

Galilee and Judea
Galilee and Judea

Deep dive

Simon enters as a passerby coming from the country and is compelled to bear the cross. Mark names him as a Cyrenian and identifies Alexander and Rufus as his sons, but does not explain why those names are supplied. An identification of Rufus with the man named in Romans 16:13 is possible, not established by the shared name. The compelled service also should not be rewritten as a voluntary declaration of discipleship. The account's plain fact is that another man physically carries the instrument associated with the road Jesus had told his followers to take.

At Golgotha, whose name Mark interprets, Jesus refuses wine mixed with myrrh. No reason for the refusal is given. The crucifixion itself is reported without a catalogue of wounds, while attention falls on the garments distributed by lot, recalling Psalm 22:18. Mark specifies the third hour and gives the written accusation above him as King of the Jews. The title does not disappear when the hearing ends. It remains attached to the condemned man throughout the execution.

Two thieves are crucified beside him, one on the right and one on the left. Those positions recall the places James and John requested in glory in Mark 10:37. The account does not claim that the two thieves inherit the brothers' requested honors. The correspondence instead sharpens the gulf between the disciples' ambition and the form Jesus' path presently takes. The KJV's verse 28 explicitly connects this company with Isaiah 53:12, where the servant is numbered with transgressors. Mark therefore gives the placement beside condemned men a scriptural frame without reducing the physical exposure of the scene to a decorative fulfillment notice.

Words to trace: crucified, place, accusation, Alexander, bear, casting

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:21

    “Compel” is angareuo, a Persian loanword for requisitioning a civilian’s labour, the word in Matthew 5:41 for being forced to go a mile. Cyrene, in modern Libya, had a large Jewish community with its own synagogue in Jerusalem (Acts 6:9). The condemned usually carried only the crossbeam.

  2. Mark 15:22

    Golgotha is Aramaic for skull; the Latin calvaria gives the English “Calvary”. “They bring him” is literally “they carry him”, which may mean he could no longer walk unaided. The place was near a road, since passers-by are there in verse 29.

  3. Mark 15:23

    Proverbs 31:6 says, “Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish”, and the Talmud records that women of Jerusalem provided drugged wine for the condemned. Myrrh was thought to dull pain. The offer may have been a mercy, and it was refused.

  4. Mark 15:24

    In Greek the crucifixion itself is three words in the present tense: and they crucify him. Mark describes no nails and no wounds. The victim’s clothes were the executioners’ recognised perquisite, and John 19:23 says there were four soldiers.

  5. Mark 15:25

    The third hour is about nine in the morning. Mark marks the day in three-hour blocks, the third, sixth and ninth hours, then evening, like watches kept at a post. John 19:14 has Pilate still judging at “about the sixth hour”, and the two reckonings have been argued over since antiquity.

  6. Mark 15:26

    The charge was written on a board, a titulus, often carried ahead of the condemned or hung around his neck on the way, then fixed to the cross. Mark gives the shortest wording of the four gospels, the crime alone. John 19:20 adds that it was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin.

  7. Mark 15:27

    Rome crucified insurgents in numbers to terrify a province; after the revolt of 4 BC the governor Varus crucified two thousand men around Jerusalem, according to Josephus. The present tense, “they crucify”, runs on from verse 24 as a continuing scene.

  8. Mark 15:28

    This verse is absent from the earliest manuscripts of Mark and appears to have been added from Luke 22:37, where Jesus quotes Isaiah 53:12. Modern editions print it in the margin or a footnote. The King James, following later manuscripts, keeps it in the text.

Mark 15:21-28

King James Version

21And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus, to bear his cross.

22And they bring him unto the place Golgotha, which is, being interpreted, The place of a skull.

23And they gave him to drink wine mingled with myrrh: but he received it not.

24And when they had crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.

25And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.

26And the superscription of his accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.

27And with him they crucify two thieves; the one on his right hand, and the other on his left.

28And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors.

Mark 15:29-32

They Make Descent the Condition of Belief

The mockery makes self-rescue the test of identity. Passersby revive the temple accusation that Mark had already labeled false testimony, wag their heads, and tell Jesus to save himself by coming down. Chief priests and scribes sharpen the same demand: "He saved others; himself he cannot save." Within their argument, remaining on the cross proves failure. Within Mark's own account, Jesus has already described the Son of man's work as giving his life a ransom for many. Their proposed demonstration would therefore reverse the path he has repeatedly named. That contradiction gives the taunt its force. They promise belief if "Christ the King of Israel" will descend in the form they authorize. Mark has encountered that demand for dictated signs before. Even the men crucified beside Jesus join the reviling here. No friendly voice interrupts from a neighboring cross in this telling. The recognition that follows will come from someone watching how Jesus dies, not from a spectacular escape from death.

Deep dive

The allegation about destroying and rebuilding the temple reappears in the mouths of passersby. Earlier, Mark identified the testimony that carried this allegation as false and inconsistent. Its repetition at the cross shows how an accusation can continue functioning after its failure in the hearing. The head-wagging also recalls the mockery surrounding the sufferer in Psalm 22:7. Jesus is not merely watched as he dies; his previous teaching and disputed identity are used to interpret the death against him.

The chief priests and scribes state the contrast as saving others while being unable to save himself. Within their mockery, remaining on the cross discredits the claim. Within Mark's earlier teaching, however, the Son of man gives his life as a ransom for many. The demand for self-rescue therefore asks for a demonstration that would reverse the work he has described. That is the scene's central irony. Their chosen criterion for proving his identity conflicts with the path he has already assigned to it. In the account's own terms, saving others and refusing this demand for self-rescue belong together rather than canceling one another.

Their demand to see him descend and then believe returns to the book's recurring problem of dictated signs. Evidence is acceptable only if it arrives in the form the challengers authorize. Mark also says that those crucified with him revile him. It does not include Luke's exchange with a repentant criminal, and that separate account should not displace the collective reviling reported here. At this point in Mark, no voice from the crosses beside him breaks the mockery. The recognition that follows will come from a different observer and from the manner of his death, not from his descent.

Words to trace: cross, save, believe, buildest, chief, Christ

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:29

    “Railed on him” is literally “blasphemed him”, the charge the council condemned him for in 14:64 now turned against him. “Ah” is oua, a cry of mock admiration found nowhere else in the New Testament: bravo, temple-wrecker.

  2. Mark 15:30

    “Save” is the verb Mark uses for healing: “thy faith hath made thee whole” (5:34, 10:52) is literally “thy faith hath saved thee”. It also recalls 8:35: “whosoever will save his life shall lose it”. The passers-by ask for the one thing he has taught his followers not to do.

  3. Mark 15:31

    “Mocking” is the verb Jesus used in 10:34 and the one Mark used of the soldiers in verse 20. The priests speak “among themselves”, about him rather than to him, a conversation held within earshot of a dying man.

  4. Mark 15:32

    The priests say “King of Israel”, the title as Jews used it; Pilate and the soldiers said “King of the Jews”, as outsiders would. “That we may see and believe” turns 4:12 inside out, where people see and do not perceive.

Mark 15:29-32

King James Version

29And they that passed by railed on him, wagging their heads, and saying, Ah, thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days,

30Save thyself, and come down from the cross.

31Likewise also the chief priests mocking said among themselves with the scribes, He saved others; himself he cannot save.

32Let Christ the King of Israel descend now from the cross, that we may see and believe. And they that were crucified with him reviled him.

Mark 15:33-39

The Cry, the Torn Veil, and the Centurion

Darkness covers the land from the sixth hour to the ninth, and Mark gives the sign without supplying a physical mechanism. At the ninth hour Jesus cries, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" The words open Psalm 22, whose wider movement matters, but the psalm's eventual vindication does not erase the anguish of the sentence Mark records. Some bystanders mishear the cry as a call for Elijah. Vinegar is offered, and they wait to see whether Elijah will take him down, keeping rescue on the table until the end. It does not come. Jesus cries again and dies. Then the temple veil tears "from the top to the bottom," tying the death to the sanctuary that has dominated the Jerusalem chapters. Mark does not settle every meaning of that sign. Immediately afterward, the centurion standing opposite Jesus says, "Truly this man was the Son of God." The declaration comes not after descent from the cross, but after the death the mockers treated as disproof.

Deep dive

Mark marks the passage from the sixth to the ninth hour with darkness over the whole land. It reports the sign without supplying a physical mechanism. At the ninth hour Jesus cries the opening appeal of Psalm 22:1, and Mark preserves the words before interpreting them. The reference matters, but it must not make the anguish disappear. Psalm 22 ultimately moves toward vindication and proclamation, yet the words voiced here are words of forsakenness. Treating them merely as a code for the psalm's triumphant ending would flatten the cry that Mark has chosen to record. Conversely, the verse does not by itself supply a complete metaphysical explanation of relations within God.

Some hear the cry as a call for Elijah. The offered vinegar and the proposal to wait for Elijah's intervention keep rescue in view as a possibility entertained by bystanders, but no such removal from the cross occurs. Jesus cries out again and dies. Mark then moves immediately to the veil of the temple, torn in two from top to bottom. The direction points beyond an ordinary human action, while the temple setting connects the death with the place whose authority and future have dominated the Jerusalem chapters. The torn veil can be read in terms of opened access, judgment on the sanctuary, or both; Mark reports the event without adding an explicit explanation that settles the symbol's entire reach.

The verb used for the tearing recalls the torn heavens at Jesus' baptism in Mark 1:10. At that opening, the heavenly voice named the beloved Son. Here, after the death and the tearing, a centurion standing opposite Jesus says that this man was the Son of God. Mark does not describe the officer's full subsequent beliefs or claim that he has articulated a developed Christian creed. The significance of his words within the book is nevertheless unmistakable: the title given at the beginning is spoken at the cross, prompted in the KJV by the cry and death he has witnessed. The mockers demanded descent as proof. The declaration comes while Jesus remains the one who has died.

Words to trace: cried, gave, hour, Elias, Eloi, ghost

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:33

    The sixth to the ninth hour is noon to three in the afternoon. Passover fell at full moon, when a solar eclipse cannot occur. Amos 8:9 had said, “I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day.”

  2. Mark 15:34

    Mark gives the cry in Aramaic, “Eloi”, where Matthew has Hebrew “Eli”. He keeps several of Jesus’ Aramaic words and translates each: Talitha cumi (5:41), Ephphatha (7:34), Abba (14:36), and this one, the last words Jesus speaks in the book.

  3. Mark 15:35

    “Elias” is the Greek form of Elijah. Popular belief held that Elijah, taken up alive, came to rescue the righteous in trouble. Mark’s readers heard in 9:13 that Elijah has already come and that they did to him whatever they wanted, words that point to John the Baptist.

  4. Mark 15:36

    “Vinegar” is oxos, the sour wine soldiers drank. Psalm 69:21 reads, “in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.” “Let alone” means wait: let us see. Whether the drink was meant to help or to prolong the spectacle, Mark does not say.

  5. Mark 15:37

    “Gave up the ghost” translates one Greek word, he breathed out; in 1611 “ghost” meant breath or spirit. Crucified men usually died of exhaustion and slow suffocation, too weak to cry out, which is why a loud cry at the end was worth recording.

  6. Mark 15:38

    The temple had two great curtains: one at the entrance to the sanctuary, visible from the courts, and the inner veil before the most holy place. Which is meant is debated. Josephus describes the outer one as a Babylonian tapestry embroidered with a panorama of the heavens.

  7. Mark 15:39

    “Centurion” here is the Latin word written in Greek letters; Matthew and Luke use a Greek equivalent. He commanded about a hundred men and stood “over against him”, facing the cross. The Greek has no article, so “a son of God” and “the Son of God” are both grammatically possible.

Mark 15:33-39

King James Version

33And when the sixth hour was come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour.

34And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

35And some of them that stood by, when they heard it, said, Behold, he calleth Elias.

36And one ran and filled a spunge full of vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink, saying, Let alone; let us see whether Elias will come to take him down.

37And Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost.

38And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.

39And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God.

Mark 15:40-47

The Women See Where He Is Laid

When the twelve have disappeared from the visible scene, Mark identifies women who are still watching. Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the less and Joses, Salome, and other women are not introduced as strangers arriving at the end. Mark explains that they followed Jesus in Galilee, ministered to him, and came with him to Jerusalem. Their distance from the cross does not break the chain of observation. Joseph of Arimathaea then goes boldly to Pilate and asks for the body. Pilate is surprised that Jesus is already dead and seeks confirmation from the centurion before releasing it, so burial does not rest on rumor or assumption. Joseph buys linen, takes the body down, wraps it, lays it in a rock-hewn sepulchre, and rolls a stone over the entrance. Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses see where he is laid. That final fact becomes the bridge to the next morning: they know the tomb to which they will return.

The women see where he is laid
Chapter sceneMark 15

Deep dive

Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the less and Joses, and Salome are named among the women looking on from a distance. Mark then explains that they had followed Jesus and ministered to him in Galilee, alongside many other women who came to Jerusalem. Their appearance here is therefore not the arrival of strangers at an execution. The account discloses a sustained history of following at the moment when the twelve's visible company has collapsed. They remain at a distance, but they remain within the chain of observation that will connect cross, burial, and the first morning after the sabbath.

Joseph of Arimathaea is described as an honorable counsellor who waits for God's kingdom. He goes boldly to Pilate and requests the body. His place in the council makes his action notable after the condemnation, but Mark does not explain his participation or absence during that proceeding. Pilate is surprised that Jesus is already dead and seeks confirmation from the centurion before granting the body. The repeated concern with death prevents the burial from resting on a casual assumption by a distant observer. The official who supervised the execution confirms it to the official authorizing release of the body.

Joseph buys linen, takes the body down, wraps it, lays it in a rock-hewn tomb, and rolls a stone across the entrance. Mark follows the physical handling carefully. Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses see where he is laid. That last detail is the chapter's bridge rather than a small piece of scenery. The women who return in chapter 16 are not searching an unfamiliar burial ground on the basis of a rumor. The place is known, the body has been laid there, and the entrance has been closed. The next chapter begins with those facts still governing their intention to anoint him.

Words to trace: Mary, body, centurion, dead, Joseph, Joses

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 15:40

    Psalm 38:11 reads, “my lovers and my friends stand aloof from my sore; and my kinsmen stand afar off.” Magdalene means from Magdala, a fishing town on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee. “James the less” is literally “the little”, perhaps younger or shorter.

  2. Mark 15:41

    “Ministered” is the verb of 10:45, where the Son of man came “to minister”. Mark has used it of the angels in the wilderness (1:13) and of Peter’s mother-in-law (1:31). Luke 8:3 adds that such women supported Jesus out of their own means.

  3. Mark 15:42

    “Preparation” became the Greek name for Friday, the day for readying the sabbath, and Mark explains it for readers who did not keep one. Deuteronomy 21:22–23 forbade leaving a hanged body overnight, and the sabbath would begin at sunset.

  4. Mark 15:43

    Arimathaea is probably Ramathaim, the hill town of Samuel’s family (1 Samuel 1:1). “Craved” meant simply asked, requested. Rome often left the crucified unburied as a warning, so asking for the body of a man executed as a king was a risk worth the word “boldly”.

  5. Mark 15:44

    Crucified men commonly lasted a day or longer, so six hours was quick. “Marvelled if” means wondered whether. It is Pilate’s second marvelling in the chapter (verse 5): first at a silence, now at a speedy death.

  6. Mark 15:45

    “Gave” is the verb for granting a favour freely; Roman governors were known to sell bodies to relatives. In the oldest manuscripts Joseph asks for the body but Pilate grants the corpse, a different Greek word, as if the governor sees only a dead criminal.

  7. Mark 15:46

    Nothing is said of washing or spices; the hour allowed only the essentials, which is why the women come back with spices (16:1). Tombs around Jerusalem were cut into rock with a low entrance. Rolling disc-shaped stones were rare and belonged to wealthier tombs; most were sealed with a square block.

  8. Mark 15:47

    The verb is imperfect: they were watching, taking it in. Two named women see the burial; Deuteronomy 19:15 asked for two or three witnesses to establish a matter. This Mary is “mother of Joses” here and “mother of James” in 16:1, the same woman named by different sons.

Mark 15:40-47

King James Version

40There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;

41(Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem.

42And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath,

43Joseph of Arimathaea, an honourable counsellor, which also waited for the kingdom of God, came, and went in boldly unto Pilate, and craved the body of Jesus.

44And Pilate marvelled if he were already dead: and calling unto him the centurion, he asked him whether he had been any while dead.

45And when he knew it of the centurion, he gave the body to Joseph.

46And he bought fine linen, and took him down, and wrapped him in the linen, and laid him in a sepulchre which was hewn out of a rock, and rolled a stone unto the door of the sepulchre.

47And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses beheld where he was laid.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Watch what Jesus says and does, and how people respond.
  2. Trace kingdom, discipleship, opposition, cross, and resurrection in the evangelist’s own sequence.
  3. Let later doctrine clarify the scene without erasing its immediate setting.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Mark 15?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Mark 15 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Jesus before Pilate, mocked, crucified, dying, and placed in the tomb?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006