New · FreePlay The Witnesses The in-depth puzzle battle quest through Bible history

Hands Restored and Lines Drawn

Mark 3

The big picture

By Mark 3, disagreement has sharpened into a plan to kill. A healed hand stands next to a conspiracy, while growing crowds press so hard that Jesus needs a boat kept ready. He appoints twelve first to be with him and then to be sent with authority, but closeness does not guarantee understanding or loyalty. Concern from his own people and accusation from Jerusalem converge around a crowded house. Jesus answers the claim that he works by Satan with the image of a strong man's house being emptied, then ties the warning about blasphemy directly to the charge that his liberating work comes from an unclean spirit. The chapter ends with family language redrawn around doing God's will. Mark keeps physical nearness, accurate recognition, appointed status, and genuine belonging from collapsing into the same category.

In this chapter

Mark 3: Hands Restored and Lines Drawn
Chapter sceneMark 3

Scripture beside the summary

Mark · King James Version · 35

Mark 3:1-6

A Restored Hand and a Plan to Kill

The watchers enter the synagogue already looking for an accusation. Jesus makes the man's withered hand visible and then asks a question that exposes the moral shape of their surveillance: is the Sabbath for doing good or evil, saving life or killing? Their silence becomes part of the scene. Mark records anger and grief together in Jesus' response to their hardness, refusing the easy choice between confrontation and sorrow. The hand is restored with a command to stretch it out. Then the Pharisees leave and immediately consult with the Herodians about destroying Jesus. The Book of Mark hardly needs to underline the irony. A dispute framed by saving and killing is followed by restoration on one side and a murder plan on the other. The healed hand leaves the center almost at once because the larger conflict has just shown its teeth.

Mark 3:1-6: A Restored Hand and a Plan to Kill
Chapter sceneMark 3

Deep dive

The man with the withered hand is not introduced through a request. The first stated intention belongs to the watchers: they want grounds for accusation. Jesus brings the man into the open and frames the issue as doing good or evil, saving life or killing. Their silence is therefore active in the exchange. They will not answer the question that would expose the terms on which they are watching. Mark explicitly records both anger and grief in Jesus' response, with the hardness of their hearts as the cause. Anger and grief are held together: their hardness is confronted, but it is also the occasion of his sorrow.

After the hand is restored, the Pharisees go out and consult the Herodians about destroying Jesus. The positioning is exact. A question about saving or killing is followed by healing on one side and a plan for death on the other. Mark does not need to add a verdict about the inconsistency. The sequence supplies it. Nor does the healed man become the subject of a prolonged closing scene. The focus turns immediately to the alliance against Jesus, showing how an act that repairs one person's hand exposes a much larger conflict. The danger established at John's imprisonment is now taking shape around Jesus himself.

Words to trace: hand, sabbath, withered, accuse, anger, counsel

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 3:1

    “Withered” is exērammenēn, a perfect participle, dried up: the wording suggests a hand that had become useless rather than one malformed from birth. Jerome quotes a lost gospel used by Jewish Christians in which the man was a stonemason who asked to be healed so he would not have to beg.

  2. Mark 3:2

    “Watched” is paretēroun, to watch closely from the side, the verb for spying or lying in wait. Jewish teaching allowed the sabbath to be broken to save a life, but a withered hand was not in danger; healing it could wait a day. That is the gap the watchers are hoping to catch him in.

  3. Mark 3:3

    “Stand forth” is literally “rise into the middle”. Jesus does not heal in a corner. He sets the man in the centre of the synagogue, in full view of those watching for a charge, so that nothing that follows can be missed or denied.

  4. Mark 3:4

    “Held their peace” is esiōpōn, an imperfect: they kept silent, and went on keeping it. Mark uses the same verb of Jesus before the high priest in 14:61, “he held his peace”. On the sabbath the accusers refuse to answer; at his trial Jesus will refuse to answer them.

  5. Mark 3:5

    Nowhere else in the Gospels is the noun for anger, orgē, used of Jesus, and Matthew and Luke both leave it out of their accounts. “Hardness” is pōrōsis, the forming of a callus, a word Mark later applies to the disciples (6:52, 8:17). “Restored” is the verb used of Elijah restoring all things in 9:12.

  6. Mark 3:6

    The Herodians were supporters of Herod Antipas’s dynasty, strange allies for Pharisees, who resented Herodian rule. Antipas is the ruler who will behead John in chapter 6. The same pairing, Pharisees with Herodians, returns in 12:13 to trap Jesus over the tribute money.

Mark 3:1-6

King James Version

1And he entered again into the synagogue; and there was a man there which had a withered hand.

2And they watched him, whether he would heal him on the sabbath day; that they might accuse him.

3And he saith unto the man which had the withered hand, Stand forth.

4And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? to save life, or to kill? But they held their peace.

5And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts, he saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it out: and his hand was restored whole as the other.

6And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him.

Mark 3:7-12

A Crowd Large Enough to Need a Boat

The geography widens before the theology does. People arrive from Galilee, Judaea, Jerusalem, Idumaea, beyond Jordan, and the regions around Tyre and Sidon. Mark turns fame into something physically dangerous: the pressure of bodies is strong enough that a small boat must stand ready to keep the crowd from crushing Jesus. Popularity is not a clean success metric in this book. Those seeking healing press forward, while unclean spirits fall before him and correctly identify him as the Son of God. Their knowledge still does not make them trustworthy witnesses. Jesus forbids them to make him known. The Book of Mark keeps the loudest voices from dictating the meaning of the scene. A vast crowd, urgent need, and supernatural recognition all testify to authority, but none of those things alone settles what it means to stand rightly toward the one they recognize.

Deep dive

The list of places widens the account beyond a few Galilean towns. Mark names Judaea, Jerusalem, Idumaea, the region beyond Jordan, and the area around Tyre and Sidon. The report has turned places far beyond the earlier encounters into points of departure for people seeking him. Those with afflictions press forward to touch Jesus, and a small boat must be kept available so that the crowd does not crush him. That practical detail is worth retaining. Popularity in Mark is not an abstract measure of success; it can become a bodily obstacle to the work that attracts it.

The unclean spirits fall before him and identify him as the Son of God. Their knowledge exceeds that of many human participants, but it does not make them disciples. Jesus again forbids them to make him known. Mark keeps the difference between knowing a title and standing rightly toward its bearer in view. The prohibition also prevents the loudest voices in the scene from controlling its meaning. A mass of people, urgent need, and supernatural recognition might seem to settle the question of who Jesus is. The account instead keeps that question open for the human characters, while showing that the authority exercised in the synagogue extends across the growing multitude.

Words to trace: multitude, disciples, charged, cried, fell, followed

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 3:7

    After a plot to destroy him, Jesus takes his disciples out of the synagogue and down to the open shore. The grammar makes a small distinction: the Galileans “followed him”, while the people from further off, listed in the next verse, “came unto him”.

  2. Mark 3:8

    Idumaea is the region south of Judaea that had once been Edom; Herod the Great’s family came from there, and this is its only mention in the New Testament. Tyre and Sidon were Gentile cities on the Phoenician coast. The list covers almost every quarter of old Israel and beyond, with Samaria left out.

  3. Mark 3:9

    “A small ship” is ploiarion, a little boat. “Wait on him” means stand constantly ready, and “throng” is thlibōsin, to crush. The boat kept ready here is the one Jesus will sit in to teach at the start of chapter 4.

  4. Mark 3:10

    “Plagues” is mastigas, literally whips or scourges: diseases pictured as lashes. The verb from the same root is used in 10:34 for the scourging Jesus foretells for himself. “Pressed upon” is epipiptein, to fall on, a crowd surging forward with arms outstretched.

  5. Mark 3:11

    The verbs are in the imperfect, “whenever they saw him, they fell down”. Up to this point in Mark only two voices have called Jesus the Son of God: the opening title of 1:1 and the voice from heaven in 1:11. Now unclean spirits say it, and the next human being to say it is the centurion at the cross (15:39).

  6. Mark 3:12

    “Straitly charged” here is epetima, rebuked, the verb used when Jesus silenced the spirit in 1:25 and when he will quiet the storm in 4:39. It is a different word from the “straitly charged” of 1:43. Mark adds “much”, polla: the silencing was forceful and repeated.

Mark 3:7-12

King James Version

7But Jesus withdrew himself with his disciples to the sea: and a great multitude from Galilee followed him, and from Judæa,

8And from Jerusalem, and from Idumaea, and from beyond Jordan; and they about Tyre and Sidon, a great multitude, when they had heard what great things he did, came unto him.

9And he spake to his disciples, that a small ship should wait on him because of the multitude, lest they should throng him.

10For he had healed many; insomuch that they pressed upon him for to touch him, as many as had plagues.

11And unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God.

12And he straitly charged them that they should not make him known.

Mark 3:13-19

With Him Before They Are Sent

The order of purpose matters when Jesus appoints the twelve. They are first to be with him, and then to be sent to preach with authority over sickness and unclean spirits. Companionship is not spare time before the useful work begins. The Book of Mark builds it into the assignment itself. That makes the later failures of these men more revealing, because misunderstanding will occur after sustained proximity rather than from a distant lack of exposure. The list gives the group shape without pretending to give twelve biographies. Simon receives the name Peter, James and John receive a translated nickname, and then Judas Iscariot appears with the future rupture already attached to his name: he is the one who betrayed Jesus. Appointment and betrayal stand in the same roster. Mark refuses to preserve an idealized portrait of the twelve by hiding what one of them will become.

Galilee and Judea
Galilee and Judea

Deep dive

Jesus calls those he chooses up the mountain, and Mark states the purpose of their appointment in an important order: "that they should be with him," followed by their being sent to preach and given authority. Companionship is not merely the waiting room before the real assignment. It belongs to the assignment's definition. Their later failures will occur after sustained nearness, which makes those failures more revealing than simple ignorance at a distance. The number twelve also gives the group a collective identity. Mark presents a constituted company, not only a loose sequence of individual admirers.

The names are not accompanied by complete biographies. Simon receives the name Peter, and James and John receive a name Mark translates as "The sons of thunder," without explaining the particular incident or trait behind it. The names establish a recognizable company without reducing its members to a list of temperaments. The sharpest description is attached to Judas Iscariot: he is the one who betrayed Jesus. The reader is told this before watching the relationship unfold. Appointment and betrayal therefore occupy the same list from the outset. Mark does not hide the eventual rupture in order to preserve an untroubled portrait of the twelve, and the move into a house immediately returns this newly named company to the pressure of the crowds.

Words to trace: James, Simon, surnamed, Alphaeus, Andrew, Bartholomew

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 3:13

    “A mountain” is simply “the mountain”, the hill country above the lake. “Whom he would” is emphatic, those he himself wanted. “They came unto him” is literally “they went off to him”, a verb that implies leaving somewhere else behind.

  2. Mark 3:14

    “Ordained” is epoiēsen, simply “he made”; the Greek implies no rite, though the 1611 word suggests one. The Greek Old Testament uses the same verb in 1 Samuel 12:6, where the LORD “advanced”, literally made, Moses and Aaron. Twelve is the number of Jacob’s sons and Israel’s tribes. Some manuscripts add “whom also he named apostles”.

  3. Mark 3:15

    “Power” is exousia, the word the synagogue crowd reached for in 1:22 and 1:27 when they said he taught and commanded “with authority”. What was his is now delegated. Older manuscripts lack “to heal sicknesses” and give only the authority to cast out devils.

  4. Mark 3:16

    Peter is Petros, the Greek form of the Aramaic Kepha, rock, which gives Cephas. Mark records the name and gives no explanation for it, unlike Matthew 16:18. From here on Mark calls him Peter, except in Gethsemane, where Jesus says, “Simon, sleepest thou?” (14:37).

  5. Mark 3:17

    Only Mark keeps the Aramaic nickname. The Greek spelling is awkward, and scholars debate what Aramaic words lie behind it; bene regesh, sons of commotion, is one proposal. Luke 9:54 shows the brothers asking to call down fire on a Samaritan village, which some take as the kind of temper the name recalls.

  6. Mark 3:18

    “The Canaanite” has nothing to do with Canaan: Kananaios renders the Aramaic qan’ana, zealous, and Luke 6:15 translates it “Zelotes”. Bartholomew is a patronymic, bar Tolmai, son of Tolmai. Where Mark and Matthew have Thaddaeus, Luke’s list has Judas the son of James, probably the same man under another name.

  7. Mark 3:19

    Iscariot most likely means “man of Kerioth”, a town in southern Judah (Joshua 15:25), which would make Judas the one Judaean among Galileans; other proposals exist. “Betrayed” is paredōken, handed over, the verb used of John’s arrest in 1:14. “They went into an house” begins the next scene in most modern editions.

Mark 3:13-19

King James Version

13And he goeth up into a mountain, and calleth unto him whom he would: and they came unto him.

14And he ordained twelve, that they should be with him, and that he might send them forth to preach,

15And to have power to heal sicknesses, and to cast out devils:

16And Simon he surnamed Peter;

17And James the son of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and he surnamed them Boanerges, which is, The sons of thunder:

18And Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Canaanite,

19And Judas Iscariot, which also betrayed him: and they went into an house.

Mark 3:20-30

The Strong Man's House Is Being Emptied

The house is so crowded that eating becomes difficult, and concern from Jesus' own people is followed by a much sharper accusation from scribes who have come from Jerusalem. They say his expulsions of unclean spirits are powered by the ruler of those spirits. Jesus answers by making the logic collapse under its own weight. A kingdom or house that systematically attacks itself cannot stand. Then the image changes from civil war to burglary. If the strong man's goods are being carried away, the better explanation is that the strong man has been bound, not that he authorized the emptying of his own house. The Book of Mark ties the severe warning about blasphemy against the Holy Ghost to this concrete accusation: "He hath an unclean spirit." The issue is not an anxious accidental phrase. It is the deliberate naming of liberating work as the work of an unclean source.

Deep dive

The crowd is so demanding that the group cannot eat. Those the KJV calls Jesus' "friends" come to restrain him, saying he is beside himself. The phrase can refer to his own people, and the arrival of his mother and brothers shortly afterward gives the episode a family setting, but Mark does not supply the identity or private intention of every person involved. The scribes from Jerusalem make a more specific accusation: his expulsions are powered by the ruler of the very spirits being expelled. Jesus answers with the collapse of a divided kingdom and household. A power systematically dismantling its own dominion is not an explanation of secure control.

The strong man's house gives the alternative account. The removal of his goods indicates that he has been overcome, not that he has kindly authorized the burglary. Mark's image is vigorous and almost disarmingly practical: a house being emptied is poor evidence that its strong occupant remains in charge. The severe warning about blasphemy against the Holy Ghost then receives an explicit explanation in verse 30: they have said, "He hath an unclean spirit." The warning is tied to their attribution of Jesus' work to an unclean source. Mark does not present a catalogue of anxious thoughts or accidental phrases. It identifies a concrete accusation made in the face of the liberating acts just described.

Words to trace: house, divided, Satan, stand, blaspheme, devils

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 3:20

    The crowd of 2:2 is back at the door. “Eat bread” is a Hebrew way of saying to have a meal of any kind. The crush that made a boat necessary at the shore now fills the house, with no boat to escape into.

  2. Mark 3:21

    “His friends” is hoi par’ autou, “those from beside him”, his own people; verse 31 shows who they are. “Lay hold on” is kratēsai, to seize, the verb for Herod arresting John (6:17) and the arrest in Gethsemane (14:46). “Beside himself” is exestē, the verb Mark used in 2:12 for the crowd being “amazed”.

  3. Mark 3:22

    The Greek manuscripts read Beelzeboul. Baal-zebub, “lord of flies”, was the god of Ekron consulted by Ahaziah in 2 Kings 1:2; Beelzeboul is often taken as “lord of the dwelling”, which would fit Jesus’ reply about a house. “Came down” is exact: Jerusalem sits about 2,500 feet above sea level, Capernaum below it.

  4. Mark 3:23

    Mark uses the word “parables” for the first time here, a chapter before the parables of the sower and the seed. Jesus “called them unto him”: he summons his accusers rather than avoiding them. His opening question turns their charge into a puzzle they have to solve themselves.

  5. Mark 3:24

    Mark’s first readers knew what a divided kingdom looked like. In 63 BC the brothers Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II fought over the Judaean throne, both appealed to Rome, and Pompey marched into Jerusalem. The land had not been independent since.

  6. Mark 3:25

    “House” can mean a building, a household or a dynasty. The saying lands in a crowded house, while Jesus’ own household is outside saying he is out of his mind (verse 21). The scene around him supplies the example of a house divided.

  7. Mark 3:26

    “Hath an end” is telos echei, is finished. The argument is a conditional: if Satan were at war with himself, his reign would already be over. Jesus does not say that is how Satan falls. The next verse gives another explanation for why his hold is breaking.

  8. Mark 3:27

    “Strong man” is ischyros, and John had announced one “mightier”, ischyroteros, coming after him (1:7). Isaiah 49:24–25 asks, “Shall the prey be taken from the mighty?” and answers that the captives of the mighty shall be taken away. “Spoil” is diarpasai, to plunder a house completely.

  9. Mark 3:28

    “Verily” is amēn, the first time in Mark that Jesus uses his formula “Amen, I say unto you”. Others said amen at the end, to agree with a prayer or statement; Jesus puts it at the start of his own sentences. It occurs thirteen times in Mark.

  10. Mark 3:29

    “Damnation” in 1611 meant condemnation, a judicial verdict, and the Received Text here has kriseōs, judgment. Older manuscripts read “eternal sin”, hamartēmatos, a sin whose guilt remains for ever. “In danger of” is enochos, liable to, the legal word for being held to answer.

  11. Mark 3:30

    The Book of Mark adds its own explanation to Jesus’ saying. “Unclean spirit” is the exact term for what Jesus has been casting out since the synagogue in 1:23. The scribes have put him in the class of the very thing he expels. “They said” is imperfect: they kept saying it.

Mark 3:20-30

King James Version

20And the multitude cometh together again, so that they could not so much as eat bread.

21And when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself.

22And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils.

23And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?

24And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.

25And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.

26And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.

27No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.

28Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:

29But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

30Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.

Mark 3:31-35

Outside the House and Inside the Circle

Mark lets the room itself carry part of the argument. Jesus' mother and brothers stand outside and send word inward, while those hearing him sit around him. He looks at that surrounding circle before naming brother, sister, and mother in relation to doing the will of God. The Book of Mark does not say that natural family affection has vanished, and it does not pass a final verdict on every relative at the door. The point is more exact. Biological nearness does not control Jesus' work, and inherited relationship does not by itself define belonging. The addition of "sister" also expands the category beyond the specific relatives who have arrived. Yet Mark does not simply canonize the crowd as faithful because they occupy the inside position. Crowds have obstructed, misunderstood, and merely marveled before. The scene redefines kinship without reducing it to geography.

Outside the house and inside the circle
Chapter sceneMark 3

Deep dive

The spatial arrangement carries the argument. His mother and brothers stand outside and send for him; those hearing him sit around him. Jesus looks around that seated circle before naming brother, sister, and mother in relation to doing God's will. The scene answers the question of belonging with more than biological nearness. It does not require an invented claim that he feels no affection for his family, nor does Mark record such a claim. The account changes the basis on which access and kinship are being discussed.

The added "sister" broadens the language beyond the mother and brothers who have been announced at the door. The new family is not simply the twelve under a different name. It includes whoever does God's will. At the same time, the surrounding crowd is not pronounced permanently faithful merely because it occupies the better position in the room. Mark has already shown that crowds can obstruct access and that recognition can come from unclean spirits. The scene's force is more exact: inherited relationship does not by itself control Jesus' work, and genuine belonging is described through response to God. The chapter ends with a household redefined while the literal household remains crowded.

Words to trace: mother, brethren, brother, calling, looked, multitude

Verse-by-verse path

  1. Mark 3:31

    Mark names the brothers in 6:3: James, Joses, Juda and Simon. Their relation to Jesus has been read three ways since the fourth century: younger sons of Mary (Helvidius), sons of Joseph by an earlier marriage (Epiphanius), or cousins (Jerome). The family “sent unto him”, relaying a message through the crowd.

  2. Mark 3:32

    “Sat about him” is the posture of pupils around a teacher. Some manuscripts add “and thy sisters” to the message, which would prepare for the “sister” of verse 35. “Seek for thee” uses the same verb as the disciples in 1:37, and again the seekers want Jesus somewhere other than where he is.

  3. Mark 3:33

    The question hangs for a moment before verse 34 answers it with a look and a gesture. Mary is never named in Mark except once, by the people of Nazareth in 6:3, “the carpenter, the son of Mary”. Here she is simply “thy mother”, standing outside.

  4. Mark 3:34

    “Looked round about” is periblepsamenos, Mark’s word for Jesus’ slow searching look, used in 3:5 in anger, and again in 5:32, 9:8, 10:23 and 11:11. The other Gospels almost never use it. The same look that swept the synagogue in anger now sweeps the circle of listeners.

  5. Mark 3:35

    “The will of God” appears only here in Mark. The nearest echo comes in Gethsemane, where Jesus himself prays, “not what I will, but what thou wilt” (14:36). The saying defines family by the same obedience he will be asked to give.

Mark 3:31-35

King James Version

31There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him.

32And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee.

33And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?

34And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

35For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.

Questions to keep in mind while reading

  1. Watch what Jesus says and does, and how people respond.
  2. Trace kingdom, discipleship, opposition, cross, and resurrection in the evangelist’s own sequence.
  3. Let later doctrine clarify the scene without erasing its immediate setting.

Text first

Where readers differ

The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.

The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.

Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.

Questions beneath the surface

  1. What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Mark 3?
  2. Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
  3. What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
  4. Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?

Questions for serious personal contemplation

These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.

Observe without rushing

  1. What part of Mark 3 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?

  2. Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?

  3. Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Crowds pressing toward Jesus, the twelve appointed, and Jesus redefining family around doing God’s will?

  4. What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?

Examine your inner life honestly

  1. Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?

  2. What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?

  3. Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?

  4. If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?

Respond with wisdom and courage

  1. What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?

  2. How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?

  3. What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?

  4. What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?

Music and video connected to the passage

Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.

Report an error on this page

Source: eBible.org · eng-kjv2006