The big picture
The first and last saying becomes a vineyard in which the earliest workers receive exactly the wage they agreed to, yet resent the owner because late arrivals receive the same amount. The offence is not broken contract but generosity shown to someone else. From there, Jesus gives the twelve his clearest description yet of what awaits in Jerusalem: condemnation, delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, scourging, crucifixion, and resurrection. The next request makes the contrast almost painful. The mother of Zebedee’s sons asks for places of honour, the ten become indignant, and Jesus redefines greatness through service rather than dominion. His own life, given as a ransom for many, becomes the measure. The chapter ends with two blind men by the road asking not for thrones but for sight. The crowd tries to silence them, Jesus stops, compassion is named, their eyes are opened, and they follow him toward the city whose suffering he has just described.
In this chapter
- The Wage Is Fair; the Generosity Is Offensive Matthew 20:1-16
The earliest workers have a contract, and the owner keeps it.
- The Road Receives Its Clearest Description Yet Matthew 20:17-19
As Jerusalem draws nearer, Jesus’ prediction becomes more detailed, not less.
- The Seats Are Requested; the Cup Is Offered Matthew 20:20-28
The mother of Zebedee’s sons makes the request, but Jesus answers the sons, so responsibility for the ambition cannot be assigned to the parent alone.
- The Request That Does Not Ask for a Throne Matthew 20:29-34
Two blind men by the road hear that Jesus is passing and call him “Lord” and “Son of David.” Their lack of sight has not prevented recognition, while the seeing crowd attempts to silence them.

Scripture beside the summary
Matthew · King James Version · 34Matthew 20:1-16
The Wage Is Fair; the Generosity Is Offensive
The earliest workers have a contract, and the owner keeps it. Their complaint begins only after they see people who worked one hour receive the same penny. The Book of Matthew makes comparison, not underpayment, the source of the anger. Because the last workers are paid first, the men who carried the burden and heat of the day have time to form an expectation that was never part of their agreement. The latecomers, meanwhile, explain that no one hired them; the parable does not call them lazy or say they deliberately avoided earlier work. The owner’s repeated trips keep the initiative with him. His answer to the first workers is devastatingly simple: “I do thee no wrong.” Then he asks whether his generosity has become offensive merely because it reaches someone else. The “evil eye” is exposed when another person’s unexpected benefit is experienced as personal injury. This is not a general wage code for every workplace. It is a kingdom comparison in which justice to the first and generosity to the last can coexist, though the first workers would prefer generosity to stop before it makes others equal.

Deep dive
The first workers agree to a penny for the day. When they later complain, the householder has not paid less than the contract or secretly changed its terms. Their grievance is comparison: people who worked far less have been made equal in payment. The order of distribution lets the first arrivals see the latecomers’ wages and form an expectation that the agreement itself never promised.
The final workers explain that no one has hired them. The parable does not label them lazy or say that they deliberately avoided the earlier opportunities. Their lack of work is not enough to establish a motive. The owner’s repeated trips into the marketplace keep the initiative with him.
His concluding contrast between their evil eye and his goodness identifies the centre of the dispute. Generosity to another has become an injury in the first workers’ accounting. The parable answers the first-and-last saying without supplying a general system for setting every human wage. Within its own terms, the promised payment is honoured, the unexpected gift is real, and resentment arises because the gift is given beyond the circle of those who believe they have earned priority.
Words to trace: hour, last, vineyard, first, penny, received
Verse-by-verse path
- Matthew 20:1
Only Matthew has this parable. A “householder”, oikodespotes, is the master of an estate, the same figure who plants the vineyard in 21:33. Isaiah had already made the vineyard Israel (Isaiah 5:7). “Early in the morning” is dawn, the start of a working day that ran from sunrise to dark, and harvest needed extra hands fast.
- Matthew 20:2
The penny is a denarius, the standard day wage for a labourer. In Tobit 5:14 a hired companion is offered a drachma a day, the Greek equivalent. “Agreed” is symphoneo, the verb used of two who agree in prayer in 18:19: a bargain struck in the open.
- Matthew 20:3
Hours were counted from sunrise, so the third hour is about nine in the morning. “Idle” is argos, literally without work; it means unemployed, not lazy. The marketplace is where day labourers stood to be hired, as they still do in some towns.
- Matthew 20:4
No figure is named for this group, only “whatsoever is right”, dikaion, what is just. They go on the strength of his word. The adjective belongs to the same family as Joseph, “a just man” (1:19), and the righteousness the Sermon on the Mount demanded.
- Matthew 20:5
Noon and three in the afternoon. The text gives no reason why he keeps returning; it may be inferred that the harvest had to be brought in before it spoiled, but the parable does not say so. It simply records a man who goes out again and again.
- Matthew 20:6
The eleventh hour is about five in the afternoon, one hour before dark, and it gave English the phrase “at the eleventh hour”. The owner’s question is blunt, though not an accusation: why stand here all day with no work?
- Matthew 20:7
In the oldest manuscripts this last group is sent with no promise at all: “Go ye also into the vineyard.” The King James text adds a clause repeating verse 4. Either way they work the final hour with no agreed wage.
- Matthew 20:8
The law required a hired man to be paid the same day, before sunset, “for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it” (Deuteronomy 24:15; Leviticus 19:13). The owner keeps that law exactly. The “steward”, epitropos, is an estate manager, the title Luke gives to Chuza, Herod’s steward (Luke 8:3).
- Matthew 20:9
A full denarius for one hour is roughly twelve times the hourly rate. An inference, but a fair one: a twelfth of a denarius would not have fed a family that night, and a day wage was a day’s bread. The owner pays for the need, not the hours.
- Matthew 20:10
“Supposed” is nomizo, to reckon or assume, the verb in “Think not that I am come to destroy the law” (5:17). The Greek ends heavily: they received the denarius, each of them, they too. Nobody has lied to them; the assumption was their own.
- Matthew 20:11
“Murmured” is gongyzo, a sound word like the English “grumble”, the verb of Israel murmuring against Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 16:7–8 in the Greek Old Testament). “Goodman of the house” was 1611 English for head of a household, not a compliment; the owner will call himself “good” in verse 15.
- Matthew 20:12
“Heat” is kauson, the scorching east wind off the desert, the word the Greek Old Testament uses for the “vehement east wind” that beat on Jonah (Jonah 4:8). “Made them equal” is the real charge. They do not say the owner underpaid them, only that he levelled them.
- Matthew 20:13
“Friend” is hetairos, comrade. Matthew uses it three times as a form of address, always from a superior to someone in the wrong: here, to the guest without a wedding garment (22:12), and from Jesus to Judas in the garden (26:50). He answers one man, not the group.
- Matthew 20:14
“Take that thine is” may imply the man had refused to pick up his coin; the verb is to take up or pick up. “Go thy way” is hypage, a dismissal. “This last” is singular, one man pointed out, and “I will” introduces the owner’s will, the hinge of the next verse.
- Matthew 20:15
An “evil eye” in Hebrew idiom is a grudging, envious eye. Deuteronomy 15:9 warns against the eye turning evil toward a poor brother as the year of release draws near, when debts must be cancelled. Jesus used the phrase in 6:23. Here the evil eye meets the owner’s goodness, agathos.
- Matthew 20:16
The final clause, “many be called, but few chosen”, is absent from the oldest manuscripts here and stands securely at 22:14, closing the wedding feast parable. The King James text carries it in both places. The first half turns 19:30 around, closing the frame.
Matthew 20:1-16
King James Version1For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard.
2And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard.
3And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace,
4And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way.
5Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise.
6And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle?
7They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.
8So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first.
9And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny.
10But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny.
11And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house,
12Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day.
13But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny?
14Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee.
15Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?
16So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.
Matthew 20:17-19
The Road Receives Its Clearest Description Yet
As Jerusalem draws nearer, Jesus’ prediction becomes more detailed, not less. The twelve are taken apart on the road and told that the Son of man will be delivered to chief priests and scribes, condemned to death, handed to Gentiles, mocked, scourged, crucified, and raised on the third day. The Book of Matthew maps the coming passion through several sets of human hands. No single group performs every act, and knowing the sequence beforehand does not erase the responsibility of the people who will make decisions within it. Resurrection remains the final clause, but it is not postponed to a separate conversation where the suffering can be forgotten. The rising belongs in the same sentence as humiliation and death. What gives the section even more force is what comes immediately after it. Jesus has just described the road in detail, yet the next request concerns seats of honour beside him. The Book of Matthew does not add a scolding editorial comment about the contrast. The placement is enough. The disciples have heard the route and are still imagining the throne mainly in terms of proximity to rank.
Deep dive
The prediction becomes more specific as the journey approaches its destination. Earlier announcements named suffering and death; this one names condemnation, delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, scourging, and crucifixion. The sequence anticipates the passion’s actual movement through different hands. No single group performs every action, and Jesus’ knowledge of the course does not erase the distinct decisions made along it.
Rising on the third day remains the final clause. Matthew does not place resurrection in a separate discussion reserved for a more hopeful moment; it belongs within the same announcement as the humiliation. The twelve receive this explanation privately, emphasizing what they have been given to understand.
The next request makes the placement painfully effective. Jesus has described what awaits him, and the following conversation turns to who will sit beside him in the kingdom. Matthew does not need to comment that the disciples have missed the weight of the road ahead. The juxtaposition lets their concern expose itself.
Words to trace: Jerusalem, apart, betrayed, chief, condemn, crucify
Verse-by-verse path
- Matthew 20:17
Jericho lies about 250 metres below sea level and Jerusalem about 750 above, so the road climbs about a kilometre in some twenty five kilometres. “Going up to Jerusalem” was the pilgrims’ phrase, and on this road it was literal.
- Matthew 20:18
“We go up” includes the twelve in the journey. “Condemn” is katakrino, the verb used when Judas “saw that he was condemned” (27:3). This third prediction is the first to state that the religious court itself will pass the death sentence.
- Matthew 20:19
Mark and Luke say the Gentiles will kill him (Mark 10:34; Luke 18:33). Matthew alone names crucifixion in advance, and crucifixion was a Roman punishment, which is why “the Gentiles” must do it. Matthew keeps “the third day”; Mark’s wording is “after three days”.
Matthew 20:17-19
King James Version17And Jesus going up to Jerusalem took the twelve disciples apart in the way, and said unto them,
18Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death,
19And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again.
Matthew 20:20-28
The Seats Are Requested; the Cup Is Offered
The mother of Zebedee’s sons makes the request, but Jesus answers the sons, so responsibility for the ambition cannot be assigned to the parent alone. They want the right and left seats in the kingdom. Jesus offers a cup and a baptism of suffering before he speaks of seats, and they answer with striking confidence: “We are able.” The Book of Matthew has just described mockery, scourging, and crucifixion, which gives their answer a weight they may not yet understand. The other ten become indignant, revealing not a peaceful group embarrassed by two unusually ambitious men but a community still vulnerable to rivalry. Jesus gathers all of them and changes the definition of greatness. Gentile rulers exercise dominion; among his disciples, the great one serves and the chief becomes a servant. Rank is not simply redistributed among the same competitors. Its meaning is inverted. Jesus grounds the instruction in himself: the Son of man came to minister and to give his life “a ransom for many.” The road to greatness therefore runs through costly service, not upward through control.

Deep dive
The mother of Zebedee’s sons presents the request, but Jesus answers the sons directly. Their participation cannot be shifted entirely onto an ambitious parent. When he speaks of the cup and baptism of suffering in the KJV, they answer that they are able. Their confidence echoes Peter’s readiness elsewhere, while the passion prediction just given shows the scale of what they are agreeing to share.
The indignation of the ten does not prove that the remaining disciples have already mastered humility. It reveals a divided group, and Jesus addresses them together. The contrast with rulers who exercise dominion introduces a different account of greatness within their company: the great one serves, and the first becomes a servant. Rank is not merely redistributed among the same competitors; the meaning of rank is altered.
Jesus then grounds the instruction in his own mission. His life is given as a ransom for many, connecting service to the coming death rather than to helpfulness alone. The text names the cost and those benefited without identifying a party to whom a literal ransom payment is handed. The Son of man’s path supplies the measure for the disciples’ place beside him.
Words to trace: baptized, drink, able, baptism, exercise, hand
Verse-by-verse path
- Matthew 20:20
Comparing 27:56 with Mark 15:40 suggests her name was Salome, and she will be one of the women watching at the cross. In Mark 10:35 the sons make the request themselves; Matthew puts it in their mother’s mouth. “Worshipping” is again proskyneo, a petitioner’s prostration.
- Matthew 20:21
“What wilt thou?” is the question he will put to the blind men in verse 32. The right and left of a king were the seats of highest honour; Bathsheba sat at Solomon’s right hand (1 Kings 2:19). The next time Matthew places two men at Jesus’ right and left, they are thieves on crosses (27:38).
- Matthew 20:22
“Ye know not” is plural: he answers the sons. The cup was the prophets’ image for the wrath God gives the nations to drink (Isaiah 51:17; Jeremiah 25:15), and in Gethsemane Jesus will pray “let this cup pass from me” (26:39). The baptism clause is absent from the best manuscripts of Matthew and comes from Mark 10:38.
- Matthew 20:23
The prediction came true for James first: Herod Agrippa killed him with the sword around AD 44 (Acts 12:2), the first of the twelve to die for Jesus. “Prepared of my Father” anticipates the kingdom “prepared for you from the foundation of the world” (25:34).
- Matthew 20:24
“Moved with indignation” is aganakteo, the verb used of the chief priests at the children’s hosannas (21:15) and of the disciples at the waste of ointment in Bethany (26:8). The ten are angry at the two for asking first, which is the same ambition from the other side.
- Matthew 20:25
“Princes” are archontes, rulers. “Exercise dominion” is katakyrieuo, to lord it down over; the prefix makes the rule heavy. First Peter 5:3 uses the same verb when it tells elders not to act “as being lords over God’s heritage”.
- Matthew 20:26
The best manuscripts read a present tense: “it is not so among you”, a statement of what the community is, not only a command. “Minister” is diakonos, the servant who waits at table, the word that later became the title deacon.
- Matthew 20:27
“Servant” is doulos, slave, a step lower than diakonos in verse 26. The two lines climb and descend together: great becomes table servant, first becomes slave. “Chief” is protos, first, the word of 20:16, so the parable’s last and first reappear as a rule for the twelve.
- Matthew 20:28
“Ransom” is lytron, the price paid to free a captive or slave, or to redeem a forfeited life (Exodus 21:30). “For many” is anti pollon, in place of many, which echoes Isaiah 53:11–12, where the servant justifies many and bears “the sin of many”. This is the only ransom saying in Matthew.
Matthew 20:20-28
King James Version20Then came to him the mother of Zebedee’s children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.
21And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.
22But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.
23And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.
24And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren.
25But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
26But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
27And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
28Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.
Matthew 20:29-34
The Request That Does Not Ask for a Throne
Two blind men by the road hear that Jesus is passing and call him “Lord” and “Son of David.” Their lack of sight has not prevented recognition, while the seeing crowd attempts to silence them. The Book of Matthew has shown this pattern before: people near Jesus can become barriers to those trying to reach him. The men refuse the rebuke and cry louder. Jesus stops and asks what they want, a question that deliberately echoes the earlier request for seats in the kingdom. Their answer is simpler: “that our eyes may be opened.” No throne, no position over anyone else, just sight. The Book of Matthew explicitly names compassion before Jesus touches them, and the result is immediate. Their eyes open and they follow him. That final movement matters. Restored vision does not send them away to build a separate status from what they received. It puts them on the road behind Jesus, the very road toward Jerusalem whose cost he has just explained. The chapter ends with two people who can finally see occupying the place disciples have repeatedly been told to take: following behind.
Deep dive
Matthew records two men beside the road. Their repeated address names Jesus as Lord and Son of David, so lack of physical sight has not prevented a significant recognition. The multitude’s rebuke attempts to silence them, but they cry out more. As with the children earlier, people near Jesus can become obstacles to the approach of those seeking him.
Jesus stops and asks what they desire. The question resembles his invitation to the mother of Zebedee’s sons to state her request, but the answer is different. They ask for opened eyes, not places above other disciples. That juxtaposition gives the healing more than an incidental place at the end of the chapter.
Matthew expressly names compassion before Jesus touches their eyes. The recovery is immediate, and their response is to follow him. The final movement is therefore onto the road Jesus is already travelling toward Jerusalem. Their restored sight does not lead to a separate display of status. It enables them to join the following that the argument about greatness has just redefined.
Words to trace: eyes, Jesus, Lord, cried, David, followed
Verse-by-verse path
- Matthew 20:29
Mark also sets the healing as Jesus leaves Jericho; Luke sets it as he approaches (Luke 18:35). The Jericho of Jesus’ day stood about two kilometres from the ruins of the Old Testament city, and some have resolved the difference by placing the men between the two. From here the road climbs to Jerusalem.
- Matthew 20:30
Mark names one blind man, Bartimaeus (Mark 10:46). Matthew often has two where Mark has one: two demoniacs at Gadara (8:28), and two blind men earlier in 9:27, who used the same cry. “Son of David” in Matthew comes repeatedly from the blind, the sick and the outsider.
- Matthew 20:31
“Hold their peace” is siopao, the verb used when Jesus “held his peace” before the high priest (26:63). The crowd demands silence of the blind men that Jesus will later keep for himself. “Cried the more” is louder, not longer: the verb is the same, the volume greater.
- Matthew 20:32
In 9:28 Jesus asked two blind men, “Believe ye that I am able to do this?” Here he asks what they want, though their blindness is obvious. A crowd of pilgrims is moving up the road, and he stops it for two men sitting at the edge.
- Matthew 20:33
“That our eyes may be opened” is the language of Isaiah 35:5, “Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened”, and of the servant sent “to open the blind eyes” (Isaiah 42:7). Jesus pointed John’s messengers to exactly this sign in 11:5.
- Matthew 20:34
Matthew alone has the touch; in Mark and Luke the healing comes by a word. It is the last of four times Matthew says Jesus “had compassion”. Their following is literal and immediate: the next verse is the approach to Bethphage and the Mount of Olives.
Matthew 20:29-34
King James Version29And as they departed from Jericho, a great multitude followed him.
30And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.
31And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace: but they cried the more, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.
32And Jesus stood still, and called them, and said, What will ye that I shall do unto you?
33They say unto him, Lord, that our eyes may be opened.
34So Jesus had compassion on them, and touched their eyes: and immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed him.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Watch what Jesus says and does, and how people respond.
- Trace kingdom, discipleship, opposition, cross, and resurrection in the evangelist’s own sequence.
- Let later doctrine clarify the scene without erasing its immediate setting.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Matthew 20?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Matthew 20 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: Matthew 20 develops its own movement around Jesus, hour, last, received, vineyard?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.
The Eleventh HourMatthew 20:1-16Listen to related music →
He Is RisenMatthew 28:1-10; Mark 16:1-11; Luke 24:1-12; John 20:1-18Listen to related music →
A House of PrayerMatthew 21:12-23:39; Mark 11:12-12:44; Luke 19:45-21:4Listen to related music →
Matthew, Part TwoMatthew 14:1-28:20Listen to related music →

