The big picture
Further records of Judah place ordinary households, women, craftsmen, and settlements beside the brief but memorable prayer of Jabez. His two verses interrupt the register with sorrow, petition, and an answer, yet the chapter does not turn that prayer into a general formula for material prosperity. Work soon returns to the foreground through craftsmen, linen workers, potters, and royal service. Then the focus shifts to Simeon, where one unusually large household is carefully distinguished from the tribe's more modest growth. Geography closes the chapter with pressure for pasture and territorial expansion. The land found by the expanding families is called wide, quiet, and peaceable before violence changes the situation. 1 Chronicles records successful settlement while keeping the destruction and displacement that made that settlement possible plainly visible.
In this chapter
- The Families Outside the Spotlight 1 Chronicles 4:1-8
After the royal line, 1 Chronicles returns to Judah's wider households and places.
- Jabez Interrupts the Register 1 Chronicles 4:9-10
Jabez interrupts the genealogy because the record suddenly gives one man a voice.
- Judah Had Workshops as Well as Ancestors 1 Chronicles 4:11-23
Judah's genealogy now sounds like a workshop directory.
- A Large Household Is Not a Large Tribe 1 Chronicles 4:24-33
Simeon's register includes the arresting detail that Shimei had sixteen sons and six daughters, but the next sentence prevents that household from being mistaken for the condition of the whole tribe.
- Pasture Acquired at a Human Cost 1 Chronicles 4:34-43
The final Simeonite movement begins with a practical pressure: families have increased, and their flocks require pasture.

Scripture beside the summary
1 Chronicles · King James Version · 431 Chronicles 4:1-8
The Families Outside the Spotlight
After the royal line, 1 Chronicles returns to Judah's wider households and places. Zorathites, Bethlehem, Tekoa, and other local connections show that ancestry is also a geography of settlement. The change of focus should not be read as a descent from important people to insignificant ones. These families are part of how Judah actually occupied and remembered its land. Hazelelponi is named as a sister, while Helah and Naarah distinguish branches of Ashur's household. Almost nothing else is said about them, and that brevity establishes a useful boundary. A preserved name does not authorize an invented personality, private tragedy, or symbolic role. The women belong to the register because they belong to the family, not because later readers can confidently reconstruct a hidden biography. The passage respects memory by being specific where it has information and quiet where it does not.
Deep dive
After David's royal descendants, the book returns to the wider texture of Judah. This is not a descent from important people to unimportant ones. The focus changes from succession to the households through which a tribe occupied and recognized its places. Bethlehem, Tekoa, and other names connect ancestry with lived geography.
Hazelelponi is preserved as a sister, and the wives of Ashur distinguish branches of his family. The brevity can be frustrating because almost no personal detail follows. Yet that is also a boundary the writing maintains. A name is not permission to supply a personality, an unrecorded hardship, or a symbolic role. These women belong to the record as named relations, not as blank spaces waiting for an imagined biography.
Words to trace: father, sons, begat, Naarah, families, Helah
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Chronicles 4:1
These five are not brothers. Pharez is Judah’s son, Hezron his grandson, Hur a descendant of Hezron through Caleb (2:19), and Shobal is Hur’s son (2:50). “Sons” here means a line read downward. Carmi is a puzzle, since he belongs to Zerah’s branch in 2:7, and many take the name as a slip for Chelubai, Caleb.
- 1 Chronicles 4:2
Reaiah is probably the Haroeh of 2:52, a son of Shobal with the name spelled differently. The Zorathites take their name from Zorah, the town in the lowland where Manoah lived and Samson was born (Judges 13:2). The line runs to Ahumai and Lahad and stops, as though that was as far as the record went.
- 1 Chronicles 4:3
The Hebrew reads awkwardly, “these were the father of Etam”, and the Greek has “these are the sons of Etam”, which suggests a word dropped out. Etam lay near Bethlehem and was one of the towns Rehoboam fortified (2 Chronicles 11:6). Jezreel is a man here, sharing his name with the famous valley and city in the north.
- 1 Chronicles 4:4
“Father of” a town means its founder or chief, so Hur stands at the head of Bethlehem itself. Ephratah is Caleb’s wife (2:19) and also an old name for Bethlehem (Micah 5:2), and the two meanings lie on top of each other. Hushah is the home of Sibbechai the Hushathite, one of David’s champions (11:29).
- 1 Chronicles 4:5
Ashur was introduced in 2:24 as a son born to Hezron’s widow Abiah after his father’s death. Tekoa, the town he heads, sent the wise woman to David (2 Samuel 14:2) and was the home of the herdsman Amos (Amos 1:1). Its founder is the first man in this chapter said to have two wives.
- 1 Chronicles 4:6
Verse 5 named Helah first, but Naarah’s sons come first, and the order of the wives is reversed as their children are listed. Naarah is simply the Hebrew word for a girl or young woman. Haahashtari carries the definite article, “the Ahashtarite”, which makes it look like the name of a clan rather than a single son.
- 1 Chronicles 4:7
Helah’s three sons close the account of Ashur’s house. Ethnan is spelled like the Hebrew word ethnan, a fee or payment, the word used for a harlot’s hire in Deuteronomy 23:18, though nothing suggests the name was meant that way. Zereth and Jezoar appear nowhere else in Scripture.
- 1 Chronicles 4:8
Coz arrives with no father, and nothing in the text says how he joins Ashur’s family or anyone else’s. The phrase “the families of Aharhel” shifts from single sons to whole clans in mid-sentence. Anub and Zobebah are otherwise unknown, preserved here only as a link in someone’s claim to belong.
1 Chronicles 4:1-8
King James Version1The sons of Judah; Pharez, Hezron, and Carmi, and Hur, and Shobal.
2And Reaiah the son of Shobal begat Jahath; and Jahath begat Ahumai, and Lahad. These are the families of the Zorathites.
3And these were of the father of Etam; Jezreel, and Ishma, and Idbash: and the name of their sister was Hazelelponi:
4And Penuel the father of Gedor, and Ezer the father of Hushah. These are the sons of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah, the father of Beth-lehem.
5And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives, Helah and Naarah.
6And Naarah bare him Ahuzam, and Hepher, and Temeni, and Haahashtari. These were the sons of Naarah.
7And the sons of Helah were, Zereth, and Jezoar, and Ethnan.
8And Coz begat Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel the son of Harum.
1 Chronicles 4:9-10
Jabez Interrupts the Register
Jabez interrupts the genealogy because the record suddenly gives one man a voice. His mother associates his name with sorrow, the passage calls him more honorable than his brothers, and he asks the God of Israel for blessing, enlarged territory, divine presence, and protection from evil so that grief will not master his life. The language of sorrow in his naming and grief in his prayer makes the two verses tightly connected. His request for an enlarged “coast” concerns boundary or territory, not a literal seaside. Then the account says only that God granted what he requested. It supplies no acreage, income, timetable, or account of the answer's mechanics. That restraint prevents the prayer from becoming a stated guarantee of identical material results for anyone who repeats its words. Its force lies in the moment itself: amid inherited names, one man petitions, and the register records that he is heard.
Deep dive
Jabez enters without the parentage that normally secures a person's place in these lists. Instead, the passage names his honor among his brothers, his mother's pain, and his appeal to the God of Israel. The explanation of his name makes sorrow part of his introduction. His request to be kept from evil so that it may not grieve him answers that introduction with carefully matched language.
The request to enlarge his "coast" concerns territory or boundary, not a seaside view. Beyond that, the book supplies no acreage, financial result, or account of how the answer unfolded. It says that God granted the request, then returns to the register. This is one man's answered prayer, not a stated formula guaranteeing the same material outcome whenever its wording is repeated. Its force lies in the interruption: amid inherited names, one man speaks, and his petition is heard.
Words to trace: Jabez, wouldest, bare, bless, brethren, coast
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Chronicles 4:9
The name Jabez, Ya’bets, is the Hebrew word for pain, otseb, with two of its letters swapped, so it sounds like sorrow almost spelled backward. “More honourable” is nikbad, from the root for weight, heavy with standing. A town called Jabez, home to families of scribes, appears in 2:55, though the text never connects it to this man.
- 1 Chronicles 4:10
“Oh that” renders the Hebrew im, “if”, and the sentence never finishes: “If thou wilt bless me…”, with the promise that should follow left unsaid, like a vow broken off. “Bless me indeed” doubles the verb, as in Genesis 22:17, “in blessing I will bless thee”. He calls on the God of Israel, the patriarch’s own name.
1 Chronicles 4:9-10
King James Version9And Jabez was more honourable than his brethren: and his mother called his name Jabez, saying, Because I bare him with sorrow.
10And Jabez called on the God of Israel, saying, Oh that thou wouldest bless me indeed, and enlarge my coast, and that thine hand might be with me, and that thou wouldest keep me from evil, that it may not grieve me! And God granted him that which he requested.
1 Chronicles 4:11-23
Judah Had Workshops as Well as Ancestors
Judah's genealogy now sounds like a workshop directory. The valley of craftsmen is explained by the people who practiced their trades there, and later entries identify fine linen workers, potters, and people connected with the king's work. Occupation is not a decorative side note. Skilled labor helps define why families belong to particular places and how those households contributed to communal life. Bithiah, identified as a daughter of Pharaoh and wife of Mered, adds another unexpected connection. The passage gives no basis for identifying her with the princess who rescued Moses, and it does not need that extra biography to make her presence striking. An Egyptian royal woman can stand inside Judah's family material beside local craftsmen and laboring households. The tribe is not presented as a uniform collection of kings and soldiers. Its remembered identity includes foreign connections, technical skill, inherited trades, and the ordinary work required to sustain settled life.


Deep dive
The valley of craftsmen receives an explanation through the people who practiced their craft there. Later, linen workers and potters appear with their locations and royal service. The register is preserving more than biological descent. It records skilled labor as part of a community's identity, with trades helping explain why particular families belonged to particular places.
Bithiah, identified as Pharaoh's daughter, is named as a wife of Mered. The text does not identify her with the princess who rescued Moses; the shared connection with Pharaoh's household does not establish that they are the same woman. Her presence is already significant without an added biography. An Egyptian royal woman stands inside the Judah material, just as ordinary workers stand alongside prominent ancestral names. The chapter's Judah is not made exclusively of kings, soldiers, or people with uncomplicated local origins.
Words to trace: sons, father, begat, bare, dwelt, Elah
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Chronicles 4:11
Chelub is a variant of the name Caleb, but his brother Shuah ties him to a different family from the Caleb of chapter 2. His son’s name, Mehir, is the ordinary Hebrew word for a price or payment. Eshton, the grandson, is the only one of the three who carries the line further.
- 1 Chronicles 4:12
Beth-rapha, “house of Rapha”, is a household name standing where a person’s name should be, which suggests the list is naming clans. Ir-nahash means city of the serpent, or of copper, since nahash and nechoshet share their letters, and copper-working in the Arabah has been suggested for it. The Greek reads Rechab for the unknown Rechah.
- 1 Chronicles 4:13
Othniel is the first judge, who delivered Israel from Cushan-rishathaim (Judges 3:9–11). Judges 1:13 calls him the son of Kenaz, Caleb’s younger brother, and he won Caleb’s daughter Achsah by taking Kirjath-sepher. His son’s name, Hathath, means terror. The Greek adds Meonothai at the end of the verse, which the next verse needs.
- 1 Chronicles 4:14
This Joab is not David’s general. Charashim is the plural of the word for a craftsman in wood, stone or metal, and Nehemiah 11:35 lists a “valley of craftsmen” beside Lod and Ono, resettled after the exile. Ophrah here is a person, sharing a name with Gideon’s town in Manasseh.
- 1 Chronicles 4:15
Caleb son of Jephunneh is the spy who stood with Joshua against the ten (Numbers 14:6–9), a different man from Caleb son of Hezron in chapter 2. Numbers 32:12 calls him a Kenizzite, so a grandson named Kenaz keeps the clan name alive. The Hebrew’s “and Kenaz” dangles, as though a name before it has dropped out.
- 1 Chronicles 4:16
Jehaleleel arrives unattached. Ziph is the town in the wilderness of Judah where David hid, and whose people twice told Saul where he was (1 Samuel 23:19 and 26:1). Ziph and Ziphah are the same name in masculine and feminine form, the kind of pairing that often marks a town and its daughter settlement.
- 1 Chronicles 4:17
This Ezra is spelled with a final he, a different name from the scribe Ezra. The sentence “and she bare Miriam” has no woman to refer to, and most commentators think the end of verse 18 belongs here, making Bithiah the mother. Eshtemoa is one of the towns David sent spoil to from Ziklag (1 Samuel 30:28).
- 1 Chronicles 4:18
Jehudijah carries the article in Hebrew, “the Judahite woman”, and set beside Bithiah it may mean Mered’s Jewish wife as against his Egyptian one. Bithiah means daughter of Yah, a striking name for Pharaoh’s daughter. Socho is where the Philistines camped before Goliath came out (1 Samuel 17:1), and Zanoah was resettled after the exile (Nehemiah 11:30).
- 1 Chronicles 4:19
The Hebrew is tangled, and even Hodiah’s sex is uncertain in the versions. Keilah is the lowland town David rescued from the Philistines, whose people would have handed him over to Saul (1 Samuel 23:1–12). The Maachathite ties Eshtemoa to Maacah, a small Aramean kingdom whose name also marks clans that married into Israel.
- 1 Chronicles 4:20
Shimon is not Simeon, whose tribe begins at verse 24. Amnon shares his name with David’s firstborn, and Ben-hanan means son of the gracious one. Ishi’s two sons are Zoheth and Ben-zoheth, “son of Zoheth”, which reads less like a second brother than like a grandson folded into the same line.
- 1 Chronicles 4:21
Shelah is the third son of Judah, the one withheld from Tamar (Genesis 38:11 and 14). His firstborn is named Er after the brother the LORD slew, so the dead son’s name comes back. The fine linen is buts, byssus, the fabric of the temple veil in 2 Chronicles 3:14, worked by a house that sounds like a guild.
- 1 Chronicles 4:22
“Had the dominion in Moab” uses the verb ba’al, which can also mean to marry, and the Talmud (Bava Batra 91b) read Joash and Saraph as Mahlon and Chilion, who took Moabite wives. The Latin turned Jashubi-lehem into “who returned to Bethlehem”. “These are ancient things” is an open admission that the book is copying old records.
- 1 Chronicles 4:23
“Among plants and hedges” translates two place names, Netaim and Gederah, meaning plantations and walls or folds. Potters working “with the king for his work” calls to mind the thousands of jar handles stamped lmlk, “belonging to the king”, dug up across Judah from Hezekiah’s time, though linking these potters to those jars is an inference.
1 Chronicles 4:11-23
King James Version11And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which was the father of Eshton.
12And Eshton begat Beth-rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of Ir-nahash. These are the men of Rechah.
13And the sons of Kenaz; Othniel, and Seraiah: and the sons of Othniel; Hathath.
14And Meonothai begat Ophrah: and Seraiah begat Joab, the father of the valley of Charashim; for they were craftsmen.
15And the sons of Caleb the son of Jephunneh; Iru, Elah, and Naam: and the sons of Elah, even Kenaz.
16And the sons of Jehaleleel; Ziph, and Ziphah, Tiria, and Asareel.
17And the sons of Ezra were, Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon: and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
18And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father of Socho, and Jekuthiel the father of Zanoah. And these are the sons of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh, which Mered took.
19And the sons of his wife Hodiah the sister of Naham, the father of Keilah the Garmite, and Eshtemoa the Maachathite.
20And the sons of Shimon were, Amnon, and Rinnah, Ben-hanan, and Tilon. And the sons of Ishi were, Zoheth, and Ben-zoheth.
21The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea,
22And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubi-lehem. And these are ancient things.
23These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges: there they dwelt with the king for his work.
1 Chronicles 4:24-33
A Large Household Is Not a Large Tribe
Simeon's register includes the arresting detail that Shimei had sixteen sons and six daughters, but the next sentence prevents that household from being mistaken for the condition of the whole tribe. His brothers did not have many children, and Simeon's families did not multiply like Judah. One large house is not a tribal population report. The passage then locates these families in Beer-sheba and a network of other cities and villages, with the reign of David supplying a historical frame for the settlement record. Simeon's identity is therefore preserved through both descent and place even where its territory is closely connected with Judah's southern region. The tribe does not need its own famous king or a massive population figure to receive careful remembrance. The chapter treats a smaller inheritance as worth locating, naming, and distinguishing from the larger tribal growth around it.

Deep dive
Shimei's sixteen sons and six daughters make an imposing household, but the next qualification keeps that household from becoming a misleading statistic for the whole tribe. His brothers did not have many children, and Simeon's wider families did not increase like Judah's. One exceptionally full house is not a tribal population report.
The towns and villages then give those families a geographical setting. The reference to David's reign places part of this settlement memory within a historical frame rather than leaving it timeless. Simeon's identity is preserved through its own names and places even where its life is closely connected with Judah's territory. The chapter does not need a separate kingdom or a famous ruler to treat that smaller tribal inheritance as worth recording.
Words to trace: cities, sons, Beth, children, Hazar, Mishma
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Chronicles 4:24
Simeon’s sons match Numbers 26:12–13 closely, with Jarib standing for Jachin. Genesis 46:10 gives six sons, including Ohad, who never appears again and founded no family. It also calls Shaul “the son of a Canaanitish woman”, a detail this list does not repeat.
- 1 Chronicles 4:25
Mibsam and Mishma are also the names of two of Ishmael’s sons in 1:29–30 and Genesis 25:13–14. Their turning up in Simeon’s line has led scholars to suggest that Simeon, living far south near the desert, absorbed Ishmaelite groups. That is an inference from shared names, not something the text states.
- 1 Chronicles 4:26
The line runs straight down, one son to each generation, to reach Shimei, the man the next verse wants to talk about. Zacchur means remembered. This Shimei shares his name with the Benjamite who cursed David and several others in these books, a common name among many.
- 1 Chronicles 4:27
The shortfall against Judah shows in the two census counts. Simeon numbered 59,300 men of war in Numbers 1:23 and only 22,200 in Numbers 26:14, the steepest fall of any tribe. Moses’ blessing in Deuteronomy 33 leaves Simeon out entirely, and here Simeon is measured against the tribe that swallowed it.
- 1 Chronicles 4:28
The town list follows Joshua 19:2–8, where Simeon’s inheritance is said to lie “within the inheritance of the children of Judah”. Beer-sheba is Abraham’s well of the oath (Genesis 21:31). Moladah and Hazar-shual were both resettled by returning exiles (Nehemiah 11:26–27), so these names were still living places when Chronicles was written.
- 1 Chronicles 4:29
Joshua 19:3–4 spells these Balah and Eltolad, and Chronicles drops the El from the front of Tolad. Bilhah happens to share its name with Rachel’s maid, the mother of Dan and Naphtali, though there is no sign of a link. Ezem was a town in the dry south, the Negev.
- 1 Chronicles 4:30
Hormah means destruction, named after Israel devoted the Canaanite towns there to the ban (Numbers 21:3). Ziklag was given to David by Achish of Gath when he was an outlaw, and 1 Samuel 27:6 adds that it has belonged to the kings of Judah ever since. Bethuel is Joshua’s Bethul.
- 1 Chronicles 4:31
Beth-marcaboth means house of chariots and Hazar-susim enclosure of horses, names that sound like depots for a king’s chariotry; some connect them with Solomon’s chariot cities (1 Kings 9:19), an inference from the names. “Unto the reign of David” implies that after David these towns ceased to be counted as Simeon’s.
- 1 Chronicles 4:32
Joshua 19:7 names four cities, Ain, Remmon, Ether and Ashan. Chronicles counts five, adding Etam and Tochen, and if Ain and Rimmon are one place, the En-rimmon of Nehemiah 11:29, the count shifts again. Ashan was also given to the Levites (6:59), one town claimed by two lists.
- 1 Chronicles 4:33
Baal is shortened from Baalath-beer in Joshua 19:8. “Their genealogy” is hityachsam, the enrolment by descent, a word found almost only in Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah. Settlement and genealogy are named together, as if a family’s towns were part of its pedigree.
1 Chronicles 4:24-33
King James Version24The sons of Simeon were, Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, and Shaul:
25Shallum his son, Mibsam his son, Mishma his son.
26And the sons of Mishma; Hamuel his son, Zacchur his son, Shimei his son.
27And Shimei had sixteen sons and six daughters; but his brethren had not many children, neither did all their family multiply, like to the children of Judah.
28And they dwelt at Beer-sheba, and Moladah, and Hazar-shual,
29And at Bilhah, and at Ezem, and at Tolad,
30And at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,
31And at Beth-marcaboth, and Hazar-susim, and at Beth-birei, and at Shaaraim. These were their cities unto the reign of David.
32And their villages were, Etam, and Ain, Rimmon, and Tochen, and Ashan, five cities:
33And all their villages that were round about the same cities, unto Baal. These were their habitations, and their genealogy.
1 Chronicles 4:34-43
Pasture Acquired at a Human Cost
The final Simeonite movement begins with a practical pressure: families have increased, and their flocks require pasture. The land they discover is described as fat, good, wide, quiet, and peaceable, but those qualities describe the place before the newcomers attack. In Hezekiah's days, the expanding families destroy the people already living there and occupy their dwellings because the land suits their animals. Another group moves into mount Seir, kills a remaining Amalekite population, and settles there. The account records successful expansion and enduring residence, yet it does not hide the human cost behind the language of good pasture. Population, livestock, land, and violence are bound together in the same sentences. The passage does not provide speeches from the displaced inhabitants or a full account of everyone's motives, but neither does it permit an attractive rural description to erase how possession changed hands.

Deep dive
The pressure behind the movement is stated plainly: the families increased and needed room for their flocks. The land they found is described as broad, quiet, and peaceable. Those descriptions belong to the situation before the attackers arrived. They cannot be used to turn the resulting settlement into an uncomplicated pastoral scene.
The expedition in Hezekiah's days destroys the previous inhabitants and takes their place. A further movement into mount Seir kills a remnant of Amalekites and settles there. The book records success and continued residence, but the means remain visible in the same sentences. Pasture, population, and violence are connected. The account does not report the displaced people's feelings or supply speeches explaining every participant's motives; it also does not allow their removal to disappear behind the appealing description of the land.
Words to trace: dwelt, pasture, flocks, smote, sons, Adiel
Verse-by-verse path
- 1 Chronicles 4:34
A roll of thirteen chiefs begins here and runs to verse 37. Jamlech means “he makes king”. This Amaziah is not the king of Judah, and Joshah is known only as his son. Meshobab, first on the list, is given no father at all.
- 1 Chronicles 4:35
Jehu receives three generations of ancestry, back to Asiel, whose name means made by God. He is not the king of Israel who wiped out Ahab’s house. Joel, listed beside him, gets no ancestry, and the pedigrees in this roll are uneven, full for some men and absent for others.
- 1 Chronicles 4:36
Seven names stand in one verse without a single father. Several are built from the divine name or from prayer: Elioenai means “toward Yah are my eyes”, and Jeshohaiah and Asaiah both carry Yah. Jaakobah is a form of Jacob, and Benaiah shares his name with the captain of David’s bodyguard.
- 1 Chronicles 4:37
Ziza, the last of the thirteen, is given the longest pedigree, five generations back to Shemaiah. A man whose ancestry is written out this far is usually one whose descendants had reason to prove it. Shimri means my watchman.
- 1 Chronicles 4:38
“Mentioned by their names” is literally “coming by names”, an idiom repeated in verse 41, “written by name”. “Princes” is nesi’im, the title of the tribal chiefs who brought offerings in Numbers 7. “The house of their fathers” is the extended clan, the unit that was growing too large for its pasture.
- 1 Chronicles 4:39
The Greek reads Gerar for Gedor, which fits Simeon’s south-western country better than any Gedor known in Judah. Gerar is where Abraham and Isaac lived among the Philistines and Isaac’s herdsmen quarrelled over wells (Genesis 26:17–22). The search is for grazing, the ordinary pressure of herders in the dry south.
- 1 Chronicles 4:40
“They of Ham” means peoples descended from Ham, Canaan, Egypt and Cush in Genesis 10:6. 2 Chronicles 14:9–15 has Cushites near Gerar in Asa’s day, with tents of cattle. “Quiet” is the word Judges 18:7 and 27 uses of Laish, a people quiet and secure, just before the Danites fell on it.
- 1 Chronicles 4:41
“Habitations” renders ha-me’unim, which many read as “the Meunim”, a people Uzziah fought (2 Chronicles 26:7). “Destroyed them utterly” is the verb of the ban, charam, used of Jericho and Amalek. “Unto this day” means the source was written while the settlers still held the land, before Assyria and Babylon ended it.
- 1 Chronicles 4:42
Mount Seir is the highland of Edom, south-east of the Dead Sea. The number, five hundred, marks a war band, not a migration of the whole tribe. This Ishi is a Simeonite, not the Judahite of verse 20, and his four sons lead the expedition together.
- 1 Chronicles 4:43
Amalek survived Saul’s campaign in 1 Samuel 15 and David’s raid in 1 Samuel 30:17, when four hundred young men escaped on camels. Exodus 17:16 promised war with Amalek from generation to generation. This is the last Amalekite remnant in the historical books, unless Haman the Agagite in Esther is counted.
1 Chronicles 4:34-43
King James Version34And Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah the son of Amaziah,
35And Joel, and Jehu the son of Josibiah, the son of Seraiah, the son of Asiel,
36And Elioenai, and Jaakobah, and Jeshohaiah, and Asaiah, and Adiel, and Jesimiel, and Benaiah,
37And Ziza the son of Shiphi, the son of Allon, the son of Jedaiah, the son of Shimri, the son of Shemaiah;
38These mentioned by their names were princes in their families: and the house of their fathers increased greatly.
39And they went to the entrance of Gedor, even unto the east side of the valley, to seek pasture for their flocks.
40And they found fat pasture and good, and the land was wide, and quiet, and peaceable; for they of Ham had dwelt there of old.
41And these written by name came in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and smote their tents, and the habitations that were found there, and destroyed them utterly unto this day, and dwelt in their rooms: because there was pasture there for their flocks.
42And some of them, even of the sons of Simeon, five hundred men, went to mount Seir, having for their captains Pelatiah, and Neariah, and Rephaiah, and Uzziel, the sons of Ishi.
43And they smote the rest of the Amalekites that were escaped, and dwelt there unto this day.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
- Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
- Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Comparative interpretive notes for this chapter are in preparation. Until reviewed notes are ready, this page separates the KJV text from summary and application without claiming that serious readers agree on every question.
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from 1 Chronicles 4?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of 1 Chronicles 4 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: 1 Chronicles 4 develops its own movement around sons, father, begat, dwelt, bare?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.




