The big picture
Joseph enters the account at seventeen. Favoritism, troubling reports and dreams intensify his brothers' hatred. A journey to find them becomes betrayal, enslavement and a deception that leaves Jacob mourning a son who is still alive.
In this chapter
- Favor and Dreams Genesis 37:1-11
Jacob gives Joseph a distinctive garment, and the brothers resent the unequal love.
- The Pit and the Sale Genesis 37:12-28
The brothers first plot murder.
- A Garment Used as Evidence Genesis 37:29-36
The brothers dip the garment in goat's blood and ask Jacob to identify it.

Scripture beside the summary
Genesis · King James Version · 36Genesis 37:1-11
Favor and Dreams
Jacob gives Joseph a distinctive garment, and the brothers resent the unequal love. Joseph's dreams depict his family bowing to him. The brothers hate him more, while Jacob rebukes him yet keeps the matter in mind. The dreams announce a future whose route no one understands.

Deep dive
The heading names the generations of Jacob, but the next sentence concentrates on Joseph. That is a useful indication of the chapter's scale: the account follows one son because the whole household's future will pass through his circumstances. At seventeen he is both a younger worker among his brothers and someone who reports their conduct to their father. The report is called evil; Genesis does not supply its contents or say that Joseph invented it. Calling him a malicious informer adds a verdict the passage has not given.
The coat makes Jacob's preference publicly wearable. The Hebrew expression containing passim has an uncertain sense: the familiar KJV gives "many colours," while another longstanding reading understands a long or sleeved garment. The precise tailoring is less certain than its place in the family. The brothers see that their father loves Joseph more. Their inability to speak "peaceably" to him describes a household in which even ordinary conversation has become difficult, before dreams add a future hierarchy to the present one.
Joseph supplies images; his brothers immediately supply the language of government. The standing sheaf becomes reigning and dominion in their response. Their answer shows that the dream has communicated its disturbing point perfectly well. The second dream expands the scene from the field to the heavens, and from brothers alone to the larger household. Hatred, already established, becomes greater hatred and then envy. The account records these reactions without explaining Joseph's motive for telling what he dreamed.
Jacob's response has two parts that resist being flattened into either belief or dismissal. He rebukes Joseph, then "observed the saying." The matter stays with him. His identification of the moon with Joseph's mother is not straightforward, since Rachel's death has already been recorded in Genesis 35. Proposals include another maternal figure or an image that is not intended as an exact future attendance list. Genesis does not identify a substitute mother here. The dream's family-wide submission is clear even where the correspondence of every heavenly body is not.
Words to trace: brethren, father, Joseph, Jacob, land, loved, dream, dreamed, told, hated
Verse-by-verse path
- Genesis 37:1
The verb is yashav, settled, and it gives this part of Genesis its Hebrew name, Vayeshev. Rashi caught the irony at once: Jacob wished to dwell at ease, and the trouble of Joseph sprang upon him. Esau’s line was dispatched in a chapter; Jacob’s will take the rest of the book.
- Genesis 37:2
This is the last of the book’s “generations” headings, and it runs to the end of Genesis. The “evil report” is dibbah, the word later used for the spies’ report of the land (Numbers 13:32), a slanted account more than a false one. Bilhah and Zilpah are called “wives”, not handmaids.
- Genesis 37:3
“Son of his old age” is odd when Benjamin is younger still; Onkelos renders it “a wise son”. The garment is a ketonet passim, a tunic reaching to the palms or ankles. The only other one in the Bible is worn by David’s daughter Tamar, the dress of the king’s daughters (2 Samuel 13:18).
- Genesis 37:4
The Hebrew reads that they could not speak to him “for peace”, leshalom. Rashi found something to their credit even here: they did not say one thing with the mouth and another in the heart. Their hostility was at least open.
- Genesis 37:5
No earlier dream in Genesis came without God in it: Abimelech (20:3), Jacob at Bethel (28:12) and Laban (31:24) all hear him speak. Joseph’s dreams name no speaker at all. The brothers had hated him for the coat; now they hate him “yet the more”, and the phrase will come again in three verses.
- Genesis 37:6
These are Joseph’s first recorded words, and they begin with a plea for a hearing: shim’u-na, hear, I pray you. The Hebrew repeats the root, “the dream which I have dreamed”, a doubling that runs through all of Joseph’s dream speech.
- Genesis 37:7
Shepherds dreaming of harvest is less strange than it sounds: Isaac sowed and reaped a hundredfold in 26:12. The dream is about grain, and grain is what will bring the brothers to Egypt, where they “bowed down themselves before him with their faces to the earth” (42:6).
- Genesis 37:8
Both questions double their verbs in Hebrew: “reigning, will you reign over us? ruling, will you rule?” Two different words for power are used, malak for a king and mashal for dominion. “His words” may be the dreams, or everything he has reported of them, including the evil report of verse 2.
- Genesis 37:9
Eleven stars is the right number now that Benjamin is born. Pharaoh’s dreams will also come in pairs, and Joseph will explain why: “the dream was doubled unto Pharaoh twice; it is because the thing is established by God” (41:32). Stars already meant descendants in the promise to Abraham (15:5).
- Genesis 37:10
“Bow down ourselves to thee to the earth” is almost exactly what the brothers do in 42:6. Jacob himself will bow in 47:31, when “Israel bowed himself upon the bed’s head”. This second dream is told to the father as well as the brothers, and it is the one that earns a rebuke.
- Genesis 37:11
“Envied” is qana, the jealousy Rachel felt when she “envied her sister” for her children (30:1). Hatred has turned into something more personal. Jacob’s keeping of the saying uses shamar, to guard, the verb of watching over something one expects to need later.
Genesis 37:1-11
King James Version1And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan.
2These are the generations of Jacob. Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren; and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father’s wives: and Joseph brought unto his father their evil report.
3Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours.
4And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably unto him.
5And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it his brethren: and they hated him yet the more.
6And he said unto them, Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed:
7For, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves stood round about, and made obeisance to my sheaf.
8And his brethren said to him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us? And they hated him yet the more for his dreams, and for his words.
9And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
10And he told it to his father, and to his brethren: and his father rebuked him, and said unto him, What is this dream that thou hast dreamed? Shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth?
11And his brethren envied him; but his father observed the saying.
Genesis 37:12-28
The Pit and the Sale
The brothers first plot murder. Reuben urges that Joseph be placed in a pit, intending later rescue, while Judah proposes selling him. Traders take Joseph toward Egypt. Profit replaces outright murder without making the betrayal merciful or acceptable.


Deep dive
Jacob sends Joseph to discover whether it is well with the brothers and the flock. The commission sits uneasily beside the opening description of brothers who cannot speak peaceably to him. Joseph is sent to inquire after the welfare of people whose relationship with him is already damaged. His answer to his father is immediate, but the journey does not lead directly to its destination. At Shechem he is found wandering in a field.
An unnamed man supplies the missing information. He has overheard the brothers mention Dothan, and this ordinary piece of direction puts Joseph on the road that will bring him to the traders. Genesis calls him a man, not an angel, and does not reveal an identity behind his anonymity. His brief appearance matters because Joseph might otherwise have failed to find the flock. The movement toward Egypt begins with a son carrying out an errand and refusing to stop at an empty meeting place.
Joseph has not reached speaking distance when his brothers conspire. Whatever he might say on arrival is irrelevant to a decision already made. Their greeting to one another, "this dreamer," reduces him to the feature they want to eliminate. The proposed killing is also a proposed answer to the dreams: the brothers intend to demonstrate what can become of a future when its bearer is dead. The cover explanation of a wild beast is planned before there is anything to cover.
Reuben's intervention has an expressly stated purpose. His suggestion of a pit is meant to create an opportunity to return Joseph to his father. That intention is not a charitable guess about Reuben; Genesis supplies it. The brothers strip off the identifying coat before throwing Joseph in. The garment that marked paternal preference is the first thing removed when paternal protection is absent. The pit has no water, a detail that makes this particular confinement possible, not a description of safety. Joseph is alive, isolated, and in the hands of people who have just discussed killing him.
The brothers sit down to eat. Genesis gives the meal no explanatory comment, and the absence is severe enough: Joseph is in the pit while they take their bread. Judah's proposal then makes kinship an argument against direct bloodshed but not against sale. "Our brother and our flesh" is followed by an agreement to hand that brother over for money. His language limits the violence he is willing to endorse without restoring Joseph to the household.
The trading sequence is difficult in detail. Ishmeelites and Midianites both appear, and the subject of "they drew" in verse 28 can be understood as the brothers or the passing merchants. Readings differ over the groups' relationship and the exact mechanics of the sale. The broader responsibility is not erased by that uncertainty: in Genesis 45:4 Joseph identifies his brothers as those who sold him into Egypt. Reuben's return establishes that the transaction occurred outside his immediate presence. His torn clothes answer the coat already torn from Joseph's place in the family, but they cannot put his rescue plan back within reach.
Words to trace: brethren, feed, Shechem, Dothan, flock, flocks, coat, hands, Joseph, Reuben, slay, some, Ishmeelites, brother, Egypt, lifted
Verse-by-verse path
- Genesis 37:12
Shechem is where Simeon and Levi killed every male in chapter 34, about fifty miles north of Hebron. In Hebrew manuscripts the small word before “their father’s flock” carries scribal dots, and the rabbis read them to say the brothers went to feed themselves rather than the flock.
- Genesis 37:13
Jacob had said after Shechem, “ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land” (34:30), yet sends his favourite alone to that district. Joseph answers “Here am I”, hinneni, the answer Abraham gave before Mount Moriah (22:1).
- Genesis 37:14
“See whether it be well” is literally “see the peace of thy brethren and the peace of the flock”, the same shalom they could not speak to him in verse 4. The vale of Hebron to Shechem is a journey of several days on foot. Joseph once brought word home about his brothers, and is sent to do it again.
- Genesis 37:15
“Wandering” is ta’ah, the verb used when Hagar “wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba” (21:14). Joseph is lost in the fields near a city his family has made hostile. The man is not named and never appears again.
- Genesis 37:16
Hebrew puts the object first: “my brethren I am seeking”. It is the only sentence Joseph speaks on the whole journey, and it names the men who are about to sell him as the ones he is looking for.
- Genesis 37:17
Dothan lies about fifteen miles north of Shechem, beside the pass that carried trade from Gilead through the Jezreel Valley towards the coast and Egypt. That is why a caravan comes by in verse 25. Elisha will later be surrounded by Syrian troops at Dothan (2 Kings 6:13).
- Genesis 37:18
The verb “conspired” is from nakal, to deal craftily, the word used when Moab and Midian “beguiled” Israel (Numbers 25:18). They know him from afar; the coat, visible across open country, would make that easy, though Genesis does not say so.
- Genesis 37:19
“This dreamer” is ba’al hachalomot, literally “the master of dreams”, a mocking title. The pronoun is the rare and pointed hallazeh, “that one there”, which Rebekah used of Isaac when she saw him across the field (24:65).
- Genesis 37:20
A pit, bor, is a cistern cut in rock to hold winter rain. The brothers rehearse the sentence “some evil beast hath devoured him” and never need to say it: Jacob says it for them, word for word, in verse 33.
- Genesis 37:21
Genesis credits Reuben with delivering him before any rescue has happened; the verb natsal names what he set out to do. His words are literally “let us not strike him a life”. The eldest had just lost his father’s trust over Bilhah (35:22), which some have read as a motive; the text gives none.
- Genesis 37:22
“Shed no blood” uses the language of 9:6, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.” A pit in the wilderness would let hunger and thirst do what no hand had done, and the brothers could tell themselves they had not killed him.
- Genesis 37:23
The verse names the garment twice, “his coat, his coat of many colours that was on him”, slowing on what they tear away. Joseph says nothing in this chapter from here on. Only in 42:21 do the brothers admit that “we saw the anguish of his soul, when he besought us, and we would not hear”.
- Genesis 37:24
The word for pit, bor, is the word Joseph will use for his prison in Egypt: “they should put me into the dungeon” (40:15), and Pharaoh brings him “out of the dungeon” in 41:14. Jeremiah was let down into a cistern with no water, only mire (Jeremiah 38:6).
- Genesis 37:25
Spicery, balm and myrrh are the same goods Jacob will send to Egypt as a gift in 43:11, “a little balm, and a little honey, spices, and myrrh”. Gilead was famous for its balm (Jeremiah 8:22). The brothers eat bread within earshot of the cistern.
- Genesis 37:26
“Profit” is betsa, gain, usually gain got wrongly. The psalmist asks almost the same question in Psalm 30:9, “What profit is there in my blood, when I go down to the pit?” Blood that is concealed recalls Abel’s, which cried from the ground (4:10).
- Genesis 37:27
“Our brother and our flesh” is the kinship Laban claimed with Jacob, “Surely thou art my bone and my flesh” (29:14). “Let not our hand be upon him” borrows Reuben’s phrase. Judah will later offer himself as surety for Benjamin (43:9) and as a slave in his place (44:33).
- Genesis 37:28
Twenty shekels of silver is the valuation given for a male between five and twenty years old in Leviticus 27:5, a price that fits a youth of seventeen. The weight is not specified here; it is literally “twenty of silver”.
Genesis 37:12-28
King James Version12And his brethren went to feed their father’s flock in Shechem.
13And Israel said unto Joseph, Do not thy brethren feed the flock in Shechem? come, and I will send thee unto them. And he said to him, Here am I.
14And he said to him, Go, I pray thee, see whether it be well with thy brethren, and well with the flocks; and bring me word again. So he sent him out of the vale of Hebron, and he came to Shechem.
15And a certain man found him, and, behold, he was wandering in the field: and the man asked him, saying, What seekest thou?
16And he said, I seek my brethren: tell me, I pray thee, where they feed their flocks.
17And the man said, They are departed hence; for I heard them say, Let us go to Dothan. And Joseph went after his brethren, and found them in Dothan.
18And when they saw him afar off, even before he came near unto them, they conspired against him to slay him.
19And they said one to another, Behold, this dreamer cometh.
20Come now therefore, and let us slay him, and cast him into some pit, and we will say, Some evil beast hath devoured him: and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
21And Reuben heard it, and he delivered him out of their hands; and said, Let us not kill him.
22And Reuben said unto them, Shed no blood, but cast him into this pit that is in the wilderness, and lay no hand upon him; that he might rid him out of their hands, to deliver him to his father again.
23And it came to pass, when Joseph was come unto his brethren, that they stript Joseph out of his coat, his coat of many colours that was on him;
24And they took him, and cast him into a pit: and the pit was empty, there was no water in it.
25And they sat down to eat bread: and they lifted up their eyes and looked, and, behold, a company of Ishmeelites came from Gilead with their camels bearing spicery and balm and myrrh, going to carry it down to Egypt.
26And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit is it if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood?
27Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. And his brethren were content.
28Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and they brought Joseph into Egypt.
Genesis 37:29-36
A Garment Used as Evidence
The brothers dip the garment in goat's blood and ask Jacob to identify it. He concludes that a wild animal has killed Joseph and refuses comfort. The narrative closes by placing Joseph in Potiphar's household, alive but enslaved in a foreign land.

Deep dive
The brothers sit down to eat. Genesis gives the meal no explanatory comment, and the absence is severe enough: Joseph is in the pit while they take their bread. Judah's proposal then makes kinship an argument against direct bloodshed but not against sale. "Our brother and our flesh" is followed by an agreement to hand that brother over for money. His language limits the violence he is willing to endorse without restoring Joseph to the household.
The trading sequence is difficult in detail. Ishmeelites and Midianites both appear, and the subject of "they drew" in verse 28 can be understood as the brothers or the passing merchants. Readings differ over the groups' relationship and the exact mechanics of the sale. The broader responsibility is not erased by that uncertainty: in Genesis 45:4 Joseph identifies his brothers as those who sold him into Egypt. Reuben's return establishes that the transaction occurred outside his immediate presence. His torn clothes answer the coat already torn from Joseph's place in the family, but they cannot put his rescue plan back within reach.
The coat really is Joseph's. The blood really is blood. What is false is the connection between them. The brothers invite Jacob to identify the garment, and he constructs the death account himself. They call its owner "thy son," keeping their own brotherhood out of the sentence. Genesis has already used goats and clothing in the deception of a father in chapter 27. Here Jacob, once the person arranging the disguise, becomes the father whose recognition is successfully manipulated.
The sons then join the attempt to comfort the father they have deceived. They offer consolation without the information that could change the ground of his mourning. Jacob's refusal makes the damage last beyond the single presentation of the coat. His words put Joseph in the grave, but the final verse puts him in Egypt. That last change of location is decisive: the account closes not with confirmation of Jacob's belief, but with the sale of the son whose death he regards as certain. The garment has reached home. Its owner has reached Potiphar.
Words to trace: returned, brethren, child, clothes, Joseph, rent, coat, father, son’s, beast, blood
Verse-by-verse path
- Genesis 37:29
Where Reuben had been is never said. His rending of his clothes is the first time anyone in the Bible tears a garment in grief, and Jacob will do the same five verses later.
- Genesis 37:30
“The child is not” is einennu, the word the brothers use in 42:13, “one is not”, and Jacob in 42:36, “Joseph is not”. Reuben calls a seventeen-year-old yeled, a child. The second half turns to himself: “and I, whither shall I go?”, the eldest who must answer to his father.
- Genesis 37:31
A kid of the goats will turn up again at once. In the next chapter Judah promises Tamar “a kid from the flock” (38:17) and fails to deliver it. The brothers deceive with a goat, and Judah is deceived over one.
- Genesis 37:32
“Know now” is haker-na, discern, please. Tamar will send Judah his seal and staff with the same words, “Discern, I pray thee” (38:25), and he will “acknowledge” them. The brothers send the coat rather than bring it themselves, which spares them from facing Jacob when he first sees it.
- Genesis 37:33
“Without doubt rent in pieces” doubles the verb, taroph toraph, torn, torn. Jacob repeats it years later, “Surely he is torn in pieces” (44:28), and the same verb returns in his last words for Benjamin: “Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf” (49:27).
- Genesis 37:34
This is the first mention of sackcloth in the Bible, the coarse goat’s hair cloth of mourning. “Many days” turns out to be about twenty-two years, from Joseph’s seventeenth year to the brothers’ second journey into Egypt.
- Genesis 37:35
“The grave” is she’ol, and this is its first occurrence in the Bible, the place of the dead. Jacob expects to go down to it still mourning. “Refused to be comforted” returns in Jeremiah 31:15, of Rachel weeping for her children. Only one daughter, Dinah, has been named.
- Genesis 37:36
The Hebrew here reads Medanites, a close variant of Midianites. Potiphar is an Egyptian name, Pa-di-pa-Ra, “he whom Ra gave”. His title means literally “chief of the slaughterers”, the head of the executioners or the royal guard, and saris, “officer”, is a court title.
Genesis 37:29-36
King James Version29And Reuben returned unto the pit; and, behold, Joseph was not in the pit; and he rent his clothes.
30And he returned unto his brethren, and said, The child is not; and I, whither shall I go?
31And they took Joseph’s coat, and killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the coat in the blood;
32And they sent the coat of many colours, and they brought it to their father; and said, This have we found: know now whether it be thy son’s coat or no.
33And he knew it, and said, It is my son’s coat; an evil beast hath devoured him; Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces.
34And Jacob rent his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his loins, and mourned for his son many days.
35And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down into the grave unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him.
36And the Midianites sold him into Egypt unto Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh’s, and captain of the guard.
Questions to keep in mind while reading
- Track who acts, who speaks, who is affected, and what changes.
- Notice repeated promises, failures, rescues, and consequences.
- Do not assume the account approves every action that is reported.
Text first
Where readers differ
The chapter summary begins with what the passage says and how its parts fit together. It does not assume one denomination has already settled every question. Where a conclusion depends on a tradition, literary theory, or historical reconstruction, that dependence is named openly.
The KJV text is presented first. Interpretive conclusions are labeled, and differences are introduced only when they help a reader understand why serious communities do not always reach the same answer.
Does providence make evil good?
Joseph says his brothers intended evil and God intended good. The moral distinction remains explicit. God's preserving purpose does not change the brothers' intention, make their violence necessary to imitate or eliminate their need to face what they did.
The passage supports hope and a refusal of revenge. It does not authorize an observer to explain another person's suffering confidently. Joseph speaks from within his own history and accompanies his words with care for the people before him.
Genesis 45:4-8 · Genesis 50:19-21 · Romans 12:19-21 · Romans 8:28
Questions beneath the surface
- What account of God, human freedom, responsibility, and the good life emerges from Genesis 37?
- Which tension does the chapter refuse to resolve quickly, especially around family, betrayal, providence?
- What changes when the chapter is read as part of the whole canon rather than as an isolated moral lesson?
- Where might a sincere reader confuse a familiar tradition with something the text states directly?
Questions for serious personal contemplation
These open-ended questions make room for tension, honest response, prayer, and conclusions that remain accountable to the chapter.
Observe without rushing
What part of Genesis 37 makes you stop, feel unsettled, or feel surprised, and why?
Which detail in the passage would be easiest to overlook? How does that detail change your understanding?
Where do you see tension between what happens and this focus: A favored son is sold?
What important question does the passage leave open instead of resolving quickly?
Examine your inner life honestly
Which person, response, fear, or desire in the passage feels most like your own life right now?
What assumption about God, other people, or yourself does this text challenge?
Which part would you rather soften, avoid, or explain away too quickly? What might that reaction reveal?
If this Scripture could ask you one direct question, what do you think it would ask?
Respond with wisdom and courage
What do you need to remember, confess, grieve, thank God for, or trust after reading this passage?
How might another faithful person read this situation differently without ignoring the text?
What obedient response would be costly, uncomfortable, or slow, yet still faithful to Scripture?
What question will you carry into prayer this week, and which verses will you keep in front of you?
Music and video connected to the passage
Related media appears when its Scripture reference overlaps this study. Music and video can illuminate a theme while the biblical text remains the foundation.






